Cricket and baseball: Compare and contrast, Part 5 – Tradition and change

By DaveJ / Roar Rookie

Defying my predictions, the Atlanta Braves beat the Houston Astros to take the 2021 Major League Baseball (MLB) World Series 4-2 on Wednesday.

As the cricket season heats up, this seems a good point to bring to a close this series comparing cricket and baseball.

The previous article has links to the rest of the series.

Today’s briefly surveys how tradition has been a big part of both sports and how they have changed with the times in the face of financial and social pressures.

Cricket and national identity
In several countries, cricket came to occupy a key role in national life. While eclipsed by football in England, cricket remains valued as a uniquely English invention and institution, a village game adopted and championed by the elites as well as the burgeoning industrial working class of Victorian England.

For many cricket still represents a nostalgic, if outdated, image of England. Former Prime Minister John Major, who has written a history of cricket (More than a Game), waxed lyrical about Britain as “the country of long shadows on cricket grounds, warm beer, invincible green suburbs, dog lovers and pool fillers”.

In Australia, cricket also grew in popularity in the late Victorian era, as the colonies moved towards Federation, and commanded a place as the national game. One reason was the divided preferences among the colonies and their successor states for rugby and Aussie rules football.

(Photo by Hulton Archive/Getty Images)

Moreover, cricket was the first sport we played internationally, taking on England in an amazing 20 series in the 24 years before the colonies merged to form a new nation in 1901.

Australia only played one international football series of any code before federation – a British Isles rugby tour in 1899. The Australian players only came from NSW and Queensland and wore blue jerseys in Sydney and maroon in Brisbane.

Matching and sometimes beating the ‘Mother Country’ was a big boost for the national psyche as Australia came of age. In fact, Australia overtook England in Ashes Test wins in May 1921 (41-40) and has never been headed since.

For the West Indies, cricket also had a big part in the coming of age of Britain’s Caribbean colonies, and became as an expression of unity among the constituent countries following independence in the 1960s, after failed efforts at establishing a Federation of the West Indies.

The Windies’ dominance in international cricket for nearly two decades from 1976 gave a huge boost to West Indian pride and identity.

International competition has been key to fostering cricket tradition has been. The Ashes and other series against the former colonial masters have been central in this.

Other rivalries such as the Frank Worrell Trophy, Border-Gavaskar Trophy, Australia-South Africa Tests and India-Pakistan matches have taken on a sharp edge at different times.

(Photo by PA Images via Getty Images)

While cricket has declined in relative significance from its heyday in England, Australia and the West Indies, its growth on the subcontinent, particularly India, has more than compensated in terms of money, players and astronomical public interest.

Baseball and tradition
Baseball lacks the tradition of international cricket. As described in Part 2 of this series, competitions like the World Baseball Classic and the Olympics haven’t had much traction and pale into insignificance compared to MLB and the World Series.

US MLB teams are not representative in the sense of their players coming from their host city or state, and the players get traded from team to team at a great rate, especially since free agency gave players greater bargaining power from 1976.

Mid-season trading (as highlighted in the film Moneyball) is even more important than in football.

Four of the starting ten players in Atlanta’s World Series-clinching team were bought mid-season, when the team had not yet won 50 per cent of their matches. These four weren’t known as stars, but played crucial roles in the World Series triumph.

(Photo by Tom Pennington/Getty Images)

Nevertheless, tradition is a huge part of baseball and its place in American society, and of the product that is sold to fans.

Like cricket, baseball in America has a great love of tradition, with much discussion of the great players of the past, their statistics and exploits on and off the field.

Going to a ballgame and having a beer and hotdog is seen as part of the national fabric, one reason Americans still buy MLB tickets in such huge numbers – 69 million in 2019, nearly three times more than any other sports league in the world (and four to five times cricket’s total world spectator numbers at international, provincial and T20 matches).

The National League, one of the two divisions of MLB, was founded in 1876, one year before the first cricket Test and just after English county cricket started.

Baseball was known as America’s pastime, and its early years coincided with the US’s golden age of economic and population expansion in the late 19th century.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The World Series has been played since 1903 between the champions of the National League and the American League. By contrast, the US National Football League kicked off in 1920 and the National Basketball Association was only formed in 1946.

While the MLB teams has nearly doubled in size since 1901 and some franchises have moved cities, many of them date back to the 1880s, such as the Chicago Cubs, Philadelphia Phillies and Pittsburgh Pirates.

Uniforms and branding
Team uniforms reflect this fondness for tradition in baseball. While some MLB teams dabbled with more garish uniforms in the ‘70s and ‘80s, today they have reverted to a more traditional look, many of them predominantly white, or grey for away games.

The New York Yankees’ pinstripe uniform has remained exactly the same since 1936, in contrast to most ODI and T20I cricket shirts, which change every year. The Yankees don’t even have players’ names on their shirts.

Unlike cricket clothing, MLB uniforms in contrast are ad-free.

(Photo by Cooper Neill/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

In cricket, Test teams advertise beer, airlines, banks and the like on their shirts while IPL team uniforms are splattered with seven or eight sponsors’ logos, often for products like tyres, concrete, power cables and air conditioners.

The more things change?
Since the 1960s cricket has regularly introduced innovations around shorter games and faster scoring, prompted by concerns about the declining popularity of traditional red-ball cricket and the desire to attract new and bigger audiences, especially for television.

English county cricket first brought in 60-, then 40- and 50-over matches. The ongoing proliferation of formats in cricket has included T20, T10 and even T16.666 (also known as the Hundred).

The commercial power of television flexed its muscles with World Series Cricket in 1977-79, ushering in a range of innovations.

(Photo by Allsport/Getty Images)

More recently, T20 as a TV product has brought franchise cricket to the fore, as in baseball, than representative or provincially based teams.

By contrast, MLB baseball has essentially been fixed as a nine-innings game since the 1890s. Its rules have also remained fairly static since 1901.

The biggest change was in 1920, using new balls whenever the ball got slightly worn, rather than just one throughout the game, and banning defacing the ball or applying foreign substances.

A couple of other changes, like lowering the height of the pitcher’s mound in 1969, and the use of a designated hitter in the National League (1973), were also aimed at reducing the dominance of the pitcher and getting more runs scored.

The growth in size of cricket bats over the last 20 years has boosted scoring rates, especially in white-ball cricket.

The length and width of baseball bats was fixed in 1895, with only wooden bats allowed in MLB.

Stats and umpires
The use of statistics is one area where cricket is catching up to baseball, particularly among professional teams, who are adopting some of the sabermetric methods pioneered in baseball.

Among fans, the fascination with statistics has been even more ingrained in baseball.

(Photo by Rod Mar/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

Baseball statistics tend to feel a lot more robust thanks to the huge number of games played, all in one format (some batters have twice as many innings in a season than Sachin Tendulkar’s 329 Test innings in 24 years).

They reach a much higher level of analysis than in cricket and form a backdrop to baseball commentary to a much greater degree.

Umpiring in baseball hasn’t gone as far with technology and DRS-type replays, especially for decisions about whether the ball is in the strike zone.

TV replays often show that the umps get these wrong, but this is accepted more philosophically than cricket’s obsession with the tiniest margins, notwithstanding occasional heated arguments between managers and umpires.

Baseball – slower games and smaller audiences?
Despite its huge revenues and soaring player salaries, described last week, baseball has become concerned about declining interest in the US.

Television viewers and spectator numbers (down ten million annually since 2008) have declined steadily over the last 20 years. Baseball has lost its primacy as America’s game to gridiron, and lags basketball in media profile and public recognition of its stars.

A number of explanations have been advanced. The fan-base is getting older, with age of the average TV viewer increasing to 57 from 45 in 1995. Younger generations seem a bit less engaged with baseball, although this is a challenge for other big sports too.

A slower pace of play is also seen as a turn-off for fans, which sounds unusual given the average baseball game lasts about as long as a T20 match. But, for comparison, an average play-off game in 2021 lasted one hour longer than 60 years ago.

Changes contributing to longer games include the use of a battery of relief pitchers, whereas 30 years ago starting pitchers lasted late into the game and often pitched the full nine innings. Bringing in a new pitcher chews up extra minutes.

Sabermetric analysis has encouraged greater reliance on batters who can hit home runs but tend to strike out more often. As a result the ball is in play less often, with less action running between the bases and in fielding plays.

(Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

So, unlike in cricket, emphasis on big hitting hasn’t made the game more entertaining. Likewise, the advent of harder throwing pitchers has also made it tougher to get the ball in play.

Final thoughts
Cricket’s very flexibility of format – present since the beginning – has allowed it to adapt to changing times and commercial pressures.

However, the challenge remains not to throw the baby out with the bathwater – so that traditional red-ball cricket, especially Tests, isn’t neglected and devalued, and T20 franchise cricket doesn’t crowd out international competition.

US baseball’s challenges are due not to any limits imposed by tradition so much as change and innovation prompted by the drive for team success, which have perversely made it less entertaining for some.

On a final note, I will bring up a pet peeve that suggests cricket is still some way behind baseball in professionalism.

(Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

I cannot believe that MLB managers would allow their fielders or pitchers to yell “catch it!” in the way that cricketers do at all levels when a ball goes in the air, even to slips. Or that commentators wouldn’t lambast them for it.

I am certain this almost automatic kneejerk reaction, which has crept in since the 1980s, has led to dropped catches on several occasions, without ever increasing the chances of a catch being taken. It reeks of an amateur era.

But I hope the overall comparisons have added some perspectives to how we see cricket.

I will follow up with a short article providing a summary table of the key metrics and points of comparison for those who prefer less long-winded pieces.

A look at baseball statistics and possible lessons for cricket, and how the two sports are portrayed in popular culture, might also be worth a look at a later date.

The Crowd Says:

2021-11-11T22:48:54+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


As a sidenote to this series, I note that Aussie Liam Hendriks has just been name American League relief pitcher of the year for the second time in a row.

2021-11-08T22:38:00+00:00

josh

Roar Rookie


point re: Catch it! Is the cringe when cricketers at all levels say it, for pretty normal event efforts. I was contrasting that to baseball where bare-handed catches, though rarer, are this pinnacle of fielding excellence, when in cricket it's happens every match.

AUTHOR

2021-11-08T08:07:20+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Definitely got a point that there is now more action in T20 than the average baseball match. Especially when pitchers dominate. In that respect baseball is a bit like football codes - getting a score and breaching the defence is a big moment. Low scoring baseball a bit like soccer, higher scoring games a bit like Aussie rules. But not as much action in between! The American view of cricket no doubt based on traditional red ball cricket, which has been the dominant form for a long time, and still the most prestigious among serious cricketers and purists. Not sure I followed the final sentence re Catch It! You mean in baseball? Barehanded catches are extremely rare in baseball - can’t remember seeing one. But they are almost always one handed - with glove, but in weaker hand and often 40-50 metres further than the longest boundary catches in cricket. But I’m not sure how that counters my beef about Catch It!, which comes from a long time playing, then watching cricket.

2021-11-08T03:57:37+00:00

josh

Roar Rookie


I'd be interested to see a ball-by-ball comparison of a T20 (Professional club level) and an MLB game. There are periods in baseball where nothing happens. 2 strikes, 3 balls, then foul after foul before a simple fly or a shanked hit an out at 1st. It is hardly compelling viewing. As you noted above the tendency to go big or home leads to this. I can't fathom (and maybe why the declining viewership) how American's view cricket as boring (I get it from the test match perspective). I'd bet the "nothing happening" is limited to no more than 4 consecutive balls in a typical T20. I know 1 every ball is a bit boring too, but at least something that impacts the game is happening. To counter the "Catch it", I cringe each time an outfielder makes a barehanded catch and the typical American hyperbole that follows.

2021-11-06T03:26:19+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I've never seen a catch being made because someone called out "catch it", but I've seen at least two dozen dropped for exactly that reason. I still remember dropping at least two catches thanks to be distracted. Those guys trying to game the umpire by yelling out "catch it" did my head in, back when I was playing or umpiring. Nowadays I find it totally childish, especially when a player, usually the bowler, yells that out, to a shot that's going 50 feet over a fieldsman's head for 6. They also look particularly stupid when slo-mo replays show the ball has missed the bat by miles. If we're going to accept this as a reasonable part of the game, I guess it's only fair for the non-striker to yell out "hit it" just as the ball gets to the other batsman, or the striker yells out "bowl it" when the quick is just about to deliver the ball. In all cases, its simply silly.

AUTHOR

2021-11-06T03:03:10+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


PS on uniforms, one reason they don’t have advertising is that with the amount of money from TV ads and ground advertising means they haven’t really needed it. But they are looking at it apparently for the future like NBA teams which have added fairly discreet logos on shirts recently. In addition to Nike swooshes which I hadn’t really counted perhaps because they don’t stand out.

2021-11-06T02:55:51+00:00

All day Roseville all day

Roar Guru


Thanks, DaveJ

AUTHOR

2021-11-06T02:47:07+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


You really think the Catch It cry has the slightest positive effect and never a negative one? Certainly not in my experience of playing at a decent level for over twenty years and taking a lot of catches close in and on the boundary. I’ve certainly seen people drop catches in the infield snatching at the ball just after someone’s done a Catch It! Marnus Labuschagne twice off his own bowling in Tests. It can only distract a fieldsman concentrating on the ball but not thinking of outcome. It did become more popular from the 80s as a way of trying to convinxe the umpire there was a nick off a bat-pad, but they do it nearly every time the ball is in the air now and DRS makes it pretty irrelevant for bat-pads. I didn’t really suggest baseball was spread by colonialism in the earlier article. Just fun to see how many places they’ve invaded, fought or subverted are baseball countries. Mainly because baseball is big in the Americas.

AUTHOR

2021-11-06T02:35:10+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Glad we see eye to eye on Catch It! Paul. Good point about artificial turf and safety gear, although helmets aren’t big protection if it hits them in the face. Metals bats are allowed at college and school but not in MLB or Minor League. The reason being fear that they will be too much in favour of the batter and home runs will be too easy, records would no longer have meaning. As mentioned, bat size and wooden composition have been fixed since 1895. Cricket of course hasn’t been too concerned about the new big bats but hitting a six doesn’t change the complexion of a game in the same way that home runs do.

AUTHOR

2021-11-06T02:18:51+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Thanks AMD, yes I took out mention of automatic strike zone possibly coming in for space reasons. It will be tougher to justify the umps’ big salaries. Interesting point about more walks. My overall impression is the umps are quite brilliant at getting split second base calls right, even if the strike zones can get a bit fuzzy.

2021-11-06T02:10:50+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Another good piece, Dave. I understand the 'automated strike zone' is being trialed minor league games and short-season baseball, with a view to probably introducing it at MLB level. It'll be interesting to see what happens. Keith Law was postulating that it will probably lead to even more walks, especially late in the game when the high leverage relievers are in. I wonder if it might lead to another big change in how and what type of pitchers are used.

2021-11-06T01:38:27+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


There's something to be said for all those points. They played the Field of Dreams games in the cornfield this year and there was a lot of editorial reflection on the movie with its whites-only era baseball homilies, to the focus on the African-American players of today like Tim Beckham of the White Sox who was pretty oblivious to the lore of the segregated leagues. There's a disconnect.

2021-11-06T00:59:13+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Cracking series Dave.

2021-11-06T00:37:46+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


A terrific finale to a great series. Thanks for taking the time to write this, Dave. Just a few thoughts. I find it tough to compare the money that's in MLB versus cricket. Until the IPL came along, anyone of the MLB franchises was likely to make and spend more money in a season than the entire cricketing world. That may in part explain why there's not a lot of branding on uniforms ( I noticed the Nike swoosh on the pitchers uniform in the photo that came with this article). I also wonder how much change there really is in baseball. Perhaps not massive amounts to the game itself, but they've had metal bats for ages, use artificial turf, have change safety equipment significantly, etc. On that point about fielders yelling out "catch it", I had an excellent coach in junior who made it extremely clear what would happen if any of us yelled that out, for exactly the reason you described. It's a distraction that's not needed.

2021-11-06T00:21:58+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


The catch it cry that should be used for balls that come off the pad or the body usually balooning up, its about alerting players that there was also potentially bat on the ball and they should make an effort to catch it , its not something relevant to baseball. Cricket is a sport that was more popular in colonial areas because of the better weather and the more leisure time afforded in colonial areas with a lot more servants . British weather is the reason that is impractical in the rainy cold areas and the Ireland and Scotland teams are artificial constructs with little actual cricket being played there. West Indies the white population was small so involved the black population but their cricket teams were initially white. The West Indies cricket team is the only thing the region has to unify India the ruling class played alongside the British there used to be street cricketers in the lower classes that could not play for the Indian team. South Africa having a bigger white population never involved the local black population with the effect , today that cricket isnt popular with the majority black population. Australia is the country where cricket and baseball have coexisted the most and played in opposite seasons baseball was more a hidden paricipation sport . . Ponsford was a player of both and impressed a visiting American baseball team they wanted to sign him up. Baseball didnt actually spread through colonialism it was established before the US took over Cuba and well before the Second world war in Japan and Korea. In the Carribean it was the white Spanish who came under US influence that introduced it. Baseball in the US is having the same issues as cricket is having its a sport in the summertime where now its viewed as a leisure and activities period and time consuming sports in the summer . Its also considered old fashioned and unstylish. This was also an issue with cricket in the West Indies for a while. South Africa the ability to produce cricketers isn't matched by the popularity , I haven't met any South Africans of subcontinent heritage, the whites rugby is their main interest , the few black South Africans I have met certainly their interest is football. Indians in Australia the newer immigrants are a lot more interested in cricket than the old immigrants. What cricket and baseball have in common is they cant seem to upgrade their apparel to appeal to anyone. While people appreciate the traditional looks of each sport like in a period piece but never wear it the attempts to modernise it have been laughable, the difference is cricket has had to persist with it because of the white ball in the shorter formats. Basketball is the biggest winner in general attire with casual shoe wear. Cricket has the subcontinent as the biggest source of immigrants spreading the game around. Baseball is very inward looking the MLB and very guarding of its riches, unlike NFL who funded a Euro league, the one place where baseball had an emerging professional league gets like a pittance of MLB funding.

AUTHOR

2021-11-06T00:00:10+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Yes. Mentioned in the second article of the series. African-American representation on MLB rosters peaked in 1986 at 19 percent and had dropped to below eight percent in 2021. Reasons put forward include the higher cost of baseball at school (paying for extra coaching or playing in the winter), fewer college scholarships than in gridiron or basketball, and the popularity of basketball in African-American communities. Actually I wonder if it’s also partly due to the big increase in Hispanic players from the Caribbean and other foreign players overs that period. That might mean the relative decline in African Americans isn’t so steep. Noticeable a lot of top players from the Dominican Republic and Cuba at the moment are Afro-Caribbean- Guerrero, Tatis, Soto, Alvarez, Hernandez, Franco, Devers.

2021-11-05T21:30:55+00:00

Linphoma

Guest


Of particular concern for the baseball commissioner has been the decline in African-American participation from a peak in the 1970s when there was the highest percentage of this demographic in the Majors.

Read more at The Roar