Tries, not goals, are the answer to a more exciting NRL

By Don Aprile / Roar Rookie

We haven’t had the chance to see how the extra point for a long-range field goal will play out this year, but I’m happy to stick my neck on the line before the season gets into full swing.

I fail to see how the anticipation and excitement of waiting for a long-range field goal to be attempted will reach any great heights, and realistically I doubt it will be a regular occurrence during a game anyway.

Judging by some of the comments I have read earlier on the subject, I am not alone in my thinking.

I can appreciate and applaud what the NRL is attempting to do to try and stimulate the game and add some of the uncertainty and unpredictability we’re lacking at present.

But giving an extra point for a field goal from a certain point on the field is a very limited opportunity, and won’t cut it. It won’t give them the injection of excitement they are hoping for.

Cameron Smith (Photo by Mark Metcalfe/Getty Images)

On the one hand the NRL appears to be trying to eliminate some of the time-wasting kicking in the game by introducing the six again rule instead of a penalty for infringements in the play the ball and inside the ten-metre rules. But on the other hand it is encouraging kicking back into the game by offering an extra point for a certain field goal.

I hope we are not going down the same road as rugby union, where the award for a penalty goal is three points.

There is nothing more frustrating and painful than watching a rugby union team playing for and winning matches on the back of three-point penalty kicks.

Rugby league is a team game that should be encouraged to involve as many players as possible in as many plays as possible to contribute to scoring points rather than pushing for more kicking and a reliance on certain individual players to kick them to victory.

There are only two options to inject extra points into the game: a kick or a try.

If extra points are going to be introduced to try to stimulate the game by trying to create uncertainty, anticipation and unpredictability throughout the whole of the match, these ‘extra’ points should be able to be earnt from any position on the field and at any time during the game.

The only way to gain the full value from these ‘extra’ points is by way of a try, not a kick. It should also encourage more teamwork and ball-in-hand movements, rewarding players for taking risks.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

All this brings me to a suggestion I made in an article a couple of years ago about the introduction of a six-point ‘golden try’.

Now the NRL is in the mood for injecting extra points into the game, it might be a good time to have another throw at the stumps.

So for those of you who may have read it and forgotten about it and for those who may still be interested and would like to hear more, here’s the summary.

If a team decides to take a risk and run the ball on the fifth and last tackle and as a result a try is scored without a kick being involved, in that particular play that try should be deemed to be a ‘golden try’ and be worth six points.

Basically it encourages teams to risk running the ball from any position on the field on the fifth tackle rather than kicking it, and if a try results, they are awarded two extra points for taking the risk. It’s all about risk for reward.

Hopefully it would inject the anticipation, uncertainty and unpredictability the NRL is looking for, and as a ‘golden try’ could be scored at any time during the game and from any position on the field, it may result in more exciting long-range try attempts.

I would hope it would maintain the excitement and unpredictability in a game longer knowing that if a team is trailing by as much as 15 points, they still have a chance of winning the game in the last five or ten minutes if they can score two converted six-point golden tries.

The question is: what would you as a fan or supporter prefer:

  1. waiting for a team to position itself 40 metres out so someone may have an attempt at a field goal to gain one extra point; or
  2. watching a team trying to set itself up from any position on the field to try and score a six-point golden try by running the ball on the fifth and last tackle and gain two extra points?

What’s the answer?

The Crowd Says:

2021-03-14T06:57:45+00:00

Tim Buck 3

Roar Rookie


Hey Don stay tuned for another post. The poorly written mooder8or program has been activated somehow.

2021-03-14T06:51:22+00:00

Tim Buck 3

Roar Rookie


The bom is the main attacking weppon in Rugby League and it encourages the first five to be safe bush and barge runs to position for a bom. When we copied the rule from US Football we should have taken the whole thing and make a field goal the only option for scoring on the last tackle. This would make tries by running or kicking the ball with creative ball play much more exciting than the bush and barge we see now. The bom could be removed by allowing the defence to punch the ball ded if an attacking player is underneath it. This would reward passing kicks and grubber kicks while allowing boms to be easily diffused. The bom would be replaced by creative play.

2021-03-14T05:07:00+00:00

Tim Buck 3

Roar Rookie


The 2 point field goal will only be used if the scores are close near the end of the game. It will give a team that is one point behind a chance to kick to from 40m and win the game rather than have the dreaded draw. It will also allow a team to draw from two points behind so it won't have much effect on the main try scoring option of playing Aussie Rules and kicking it up in the air and hoping your tall players can avoid the blockers.

2021-03-12T22:19:06+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


So they did trial it first....

2021-03-12T04:48:11+00:00

Stormy

Roar Rookie


I do thanks, Albo it's a great life. Just don't like change just for the sake of it.

AUTHOR

2021-03-12T01:35:19+00:00

Don Aprile

Roar Rookie


The only problem is Aldo I feel if you start nominating which areas of the field a 6 point try would be awarded and which area it wouldn't you would start to lose a lot of the unpredictability the rule is trying to achieve.

2021-03-12T01:07:54+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


Strewth Stormy ! You must enjoy todays modern world ?

2021-03-12T01:04:24+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


I don't mind the idea of extra points for a 5th tackle run in try, but not for a dummy half barge over . Maybe an extra proviso could be added ........"a run in 5th tackle try started outside the opposition's red zone ( 20m line )" ?

2021-03-12T00:56:53+00:00

Albo

Roar Rookie


Whilst the Storm taking those penalty kicks in the 2nd half might seem a bit conservative, I'm pretty sure every team coach would have instructed exactly the same. Not just due to any fatigue factor , but because the first was to extend the Storm's lead to 12 points and the second, with Souths coming back, to extend the lead out to 8 points. Game management 101 these days.

2021-03-12T00:17:03+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Sry mate, that was a facetious comment, not serious. Both GI and Baa took FG shots when their sides were down by 2 so I just play on the running joke.

2021-03-11T23:45:57+00:00

farkurnell

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the info Nat - you think they might have trialed it 1st.

2021-03-11T23:27:05+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Absolutely. It's a genuine skill. Add to that the risk of a 7 tackle set and the execution is as pretty as Walker's pass last night.

2021-03-11T23:26:42+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Sherwin! Now there's a blast from the past.

2021-03-11T23:18:06+00:00

Stormy

Roar Rookie


I find League pretty exciting now, especially when it's my team playing - have always found it to be so. I don't understand the, constant, need for change. Tweeks here & there, sure, but, numerous changes every season just don't make sense to me. Personally, my heart couldn't take much more excitement than a close game brings. If you don't like the game, as it is, don't watch, or, invent & follow a new game, that you do like & let the rest of us enjoy our game.

2021-03-11T23:09:24+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I’m not as down on tries from kicks as some others Yeah, the hit and hopes don’t add much, but a perfectly executed cross field kick with a flying take and put down on the end is exhilarating An inch perfect grubber into the in-goal or those bending grubbers that Johns and Sherwin used to do are completely entertaining

2021-03-11T22:33:25+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


I understand and I am the last one to rag on an idea being floated. Like other have pointed out, it's limited to one play in a set it can be achieved by a barge-over. IMO, it's not worth 6pts. Using an example from last season when Smith kicked early for JAC. That's risk v reward play that the punters can get excited about.

2021-03-11T22:33:16+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


Like touch football?

AUTHOR

2021-03-11T22:23:59+00:00

Don Aprile

Roar Rookie


Maybe Nat....but my idea is to try to try to encourage more running and less kicking from "all " parts of the field.

2021-03-11T21:59:15+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


I'd hate to see a dummy half dive over try on the 5th tackle be awarded more points than say a length of the field try on the third tackle.

2021-03-11T21:55:06+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


I think the concept is right, maybe not articlyulated as well as it could be. 6pts is a lot, especially when another 2 coming from the conversion making it 8pts. It would eliminate/put at risk the FG for a comfy 7pt lead. Maybe a 5pts for a try scored from your own half encourages open play?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar