Free Sicily: Hawks skipper cleared of kicking ban by Tribunal

By News / Wire

Captain James Sicily will play against Melbourne after Hawthorn had his kicking charge downgraded from a ban to a fine at the AFL tribunal.

Sicily was facing a one-game suspension for kicking Essendon opponent Andrew McGrath, but the Hawks convinced the tribunal the impact should be low, rather than medium.

The All-Australian defender, who pleaded guilty to the charge, was fined $2500.

Tribunal chairman Jeff Gleeson KC said the panel agreed with Hawthorn advocate Myles Tehan that the risk of injury from the kick was “relatively low”.

Tehan had argued, using a golfing analogy, Sicily’s kick had “no long backswing” and if he’d kicked a football with the same motion, it probably would not have gone 10m.

But the Hawks’ bid to downgrade the penalty started badly with Gleeson disallowing their application to call McGrath as a witness.

The Bombers star had gone in to bat for Sicily on Monday, telling SEN  the contact was “pretty innocuous” and he was not bruised.

The old “players’ code” means the tribunal now generally does not take evidence from victims and Gleeson said this did not qualify as an exception to that.

But Tehan argued successfully there was “no sensible way” the Sicily kick should have the same impact grading as an incident last season when Geelong’s Tom Atkins was charged with kicking St Kilda’s Jimmy Webster.

That incident, which left Webster writhing in pain, was graded as medium and resulted in a fine for the Cats player.

The medical report from Essendon presented to the tribunal backed up McGrath’s comments. 

Meanwhile, Essendon coach Brad Scott has conceded they would not have been able to overturn Mason Redman’s one-match suspension for striking at the AFL tribunal.

James Sicily successfully challenged his one-match ban for kicking Andrew McGrath. (Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

Redman was charged with striking Hawthorn’s Jai Newcombe in an off-the-ball incident during the Bombers’ 24-point win on Saturday.

The contact was deemed as intentional and high contact, with low impact.

It resulted in an automatic one-match ban that means Redman will miss Essendon’s tough assignment against Sydney at the SCG in round two.

Bombers coach Scott felt the club owed it to their fans to consider challenging the match review officer’s decision in a bid to clear Redman to face the Swans.

But Scott, who was the AFL’s general manager of football before taking the Essendon job, felt it would have been a futile exercise.

“The AFL have really reverse-engineered this rule and they’ve written into the guidelines that an open hand can constitute a strike, and anything high and off the ball will be graded intentional,” Scott told Fox Footy on Monday night.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

“You go through the guidelines and they’ve sort of made it so that we have absolutely no grounds or legal grounds for an appeal.

“We can on principle appeal it, but we’ll lose.”

Newcombe wasn’t seriously hurt by Redman in the second-quarter incident.

Gold Coast’s Malcolm Rosas Jr and Western Bulldogs recruit James Harmes have accepted one-match bans for headbutting opponents in round one.

The Crowd Says:

2024-03-19T19:58:34+00:00

AR

Roar Rookie


The context was everything. More than 6 Essendon players swarmed on Sicily, bumped him, roughed him, he grabbed them back, and in the pushing he stuck his leg out. Sensible decision. If he had initiated the mini-melee it may have been viewed differently.

2024-03-19T10:56:21+00:00

XI

Roar Guru


I can’t believe AAP resisted the urge for the headline “Free kick Hawthorn”

2024-03-19T10:02:39+00:00

Birdman

Roar Rookie


True but the impact was low so the MRO's proposed 1 week suspension was rightly struck down. The first time Sic has had any relief in these type of proceedings IIRC. Yay!

2024-03-19T09:23:43+00:00

Doc Disnick

Roar Guru


He should have been suspended 1 week for the kick. When you put the situation into context, I’m glad he got off. Correct decision.

2024-03-19T09:09:14+00:00

Dougs

Roar Rookie


Agreed, a bit. It is obviously tough being a star player and they do cop a lot of attention. But mate there were quite a few umpires out there and they didn't see much wrong with his treatment. Many players cop this stuff and don't react like that. If you care about examples set by people I suggest it is a very poor example for young players to respond to treatment lije this with a kick. A very dangerous action. As I said a suspended sentence at least sends a message.

2024-03-19T08:28:42+00:00

dargerovitch

Roar Rookie


Surrounded by six opposition players who'd been told by the coach to rough him up to put him off his game. How'd you go controlling yourself in those circumstances? And is that a legitimate tactic? I used to umpire in U17 footy and saw the kids imitating the AFL players. Not a good look.

2024-03-19T08:01:29+00:00

Dougs

Roar Rookie


Wrong decision IMO. Definitely reportable. Suspended sentence at the very least. A v good player who still can't control himself.

Read more at The Roar