'You'd be shocked': Khawaja vows to 'fight' CA ban on anti-war statement as he's told he has 'zero right' to protest

By Tony Harper / Editor

Usman Khawaja says he will fight the ICC and Cricket Australia to be allowed to share what he calls a “humanitarian message” of peace in the Test against Pakistan in Perth.

Khawaja wore shoes sporting the handwritten slogans “Freedom is a human right” and “All lives are equal” at the Australia team’s training session on Tuesday.

He had planned to wear them in the game but after media reports indicating this, Cricket Australia said he would not be allowed to.

“We support the right of our players to express personal opinions,” CA said in a statement.

“But the ICC has rules in place which prohibit the display of personal messages which we expect the players to uphold.”

His captain Pat Cummins said Khwaja had accepted he would not wear the shoes in the game – but the Test veteran indicated he was not content with the decision in a social media post later Wednesday.

“I’ve noticed what I’ve written on my shoes has caused a little bit of a stir. I won’t say much, I don’t need to,” he said.

“But what I do want is for everyone who did get offended, somehow, is to ask yourself these questions.

“Is freedom not for everyone? Are all lives not equal?

“To me personally, it doesn’t matter what race, religion or culture you are.

“Let’s be honest about it. If me saying all lives are equal as a resulted people being offended, to the point where they’re calling me up, and telling me, well isn’t that the bigger problem?

“These people obviously don’t believe in what I’ve written. It’s not just a handful of people. You’d be shocked about how many feel this way.

“What I’ve written on my shoes isn’t political. I’m not taking sides. Human life to me is equal. One Jewish life is equal to one Muslim life is equal to one Hindu life and so on. I’m just speaking up for those who don’t have a voice.

“This is close to my heart. When I see thousands of innocent children dying, without any repercussions, or remorse I imagined my two girls. What if this was them?

“No one chooses where they’re born. And then I see the world turn their backs on them. My heart can’t take it.

“I already feel my life wasn’t equal to others when I was growing up. But luckily for me, I never lived in a world where that lack of equality was life or death.

“The ICC have told me that I can’t wear my shoes on field because they believe it’s a political statement under their guidelines. I don’t believe it is so – it’s a humanitarian appeal.

“I will respect their view and decision but I will fight it and seek to gain approval.

“Freedom is a human right. And all lives are equal. I will never stop believing that, whether you agree with me or not.”

Cummins earlier told reporters:

“It’s one of our strongest points, our team, that everyone has their own passionate views and individual thoughts.

“Chatted to Uzzie briefly about it today. I don’t think his intention was to make too bit of a fuss, but we support him.

“He said he won’t (wear the shoes)

“I don’t know if Uzzie was across (the ICC rules).

“On his shoes were, ‘All Lives Are Equal’. I don’t think that’s very divisive. I don’t think anyone can really have too many complaints about that.

“Everyone in our team has their own individual thoughts, and I love that. You want everyone to being their own individual self to the team.

“What was on the shoes, ‘All Lives Are Equal’. I support that.”

The issue came to a head earlier Wednesday.

News Corp reported that Khawaja was “poised” to display the same messages on his shoes during the first Test against Pakistan starting Thursday.

Nine also reported that Khawaja was “planning to wear shoes during the Perth Test against Pakistan on Thursday that are emblazoned with slogans supporting Palestinians caught in the fighting in Gaza.

“The leading Test batter in the world over the past two years and a proud Muslim, Khawaja has been deeply affected by the distressing scenes emanating from Gaza since the October 7 Hamas attacks that resulted in Israeli retaliation, often sharing videos and photos from the conflict on social media.”

His stance was panned by former Australian all-rounder Simon O’Donnell.

“I fully respect Usman Khawaja’s beliefs personally. He should be able to state his beliefs on his own platform,” he said on SEN Radio.

“But while he’s representing Australia he has no right, nil, zero, to bring his personal beliefs and instil those onto others.”

In 2014, England spinner Moeen Ali was reprimanded for wearing wristbands with the messages “Save Gaza” and “Free Palestine” written on them.

Usman Khawaja’s cricket boots. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

“The ICC equipment and clothing regulations do not permit the display of messages that relate to political, religious or racial activities or causes during an international match,” the ICC said.

“Moeen Ali was told by the match referee that whilst he is free to express his views on such causes away from the cricket field, he is not permitted to wear the wristbands on the field of play and warned not to wear the bands again during an international match.”

The ICC rules on such matters are as follows.

CC clothing and equipment regulations

Players and team officials shall not be permitted to wear, display or otherwise convey personal messages on their clothing, equipment or otherwise, irrespective of whether such messages are affixed to clothing, equipment or otherwise and whether such messages are displayed or conveyed through the use of the specific clothing or other items (e.g. an arm band) or by the use of words, symbol, graphic message, images or otherwise (“Personal Messages”), unless approved in advance by both the player or team official’s Board and the ICC Cricket Operations Department.

Approval shall not be granted for messages which relate to political, religious or racial activities or causes. The ICC shall have the final say in determining whether any such message is approved. For the avoidance of doubt, where a message is approved by the player or team official’s Board but subsequently disapproved by the ICC’s Cricket Operations Department, the player or team official shall not be permitted to wear, display or otherwise convey such message in International Matches.

Guidance note

In determining whether a message is for a “political, religious or racial cause”, the starting point is that the ICC and its Members acknowledge and agree that cricket should be used as a tool to bring people and communities around the world together and not as a platform to draw attention to potentially divisive political issues, rhetoric or agendas.

Each case must be considered on its own facts and the ICC will take into account all relevant circumstances, including (as it sees fit): (a) the views of any other relevant team or individual; (b) the likely sentiment and response in the media to the message in all relevant countries; (c) whether the message is a ‘one-off’ or whether it is to be displayed for a longer period; (d) the purpose and impact of conveying the message.

By way of example only, and without limitation, where the purpose of a message appears to be commemorative in nature (e.g. the use of a black armband or a poppy) or to serve a charitable purpose (e.g. to generate funds or awareness for a non-political charitable cause), it is more likely to be permitted; where a message appears to indicate support for a particular government, political party or individual, it is more likely to be prohibited. Where a request for approval is submitted to the ICC, the ICC shall be entitled to request such further information as it considers necessary before making its decision and to impose such conditions as it sees fit in providing its approval.

The Crowd Says:

2023-12-15T09:01:08+00:00

Bobbyd

Roar Rookie


Concur NH. Sporting fields are not the places for talented sports people (that's the only difference between them and us} to advertise political slogans whenever they feel like it. And it's proper that the ICC have rules in place to stop or restrict that type of thing. Ussie has not achieved anything here other than controversy in breaking rules. 99.9% of people agree with the expression used here " all lives matter" but the political issues (they always appear political to me) are overwhelmingly more involved than that. I'd be surprised if the whole Australian team didn't feel the same way about "all lives matter" but I would be concerned if they all went about it like Ussie. I don't like the idea of sports-people thrusting their opinions down everyone else's throats.

2023-12-15T04:03:41+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


Palestine has been taken over against their will in 1948. Israel's response to the Hamas invasion has been completely disproportionate. They may think in name they are democratic but in practice, their behaviour demonstrates the opposite - even the US says Israel's approach needs to change.

2023-12-15T03:34:40+00:00

Jack Russell

Roar Guru


Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East. That obviously doesn't excuse any action they take but they are the last country you can call dictatorial in that region.

2023-12-14T11:33:48+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


I don’t think he’s hidden that context at all. He has said expressly that he doesn’t think the civilian muslim casualties – which are massive in this war – are being considered as important as other nationalities/cultures would be. I think he’s pretty much right. . It doesn’t matter where most people’s sympathies lie in the broader context of the war, we should be able to see the civilian casualties as equally important regardless.

2023-12-14T05:02:13+00:00

WhoDis

Roar Rookie


I know where you’re coming from. I still think it’s a misjudgment, even if he hasn’t gone through with it. I just don’t believe that being a professional sportsman gives you licence to commentate on divisive matters, at least in your capacity as a cricketer. Sure, in your own time l, on social media etc. But I don’t support turning a test match into a device for running one’s own agenda. I also am aware he’s making the point ALL lives matter and not siding with anyone necessarily… But he is still inviting attention and discourse about a conflict totally unrelated to the game. Neither combatants are relevant cricketing nations. I watch cricket to see cricket, not to have world affairs stuffed down my throat. I can read The Guardian if I want that. I do also note that he is a Muslim, commentating within the Australian cricketing community and in a wider society that is likely more sympathetic to the Israeli cause than the Palestinian (I realise that’s a generalisation and Australian culture is more diverse than what it used to be). But by simply stating all lives are equal, on a superficial level may look egalitarian but on a different level could be interpreted as reminding people of the plight of the victims on the Islamic side of the conflict and therefore divisive by its very nature.

2023-12-14T04:01:03+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Look I hate politicians getting their ugly mugs in photos as much as anyone, so I’d happily get rid of them too.

2023-12-14T03:59:09+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


No I really don’t. ANZAC Day is a Memorial Day for the sacrifice of our servicemen and women, it is not a political statement, anymore than a state funeral is.

2023-12-14T03:42:29+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


It is the essence of power.

2023-12-14T03:42:01+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


You're going to need to do a lot better than that.

2023-12-14T03:40:52+00:00

Barb Dwyer

Roar Rookie


If military pressure needed to be applied, you would ensure that it was proportionate. That has not been done.

2023-12-14T02:46:44+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Exactly

2023-12-14T02:46:25+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


That applies to the people of Israel as well, yes ?

2023-12-14T02:45:24+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


If you’re referring to this particular conflict, Hamas started this on Oct 7. This is not in dispute, not even by Hamas.

2023-12-14T02:44:08+00:00

danwain

Roar Rookie


Great comment, I'm all for Usman making this stand, but why is this any different to BLM? Is it simply because only one guy is sending the message, rather then everyone?

2023-12-14T02:43:46+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Not Islam per se, but the Arab world is.

2023-12-14T02:42:04+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


It goes back a lot further than that.

2023-12-14T02:40:58+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


Not as good as he used to be.

2023-12-14T02:40:01+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


No one equates sporting excellence with being in a war. Politicians wanting photos with winners doesn’t make it politics.

2023-12-14T02:37:20+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


No, it really isn’t.

2023-12-14T02:36:36+00:00

Brett Allen

Roar Rookie


No I do not, they are the actions of a nation that is asserting its right to exist. It is surrounded by 26 nations that hate their very existence, many of whom covertly, and some cases overtly, sponsor terror groups like Hamas & Hezbollah who’s express mission is to wipe Israel, and all Jews, from existence. Barb, what would you do if your next door neighbour openly expressed a desire to kill you and your family and continually fired shots from a gun across the fence into your home, constantly putting your family in danger ? What would you do if you were in Israel’s position ?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar