Cricket World Cup Power Rankings: All hail Afghanistan, the Kiwis keep on keeping on - and can anyone stop India?

By Mike Meehall Wood / Editor

Every World Cup needs a few things to get going: the hosts have to play well to keep the locals interested, a big favourite has to start slowly and a major upset has to happen.

We got all that this week and more, with India continuing to brain the competition, Australia and England flattering to deceive and Afghanistan pulling off a shock for the ages.

The only thing we’ve not had is close games: none have been settled by four wickets or fewer and Afghanistan’s 69 run win over England is the closest by a chasing side in defeat – and even then, that was with a full ten overs to play.

Still, that’s lead to a topsy-turvy set of rankings for this week, especially down the bottom. Let’s get going.

1 – India (-)

It’s currently India, followed by a wide expanse of daylight. The question around the hosts will remain about pressure and their ability to handle it come the big occasion, but on a player-for-player level they have been outstanding and as a collective, untouchable.

Pressure doesn’t come much bigger than a match with Pakistan, either, and that was a test they passed with flying colours. Rohit is on a different plane and Jasprit Bumrah, after a long time out, is reminding everyone of how good he is.

2 – New Zealand (+1)

NZ are also unbeaten, but given that they have faced weaker opposition – depending on how rubbish you think Australia are – they are only good enough for third.

They dealt with Bangladesh easily on a track that could have been problematic, and retain in ineffable ability to just get it done, especially now Kane Williamson is into the tournament (if his thumb holds up)

Will that be enough to win a World Cup? Probably not, but it’ll certainly get them to a semi. Given how badly everyone else has done, that’s plenty for now because there’s a decent chance they get a wounded, weakened animal come that time too.

3 – South Africa (-1)

South Africa looked like the best of the rest.

Their middle order was unimpeachable and their attack was taking wickets, plus they had options with an extra pacer on the sidelines and another spinner, Tabraiz Shamsi, able to come in when conditions suit and pick up immediately.

They’re the world’s great chokers, however, and proved it in epic fashion by losing to the Netherlands. Lucky for them, they get another crack this time around, and perhaps have got the choke out when it doesn’t matter that much.

Any aura they might have built, however, is toast.

Glenn Maxwell. (Photo by Matthew Lewis-ICC/ICC via Getty Images)

4 – Pakistan (-)

Pakistan lost the big game with India but really, that was always likely to happen. The pressure on them told much more than it did on their opponents, and the collapse that seems to always accompany their clashes with their biggest rivals was inevitable.

As everyone knows, it’s not really worth trying to find a formline when talking about Pakistan, but the good news from their defeat was a score for Babar Azam and a continuation of Mohammad Rizwan’s form. 

Friday’s clash with Australia will be the big test, because both sides are fighting for their lives. It should be box office.

5 – England (-)

Fun fact: every team from New Zealand downwards has a negative net run rate, but England have the best of the bad bunch.

The general feeling is that six wins will take you through and five plus NRR should be enough once everyone has taken points off everyone else, so that’s good for England, who might end up scraping their way to the semis.

Having lost spectacularly to Afghanistan, they’ll have to make up that result elsewhere by defeating either South Africa this weekend or one of their direct rivals, Australia or Pakistan, and hoping that the other sides beneath that are thrashed.

Adil Rashid at least seems to be in the tournament now, which helps, but there’s going to be serious conversations taking place about Chris Woakes and Sam Curran, who are getting thumped. 

It might be that a few spinning tracks allow them to bring in Moeen Ali for a bit, or that a cheeky calf strain could be invoked to get Jofra Archer into the tournament.

Or, just whisper it, the radical move: both allrounders out, another seamer (David Willey) to take the new ball and Ben Stokes back alongside Harry Brook. Sensible? Debatable. Box office? Certainly.

6 – Australia (-)

That was a lot more like it, wasn’t it. The Aussies finally decided to show up at the World Cup, just when everyone on social media was collectively asking for them to come home early.

