'The price I'm willing to pay': Djokovic breaks silence on visa debacle, makes massive call on future Grand Slams

By The Roar / Editor

Novak Djokovic has admitted he would rather miss out on future Grand Slam titles than be forced to get vaccinated against Covid.

Djokovic, who was deported from Australia in shambolic circumstances last month, was asked in an interview with the BBC if he would sacrifice taking part in competitions such as Wimbledon and the French Open over his stance on the vaccine.

“Yes, that is the price that I’m willing to pay,” he said.

Djokovic, the world No.1 and 20-time Grand Slam winner was deported from Australia when the government cancelled his visa in a row over his vaccine status.

Djokovic said he had obtained a medical exemption to enter the country to play in the Australian Open because he had recently recovered from Covid-19.

Australia’s immigration minister Alex Hawke cancelled the 34-year-old’s visa, on the grounds that his presence could incite “civil unrest” and encourage anti-vaccine sentiment, a decision upheld after Djokovic appealed.

“I was never against vaccination but I’ve always supported the freedom to choose what you put in your body,” Djokovic told the BBC. He confirmed he had received vaccines as a child.

Djovic said he hoped vaccination requirements in certain tournaments changed and added he wanted to “play for many more years”.

But he also confirmed he was willing to forfeit the chance to win a record number of Grand Slam titles.

Asked why, Djokovic said: “Because the principles of decision making on my body are more important than any title or anything else. I’m trying to be in tune with my body as much as I possibly can.”

(Photo by Burak Akbulut/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images)

Djokovic said he had “always been a great student of wellness, wellbeing, health, nutrition.” He said he was “keeping [his] mind open” about the possibility of being vaccinated in the future, “because we are all trying to find collectively, a best possible solution to end Covid”.

“I was never against vaccination. I understand that globally, everyone is trying to put a big effort into handling this virus and seeing, hopefully, an end soon to this virus.”

Djokovic also gave his version on the sequence of events ahead of the Australian Open.

“I understand that there is a lot of criticism, and I understand that people come out with different theories on how lucky I was or how convenient it is,” he said of the timing of his positive result.

“But no-one is lucky and convenient of getting Covid. Millions of people have and are still struggling with Covid around the world. So I take this very seriously, I really don’t like someone thinking I’ve misused something or in my own favour, in order to, you know, get a positive PCR test and eventually go to Australia.

“I was really sad and disappointed with the way it all ended for me in Australia. It wasn’t easy.”

While his medical exemption request was made anonymously and accepted by two independent Australian panels, he was ultimately rejected because of an error on a separate travel declaration.

“Absolutely, the visa declaration error was not deliberately made,” Djokovic said. “It was accepted and confirmed by the Federal Court and the minister himself in the Ministry for Immigration in Australia.

“So actually, what people probably don’t know is that I was not deported from Australia on the basis that I was not vaccinated, or I broke any rules or that I made an error in my visa declaration. All of that was actually approved and validated by the Federal Court of Australia and the Minister for Immigration.

“The reason why I was deported from Australia was because the Minister for Immigration used his discretion to cancel my visa based on his perception that I might create some anti-vax sentiment in the country or in the city, which I completely disagree with.”

Djokovic said he understood the reaction in Australia and why the population was frustrated with the situation, but hinted he felt the situation was whipped up by newspapers.

“Ausralia has been through one one of the most severe lockdowns we have had sine the beginning of the pandemic,” Djokovic said.

“I can only imagine how hard it was for Australians and I sympathise and and emphathise with all the people and I understand there has been a lot of frustration from Australian people towards me and towards the entire situation and the way it was dealt with. I understand as well reading the newspapers you get certain conclusions.

“I would like to say I always follow the rule.

“I was ready not to go to Australia, as much as I love the country and always looked forward to going to the Australian summer and participate in the Australian Open.

“It was a very difficult decision for me because I understood that with the decision I made there were going to be consequences and I was ready.”

The Crowd Says:

2022-02-24T07:16:46+00:00

Ace

Guest


The self reporting sample size of one you mean ? Oh yeah sign me up.

2022-02-24T06:46:00+00:00

Ace

Guest


Yeah once in a century global pandemic with anywhere from about 6 to 20 million dead. Historically rating only behind the plague and Spanish flu. Can't see why anybody would consider that a risk.

2022-02-17T08:54:10+00:00

Peter Darrow

Roar Guru


mushi Thought this might apply to you and others here from the great Alexandra Marshall: “Fixation on something skews our ability to accurately assess its risk. Humans are social creatures prone to collective thinking, and if the collective is told every day that the most dangerous thing in the whole world is Covid – they believe it.” Time to wake up mushi

2022-02-17T04:23:36+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


That sample size of 1 has convinced me.

2022-02-17T04:20:28+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Like his stand in 2020 to run his own tournament and create a super spreader? I agree with your sentiment but Djoker is definitely not the pin up boy you need.

2022-02-17T04:18:47+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


It’s a price we are willing for you to pay as well Novak :stoked:

2022-02-16T23:48:49+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


In that context, I was referring to his principal principle.

2022-02-16T22:56:01+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


The data suggests otherwise. Oh sorry forgot you don't put much faith in empircal analysis

2022-02-16T22:52:07+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


"The “democratic process” would allow “freedom of choice” would it not?" No. Not now not ever and it is a betrayal of logic to suggest otherwise. The democratic process requires you to accept the consensus view of the citizens. To participate in a society is the deliberate trade of personal freedoms for controls in order to get access to the benefits of being part of a group. You and your ilk want to betray that social contract. Liberal democracies will typically try to maximise freedoms to the extent they do not harm the execution of the consensus view but Australia has simply never had the freedom to individually chose everything. That you are openly saying you reject the principles of our society suggests you should be removed from it for the benefit of the society as a whole. “The word “selfish” gets attached by many to the unvaxxed, a bit like the term “far right” is used.” The word selfish gets used because the meaning of the word fits the scenario. You constantly assert you should be allowed to break from the perceived social benefit towards a position you find personally advantageous. So the label isn’t hyperbolic. You are selfish. You are simply asserting that you should have the right to be as selfish as you want. As for the far right – it’s not “a bit like” given it doesn’t fit the literal definition of the term. If did have to go into the right left (assuming social not economic) I’d assume it was both extremes that would be Anti vax. But it would be fundamentally incorrect to say the use of the label was akin to selfish. “I wonder who your heroes are mushi? Like to list some? Promise I won’t judge.” Well that’s just patently untrue. The only reason you could have for wanting to know my heroes is to form a judgement on the selection. I’m getting the impression you don’t understand the meaning of most of the words you use to communicate.

2022-02-16T22:36:55+00:00

Mark

Guest


RT, It's principle, not principal. A principal is the person in charge of something, such as a school.

2022-02-16T20:28:59+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Golden Army - okay! Rearming the armoury now!!

2022-02-16T08:38:30+00:00

Golden Army

Guest


You shouldn't move on from anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorists. You should belittle them or ignore them, but don't let them think they are validated by "liking" them.

2022-02-16T08:32:19+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


Save it for Facebook.

2022-02-16T08:21:39+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


You love to divert. I made a simple point on your claim about his so called strength of character that is not that hard when his is loaded and doesn't stand to lose much since he is at the tail end of his career. It is nothing to do with envy, what I think of him or my vax stance. It is a simple matter of fact, which you refuse to acknowledge and instead divert.

2022-02-16T08:15:05+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Golden Army, Yeah, I move on. I don't keep a dossier. I know how this site works, it's all waffle, no need to take it seriously.

2022-02-16T07:52:35+00:00

Golden Army

Guest


Oh, pray tell me...what is to happen in 6 months? Should I be prepared? Indeed, am I even able to be prepared?

2022-02-16T07:50:35+00:00

Golden Army

Guest


Must be the vaccine in me, Massa.

2022-02-16T07:46:06+00:00

Peter Darrow

Roar Guru


Read the book, seen the movie Golden. Do you know how long it is between a conspiracy theory and the truth? Oh, about 6 months. So we'll see how the "fiction" pans out.

2022-02-16T06:56:59+00:00

Beaufort T Justice

Guest


Plenty of those young nurses and doctors have walked out in protest of these mandates, and yes many have been put in a position of financial hardship . But they've committed to what they believe , and they believe because of what they've witnessed first hand .

2022-02-16T06:52:49+00:00

Beaufort T Justice

Guest


You have issues boy

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar