Test XIs we should have had: 1978-79

By Stephen Vagg / Roar Guru

This is the second in my series of hardcore deep dives into hypothetical XIs Australia should have played in years gone by.

This time I’m turning my attention to the 1978-79 Ashes, when Australia lost to England 5-1, and resulted in the establishment raising the white flag to World Series Cricket.

This result did not seem likely the previous summer, when Kerry Packer and company struggled and the official Australian XI defeated India 3-2 in a thrilling series. We lost in the West Indies, it is true, but the team did okay – if not for a riot, the end result would have been 3-2 rather than 3-1, which isn’t bad.

And the core of a new side had developed around captain Bob Simpson: Graeme Wood, Graham Yallop and Peter Toohey had batted superbly, Steve Rixon was a decent wicketkeeper, Bruce Yardley and Jim Higgs were a terrifically effective pair of spin twins and Jeff Thomson and Wayne Clark formed the basis of a potent pace attack.

That’s nine players right there, with several more in the ‘full of potential’ and/or ‘temporarily out for injury’ camp, like Kim Hughes, Gary Cosier, Alan Hurst and Rick Darling.

Based on the side for the fifth Test against the West Indies, you could expect Australia’s team for the first Test against England to be something like this:
1. Graeme Wood
2. Rick Darling
3. Graham Yallop
4. Peter Toohey
5. Gary Cosier
6. Bob Simpson (captain)
7. Steve Rixon (wicketkeeper)
8. Bruce Yardley
9. Jeff Thomson (vice-captain)
10. Wayne Clark
11. Jim Higgs

(Photo by Don Morley/Allport/Getty Images/Hulton Archive)

Well, this was the side they ended up picking:
1. Graeme Wood
2. Gary Cosier
3. Graham Yallop (captain)
4. Kim Hughes
5. Peter Toohey
6. Trevor Laughlin
7. John Maclean (vice-captain) (wicketkeeper)
8. Bruce Yardley
9. Rodney Hogg
10. Alan Hurst
11. Jim Higgs
12. Phil Carlson (12th man)

What happened?

Let’s get the easiest stuff out of the way first. Wood, Yallop and Toohey kept their spots as they deserved to. No one was surprised that Cosier came back. Darling’s pre-season form had been a little iffy and Kim Hughes’ had been strong, so it was decided to overlook Darling, make Cosier opener and bring in Hughes. Yardley and Higgs counter balanced each other. These selections weren’t so surprising.

The rest were more radical. Some turned out alright. Others were disastrous.

Bob Simpson had made himself unavailable for the Ashes. He wanted to play, but insisted on his selection being guaranteed for the first few Tests and the board refused. There’s lots of theories flying around about why this happened (the ’78 tour was not an entirely happy one, and there was a feeling among some that Simpson was getting too big for his boots). Regardless, it meant Australia lost its captain and most experienced player, a useful part-time bowler and one of its best batsmen.

The obvious replacement for Simpson was John Inverarity, whose leadership track record was second to none. Inverarity’s playing record was less impressive than Simpson’s (his first class batting average was 35) but he could bowl, he was good with young tyros, and he had the respect of all. In addition he scored 187 in a Shield game prior to the first Test, meaning the selectors could argue they picked him on form.

John Inverarity (left) is perhaps better known for his period as a selector. (Photo by Scott Barbour/Getty Images)

But Inverarity, in easily the most disastrous decision of the summer, was overlooked. The captaincy instead went to Graham Yallop, mostly because he was (a) considered the side’s best batsman and (b) captained Victoria.

Thing is, Yallop didn’t have the best reputation as leader – he was a marvellous player who actually led Victoria to a few Sheffield Shield titles, but he was shy and introspective and not famed for his communication skills.

Even the selectors felt so. This was why, I have heard, they brought in the experienced John Maclean, a highly respected Queensland captain, as wicketkeeper, over Steve Rixon, who had done little wrong in his ten Tests. Maclean should have been keeper in ’77-78, but Rixon got the gig, and did well, and now Rixon was out the door for Maclean.

Bob Simpson later wrote in one of his memoirs that John Inverarity should have been made captain that summer, and if not him then Maclean should have got the job over Yallop. He was right on both counts.

The second most disastrous decision of that side was picking Trevor Laughlin to play at six. Laughlin was a fine competitor for Victoria, who played a key role in that state’s triumphs around this time. But he was a bits-and-pieces all-rounder in a side that needed six specialist batsmen, especially with a tail that included notorious bunnies Alan Hurst and Jim Higgs.

Australia hadn’t gone with an all-rounder the previous summer against India but in the Ashes they were swept up in Ian Botham mania.

(Photo by Adrian Murrell/Allsport/Getty Images/Hulton Archive)

You could see the selectors’ mental wheels turning… ‘if they have an all-rounder, we better get one too’. Which actually would’ve been fine if they’d played Laughlin in tandem with a second all-rounder at seven, like England did with Botham and Geoff Miller. Phil Carlson would have been ideal, and he was picked in the side for the first Test, but was made 12th man.

Australia’s position was further weakened when Jeff Thomson became unavailable for selection. He had always wanted to be with his mates playing World Series Cricket. Financial troubles stopped him doing this in ’77-78, but the following summer he decided to try again. Lawsuits flew, resulting in Thomson sitting out most of the ’78-79 series.

Another person ruled out was Wayne Clark, though in his case it didn’t have anything to do with desire, availability or form. There were whispers that Clark had a suspect action (in part due to a bad back), and he had been called for throwing in the West Indies. Australia and England had an unofficial agreement at the time that any suspect Australian bowlers wouldn’t be picked for Ashes matches (I think this had its origins in the Ian Meckiff throwing controversy of 1958-59, though I could be wrong).

Clark, who had bowled magnificently for Australia against India and the West Indies, never played against England that summer, though he did get one Test against Pakistan. It was horrible and unfair on him.

Still, Australia has always been lucky with its stock of pace bowlers. Alan Hurst had long impressed for Victoria and was back in the side after his injury the previous summer. Rodney Hogg was an exciting prospect from South Australia. While Ian Callen lost form, there was always the ever faithful Geoff Dymock waiting in the wings.

Anyway Australia lost that first Test. Our batting was dreadful aside from centuries by Yallop and Kim Hughes, but we were kept in the game via magnificent bowling from Hogg and Hurst. With a genuine number six and more inspiring captaincy, who knows?

For the second Test, Higgs and Laughlin were out and Geoff Dymock and Rick Darling were in. Australia’s bowlers kept us in the game but the batsmen caved and we lost.

The third Test saw Higgs back in, replacing Yardley, and Gary Cosier dropped for a young New South Welshman called Allan Border.

(Adrian Murrell/Getty Images)

Once again Australia bowled excellently but this time the batsmen stepped up to give Australia a victory. Hurray! We were still in it!

The fourth Test was the turning point. Australia were 142 runs ahead on the first innings, but the bowlers struggled in England’s second innings, then the batsmen caved, and we lost a game we should have won.

The selectors panicked for the fifth Test. Maclean was out, not for Steve Rixon but for Kevin Wright. Peter Toohey was dropped for Carlson. Yardley came in for Dymock. Australia bowled well again but the batting was terrible and we lost.

There were more changes for the sixth Test (Border was dropped), which no one expected us to win and we didn’t. The selectors kept changing for the next two Tests against Pakistan, eventually winding up with Kim Hughes as captain, with long-term disastrous consequences for all involved.

Ugh. What a terrible summer. For us, anyway, I’m sure the English had a good time. And Rodney Hogg, too, who took 41 wickets.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

A bowling attack of Hogg, Hurst, Higgs, Yardley/Dymock/Clark was easily enough to win Australia the Ashes. Where Australia went wrong was in its terrible batting. This was compounded by picking a bits-and-pieces all-rounder in three of the Tests (all lost by Australia) – in a bowling-strong, batting-weak side, the selectors decided to weaken the batting and strengthen the bowling.

I once asked the late Sam Loxton what went wrong during this summer and he responded with a long diatribe about how officials changed the ball they used, which gave the English an unfair advantage. The greatest mistake was not picking Inverarity as captain. The second was not always selecting six specialist batsmen. The third was changing the damn side every Test.

A team that would’ve if not won the Ashes that summer, then at least drawn them 3-3:
1. Wood
2. Darling
3. Yallop
4. Inverarity (captain)
5. Toohey
6. Cosier
7. Maclean (vice-captain)
8. Yardley/Clark
9. Hogg
10. Hurst
11. Higgs

With Hughes and Border to come in if/when a batsman was dropped and Dymock as a spare bowler.

But the main take out from that summer is this: if you pick a bunch of kids, sometimes they’ll play like kids.

The Crowd Says:

2021-07-29T09:09:07+00:00

PeteB

Roar Rookie


Shame Hughes was treated so badly. No he should never have been made captain but he played many great innings for Australia.

2021-07-29T08:55:54+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


How about the second innings at Brisbane? We got to 6 for 310 (leading by 120) An 80 during this innings would have made England chase 260+ And Hughes was last out throwing his wicket away. . . It's all hypothetical but the speculation is fun.

2021-07-29T08:38:33+00:00

PeteB

Roar Rookie


Think I watched every ball possible when I wasn’t at primary school. Our batting was so fragile. Even the first test I got to watch at lunch time at school and saw us go to 6-26 in the first hour. Felt like we were always going to lose from there. Clearly the 4th test was our best opportunity but the batsman failed again in the second innings. Might have needed two top batsman to win the series.

2021-07-29T06:29:10+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


I agree, Pete. It's interesting to ponder what the addition of one great batsman would have done to our chances against England. Say Greg Chappell. Because we were close in the 1st, 4th and 5th tests. One Chappell 80-odd in any of those gets us home. We were one top batsman short.

2021-07-26T23:57:32+00:00

Kalva

Roar Rookie


This series was my first summer in Australia after my family moved there from England in September. It was a brilliant summer with so much cricket but I started off a firm supporter of England and ended it supporting Australia with Kim Hughes my new favourite player! Couple of points..I am pretty sure that Cosier was vice captain for the first 2 Tests and McClean only took when he was dropped. Peter Toohey was managed by Bob Simpson at one stage which created a bit of an issue with the other players. England’s batting was very average at the time... I was delighted when they lost 3-0 the next year and I think there will always be a big question mark around Brearley’s captaincy around that.

2021-07-26T00:11:28+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


Also another bit of trivia from this series. Maclean got sconed at Sydney. Yallop subbed for him. Yallop's only keeping victim was Botham c Yallop b Hogg 59. It was a nick from a bouncer. Not sure who Hoggy was aiming at.

2021-07-26T00:08:12+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


I think Woody has the most test centuries for a bloke with the lowest average. 9 X 100s and 31. Something like that. Ric Darling did score a great 91. Survived swallowing his tongue in the next test. I think he got an 80 odd later against Pakistan or India. Gave it a crack against quality opposition.

2021-07-25T23:52:09+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


Hey Steve. This was an interesting one. England had batted for about 12 hours, painfully slow scoring rate in 40 degree heat. The aussies would have been pretty stuffed. Also Randall's great innings could have ended first ball as he survived an extremely close lbw appeal. Could have been 2 for 0. Alas. Woulda, coulda, shoulda. Another interesting thing about 77-79 establishment team, they were much better 4th innings chasers and defenders than later incarnations. In the West Indies they got 7/362 in the 4th to win. Not long after vs Pakistan, they were 3/305 ( a score that would have won Sydney at a gallop) before Sarfraz. Then in the next they had a tricky 230-240 and got it with 3 down. One wicket a handled ball! Guess who? Although they lost 2-0 in India they dug in several times. Much better than many a tour of India in later years.