Having brought just the one frontline spinner, Australia needed Adam Zampa to perform and, finally, he did, while Pat Cummins also got involved. Glenn Maxwell was no longer sailing the ship alone, either.

It’s still an uphill battle, and Sri Lanka remain winless, so maybe we shouldn’t blow the trumpet quite yet. But it’s better than it was, for sure, and keep hopes going for another game more.

7 – Afghanistan (-)

Beating England was a huge shock, but not as huge as has been made out. Compared to England’s defeat to Ireland in 2011 or India’s loss to Bangladesh in 2007, this was a lot less unlikely. Neither of those underdogs had anyone of the standard of Rashid Khan, for example.

Afghanistan have always had the bowling to make a huge impression, so when they get a little batting put together, they suddenly become a threat. Rahmanullah Gurbaz got them going and Ikram Alikhil finished it off.

Nobody will want to face them now, and while they won’t be favourites against anyone except the Netherlands, they have shown they can succeed. As ever, the issue will be backing it up.

Jasprit Bumrah celebrates the wicket of Shadab Khan. (Photo by Surjeet Yadav-ICC/ICC via Getty Images)

8 – Netherlands (+2)

The Dutch, as we have mentioned, have won merely by being here, and their performances have been perfectly fine given the circumstances.

They’re the weakest team in the World Cup and look like it, but given the way others are travelling down the bottom, you’d not back against them getting something. 

And yet, they’ve managed it. That win over South Africa is a triumph for everything that they’ve put in across the World Cup Super League, and indeed, a victory for that competition too, as it has clearly improved the Associate nations through repeatedly exposing them to better opposition.

9 – Bangladesh (-1)

That win against Afghanistan has faded into the rear-view mirror after repeat thumpings at the hands of England and New Zealand.

The Tigers are far from a terrible team, but there’s a clear bottom four at this tournament and they are well within it until proven otherwise. 

If Shakib doesn’t get wickets, as was the case against England, or if Liton Das doesn’t get runs off the top, as was the case against the Black Caps, they are in big trouble.

Now it’s India and South Africa in back-to-back games – things could get very ugly indeed.

10 – Sri Lanka (-3)

At one point do decent performances in defeat start to add up? For the third time running, Sri Lanka did plenty of good things that might have lead to a win, only to lose anyway and, really, quite comfortably.

They were 125 without loss against Australia and totally collapsed, but even so, had the Australians in a spot of bother before letting it slide.

The batting was thought to be the problem, until the bowling was. Now, with Dasum Shanaka out of the tournament, it suddenly becomes hard to see them winning at all – lucky, then, that the Netherlands are next, and in Lucknow, where they should get a spinning track.

The Crowd Says:

2023-10-19T13:10:26+00:00

chaukspp

Roar Rookie


I predict the semis line up to have IND, NZ, SA and PAK. Sorry no AUS and ENG. An INDOPAK final would be phenomenal but looks unlikely. Being from India, I would love to see INDIA in finals and as eventual winners.

2023-10-18T23:43:38+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Or not…this is more comfortable. Surely you can’t be happy with the Australian bowling attack over these past months. Surely you can’t be happy with the Oz middle order. They are our most experienced players; they should know how to address form slumps. Instead, we drop the newbies and keep the plodders. Why? Because they are calling the shots at selection.

2023-10-18T23:15:08+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


Oh please. You're being selective with both body language and gauging performance. If the players you mentioned were just in it for the money, which you suggested, instead of being automatic selections, they'd be full time on the global 20/20 circuit. It's not a lack of interested teams holding them back.

2023-10-18T22:47:18+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Body language. Making the same mistakes. No real adjustments to improve. I think taking positions in the team for granted, despite continuing poor performance, indicates it's a problem for those players. Players like Green, Boland, Agar, Neser are discarded at the drop of a hat by contrast.

2023-10-18T21:13:28+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Players never fail because of the opposition playing well, a poor decision or bad luck. It’s always because they don’t care enough. Get with the program Tim :stoked:

2023-10-18T17:51:23+00:00

Morz

Roar Rookie


Pretty dismissive of the Kiwis. Is that just our big brother mantra thinking of NZ of 20+ years ago when they relied on Hadlee and then Crowe? They have been in plenty of white ball finals in the last decade,and sooner or later they are going to win one -and the big difference of Kiwi Teams of yore is they have several world class players - no longer reliant on just one or two guys. I'd love to see an Aussie v Kiwi final, or India v Kiwi if the Aussies don't pick up their socks..... but, that's just me.

2023-10-18T14:51:05+00:00

Tim Carter

Roar Pro


Do you have any basis for how you determine who cares and who doesn't aside from your disdain for certain players?

2023-10-18T05:50:03+00:00

La grandeur d'Athéna

Roar Rookie


I wonder how this works?!!! Baring any accident or upset, to win a world cup we must beat four teams - Australia,New Zealand, England, South Africa. We played three games,only one of the strong team was involved there, so we have still a looongg task ahead given we have spent two of our relatively easy match. Australia looks scratchy, but two off their hardest match is out of the way. For me, New Zealand is the most all rounded team, followed by South Africa. And we will be playing New Zealand at HCA, which will be a problem if we lose the toss. Add to that We will be playing England at lucknow , and South Africa at Kolkata, both of this at respective venue is going to be very tough.

2023-10-18T05:09:21+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


What I just said was, “At their best, the Aussies can beat every team even if every other team is at their best too.” The Aussie talent is best. Of the veterans that are past their best, the question is, “Do they care?” I’d say Warner, Zampa do. Maxwell does when he bowls but is blase when he bats. Smith, Labuschagne, Cummins, Hazlewood and Starc just see it as another game, another payday another performance where it doesn’t matter how they go because there’s a ‘rinse and repeat’ tomorrow. Labuschagne isn’t past his best but he does share their ‘anything goes’ attitude. I’d love them to prove otherwise but since the pub-coup, they haven’t done so.

2023-10-18T03:38:08+00:00

sedz

Roar Rookie


They are playing certainly great cricket. At pitches where commentators said it's great for batting first, India bowled first all those games and won them. But one bad game beyond SF can knock them off and thats the truth. Consistency wise they are the best team world wide lets take any series thats played at home or away.

2023-10-18T03:31:18+00:00

sedz

Roar Rookie


Don, you can say the same for opposition too. India or England can beat Australia at their best too. But I agree captaincy plays a huge part. But NZ always have a knack of winning against India in the past. It always depends on captaincy, Dhoni didn't have this pressure on him(somehow he handled it cool) hence he made sure India didn't choke in finals under his captaincy.

2023-10-18T00:35:36+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


At their best, the Aussies can beat every team even if every other team is at their best too. The problem is getting the Aussies to perform at their best. Can this team leadership do that? Most of this selected team, however, is PAST its best. That means their “best” bar is now a bit lower. They can, they should…but things have to change.

2023-10-17T22:21:38+00:00

BigGordon

Roar Rookie


I seem to recall India at major tournaments in the past decade, serenely cruising through group stages, not beating but smashing the opposition, only to come unglued when it came to the knockout phase. They're certainly playing outstanding cricket and are clear favourites to win the WC, but it only takes one off day. By the way, what's an "unimpeachable middle order"? Sounds like something from American politics.

2023-10-17T21:51:06+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


Netherlands beating South Africa and Afghans beating England does prove anyone can beat anyone, however 2 teams look miles ahead of the rest. India are looking every bit the best in the world but the one team they’d hate to face are those Kiwis - the only real big threat. The rest of the contenders - Australia, England, South Africa and Pakistan have all proven they are simply to flaky and inconsistent to be a real threat.

Read more at The Roar