Flem’s Verdict: Is spirit of cricket needed? It gives teams grey areas to exploit instead of accepting umpire's decision

By Bowlologist / Expert

Do we really need the concept of the spirit of cricket? It just seems to bring more grey areas into the game. 

I can’t believe how massive the fall-out has been after the Lord’s Test after Alex Carey stumped Jonny Bairstow in a legitimate way. 

The reaction has been over the top even though pretty much every former England cricketer I’ve heard from over the past few days has agreed with what I wrote after the Test that Bairstow was caught napping by a smart piece of play from Carey. 

All these past behaviours from the England coach, Brendon McCullum, and some of their players, including Bairstow while keeping himself, are coming back to haunt them.

And I think Pat Cummins has shown true leadership with his response to it all. He’s unflappable and has led by example and that’s kept the rest of the team calm while all this nonsense has been raging on around them.

(Photo by Visionhaus/Getty Images)

The spirit of cricket debate always seems to come up when someone doesn’t like a decision that’s gone against them in a contentious incident like this one, rather than accepting the umpire’s decision. 

Australia did that the first time around on day four when Mitchell Starc’s catch was overruled by the third umpire but England did the opposite the following day when Bairstow was given out.

The spirit of cricket should be the same as all elite sport in that you play hard but fair – do we need this extra layer on top of the laws of the game which can give people a reason to protest even though no rule has been broken. 

Malcolm Knox wrote a brilliant book a few years back called Never a Gentleman’s Game about the scandals that went on when cricket first started centuries ago.

The spirit of cricket certainly wasn’t an issue when Dr WG Grace was putting the stumps back in the ground while telling bowlers the crowd had paid good money to watch him bat in the 1800s or when Douglas Jardine unleashed his Bodyline tactics against Australia in England’s 1932-33 Ashes tour.

We grew up being told that English batters were gentlemanly because they would walk before the umpires would give them out, however in Knox’s book he wrote that those players would go for the obvious ones but stay at the crease if they just feathered one through that the umpire didn’t hear.

The letter of the law is there to be adjudicated upon by the umpires – there shouldn’t need to be a spirit of cricket code for players to know that.

It looks like the English team is trying to put up a smokescreen because everyone’s talking about that incident rather than the fact that they’re 2-0 down in the series and their Bazball tactics have contributed heavily to that scoreline. 

Australia have been counterpunching, playing their style and not getting put off their game, and it’s worked in both Tests so far. 

There were times when they’ve been rattled like when Ben Stokes was going nuts with the bat on day five at Lord’s but they’ve held their nerve.

Stokes’ magnificent knock of 155, one of the best Test innings of all time, is what people should be talking about but it’s getting 2% of the coverage compared to a stumping that was just out. 

McCullum is trying to create a siege mentality and that’s what you do when you can’t control what’s happening on the field.

I think England have got plenty of problems with their team they need to address.

They’ve made a song and dance about how they don’t train as hard in the Bazball era but I think that’s hurting them. They’ve looked sloppy in the one-percenters that can be so vital.

Their ground fielding has been much worse than the Australians, they’ve dropped more catches, let in more byes, bowled more no-balls and it all adds up, particularly when it means the difference between taking a wicket and giving an opposition batter a life. 

Pat Cummins and Alex Carey of Australia celebrate the wicket of Jonny Bairstow. (Photo by Gareth Copley/Getty Image

That can be the difference between being up 2-0 or being two down. They’re controllable things for the most part that they’re getting wrong.

I’ve heard Nathan Lyon has handed the duty of leading the team song to Carey while he’s out with his torn calf. What an honour and he couldn’t have made a better choice after all the carry-on that’s been happening. 

Very few Australians have been given that privilege from Rod Marsh down to David Boon, Ian Healy and Mike Hussey, and Carey deserves it. Hopefully he’s singing it loudly for the next three Tests.

Todd Murphy replacing Lyon in the spin department for Thursday’s third Test at Leeds will be interesting because England will go after him.

But everyone who saw him on tour in India was impressed with how he went about his work so he won’t mind it if the Poms try to blast him out of the attack because it’ll open up wicket-taking opportunities.

The pitch at Headingley appears to be very green but it also looked that way at Lord’s and it turned out to have very little life in it.

Ben Stokes speaks to the umpires after Jonny Bairstow was stumped. (Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Both teams would benefit if there’s a bit of swing and seam but if this surface is similar to the second Test then we’ll be seeing Bouncerball again with a lot of short-pitched deliveries. 

Fans were getting frustrated with the tactics but when the pitch isn’t offering any sideways movement, your last resort is to see if you can get variation from up and down bounce.

The horizontal bat shots present more risk to getting out and apart from Stokes and to a lesser extent, Ben Duckett, the batters couldn’t handle it.

There’s a simple solution and that’s to go back to traditional English wickets which encourage bowlers to pitch the ball up.

Bazball is supposed to be about providing entertainment but they need flat pitches to do that and that’s prompting teams to use these negative tactics, which is taking the fun out of the spectacle. It’s all very counter-productive.

However the pitch plays, the Aussies look too strong again and it looks like the Ashes urn could be retained with two Tests to spare.

The Crowd Says:

2023-07-06T21:09:29+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


And that is the salient point. He was dismissed for his carelessness and cluelessness

2023-07-06T08:43:31+00:00

AR

Roar Rookie


"The way Ponting and particularly McGrath carried on about it was just as unedifying as most of the English reaction to the Bairstow thing." Just as unedifying?? Um...first, they are commentators. Paid to commentate and give opinions. Second...I trust you didn't see the vision of the Long Room..?

2023-07-06T08:40:20+00:00

Michael Coote

Roar Rookie


Correct, Carey caught the ball and attempted a stumping straight away as he is entitled to do and at the moment the ball left Carey's glove Bairstow was still in his crease.

2023-07-06T08:37:24+00:00

Michael Coote

Roar Rookie


That doesn't work either, that rules out run outs if the batsman are attempting to take a single with the keeper standing back, rare but happens occasionally, especially in Limited Overs Cricket.

2023-07-06T08:08:28+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


to be clearer, was it done instantly exactly so the umps couldn't call over, the act of Carey throwing the ball (towards the stumps of a player in their crease) being the only thing that actually stopped it from being dead ball/over?

2023-07-06T08:02:34+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


which makes Broad's magnificent hamming a taste of things to come. could be fun to watch.

2023-07-06T08:01:41+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


which makes it even weirder, don't you see? he caught the ball and threw it instantly even though the batter at that stage was in their crease it was also a stumping BTW

2023-07-06T07:59:44+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


nobody appointed umpires the custodian of the spirit. they are the enforcers of the Laws. his opinion is as irrelevant as mine

2023-07-06T07:55:00+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


we had "safe". which makes no sense, 50 years later!

2023-07-06T07:49:43+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


to be clearer... I thought Starc's reaction was swear jar level. general disgruntling in the huddle. Cummins then went over all body languaged, yes he was clarifying, but he was also passively protesting in real time. it went on long enough for me to notice plenty of time for clarification off the field. notwithstanding it was pretty obvious on the massive replay why the catch was disallowed.

2023-07-06T07:46:06+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


oh BTW I thought Punter was spot on when he said fielders know and batters should just accept their word. but other countries didn't agree. so we got inconclusive fight-starting 3rd umpire reviews, soft signal crabs etc. i for one would be happy to get rid of every single review except for tight and high speed stumpings and runouts.

2023-07-06T07:43:51+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


Punter was slightly odd on this. Definitely a catch, always a catch, but starc used poor technique and should be more careful next time. I like Punter. I like Starc. I thought it reasonable to disallow the catch. I have seen the Erin Burnses and Nic Careys of the world hold those time and time again, doing the much harder dive forward move, and always keeping the ball cupped well above the turf.

2023-07-06T07:41:00+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


If it is ‘dead as soon as hits Jeepers gloves’ it’d stop those times batsman/teams needs one run and do the mad dash, hoping they make it into crease while keeper throws it into stumps (hopefully hitting stumps)

2023-07-06T07:36:03+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


I think meaning, Bairstow didn’t wait for umpire calling ‘over’, took it upon himself to decide.

2023-07-06T07:35:31+00:00

Wikipetia

Roar Rookie


so he accepted the decision after he didn't

2023-07-06T07:28:16+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


To clarify the reason for the decision and then he moved straight on?

2023-07-06T06:23:44+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Maybe Flem is right and forget about the spirit of cricket. Mankad away, appeal if the batter picks up the ball and throws it to the fielder, take overthrows if the ball hits a batter taking a run. Noone said the underarm ball was fine because it was within the rules, but hey. I think something would be lost if we went that way, but maybe that’s how the world is going - even though, paradoxically, teams are getting on better on the field and there is less aggro. That doesn’t mean the Carey dismissal was in the same category as Mankads or handling the ball when returning to a fielder or bowler. The worst you could say is it was a grey area. And in future it’s definitely one where the batter can only blame himself if they wander out before being 100% sure it’s over.

2023-07-06T06:12:21+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


It’s simple from one point of view, and maybe the spirit of cricket has been lost. But there was a reason Mankads without a warning were taboo for a long time, possibly still are in first class. big Huge uproar It’s not part of the contest between bat and ball and feels like a cheap way to get someone out, when a wicket can make such a huge difference to the outcome. There was uproar when Allan Hurst did it in 1979 against Pakistan and led to Pakistan retaliating by appealing against Andrew Hilditch who picked up the ball and threw it back to the bowler - again within the rules but something no Test player would dream of appealing about otherwise. If you did a Mankad without when I was playing grade cricket it could have gotten ugly. There is room for debate over the Carey dismissal, though as many ex-England players have pointed out it’s not unknown in professional cricket and there’s no clear convention. But it’s not so simple as saying there it’s within the rules, so no debate.

2023-07-06T06:03:45+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I was an offie because l couldn't bowl wrist. Mostly because l liked the Induan spinners, Deadly and Mallett. But getting glasses at 35 I became a "batsXY".

2023-07-06T05:59:39+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


No worries. I enjoy a stoush but I'm crazy bustard. Thanks for putting up with me. --------- In other news the Jorvik, thanks to all those who corrected me, will show the Danelaw how it's done. I reckon the crowd will be on, they're a militant mob, but we're coming with our A game. I hope Murphy takes 10 in this game. ------- The sperm donor was a Geordie.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar