Ahmedabad '22-day wicket' should cop 'poor' rating as well as greats fume, Kohli ends 1200-day drought: Talking Points

By Tim Miller / Editor

If the pitch in Indore for the third Test of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy received a ‘poor’ rating from the ICC for its excessive turn and inhospitable batting conditions, then so too should be the lifeless surface dished up for the series finale in Ahmedabad.

Just 15 wickets fell across the first 11 sessions of the match, with both Australia and India reduced to merely keeping the run rate down with the ball.

The ICC have historically been reluctant to award a low score to an overly batting-friendly pitch, though they did slap the MCG with a ‘poor’ rating after the disastrously dull 2017 Boxing Day Ashes Test.

Even that wicket, though, saw 24 wickets fall across the five days – Ahmedabad still needs nine further wickets in the final four sessions of the match to simply break even.

Pitches such as these are becoming more commonplace in Test cricket, with the return to cricket in Pakistan for the first time in nearly two decades particularly hampered in recent years by a series of lifeless surfaces, including on recent tours by Australia, England and Pakistan.

It is time for the ICC to make it clear that batting paradises are just as bad for the game as any minefield – and given the suffocating heat in Ahmedabad this week, arguably just as dangerous for all involved.

Former great Mark Waugh summed it up best at lunch on Day 4 when he described the wicket as a ’22-day pitch’, while former Australian wicketkeeper Brad Haddin admitted the Test has been ‘hard to watch’.

“It’s not going to do much, I don’t think,” Waugh said on Fox Cricket.

“The pitches in the first three Test matches have been two-day pitches, and this one’s a 22-day pitch.

“It’s done nothing. There’s not much rough there, there’s not much reverse swing, the odd ball has spun. It looks pretty solid, this pitch.”

1200 days later: Kohli breaks famous drought with 28th Test ton

Just before tea on Day 4, Virat Kohli became the fourth batter to bring up triple figures for the Test, in the process breaking a 1205-day streak without a Test ton, dating all the way back to November 2019.

Brought up with a trademark flick through forward square leg off Nathan Lyon, Kohli was a relieved man as he celebrated the milestone, reached off 241 balls, in more subdued fashion than usual.

As batter-friendly as the wicket is, the 34-year old’s achievement shouldn’t be understated. Having held the burden of the heaviest monkey on the back in world cricket ever since his century drought passed the 12-month mark, after a series in which he has constantly proved a thorn in Australia’s side with the bat, his 75th international century, and 28th in Tests, should be the beginning of a fruitful conclusion to his glittering career over the next few years.

Kohli and wicketkeeper KS Bharat had already made cricket history with their 84-run partnership on Day 4: it marked the first time in Test history a team has started their innings with five 50-plus partnerships.

That became six as Kohli and Axar Patel’s partnership also reached 50; Bharat, despite clubbing Cameron Green for consecutive sixes in a whirlwind finish to his innings, would fall short of a maiden Test half-century when he edged Lyon to Peter Handscomb at short leg.

Virat Kohli bats. (Photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)

‘Threw it away’: Legend slams Jadeja for reckless dismissal

Ravindra Jadeja is a world-class all-rounder and has chalked up fantastic numbers with bat and ball in recent years.

But he’s not a No.5 batter at Test level.

His dismissal early on day four proved that. He went on the attack when India were traveling along nicely against Todd Murphy, only to undo 84 balls of good work by recklessly mistiming the Victorian straight to Usman Khawaja at mid-on.

Speaking on ABC Radio, Indian legend Sunil Gavaskar wasn’t impressed.

“He threw it away,” Gavaskar said.

“The partnership was going well, feeding off each other’s confidence.”

Jadeja’s dismissal, to leave India at 4/309, briefly threatened to let Australia back into the match, with regular number six Shreyas Iyer dropping down the order and unlikely to bat after sustaining a back injury.

India’s desire to keep Iyer at number six, and with keeper Bharat still finding his feet, Jadeja has been asked to bat at five for much of this series, averaging just 16.25 in the role after making a brilliant 70 at number seven in the first Test in Nagpur.

Having proved one of the finest number sevens in world cricket in recent years, Jadeja will likely move back down to his preferred spot once Rishabh Pant is ready to make a return from injuries sustained during a horrific car accident in late December last year.

The Crowd Says:

2023-03-15T02:39:41+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


I agree we did better in 2017. I think we had a better team this time around, but the preparation was not nearly as good - so it took until halfway through the series until we had properly adjusted to the conditions.

2023-03-15T02:27:36+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


it doesn't. the accuracy makes a different point. and on a different point, I think we regressed from 16-17. there we faced a better India I reckon. but were still right in at 1-1 with 1 to play. here we were done after 6 days.

2023-03-15T01:29:16+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


Okay, change it to the last 9.95 years then. Or wait two weeks and it will be 10 years. It doesn't really change my point.

2023-03-15T01:21:04+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


it's actually 2 wins and 6 losses because half the 12-13 series was in later march

2023-03-14T23:19:07+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


The first 3 pitches would have allowed Sweppo to turn is square, not just with the leggie but the wrongun' and his flipper would have grubbed. India has way more familiarity with finger spinners than with wrist spinners.

2023-03-14T23:12:41+00:00

DTM

Roar Rookie


It was the only pitch of the 4 test match pitches that would have suited a leggie. India is full of leg spinners - if they thought it was a good idea to play one during the series they would have had plenty to choose from. Shane Warne's stats in India are an indication that the country is not a happy hunting ground for leg spinners.

2023-03-14T20:01:58+00:00

Christo the Daddyo

Roar Rookie


As usual that comment makes zero sense.

2023-03-14T18:15:24+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


The vibe of the thing :laughing: :laughing: :laughing:

2023-03-14T13:47:47+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


The stat that's pertinent has been conveniently excluded. You are not paying attention.

2023-03-14T13:46:10+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Why the only one? As Queenslanders know, Swepson is quite a bit more potent than Kuhnemann. When Swepson returned, Kuhnemann had to be sent home, not Agar. If not Agar, Swepson should have played.

2023-03-13T23:20:59+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


oh, that's all right then. 6 overs in half an hour with spin on. pfffft

2023-03-13T09:53:14+00:00

Wes P

Roar Rookie


Come on man. I know you wear your heart on your sleeve. Take the new Zealand tests, the good bowlers got wickets and the good bats made runs. Both teams. Exciting cricket with close results against England and sri Lanka over 5 days. Here we have no runs except Rohit over three tests over three days then four batsman make hundreds over 5 plus days for no result.

2023-03-13T09:52:46+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


Tempo: Thanks for raising this. The team that has won in the most in India is India itself, daylight second, and then Australia. I wonder what the Indian bowling lineup has comprised during that period? In relation to Australia’s wins, the 2017 team included SOK and Lyon, and the most recent win involved a spinning trifecta. Yes their spinners are probably better than ours in their home conditions, but the approach taken by a very dominant home team is instructive. To reverse the analogy, India started to win Test series in Australia once they developed a pretty fearsome pace attack (Shami, Bumrah, Ishant Sharma et al). However, how many home tests has Bumrah played in his career?

2023-03-13T09:40:48+00:00

Tempo

Roar Rookie


These are the teams which have won in India in the last 35 years: – South Africa in 2000 – Australia in 2004 – England in 2012 The team that has won the most in India over the past 10 years is actually Australia. Australia has 2 wins and 4 losses in that time, with England in second place with 1 win and 7 losses. No other team has won a single test match.

2023-03-13T09:02:06+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


Chris: I wouldn’t waste time with Don. He either can’t understand or chooses to ignore the stats Tempo put up earlier because he can’t accept that his view of the world might be wrong. Look for the “no true cricket fan” comment plus a flailing insult next. Classic narcissistic behaviour ????

2023-03-13T08:21:56+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


There is no evidence because we didn't try it. We have enough evidence that the work experience kids have run their race. Murphy has a future when the time is right but Kuhnemann has reached his limit. He certainly sits behind Swepson and Agar...and Roccicchioli and Manenti and, probably, Chris Green.

2023-03-13T08:11:39+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


I just happen to disagree is all. I’ve not seen one small piece of evidence from either side to convince me that more pace bowling was the answer on this pitch. To be honest the argument is likely moot because this pitch had nothing for anyone. Still only 21 wickets total as I write this. Lucky we had a riveting NZ vs Sri Lanka finish

2023-03-13T07:46:03+00:00

Arnab Bhattacharya

Roar Guru


Indore and Ahmedabad I get. But India got 400 in a Test where Australia failed to get 200+. Even in Delhi, they lost 9 wickets in a session to poor batting. Don't blame the pitch. Blame poor batting

2023-03-13T07:29:22+00:00

Wes P

Roar Rookie


It's been a BS series. Dominated by pitch conditions not the players.

2023-03-13T06:50:51+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


What stats were they?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar