The ugly side of the fourth estate

By Les Zig / Roar Guru

I used to keep scrapbooks of Collingwood’s seasons. I’d read all the newspapers, cut out any Collingwood-related articles, and paste them into these huge yellow scrapbooks I bought from the newsagent.

There was actually an art to the way those articles fit the page – or the way I made them fit. It was painstaking, time-consuming, but something I loved doing because I loved reading everything about Collingwood, and wanted something I could look back on long after the seasons were gone.

Unfortunately, as life grew more hectic, I started to fall out of the habit. I collected the newspapers, and stacked them on my bookshelf with the intention of cutting out the articles and pasting them into a scrapbook, but as time went on, the stack grew higher.

Then I just stopped adding to it. I was just too busy. Well, at least that’s what I told myself. It’s only now that I realise that there was another contributor as to why I stopped – an ugly side of journalism had reared up, and it was one that I didn’t want to record.

The ugly side grew – disproportionately – as football itself grew as an industry. Football wasn’t always this behemoth.

In the 1970s and 1980s, you had Seven’s Big League (on Channel Seven) on Saturday nights, which would recap a quarter and a bit of the game of the round, and then give a little less time to one of the other games. If you followed a struggling team, you were unlikely to ever see them on a replay.

The Winners on Channel 2 did much the same thing as Seven’s Big League, although you’d get different coverage and different commentators, which was novel. If you were really lucky, you might get a different game altogether. Sunday, Channel Seven’s World of Sport looked at the round, and on Thursday night, you had League Teams – starring Lou Richards, Jack Dyer, and Bob Davis – which listed the team selections for that round. That was it really.

Then, as the game went national and players became full-time professionals, coverage expanded. Arguably, Channel Nine’s The Footy Show really kicked it off (although it was largely a reincarnation of the camaraderie and banter showcased on World of Sport). Channel Seven tried a number of different shows. The pay channels (in their various incarnations) did their own thing. Everybody explored boundaries, trying to find the right formula. This was the foundation being laid as media executives learned how to best serve the public their football fix.

Now it’s just wall to wall football wherever you turn. We have games ranging from Thursday night all the way to Sunday mid-afternoon (and, sometimes, beyond). There’s some football show on every day of the week. The radio station, SEN, basically cover the game 24/7. Football has gone from a national sport which had almost a niche identity to this omnipresent industry.

But as football’s evolved, journalism has devolved. Some journalists behave as if the game exists thanks to them, rather than the truth, which is they exist thanks to the game. They act is if the game is their plaything, as if they have every right to demand answers from clubs and players on issues that those clubs and players have a right to keep private.

We have journalists who hound players and clubs, who dredge up every conceivable angle to concoct a story, who exaggerate, and God knows if any of them are fictionalising to cover any gaps in an intended story. Every football show you turn on now will have a segment with some journalist giving us the inside scoop on something going on.

Now I should stop and say this isn’t criticism aimed at every journalist out there. There are still some great football writers. I’ve always been a huge fan of Rohan Connolly. You can tell he’s just a football nerd who loves the game and loves talking about it.

Some accused him of going soft on Essendon (whom he supports) during the supplements saga – but that’s not his thing; he’s not one to not only dredge up the ugliness, but exploit it for a quick headline.

You don’t see him muckraking. Emma Quayle’s another – you can see in her writing why GWS appointed her their first female recruiter. She’s excellent. Her love of the game and her knowledge shines through.

Glenn McFarlane is another I love to read – particularly his Collingwood retrospectives. On television, Gerard Whateley is brilliant – always insightful and fair. They’re out there, the good ones. But they usually don’t get the profiles of the others.

I won’t name them. You know who they are, though. Of course you do.

My query is why they’re not held accountable for their reportage, why they’re celebrated, why they’re given positions with national coverage. Honestly, they make me not want to read newspapers (in hardcopy or online), or watch the bulk of the football shows on which they appear. They are smug, self-important, and thoroughly distasteful. If I want to see stuff blown out of all proportion and sensationalised for the sake of garish entertainment, I’ll find a Jerry Springer Show rerun – although at least Springer’s likeable.

Of course, maybe that’s all it’s about – ratings and sales, which is why they operate as they do, and with the impunity that they do. Maybe it’s why their employers entrust them. Maybe it’s why they seem prevalent and get all the cushy gigs and I’ve just outgrown football media and become irrelevant myself, a relic of an era where coverage of the game had nobility and integrity, and a journalist’s love of the game – rather than of their own profile – seemed their best qualification for why they did what they did.

I miss those days.

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-21T09:41:44+00:00

Ants32

Roar Rookie


+1

2017-04-21T08:20:32+00:00

Ants32

Roar Rookie


+1

2017-04-12T21:39:59+00:00

TomC

Roar Guru


We do.

2017-04-12T07:12:08+00:00

George Apps

Roar Rookie


Caroline Wilson is the worst footy "journo" by far and Mark Robinson is 2nd worst. I cannot stand them! Just looking at Wilson's self-righteous countenance nauseates me.

2017-04-12T04:56:54+00:00

Liam Sheedy

Roar Guru


That was a great read.

2017-04-12T01:34:40+00:00

Magnus M. Østergaard

Roar Guru


I blame Ron Burgundy personally. He decided to show the people what they wanted to hear and not what they needed to.

2017-04-11T21:04:03+00:00

Steve009

Roar Rookie


And who holds the 4th state accountable Tomc?

2017-04-11T15:29:01+00:00

Peeeko

Guest


Well said

2017-04-11T08:11:29+00:00

Nardio

Guest


Very good article.....changing media has dictated the decline of footy writing in all codes. Beat-ups, sensationalism and speculation are prevalent ... too many inexperienced journos who really have not earned their spurs in the game. Shock, horror seems to take precedence over balance, credibility and knowledge. Editors have a lot to answer for .... Sadly, a fact of life these days.

2017-04-11T08:02:55+00:00

dave

Guest


Check out Ken Sakato's article on the roar today. Absolute gold. Its a refreshing break from the usual footy articles.

2017-04-11T07:32:36+00:00

J.T. Delacroix

Guest


Nice work Les. Showing my age, but I fondly recall the Friday afternoon Herald & the match previews by Ron Carter et al. Uncontaminated by stats overkill & utterly free of sub- editorial grandstanding & gossip mongering drivel.

2017-04-11T07:01:07+00:00

mattyb

Guest


I think this whole media thing has always been there,they just delve deeper now and there's more of them meaning more competition so any news they get they go with,even if it's fifth hand. Lou Richards and Jack Dyer used to stick to the on field stuff but they'd over dramatise thing. I remember Alan Jeans on WoS once getting very cranky about sensationalist reporting. Scotty Palmer used to love to do a bit of mud raking and not all his stories proved true. Then of course Eddie came along and going through people's bins became more legitimate,people loved it so the industry grew. People still love it,look at the whole Essendon saga. Strings and cables and people are making up their minds and having opinions with hardly any facts. When it's an opposition club fans generally love the mud but when it's their club not so much. It's always been there,it's just more common because people realise there is a huge market for it.

2017-04-11T06:48:36+00:00

Julian

Roar Rookie


Wilson is someone who has grudgingly won my respect. She's someone who can come across as salacious, but really what she loves is holding power accountable - the very definition of journalism. You don't have to like her personality to respect her work.

2017-04-11T06:25:52+00:00

Ryan Buckland

Expert


Thanks Seano! I consider myself more a writer than a journalist, but I humbly accept your praise.

2017-04-11T05:46:14+00:00

joe b

Guest


I was pointing fingers at Murdoch et al... yes, it is simple... it is a business that exists to make money, and if Rupert et al aren't getting good revenue, or influencing public opinion to suit, they will replace the editors to ensure the job gets done. Top down. Yes, agreed... editors should be held to account as well.

2017-04-11T05:09:23+00:00

Snert Underpant

Roar Rookie


Well written Les. Whilst I read everything I can on footy, I'm increasingly left wondering why some of the stuff was even written. Like all media, everyone's looking for a scoop and there's a lot more everyones than there used to be. Which means they're all looking for angles, real or imagined. In the end it's up to us to not follow or read the people or organisations that treat the game we all love as a business first and sport second.

2017-04-11T03:11:20+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


Wilson is the worst footy "gossip" writer there is. She's incapable of getting past her own prejudices, hatred and bias to be able to write an objective article. Barrett is a close second; everything he says is garbage.

2017-04-11T03:09:04+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


I suspect it's from the middle down - the editors have to shoulder much of the blame. Of course, there's the journalists who believe they are morally superior to us mortals and therefore have no qualms with manipulating the news to suit their own world view. Blaming Murdoch is too simple.

2017-04-11T02:08:19+00:00

Leighton

Guest


Good piece Les and agree with the sentiment. The quality of reporting has plummeted at the same rate as the number of accredited reporters has gone upwards. 'Accredited', to cover a sport? That's the first problem. A cozy little insider club has been created, full of group think and back-side covering. See the Canberra press corp to see an equivalent with a similar genesis As to the good reporters, The Roar is doing some good work so keep it up. In the mainstream press, Connelly does OK. Wilson is best when covering governance issues, however its hard for a major paper to publish this as it isn't what sells clicks. Francis Leach is great and it is a shame he has been relegated to arvos on SEN. Other less mainstream writers are the best bet and the web is flourishing with them. BTW, the HS putting up a paywall is one of the more impressive pieces of foot-shooting by News Limited in recent times. Paying to read such stuff? But any competition that is small time (AFL is so geographically concentrated that it can't help it) but with enough money to sustain an empire is going to create this problem. Who wants to rock to boat and challenge the conventional wisdom? Who would want to when they get free tickets and all you can eat pies at AFL House.

2017-04-11T02:00:32+00:00

Joe B

Guest


I suspect it is driven from the top down... the Rupert Murdochs of the world push sensationalism over balanced reporting to titillate the great unwashed, to enrage the left or right, anything to get your thumb clicking on those revenue earning headlines... and to sway public opinion.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar