The Liebke Ratings: Australia v New Zealand second ODI

By Dan Liebke / Expert

Off to Manuka Oval, where Australia ruthlessly crushed New Zealand by 116 runs to claim the Chappell-Hadlee trophy, something that England will never manage, no matter how many times they inexplicably win the Ashes.

Here are the ratings for the second ODI between Australia and New Zealand.

Toss Decisions
Grade: D-

With this game taking place in Canberra, it came as no surprise that the start of play was delayed and over budget, with the toss taking place fifteen minutes after the scheduled start of play and with a rolled up fifty dollar note.

Nevertheless, New Zealand captain Kane Williamson called correctly and elected to allow Australia to run up an almost insurmountable total of 5/378 from their fifty overs.

Steve Smith in turn revealed that Glenn Maxwell was still out. Great work from Maxwell, perhaps the only man in world cricket who can find himself dismissed at the toss. And, of course, excellent work from (presumably) Matthew Wade to have Maxwell not play in either the Victorian Shield side or the Australian ODI teams this week. What a formidable foe he’s turned out to be.

Mitch Marsh fans
Grade: C

After Aaron Finch’s customary cheap dismissal, Smith and David Warner put on a 145-run partnership that was most notable for how tediously efficient it all was. Why couldn’t at least one of them have batted with George Bailey’s new bum-first stance to mix things up a bit?

Oh, sure, Steve Smith got himself hit in the nuts – something that would never have happened with Bailey’s stance – but that’s pretty weak comedy sauce.

Luckily, both Smith and Warner eventually fell, bringing Travis Head and Mitchell Marsh to the crease. Of the two, it was Marsh who provided the comic fodder, via our old pals, the Channel Nine commentators.

With Marsh struggling to get going at first, the commentary team suddenly declared that this was yet another example of Marsh’s wretched luck, because all the bowlers were bowling so much better to him than everybody else.

Now, I have nothing against Mitch Marsh. Or, indeed, his brother, whatsisface. I’m sure they’re lovely young men. Or, y’know, if not ‘sure’, then certainly at least willing to give them the benefit of the doubt.

And I think I’d actually quite like to live in a world where I could revel in their successes, such as here when the bowlers finally stopped saving all their good deliveries for Marsh, and he proceeded to pummel his way to 76* (40) with some of the most cleanly struck sixes you’d ever want to see.

But the commentary cheerleading just makes me yearn for the oh-so-delicious schadenfreude of their failure. You know, on behalf of all those other modern cricketers who sadly didn’t get the chance to win over the commentators by being adorable children of one of their former teammates.

Broken bats
Grade: B-

Chasing 379 for victory, Martin Guptill came out and teed off, racing to 34 from just 22 balls after five overs. He was the clear danger man for Australia, which is why it came as such a shock when silly old Josh Hazlewood caught and bowled Tom Latham instead. Really poor focus from the metronomic quick to take the wrong batsman’s wicket.

Guptill batted on, eventually following Marsh’s lead in breaking a piece of his bat and calling for a replacement. Marsh had, in fact, broken his bat on multiple occasions during his innings, each time wasting valuable minutes while he chose his next blade.

Is it time to restrict the batsmen to just one bat per innings? Surely this would add a whole new element of skill and strategy to batting. Yes, you can have your bats that, like Shane Warne’s ego, combine enormity of size with surprising fragility. But if they break, then you’re restricted to dabbing away at the ball with half a handle.

Worth a try, surely.

Pat Cummins’ inexperience and youth
Grade: B

Eventually Pat Cummins had Guptill caught behind following some kind of Scarlet Witch-style magical hand gestures from Smith at first slip. Don’t be surprised to see the match referee investigate this blatant display of match-hexing from the Australian captain.

The wicket was one of four for Cummins, who bounced back well after being below his best in the first game. Good confidence boost for the youngster, because what people often forget is that despite having played his only Test eight years ago, Cummins is still just nineteen years old.

Or some damn thing. I don’t remember the details.

Travis Head
Grade: F

With Guptill gone, Williamson and Jimmy Neesham did their best to keep New Zealand in the hunt with a 125 run partnership. But it was never going to be enough, if only for the fact that 125 runs is much less than the 300 plus runs they needed when they came together. I mean, that’s just basic arithmetic, New Zealand.

Eventually, with Travis Head called on to bowl spin in lieu of the rested Adam Zampa, there was only one point of interest remaining in the game. We all saw in last year’s BBL how Zampa had run the non-striker out with a ball that deflected off his head.

A neat trick, sure. But could Head now do the reverse and instigate a run out with a deflection off his Zampa?

Alas, he could not. Disappointing.

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-07T05:30:04+00:00

Ken (Sava) Lloyd

Guest


In the Old Days of TV Cricket Coverage the commentators concentrated on the Pigeons and Seagulls that got the off field attention Now its the two legged Birds the Wags and the players children that are starting to hit the screen,Wasn't it tops to see so many kids in their Green and Gold supporters gear at Canberra and didn't they stand out ,but have you noticed that the Aussie Cricket team has changed their off field Colours to Blue ,almost the same colour as Indian Cricket teams and England, come on.. Meat Pies, Holden cars, Aussie Rules and Green and Gold colours for our sporting teams. By the way how many Channel Nine Commentators does it take to change a light bulb.?Allan Mac Gillray did it on his own. Wafwom Sava

2016-12-07T02:29:42+00:00

Magnus M. Østergaard

Roar Guru


Australia is a multicultural country so get used to it! I love the mad bantz its great! Bring on the sledges!

2016-12-07T01:17:00+00:00

Slane

Guest


I'm with ya. Our Rugby teams should be made up of real Australians. You know, the ones of British descent.

2016-12-07T01:08:08+00:00

Dutski

Roar Guru


I don't think Starc was mouthing off. Look, I'm no lip reader but I'm pretty sure he said: "Careful mate! If you take your eye off the ball and duck into it you might get hurt. Please use the bat to hit the ball. It's much safer that way". Or similar.

2016-12-07T00:37:02+00:00

Snert Underpant

Roar Rookie


Great article mate. Gold star and an elephant stamp...

2016-12-07T00:24:04+00:00

Ken (Sava) Lloyd

Guest


Why is it that I go for who ever the Aussie plays in Cricket,League, Union. I consider myself a fair dinkum Aussie. So whats going on. Is it things like Starc mouthing off at the Kiwi batsman he had hit with a body line bowl.nearly breaking his arm.or the loud mouth wicket keeper continualy yapping after every bowl,Or Steve Smith goosying on his hands all the time while feildingIs it that the League and Union teams are now made up of players of Pacific Island descent.Why not call the teams The South Pacific Islanders. Is it that the Media builds the Aussie teams up too much or give the players too much press. Cricketers now have more time and exposure on screen than any TV or Movie Star. Maybe that is the reason that when a catch is made or try scored the players rush in why? because the cameras are on the Catcher or try scorer,so look at me Mum I am on TV. Why coaches especially have not told the players not to jump on the try scorers back after atry is scored has me beat ,it would either hurt your knees or pump the breath out of you. So what do I do? watch the Food Network ,Get depressed at the World News, Why havn't we a Cowdy Movie Station?Sava

2016-12-06T23:58:48+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


D- is way too generous for Kane Williamson's lack of effort at the toss. Kane deserves the cane.

2016-12-06T22:53:08+00:00

JohnB

Guest


You may inadvertently have said something serious! Your one bat idea could actually be a way of reining in the bat developments many don't like - using the monster dried out bats would be such a risk you'd have to go back to the older type that's smaller in volume for the same weight.

2016-12-06T22:52:38+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Excellent. I love the broken bat concept, although I don't think I want to know what body part a 'Zampa' is. "...despite having played his only Test eight years ago, Cummins is still just nineteen years old" - best line ever.

2016-12-06T22:47:19+00:00

Dutski

Roar Guru


Having just come out of a budget meeting at work, this is exactly what I needed. Thanks Dan for restoring some upside to my day...

2016-12-06T22:37:58+00:00

DingoGray

Roar Guru


instigate a run out with a deflection off his Zampa? Outstanding as usual Mr Liebke

Read more at The Roar