2021-07-25T23:12:59+00:00

Johnb

Guest


It would at that time have also been a reference to all the players in WSC. In the 24 tests played by Australia during WSC so far as I can see a total of 32 players were used. By the end of that tour to the WI the number was 21 of whom I think 14 debuted during WSC (and if you take out Bob Simpson and Jeff Thomson you come to Gary Cosier with 9 tests, Graham Yallop and Craig Serjeant with 3 tests each and Kim Hughes and Alan Hurst with 1 each - you might well say not far from debutantes). So not small numbers of players used in tests (but not 41 either) but that's not entirely surprising when you have essentially no experienced core to the side (exacerbated by both Simpson and Thomson departing after the WI tour). One or two test wonders during WSC? Fewer than you might think - 4 only I think [Paul Hibbert, Ian Callen, Phil Carlson and Jeff Moss (who finished his test career averaging 60)]. A number would have played only one or two tests during WSC but subsequently played more.

2021-07-25T21:46:14+00:00

The Sports Lover

Roar Rookie


I remember listening to this series on the ABC. I can’t recall the commentator but I do remember him saying “. At the moment, we have 41 Australian current cricket players who have played Test cricket for Australia” This comment was in reference to the continual dropping and selection of players all summer.

2021-07-25T20:56:29+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


Pressure if a funny thing for a young inexperienced team. There was no real expectation we would chase down 360 the game before a so we did it easily. The next test, batting 4th again, we were no chance to get 294. Too much pressure and turn. But 94 was rubbish and a harbinger of things to come

2021-07-25T13:40:11+00:00

PeteB

Roar Rookie


No Australia would have been smashed no matter what. England only lost a small handful of players to WSC whereas our side was totally decimated. The only real change you have to the line up is Inverarity. Improves the captaincy but doesn’t change that our batsmen would have continued to fail. The prior Windies tour the whole West Indies first side made up of WSC players withdrew after the second test which only evened up the difference in ability of the two sides.

AUTHOR

2021-07-25T11:06:53+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


They did have night cricket in 77-78 but didn't get the blockbuster crowds til next season.

2021-07-25T10:18:38+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


I would say he wasn't injured at the start, having been passed fit. My memory was that he pinged Viv early in that spell but perhaps it could have been the previous test as you say. Probably his back went again after the 6 and 4s and then he was finished for the summer. Certainly his ego was injured but if he'd been able he would have come back for a chance at redemption.

2021-07-25T07:57:00+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


Was Hogg injured at the start of his first over??? If so, wtf From what I remember, he was steaming in pretty hard at the start of that spell. I can't help thinking the main injury was done to Hogg's ego.

2021-07-25T07:40:22+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


I remember that well. Viv smashed him. Hoggy was injured not "injured" though, whether it occurred before or during Viv's assault. He'd missed the previous test (vs England) due to injury and missed the rest of the summer after this test. In the first test vs WI at Brissie, he actually bowled pretty well but without much luck taking 0/55 from about 25 overs. He didn't help himself, dropping an absolute dolly return catch from Viv.

2021-07-25T07:17:03+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


A bit harsh on Darling, Tony. No one looked good, backing up to Graeme Wood. I'm a poet and I don't even know it.

2021-07-25T07:14:52+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


SV I'm pretty sure WSC had night matches in the first season. I distinctly remember Wayne Daniel hitting a six into Swanston Street, under the lights. The gurus at WSC decided night matches were the golden goose.

AUTHOR

2021-07-25T07:09:32+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


I got most of the insights from Bob Simpson's book "Simmo" - an interesting read. I gather there was a bit of a team revolt in the West Indies in 1978 - Christian Ryan's book on Kim Hughes is a good source on this. Toohey and Wood deserved their chances based on their strong efforts in 1977-78

AUTHOR

2021-07-25T07:06:15+00:00

Stephen Vagg

Roar Guru


They did have a tricky job, but I think you can get some idea how players will go from looking at their overall records. And there were some wise old heads they could have put in the team like Inverarity and Maclean. Some times you have to make a guess (no one knew Allan Border would be as good as he was, say, or that Craig Serjeant would lose form). But they all knew Yallop wasn't a strong captain when the team needed one. And to take a team that was weak in batting and strong in bowling and add a player/s who further weakened the batting and strengthened the bowling (laughin, Carlson) was just silly.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar