India will need to call on the ghosts of the past to win at Headingley

By Tejas / Roar Rookie

Headingley has special place in the hearts of India.

After all, Headingley Yorkshire is where India’s most famous cricket son Sachin Tendulkar made his debut and, in the process, was the first ever overseas player to play for the county.

This was back in 1992. In 1986, Kapil Dev’s boys continued their glory years from 1983 to 1986 and won the second Test at the ground, after winning the inaugural Test at the Legendary Lord’s. Indians are ready for an encore 35 years later; they won the previous Test at the Lord’s and are headed to Headingley.

Architects of the 1986 win were from the same team that won India its biggest prize – 1983 cricket World Cup and upstaged hockey as India’s favourite sport, in Kapil Dev, Dilip Vengsarkar, Roger Binny and Madan Lal among others.

Cricket after the pinnacles in 1986 went through an entire cycle of game becoming bigger and then becoming tainted with the match fixing scandal of 90s to be clawing back again with Sourav Ganguly at the helm and ably supported by Sachin, Rahul, Kumble, and some of the no nonsense cricketers who not just played hard but played fair while maintaining the sanctity of the Gentlemen’s game.

Last time India played in Headingley was better and that was 19 years back in 2002. Reminiscing that Test made me write this article.

That was the only Test in the history of Indian cricket where the legendary big three – Sachin, Rahul and Sourav – all scored centuries. These triumvirate played lot of cricket together before hanging their whites and it was rather strange that this was the only instance that all three of them decided to make merry at the same time and crossed the three-digit milestone in the same innings.

Thanks to that superlative effort, Indians posted a huge total for the star-studded English batting and boy, they missed the mark in both the innings to make the non-Indian wicket keepers pad up again.

(Duif du Toit / Gallo Images/Getty Images)

2002 Test was another instance where Sourav who has always been able to speak his mind and make his own decisions had gone into the Test with both Anil Kumble and Harbhajan Singh as his offensive weapons despite Headingley being the graveyard of the spinners among the English wickets and in the past 25 years, hardly any spinner from either of the teams walking away with more than one wicket.

Sourav was to be proved right here since his tweakers walked away with eleven wickets in the test. Sourav had played to his team’s strengths and not worried about the wicket. But then again, Sourav was like Chappeli, (who played by his own conviction but very fair and hard unlike his two brothers).

The Indian triumvirate had a Test to remember and though Mr Dependable Rahul Dravid walked away with MoM hardware, the wounds were inflicted on the Brits by the Indian team and there were three 150+ partnerships in Indian batting which meant a rather balanced outing.

Likewise, for bowling, spoils were shared by the spinners and seamers and made the Englishmen follow on in their own backyard. Not just did they make England follow-on, they wrapped it up in the second innings while shutting the door on rallying by Naseer Hussain’s team, with Husain himself chipping in with his own hundred to match his opposing number.

Yorkshire has been a relatively conservative among the English counties and was the last one to open their doors to overseas players but their contribution to the ECB and cricket team has always been of the high order. Names like Sir Geoffrey Boycott, Michael Vaughan and even current captain Joe Root is calling Yorkshire home.

Can Virat Kohli’s inspired band make it the third time for Indians at Headingley in the third Test of the ongoing series?

They have the momentum; they have the weapons and are leading the series despite rain robbing them in the first Test.

The biggest thorn in their side – Joe Root who may look for changing his team’s fortunes on his home ground and with England bringing David Malan to face the shining red cherry, things may get better. For Virat Kohli’s men, this could well be the knockout punch they need to deliver to wrest control of this series.

The Crowd Says:

2021-08-27T07:59:33+00:00

Gonzo99

Roar Rookie


Fair enough. Hindsight is a wonderful thing and test cricket is very unpredictable. If I'd read the article before the collapse (and now the huge 1st innings lead), I wouldn't have disagreed with any of it. Thanks for writing. :thumbup:

2021-08-27T03:45:08+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Underarm bowling was still legal in Australia up to and including that day.

2021-08-27T03:44:32+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


No such thing. An inaugural test between two countries is only the first ever they play each other in their history. The first test of any subsequent series is simply that i.e. the first test (of that series).

AUTHOR

2021-08-27T03:41:48+00:00

Tejas

Roar Rookie


inaugural of the series

AUTHOR

2021-08-27T03:41:28+00:00

Tejas

Roar Rookie


Mankadate is still well within the rules of the game. Underarm was not permissible in anyway

AUTHOR

2021-08-27T03:40:23+00:00

Tejas

Roar Rookie


Not really, the popularity of cricket truly took off after 1983 win

AUTHOR

2021-08-27T03:39:37+00:00

Tejas

Roar Rookie


I would agree and am willing to bite my words. No one read no one anticipated this performance after the Lord's

AUTHOR

2021-08-27T03:38:46+00:00

Tejas

Roar Rookie


That is correct. This was written before the test started. Review took a bit longer

2021-08-27T00:12:21+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


In 1985 and 86 India couldn't even put the weakest Australian side ever away, not even at home in India.

2021-08-27T00:11:29+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Also, inaugural means the very first ever, not the first test in any other series, so there was no inaugural test between England and India in 1986.

2021-08-26T11:15:40+00:00

PeterCtheThird

Guest


Mmm. You choose to go back to 1981 to dredge up Australian captain Greg Chappell’s completely legal decision to instruct the bowler (the fact that Trevor Chappell was and is Greg’s and Ian’s brother is irrelevant) to bowl the last ball of the match underarm. You say that this was not fair. I notice that you chose not to go back as far as 1947/48 and Indian bowler Vinod Mankad’s running out of Bill Brown at the non-striker’s end without warning. That was legal. Was it fair? And let’s not go anywhere near the perfectly legal doctoring of pitches to give advantage to the home side fair.

2021-08-26T02:26:25+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Bit confused about glory years from 1983 to 1986. I am writing based on memory but I think from dec 1981, when they beat Eng at Wankhede till the beginning of the 1986 summer India won only 1 test also at Wankhede against eng in 1984. Also don't agree with Cricket upstaging hockey . Don't know what the official version is , but Cricket was the main sports in India long before 1983.

2021-08-25T22:49:32+00:00

Renato CARINI

Roar Rookie


Cricket's a funny game. Despite what a lot of rabid Indian fans think, there's not a lot between these teams under ENGLISH conditions. Prepare for 1-1 going into the 4th Test :cricket:

2021-08-25T22:39:03+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Articles are submitted and it's then up to the editors to do their part and put them on the website. A tad hard to do a re-write under those circumstances and, in any event, the only parts that are not quite right, are the last two paragraphs. The rest is a very good piece.

2021-08-25T22:36:44+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


"For Virat Kohli’s men, this could well be the knockout punch they need to deliver to wrest control of this series." Hmmm.... maybe not after day 1. I have a lot of sympathy Tejas. When you wrote this piece, you could not have anticipated India playing as badly as it did in all facets of the game. Unless Kohli's men do something dramatic over the next 4 days, this series could well be tied up with 2 to play.

2021-08-25T22:33:27+00:00

Gonzo99

Roar Rookie


I get that this was probably written before the start of the day, but it was published after the end of play. I think that maybe a little rewrite was a good idea, given what has just happened.

2021-08-25T22:32:47+00:00

Ian Nacho

Roar Rookie


This article aged like milk.

2021-08-25T22:13:51+00:00

Tony

Roar Guru


They'd better get there real soon

Read more at The Roar