Scrumma-mogram: Wallabies bested by Beast

By RobC / Roar Guru

Hello again! It has been a good number of months since the last scrum inspection. Today, we will have a close look at the Australian scrum, focusing on the first match of the Wallabies and Springboks’ campaign towards the World Cup.

For the first eight key engagements, the Springboks dominated the Wallabies scrum, picking apart weeks and weeks of Aussie training with sheer power.

You can see immediately in the first engagement, the Wallaby tighthead pod issues, specifically Will Skelton’s inability to protect his pod.

Conversely, you can see the perfect formation held by Tendai ‘The Beast’ Mtawarira and his pod as they power through, knocking back Sekope Kepu’s pod and bumping off Michael Hooper from his side.

Harry Jones says: “I like the parallelogram of the Bok scrum: all spines on virtually the same plane. No.8 Schalk Burger is organising bums well. Bismarck du Plessis has his hands tucked under the props’ deltoids; while Stephen Moore’s grip is on shoulderblades. The Wallabies are all at different heights.”

Diggercane says: “Quite impressed with Kepu’s strength here, he was on a hiding to nothing but mostly managed to keep his balance, despite the lack of support from both his lock and flanker. Note his bind on the arm affording some leverage to try and keep his opposite from driving up and through.

In the second engagement, the Beast and his pod are still doing the job, in this case, driving back Kepu’s pod after conceding some space after the set. Very smart and powerful by the Springboks.

Harry Jones says: “Marcell Coetzee is really working on the flank to shore up Beast.”

Diggercane says: “Incredibly powerful from the Boks to keep their shape and drive through despite the angle. It appeared Kepu had lost confidence in his support, in only the second scrum.”

Third is a defensive scrum on the Wallabies’ 10 metre, which the Aussies are lucky to survive.

The fourth is a quick start by the Springboks to get their backs into space, as is the fifth engagement by the Wallabies in the Springboks’ half.

Harry Jones says: “On scrum three, the Bok locks are taking big deliberate forward steps; that’s scary. On scrum five Burger didn’t actually ever bind.”

Diggercane says: “Interesting to note the difference between the third and fourth scrums on opposite feeds. On the Wallaby feed, once the eight disengages, the loosehead side of the Wallaby scrum capitulates under the pressure that they are turned around facing backwards. On the Springbok feed they are able to withstand the pressure with seven, while their eight adjusts to protect the ball at the back.”

The sixth scrum is where the Springboks bring on the heat, leading 3-0. After hammering Kepu and Skelton’s pod again, the South Africans got a well earnt three-pointer.

Diggercane says: “Again, another great shove. Skelton’s position is awful, you can see Rob Simmons bind on Skelton up in the air, he might as well have been holding air.”

There are no scrums for another 20 minutes, where both teams scored a converted try each. Although under pressure, the next scrum was a quickly cycled Wallaby feed in their own half. Maybe they inspired the Cherry Blossoms here?

Diggercane says: “Scott Higgenbotham ends up on his knees trying to clear that quickly, almost expecting to be run over in the process.”

We then go into the last two engagements involving Skelton.

The first happened after David Pocock charged down a Bismarck du Plessis pilfer in the Springboks’ redzone. At this point the Springbok front row is replaced, and their flankers disengage from the scrum to get to the Wallaby backs. It works. The Wallaby attack is stopped.

Diggercane says: “Some nice subtleties in the scrum defence here from the Boks on the tighthead side. Jannie du Plessis’ bind slips to around the arm and he angles in with his lock pushing down. This, in turn, helps push up and angles the Wallaby scrum out, in an effort to eliminate attacking on the short side, but also stop pushing through so Burger can see which direction to go.

“The Wallabies do however manage to attack, but Pocock at the back is forced to pass from the base and further around his players, allowing the defence ample time in cover.”

The last one of this series, is how the Springboks escaped from the redzone. By using a new front row, along with Lood de Jager, they easily pushed through the Wallaby tighthead pod, now fronted by the Wallaby scrum finisher Greg Holmes. The score is 20-7.

Diggercane says: “Key was the Boks scrum continuing to stay bound and pushing through.”

That’s all folks!

Your observations are appreciated, questions even more so – no question is too silly. And anyone can answer!

Stay tuned for ‘Cheika Scrum AD: After Du Plessis’.

Please request any other engagements you want to be ‘Scrumma-mogramed’. We need ideas!

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2016-04-21T12:11:40+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Gday TF. More to come. I think on the main imo, Ledesma: - taught Check the fundamentals of the scrum - helping the Tahs pack catch up with the rest - reinforcing the WB pack ability work in pods better* *Squeak had been a good scrum Captain beforehand and EM with Cam Blades had already shored up the WBs scrum

2016-04-21T09:37:04+00:00

PiratesRugby

Guest


Thanks RobC. For me the question has always been not why Skelton did such a bad job in the scrum (and the lineout for that matter) but why he was picked for the Wallabies in the first place! He's a big guy who tries hard but he was never up to Test standard in terms of skill, technique or fitness. Why did he get picked? I got banned from GAGR for questioning the value of Skelton to the national side. Every week he'd be praised by the Tah fans for doing exactly what you showed in your series of videos. Now I can understand why Tah fans would want one of their favourites in the national side and even why they might overlook his inadequacies. But surely the Wallaby coaching staff saw what you showed? Yet they still took him to the RWC. Scrummaging across all the Australian provinces was good in the 2 years leading up to the RWC (even the Tahs got their act together under Ledesma). Skelton was one of the poorest scrummagers and complete nonentity in the lineout. I've got nothing against the guy but his selection cost either Horwill, Jones, Arnold or Coleman a RWC berth. They can all scrummage and jump in the lineout. None of them (except Horwill obviously) has had much exposure at Test level. They all would have benefitted. Unfortunately, Skelton got injured and I don't wish that on anybody. But we didn't miss him. Certainly Douglas stepped up big time. Mumm, not so much.

2016-04-21T07:21:06+00:00

ThugbyFan

Guest


Good suggestion Chookman, so now its Nick Phipps/Aaron Smith starring in Ben Hur Union, Olympic Stadium 20th August. So all the referee has to do is thumbs down for the defeated?

2016-04-21T07:13:04+00:00

ThugbyFan

Guest


In a game many years ago (too damn many, sobs) I was waiting at 5/8 while our scrum repacked again and again. I asked the bloke next to me, "do these guys play forwards cause they like sniffing bums?". Strangely our #8 and osf didn't get the joke. :) RobC, I always LOVE your Scrumma-mograms and the comments/analysis of Digger and Harry. Very educational to an old backliner. Keep sending them mate, mucho appreciated. Over the course of 2015, our scrums did improve to the point they mostly held parity even against scrum monsters like Argentina and England in the RWC. Can you put your finger on any really important flaw that Super Mario adjusted between July and October last year?

AUTHOR

2016-04-20T07:51:07+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Bryan, I think Hoops scrummaging is a lot better in 2015+ than it was in prior years. Big Willy is just so big. When he's shell backed it disrupts not just his side of the scrum, it fubars the LH side too.

AUTHOR

2016-04-20T07:43:32+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Cheers Shane. If NZ didn't do it, then maybe WB may have done it, just to survive :lol:

2016-04-20T05:31:19+00:00

Bryan

Guest


No wonder we really had issues with Tight head props with Hooper not even attached and Skelton doing his best impression of Jane.

2016-04-20T05:16:24+00:00

Shane D

Roar Rookie


Rob - as a Kiwi I am happy to acknowledge that during the early '90's NZ rugby developed some crafty tactics at scrum time. The Auckland & Canterbury teams at that time both had powerful front rows & I believe between their battles & coming together for AB tests they had an in depth working knowledge of front row 'dark arts'. This was also a period where NZ players at all levels would head over to France purely for the love of the game, red wine & cheese so there was plenty of lessons learnt over there being fed into the NZ game. It is interesting watching old games from back then though to see how few scrums went down & had to be reset.

2016-04-20T02:07:48+00:00

Hello

Roar Rookie


Hard to with a name like mine :)

2016-04-20T01:46:11+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


I'm amused by your suggestion too ,Chook.Next time Ilook at a scrum I will have that in mind. The halfbacks squeal enough already without the 'piggies' adding to a cacophony!

2016-04-20T01:04:17+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


Hey MrRobC... I forgot to thank you for all your effort (and bringing colour/ movement) with the article. Also, now, your courtesy by way of reply! Keep up the good work buddy... and glad you liked my suggestion for new age halfbacks :)

AUTHOR

2016-04-20T00:54:52+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Ginger is spared there, Partially cos I dont think he was on the paddock then. Actually the ones to be roasted are: - Big Willy (again) - Slips - HM - A bit of Frans, not - The rest is up to you and Digs :)

AUTHOR

2016-04-20T00:42:42+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


cheers Mr Chook! Thanks for looking into this. Yeah, it can get rather detailed and technical. Esp when there's around 20 scrums a game awesome idea re jockey's whip.. May not be needed considering the recent interpretations. What was telling is the Brums attacking scrum on the Tahs 5m: - Briant basically took the pushover out of the picture, albeit after a delay in the 2nd shove. - That is very interesting and has serious implications on scrum preparation re Good old days. I understand the scrum has always required a lot of training and prep: - esp Welsh ARG SA have historically focused a lot in it. NZ ENG too. Then there's Italy etc - I believe over-regulation is created by Kiwi gamesmanship in mid-90s - They would hit the opposing scrummagers on the hook - This evolved into crooked feeds, the big hit, and the race to the scrum bottom - I know a lot of NZers wont like this, whilst PeterK may smile But yeah, ironic considering many peep say ENG are scrum rule benders. Anyway that's history. I still hope it will go back to the original principles of the scrum, and not over regulated it. They will get there eventually, but only after modifying the behaviours expected of the scrummagers. I think the key is to focus on midline stability. This probably is the only major evolution needed, before gradually allowing players to start taking over the engagements: - The Ref should ensure the scrum is steady for a while before the feed - to mitigate early shoves,and other pre-engage shenanigans. - This may disadvantage WBs But in the long run, its good for the game.

AUTHOR

2016-04-20T00:13:13+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Hello Hello! ( Im waiting for you to tell me to stop saying that ;) ) There was a delay due to RWC etc. Next one coming soon. Im looking for the Rebs Canes footage, or lack thereof due to the sandy pitch. Want a replay of Julian Savea who got boggie'd in a bunker

AUTHOR

2016-04-20T00:10:39+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


hahaha. too true Dani. Then again same for arms legs, and all that vigorous hugging and pushing SCRUUUUMMMMS YEAH!!!!

AUTHOR

2016-04-20T00:09:30+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


cheers Nick. Thanks greatly. Kudos to Harry and DC for their analysis.

2016-04-19T23:47:57+00:00

Machooka

Roar Guru


Thanks MrRobC... got to this one late as I had to keep re-reading it for it to somewhat sink in! For me 'scrums' have become oh so technical, unfathomable, and performed by players who have done sort of deal with the devil. Gone are the days of big boofy blokes collectively launch themselves, like a herd mountain goats, into a collision of gigantic proportions. The contact crash of which can be heard echoing across the fields. But I'm not too blind to see that change has been necessary... I just have a giggle when even the Refs haven't got a clue as to what's really going on in the application of the 'dark arts' :) What I'd like to see these days is, at scrum time, the halfbacks of each team being given a 'jockey's whip'... just for spectator fun! Therefore my question is... would this be of benefit to the game's development, and further to get them piggies squealing?

2016-04-19T22:14:19+00:00

Hello

Roar Rookie


Thanks again for these articles RobC Keep them coming

2016-04-19T15:53:30+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


I can handle the truth. Just don't defame Steven Kitshoff.

2016-04-19T15:01:31+00:00

DaniE

Roar Guru


Good education Rob. Top stuff. You spend a lot of time looking at bums mate!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar