Early NRL Premiership odds: Here's your chance to cash in or look very foolish later on

By Stuart Thomas / Expert

With just over a month remaining until kick-off in the 2022 NRL Premiership season, now is the time to scour the odds and find value that will quickly evaporate, as soon as the team(s) in question show some form over the opening rounds.

When the Panthers and Sea Eagles launch the season on March 10, much ‘smart money’ will already have been invested by people convinced that the horse they have backed will show the improvement required to take out the premiership some eight months later.

No doubt a significant percentage of that coin will be headed in the direction of reigning premiers Penrith, with their youthful and still developing squad a certain chance for a rare repeat in the modern era of NRL play.

At $5.50 with Play Up, the return is appealing at this time of the year, yet should the Panthers get on another run of home-and-away success as they have done in previous years, that figure will shrink briskly.

Alongside the Panthers at the same price is Melbourne; the perennial contenders almost certain to once again be in the photo when the whips are cracking in 2022.

(Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

As is always the case with the Storm, a few have come and a few have gone, yet they will undoubtedly be presented as yet another competitive version of themselves with names like Cameron Munster, Harry Grant, Kenny Bromwich and Brandon Smith putting the Mexicans in the frame for yet another premiership.

The Roosters appear well undervalued at $6.50 in terms of a return on investment. Boyd Cordner, the Morris twins and Jake Friend have departed, with Connor Watson the most significant new recruit. It might take another year or two for the Chooks to rebuild yet the bookies are apparently keeping them very, very safe.

The Sea Eagles and Bunnies are on the next two lines of betting, with Adam Reynolds’ departure to Brisbane and limited recruitment the biggest concerns for Souths, who were paying $7.50 in premiership betting at the time of writing.

Manly seem reliant on the squad that finished 12 points shy of both Melbourne and Penrith last season and hopeful of producing the same result without any significant additions to it. At $8.50, not too many will see the Sea Eagles as good value with those factors considered.

Parramatta is on the next line of betting at $13 and any money sent in that direction is simply destined never to be returned, with a few ins and outs not masking the fact that without a better general, Parramatta are simply not good enough to threaten the top teams on the big occasions.

A similar line of thinking could be applied to the Raiders. At $19.00 in the premiership market, the players they have picked up from the Bulldogs and elsewhere do not appear to be the likely elixirs to their ills and finals football again looks a 50-50 possibility for them in 2022.

The Sharks, Gold Coast and Newcastle all sit at $21 in premiership betting and being held safe in term of a potential top-eight finish.

Cronulla has Dale Finucane and Cameron McInnes to add to their ninth-placed squad of 2021, Gold Coast will be relying on the youthful flock that took them to a rare and only fourth ever appearance in the finals last season and Newcastle fans will be hoping that the losses of Mitchell Pearce and Connor Watson will not mean a return to the cellar after a few seasons of hope and growth.

Frankly, the Sharks look the best placed of the three, Gold Coast devoid of the touch of class required to improve what is now a committed and professional football team under Justin Holbrook and with Dane Gagai the best new addition in the Hunter, one wonders whether Newcastle’s fortunes will improve at all after the significant losses in the spine.

The most significant X-factor in the premiership race is the Bulldogs, lurking at $26, which despite the host of new signings, still seems a little under the realistic value for a team that will probably play its best football in a year or two’s time.

(Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

At $29.00, the Brisbane Broncos have been allocated ‘Reynolds odds’, with the game’s most consistent game ‘icer’ seemingly making the competitions’ 14th-placed team in 2021 instantly better. New recruits Kurt Capewell and Ryan James might well be able to help Reynolds out, yet whether the Broncos can take step or leaps this season remains to be seen.

Peta Hiku and Chad Townsend are the biggest additions in North Queensland, with a 15th-placed finish in 2021 balancing out their arrival and keeping the Cows at a juicy $34. A stack of talent has departed and much youth re-signed. Thus, the Cowboys remain a ‘watch this space’ proposition.

The Dragons and Warriors are both attracting odds of $41 in the early premiership market, with neither doing much in terms of recruitment that suggests any significant improved on 2021 form.

One must ask why the Dragons would be bringing in players like Aaron Woods and Moses Mbye alongside some of the better recruitment decisions of George Burgess, Tautau Mogo and Moses Suli.

The big question in New Zealand will be whether Shaun Johnson and Ashley Taylor can play together and somehow improve each other, in what will be one of the most interesting combinations in the competition.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

On the bottom rung of betting is Wests Tigers, with $51 being prohibitive to any punter with logic or memory. With Tyrone Peachey the most NRL experienced of the recruits and most of the others very much questionable, the Tigers are likely to finish at or near the bottom of the ladder in 2020.

As unpredictable as many people would like to believe a salary-capped league can be, the 2022 NRL Premiership does not appear to be headed down such a path, with the haves and the have-nots likely to be well separated once again.

The idea of teams like the Raiders, Bulldogs, Sharks, Knights or Gold Coast upsetting the apple cart might be appealing, yet it does appear that the top six in betting odds will once again be pretty close to the mark when it comes to the fight for the 2022 title.

The Crowd Says:

2022-02-08T04:50:16+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


I think your numbers are slightly off (I've got 15 Top 4 finishers winning, and 8 others) but I'm otherwise all good with your summation. In any given year it's most likely the winner will come out of the previous years Top 4 - no arguments. My point was some stating it as a lock-tight stat, and it's not. Pretty much 1 season in 3 it doesn't happen.

2022-02-08T04:30:07+00:00

Beastie

Roar Rookie


To be fair, I’ve run the numbers on this and it’s a fair argument that the previous year’s top 4 are the best shot at winning the next year’s premiership. In fact, just in the past 5 years, the only team to not win a premiership the year after collecting the Minor Premiership was the Roosters in 2018, and they finished the previous year 2nd. Here’s what I found… Teams 1-4 – 16 wins 70%; Teams 5-8 – 4 wins 17%; Teams 9-12 – 2 wins 9%; Teams 13-16 – 1 win 4%. That’s based on 1999 winners to present (1998 winners Brisbane came 1st in SL, but it’s not NRL so didn’t include it.)

2022-02-07T07:42:01+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Again my man, in general. You try make a point that you "could have" but it seems a very long time since you chose to have an original thought. No, it's easier to pick off others with your brilliance isn't it?

2022-02-07T07:34:26+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


I told you this was hilarious hours ago, it's getting better. But well done on the "I know you are but what am I". You'll recognise that from the Papi reference now slung back at me? What's next, I'm rubber and you are glue?

2022-02-07T07:29:41+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Baaahahahahaha, ok. You've missed with the left and right cross so let's move it over here and take a jab. Now I hate math? Righto. Since I now hate math so I don't understand correlation? Good job. :laughing: How very "on brand" to misrepresent something and position me where you can poorly argue a point you made up! I swear you nearly gave me a cold with that air swing.

2022-02-07T07:21:34+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Gee didn’t think you’d go to the GB triple crying laugh so early. Just as hypocritical though I suppose.

2022-02-07T07:19:46+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


I think the main thin you proved was your hatred of all things mathematical means you don't really grasp correlation But it's definitely not an argument over semantics to say someone is lying when they say they haven't read something they quoted and have an opinion on the content and how the content reflects on the author. That's a lie every day of the week

2022-02-07T07:10:50+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Nope but keep swinging. You got me against the ropes “champ”. :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

2022-02-07T07:07:22+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


No, I took quotes from it to prove correlation. Your trying to hide behind semantics.

2022-02-07T07:06:08+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


"have an opinion on a story instead.." Didn't you just have a go at someone else today for that very thing? I could have put the post you didn't read as a stand alone reply but it seemed linked to points already raised. Given you didn't read it I'm going to pass on taking your advice as to the better positioning of said comment.

2022-02-07T07:03:26+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


So your issue is with content you didn’t read? Yet quoted….

2022-02-07T07:00:09+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Isn’t 500 words a little out of your range. You get upset if someone (other than you) posts 100 words. I mean if you didn’t get it from the first sentence then it’s just going to be tough to develop the concept further.

2022-02-07T06:57:26+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Also just a quick one on the condescending not sarcastic, the condescension is achieved through the irony. That means it is sarcasm. Oh and you were just attempting to be semantic... again.

2022-02-07T06:55:27+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


It wasn't a rhetorical question at all nor were there any semantics. You needed to highlight your expertise on the most boring subject in the world when not one person asked you to do so. Didn't even allude to it. It was all about you.

2022-02-07T06:52:26+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Hilarious the point was that wasn't what the post was about - got a few likes though for what ever that is worth. You're not a even a little worried that you think we should put so much stock of our self worth into the replies on a sports forum?

2022-02-07T06:51:16+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


There wasn't. You just found 6 sentences to tear out and write a reply for each. It's always fun to read the ramblings of a drunken mushi after your midnight 6 post rants because you cannot put together one coherent reply. It's 100% boring but being offensive is just an attempt.

2022-02-07T06:49:47+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


The rhetorical question you opened who asked would be viewed as sarcasm. Just like the "champ" references, unless of course you are declaring me the champ (which I must decline) You also tried to use semantics to link the two separate replies.

2022-02-07T06:35:10+00:00

Rob9

Roar Guru


‘I’m staggered you could pull together a post with 6 points to mis-represent!’ Mission impossible but you’ve found the right guy for the job…

2022-02-07T06:34:29+00:00

Nat

Roar Guru


Of course it's obvious. As evidenced by all the replies and acknowledgements of your great analysis. Well, I'm sure there will be when they wake up. I'm not afraid to use a little sarcasm mate but "Champ" isn't sarcasm it's condescending. You're the one who has nothing else to offer. Keep coming. One will land soon enough. Go after a spelling mistake, there's a 'gotcha' I'm sure your big brain can dine out on.

2022-02-07T06:26:04+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


How can I be both completely offensive and bore the dead? I'm staggered you could pull together a post with 6 points to mis-represent!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar