England can win the Ashes. Maybe

By Paul / Roar Guru

The first Test in the Ashes series starts on Wednesday, 8 December, and already most pundits have written off England’s chances of winning.

Bookies have Australia at $1.55, England at $3.50 and a drawn series at $7.00. In a two-horse race the price for Australia, given its performances in Tests over the past year or so, seems a little short, while England’s price seems a tad generous.

Should Australia be such clear favourites? Is England a genuine chance of winning? I believe they can, but they need to plan well, think outside the box and have every player execute well.

The first step in winning is to look at the Test schedule.

  1. Gabba, Brisbane – 8-12 December
  2. Adelaide Oval, Adelaide – 6-20 December
  3. MCG, Melbourne – 26–30 December
  4. SCG, Sydney – 5-9 January
  5. Optus Stadium, Perth – 14-18 January

England’s squad will likely comprise Joe Root, Ben Stokes, James Anderson, Jonny Bairstow, Dom Bess, Stuart Broad, Rory Burns, Jos Buttler, Zak Crawley, Sam Curran, Haseeb Hameed, Dan Lawrence, Jack Leach, Craig Overton, Ollie Pope, Ollie Robinson, Dom Sibley, Chris Woakes and Mark Wood.

The next step is to treat this like a three-Test series. In other words, go hard from the first ball in Brisbane and give it absolutely everything for the first three Tests.

If England are going to win the Ashes, they can’t afford to ease into the series. If they do, they could end up with a repeat of 2006-07.

They have to be leading in the series before they get to Sydney, preferably by two Tests.

Blind Freddy knows the strength of the England squad will be their fast bowlers. Even without Jofra Archer they have a strong, varied and quick attack. They must take advantage of the skills and speed these guys possess to assert dominance over the Australian batsmen.

England’s best chances in this series are in the first two games, which again is why they have to get off to a flyer.

The attack should comprise Stuart Broad, Ollie Robinson, Mark Wood and Olly Stone for the Brisbane Test, then Broad, Anderson, Robinson and Wood for Adelaide. Decisions on who to play in Melbourne can be made once performances in the first two games are assessed.

Stokes has to play and, more importantly, has to bowl. England need his ten or 12 overs per innings as well as his ability to pick up wickets. Having him there gives the attack more balance and obviously takes some of the workload off the other four bowlers.

They must bowl the right line and length and for inspiration need to look at how the Australian attack bowled to the Black Caps in the three-Test series in 2019-20. That was some of the most accurate and penetrating bowling I’ve ever seen.

None of this bowling a sixth stump line. All bowlers, but especially Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood, were on our just outside the off stump at pace and few Kiwi batsman had any answers, hence the 3-0 series scoreline.

The attack will know this is a frail Australian line-up, marginally better on paper than England but just as prone to underwhelming totals. The bowlers will target David Warner around the wicket and Marcus Harris the same way if he plays as well Will Pucovski, Travis Head and Tim Paine. They also need to contain Steve Smith and Marnus Labuschagne just as Neil Wagner, Tim Southee and co did two seasons ago.

The English attack has to take ten wickets, and if they bowl with the same intent Australia showed against the Black Caps, this should result in scores around the 200-250 mark. These are very manageable totals for the current English batting line-up to match.

(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

The key to England’s batting has to be how long the top three can stay in, depriving Australia any chance of getting at Joe Root Ben Stokes while the ball is new. Rory Burns, Dom Sibley and Zak Crawley must bat ugly but with intent.

They need to be really looking for runs, not boundaries (they’re a bonus), but ones and twos. That means no flashy cover drives, expansive cut shots et cetera. Play through the mid-off and mid-on but with intent, and the runs will come.

The openers need to aim for at least two or three singles per over for the first hour of the innings. It’s not good enough to bat for 200-odd deliveries but score only 46 runs, as Sibley did at Trent Bridge. This means the Australian attack is dictating terms and will get guys out, just as India did, for only a handful of runs.

The strength of England’s batting is at Nos. 4 to 7, with Root, Stokes, Ollie Pope, Ollie Bairstow and Jos Buttler all capable of scoring. The problem with the bottom four players is they’re very good attacking batsmen but not so great defensively.

They need to come in with a score around the 3-140 mark, in which case they can and will score runs. If they’re in at 3-40, it’s entirely possible the team could be shot out for 150 or less. Again, it’s imperative the top three batsmen get a total that the rest can improve on.

The observant will have noticed no mention of spin, and nor should there be for the first three Tests. England does not have a quality spinner unless Jack Leach or Dom Bess has a miraculous series in the remaining four Tests against India and maintains that form in Australia.

They should not be fazed by the attack Australia chooses. The England attack has world-class quicks, no world-class spinners, so don’t pick one.

Joe Root has proven to be perfectly capable of rolling over his arm for eight or ten overs to rest bowlers or provide some variety, and he’s not the worst when it comes to off spin bowling. In any event, if the other five bowlers are doing their jobs, a spinner should not be needed until the new year.

The one area where England must beat Australia is creating and taking chances and keeping up the fielding pressure generally. England must know they aren’t likely to score more than 300 against the Australian attack, so the only way the team can win is to keep Aussie totals down to manageable levels.

The fieldsmen and keeper need to set a target of missing one chance for the first three Tests and two chances for the series. Players like Warner, Labuschagne, Smith and Cameron Green are far too capable of batting long and scoring a pile of runs if they’re put down early in their innings.

There’s one final piece to this Ashes puzzle, and that’s attitude. The English players must truly believe they can win the first three Tests. They must have the attitude that supports that belief – that is, that they are not only good enough to match it with Australia but good enough to beat them too.

That attitude was clearly visible during their tour of Sri Lanka and again in the first Test in India. By the third Test that attitude was starting to wane, and by the end of the fourth Test many players looked seriously relieved the series was over and they could go home.

Attitude is the key element Joe Root and Chris Silverwood need to work on over the coming months. There’s no doubt the Ashes will be a hard series, but if England plays seriously tough cricket for the first three Tests, there’s every chance the little urn could be heading to a new home.

The Crowd Says:

2021-08-15T16:17:31+00:00

Ian

Roar Rookie


Fair go mate but why don't you find 100's of pale skinned Pom's staggering drunkenly about singing 'Ball and Chains' and not wet yourself with laughter?

2021-08-15T02:04:20+00:00

Dave

Guest


Australia lost a series at home to an Indian side missing 6 or 7 bowlers. Depth is more or less non-existent here. That will give England hope.

2021-08-13T07:49:51+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


Great number 7’s counter attack. He can’t or won’t. I feel like with his technique it’s won’t. Which makes me close to thinking he can’t lead and or plays for his average Would rather he average 25 but smash us out of a hole every 4th test like a Haddin. I mean, other than in the UAE, his runs are generally yeah, whatever.

2021-08-13T05:38:17+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


They were quartet for one solitary test series at home v India early 1983 and the 1983 world cup. It was Colin croft and Sylvester Clarke's defection to rebel saffie tours that opened the door into the test team for Marshall. Garner took the subsequent tour to India off in late 1983 and before they came here for one dayers in January 1984 Roberts either retired or was dropped.

2021-08-13T04:54:08+00:00

Keith Griffen

Guest


To be fair, take away the pink ball test ( which Australia has not lost at home in 5 matches) then compare hazelwood and Cummins stats. India's medium pacers might be superior

2021-08-13T04:46:17+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Unforgiven?

2021-08-13T04:42:03+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Scorpios are always misunderstood.

2021-08-13T03:12:20+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


First time ever England have not won a test on two successive Ashes tours down under.

2021-08-13T03:04:35+00:00

DTM

Roar Rookie


I don't have all the answers. Personally, not a big fan of Harris but who else? Can't really compare Harris to Marsh as they play very different roles. Better to compare Marsh to Green and there's only one answer to that question - Green. So with the all rounder picked, you have 5 batting spots (and maybe a keeper's spot). Warner (for now), Marnus and Smith. So 2 spots - Pucovski (either at 2 or 5) then it's a raffle. Novel idea, let's base it on form from the first few Shield games? I'm a big fan of Inglis. I'd seriously consider him for keeper but I'm not sure he demands a batting only spot. The other question is the bowlers. Assuming they are fit Cummins, Hoff and Lyon all ok but where is Starc at for test cricket? He definitely wont play all 5 tests. Do we pick him for the first?

2021-08-13T02:46:02+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


You argue no Marsh but you recycle Harris At least Marsh has a technique that does not slash out side the off stump So , the problem remains.. big doubts on the other opener and who bats 5. Warner's days are very short term due to age so really its about two openers and a number 5 and Head is not the answer. You can only fail so many times. There must be a good case for Inglis...cannot do worse And we may never solve it in the current climate

2021-08-13T02:13:52+00:00

Peter Farrar

Roar Pro


Thanks for this article Paul, an insightful one. Especially like your reference to batting ugly. I recall 2010 when a successful English team toured here led by Andrew Strauss. They were thought to have won largely due to a somewhat lengthy and thorough preparation in tour matches prior to the first test, with a 3 dayer against Victoria before the second test. Having watched some of England against NZ recently and then taking on India in the first test, I had the impression England weren't terribly inspired and considerably below their best. In the end it will quite possibly be a tale of two (ordinary) batting sides and two mainly excellent bowling teams. Which batting list will grind out more tenacity and ultimately runs in the series? Given the contributions made at times by the Australian tail enders, perhaps that will ultimately be the defining difference. Still, as one of your earlier articles suggested, in these Covid times we will have to get the tourists here first.

2021-08-13T01:38:42+00:00

Jak

Guest


Maybe? If Australia pick the under 17 squad, then perhaps. Otherwise forget it. They haven't won a test here in 10 years and it will be another 4 before they do so.

2021-08-13T01:38:39+00:00

DTM

Roar Rookie


T20 and ODI form is not relevant for test cricket. Mitch Marsh is miles behind Green as a test batsman. Warner opens with probably Harris, Marnus and Smith pick themselves at 3 & 4. Then I'd have Pucovski and Green at 5 & 6. Open to other options but please keep Marsh away from the test team. Yes, he's up there for ODI and T20 teams but that's a different game.

2021-08-13T01:33:24+00:00

Jak

Guest


the argument was if 3 seamers can’t do,4 definitely wont. I reckon Malcolm Marshall, Michael Holding, Joel Garner and Andy Roberts would disagree

AUTHOR

2021-08-13T01:15:42+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I think Australia has 5 batting options for 2 spots; the second opener with Warner and the number 5. The guys in the running are Marcus Harris, Puckovski, Head and a couple of outsiders, MM and Khawaja ( he's my smokie). Harris has batted very well in County cricket with 655 runs at 54.58 and 3 hundreds. If he can make a half way decent start to the Aussie Shield season, he should open and Puckovski bats 5. If he fails and Head does well, Puckovski opens and Head bats 5. If head fails and MM does well, ignore previous Test form and throw him in and and everyone crashes and burns except Usman, I'd give him a run. I'd rather see Puckovski down the order, at least to start his career. He's good enough to open but I'd like to see him settle into the team, make some decent scores (which is way easier to do down the list rather than as an opener) and see how things develop.

2021-08-13T01:10:25+00:00

Shire

Roar Rookie


You have it backwards. India pulled off the minor miracle, England are the ones who need Divine Intervention.

2021-08-13T01:01:10+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


you would like to think that M Marsh , on current form , could be a useful no 5 thus given the side a bit of maturity before Green batted. Then the opening spot can be the one spot to consolidate Technique suggests young Pucovski

2021-08-13T00:58:58+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


I’m hoping they pick Stone & Wood just cause I think it sounds funny.

2021-08-13T00:58:11+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Wade doesn't count because he's not a proper keeper.

AUTHOR

2021-08-13T00:29:32+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'm not sure that's the case Keith. Obviously India won the series so their entire team outplayed Australia but I think our selections were faulty which cause guys like Starc, who was both out of form and not 100% fit, to be chosen for games he shouldn't have played, ie the last two Tests. He was certainly outbowled, as was Lyon. India used their squad better than we did and their replacements did a very good job. Hazlewood and Cummins were as good if not better than their counterparts, but couldn't make up for the guys who underperformed. That plus rubbish catching cost us dearly.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar