How the hell was Paul Gallen not charged? Yet more inconsistency from the NRL

By Tim Gore / Expert

Somehow Paul Gallen has escaped even being charged for a high tackle he perpetrated during Saturday night’s game against the Raiders.

It is a yet another example of the inconsistency and ineptitude that we have unfortunately come to expect from those running the National Rugby League.

There was a mass of hysteria that surrounded the non-send off of Sia Soliola in Round 20 when he collected a slipping Billy Slater late and high. A lot of people thought that we’d see a knee jerk reaction from the officials and that players in the following weeks would be sent off for such misdemeanours as a sly facial or farting in the scrum.

The reaction of General Manager Officiating Tony Archer to the Soliola non-send off strongly suggested non-decisions from his officials would no longer be tolerated. Soliola’s non-send off would be the offence that broke the dismissal-shy referee’s back.

The video referee, Bernard Sutton, and the pocket referee, Chris Butler, were both singled out by Archer as the men who failed to send Soliola off (notably, Matt Cecchin was cleared of all responsibility).

(AAP Image/Mick Tsikas)

Both Sutton and Butler were dropped for the next round and, although Sutton has once more taken his spot in the Bunker, Chris Butler has been relegated to the touch line, swapping his whistle for a flag.

And when it comes to sending players from the field it seems that the referees are as gun shy as ever. This was highlighted by two incidents on the weekend.

The first was a spear tackle by Bronco Joe Ofahengaue on Titans Lock Max King in the 58th minute of Saturday evening’s game on the Gold Coast. Whether intentional or not, the tackle was awful and we were lucky that Max King was not very badly injured.

Given the fate of Sutton and Butler, it was a very good bet that Henry Perenara, his pocket referee Jon Stone, and video referee Jared Maxwell – who himself sat out three rounds following his role in the awarding of the Akuila Uate ‘try’ in Round 14 – would give Ofahengaue his marching orders.

As it transpired, Ofahengaue was only put on report for an offence. The Match Review Committee subsequently deemed it a dangerous throw worthy of five weeks on the sideline. That clearly tells us that they thought it was a send-off worthy offence.

Yet again, the officials lacked the courage to enforce the rules. That was especially strange as, at that point, the score was 28-0 to the Broncos and a send-off was highly unlikely to affect the result.

The second incident occurred on 56 minutes at Shark Park on Saturday night.

Just minutes after Josh Papalii was correctly sin binned by Gerard Sutton, hulking six-foot-four Raiders prop Shannon Boyd ran the ball completely upright towards the Sharks line. The five-foot-eleven Cronulla captain, Paul Gallen, ran out towards Boyd and leapt into the tackle, leaving the ground and collecting the Canberra prop flush in the throat with a swinging arm.

These are the facts.

Paul Gallen is still displaying staggering speed, aerobic fitness and strength for a man turning 36 next week. However, Shannon Boyd is a huge lump of beef and was bred very tough on the farm in Cowra. He was able to take a shot that would have laid out the likes of Billy Slater and possibly killed the likes of us punters.

However, the replays of the hit were damning. Gallen unequivocally ran at the ball carrier and jumped into the hit, getting a significantly taller man in the throat with a swinging arm.

(Photo by Jason O’Brien/Getty Images)

“Oooooooh! Gee whiz! Will the 300th be played next week?” said Fox commentator Brenton Speed on seeing the replay.

“Boy oh boy, that’s a high tackle there from the Cronulla skipper… He’s got big forearms too,” spoke expert commentator and former teammate Michael Ennis.

The tackle was indisputably high and, in my opinion, it was reckless.

Yet it was not even put on report.

Gerry Sutton, his pocket referee Adam Gee and even the chastened Bernard Sutton in the Bunker let it go with just a penalty.

It beggared belief.

However, what happened – or rather didn’t happen – next was a total disgrace.

The Match Review Committee did not even charge Paul Gallen for the hit. He will not even cop a fine, let alone any suspension.

And he will play his 300th game next week, ironically against Joe Ofahengaue’s team.

I asked the boss of the NRL Media unit, Glenn Jackson, just who was on the MRP that reviewed the Gallen high tackle. I have received no response. If I were one of the people responsible for letting this incident go without charge, I’d certainly want to be anonymous.

Want to know what is totally broken about rugby league?

1. We’ve got refs who don’t send players off, no matter how blatant the crime,
2. We’ve got a referees boss who takes little responsibility himself but seems trigger happy when it comes to scapegoating his charges, and
3. We’ve got a match review committee that can give totally inconsistent assessments that sees one player handed a large penalty while another one – who has quite the list of priors to his name – is deemed to have done nothing wrong whatsoever, when most students of the game would not be able to separate the offences in terms of severity.

President Harry S Truman has the ignominious legacy of being the commander-in-chief that ordered the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. He famously had on his desk a sign that said, “The buck stops here.”

He was the boss and he would not shirk the hard decisions.

The question is will the leader of our NRL, Todd Greenberg, make the hard decisions and fix this fiasco? Will the buck ever stop with him?

(Image: The Roar)

Greenberg needs to step in ASAP, because the inconsistencies perpetrated by referees, Match Review Committees and judiciaries may lead to charges of restraint of trade being levelled against his organisation in court.

Rugby league is no longer the part time game it was in the 1980s. It is a full-time professional sport. The broadcast deals are in the billions and the player payments we punters actually know about total over nine million dollars a year per club. It is big business.

The organisation administrating this big business must be professional, smart, effective, consistent and fair.

For all the NRL’s talk of tribunals and judiciaries, they are in no way a legal body. If they are going to suspend a player, they better be damn sure that the processes they’ve followed were clearly set out and followed fairly and consistently.

If they don’t, they’ll once more inevitably consign the game to lawyers at ten paces, like we had during the war between Packer and Murdoch for control of the game in the 1990s. We all remember what damage that did to the game we love.

However, if I was the CEO of a club that had a vital player up on a high tackle charge at a crucial point in the season, I’d be thinking very hard about fighting any subsequent suspension in court on the basis of restraint of trade, based on the precedent the MRP set in saying Gallen had no case to answer.

When Paul Gallen runs out onto Suncorp Stadium this coming Friday night to play his 300th game, he won’t just be booed by the Lang Park faithful because he’s a New South Welshman they love to hate, it will also be because their own Joe Ofahengaue will be sitting out up to five games for an offence that wasn’t that much worse than the one Gallen perpetrated.

But don’t boo Gallen. Just like it wasn’t Sia Soliola’s fault that he wasn’t sent off, it’s not Gallen’s fault that he wasn’t suspended. Given his reaction when returning to the defensive line following the hit on Boyd, I bet he is the most surprised of anyone that he doesn’t have to front the tribunal.

His avoidance of punishment is because of scared referees, caused in turn by their blamestorming boss, and compounded by an inconsistent Match Review Committee.

Take a bow, the lot of you.

Enjoy your 300th, Gal.

The Crowd Says:

2017-08-12T07:18:52+00:00

Mr Spock

Guest


cause there was nothing to charge him with

2017-08-09T08:09:17+00:00

Larry1950

Guest


Beg to differ Tim, Wade Graham deserved a charge of reckless at the least but my conspiracy theory goes along the lines of "they play the broncos next round so let's leave Gallen & Graham alone". Gallen threw the dead set old fashioned coat hanger tackle, old BRL followers will remember it as a Norm Pope tackle. Joe Ofengaue got a deserved suspension & you could tell from the press conference that Bennett wasn't going to defend him.

2017-08-09T03:57:16+00:00

JRT

Guest


The problem lies with Channel 9. Their edict to the referees & bunker is to facilitate a "fast open game" of 13 on 13 to appease the Betting Agencies. ( Don't forget bet responsibly)

AUTHOR

2017-08-09T00:53:42+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Strewth! Thank you. Where do I send the cheque?

2017-08-08T11:18:43+00:00

a

Guest


Because he is a protected specie he gets away with this every season

2017-08-08T09:31:47+00:00

Well I'll Be

Guest


This is one of the best written analysis, with more appropriate words, together, that I have seen written about a subject matter that is Political Correctness, gone berserk. You may well call yourself Womblat but I wouldn't liken you to our native furry burrowing marsupial, more akin to the old adage "How can one expect to soar like an eagle when one is working with a flock, or bunch of turkeys". Too true. Womblat - Well Done

2017-08-08T07:38:51+00:00

Rob

Guest


How did Taumalolo get 2 weeks for a bump on Glen when you compare the intent of Gallens high shot? I suspect their records must have something to do with being charged.LOL

2017-08-08T06:57:48+00:00

Cadfael

Roar Guru


The problem as I see it is that referees appear to be afraiid to use the sin bin/send off. Nothing to do with society just the game. We have send offs in union (the super rugby final) and in soccer. I won't even say this is retricted to league but to the NRL and other televised games (NSW & QldCups and the NYC). Country and park league use the sin bin and send off. Are referees told to not use these because that may affect a game (conversely, not using these also affects a game). The rules of the game are what causes the refereeing problem. Will the NRL look at this? No.

2017-08-08T06:11:31+00:00

Big Daddy

Guest


Trouble is you charge Gallen and Blair it opens a Pandora's box. They will have to charge every doubtful tackle. Fines aren't good enough. While Gallen's tackle was not as bad as soliola it probably been put on report or at least a sin bin. The NRL have obviously have an edict for professional fouls but not for dangerous play or tackles. Players welfare must be put as a priority particularly for dangerous and reckless head high tackles. Lack of consistency.

2017-08-08T05:36:37+00:00

DMac

Guest


The Billy Slater Effect strikes again.

2017-08-08T04:54:35+00:00

hooked13

Roar Rookie


What about all the errors players make in games? Maybe that's what decides games......... not referee's. If you want to take individual decision made by referee's in isolation, perhaps look at those games and all the errors each team makes. Not just dropped balls etc. But wrong defensive decisions, poor kick and last tackle options by players. Maybe then you will see it's not referee's deciding who wins games, but the players and even the tactics of coaches from the box. To put it all on referee's is really poor form.

2017-08-08T04:38:24+00:00

Memphis

Guest


Gallen act was bad but wade Grahams lifting of a player well past the horizontal deserved something as well if Ofenghaue got weeks. However Cronulla were behind at both times (Sutto is a whiz for "entertaining games" hence a perennial SOO choice) and they have a big game against Brisbane next week so we cant disappoint the broadcasters

2017-08-08T03:10:17+00:00

BrainsTrust

Guest


If you compare the two. Gallen was looking straight at the bloke,running towards him and jumped up to effect a high shot. Soliala was looking at the ongoing play, Slater slips instead of pulling out. The second collision was harder because you had two players running at speed in different directions and so looks a lot more spectacular.

2017-08-08T01:12:53+00:00

madmax

Guest


So you're saying AFB's shot was worse than Gallen's? Yeah right!

2017-08-07T23:05:45+00:00

Andrew

Guest


Fair enough Tim. As I said, these things are always going to be subjective, and while I don't disagree that he could have been charged, in my opinion, it was far from the most egregious shot we have seen go unpunished, so I (personally) didn't think it was worth your time and effort in your busy schedule. I site the Adam Blair hit as a recent example, which was shown a million times on replay because it ended McCullough's season. Because Blair's shot resulted in his team mate getting hurt not an opponent, it seemed to be ignored that when he contacted the Eels Michael Jennings, a) - He used a shoulder, no arms, b) it was late, and c) he hit the legs of a kicker. Given his record I thought it was a given he would be charged and miss a week or two, but how many times have i thought it in my life watching football? I didn't think Graham would ever play again after he bit Billy Slater's ear, but 105 games later he kicks on. You may think 12 matches was suitable, point is, it has been going on for years and while we should strive for a better outcome with more "consistency'', we are never all going to agree that they are consistent, because the subject matter will always be subjective, and some will think they are right, and others won't. I like and appreciate the stuff you write, but I don't think you expect people to agree with you all the time. I prefer the articles with more statistics behind them because I like that sort of thing - I have two jobs as well and one of them is working for one of the TV networks working in their stats department - in fact I think I am at the Raiders next home game, so who knows, I might see you there...

2017-08-07T22:36:23+00:00

Squidward

Roar Rookie


I was expecting a travis burns style leap.

2017-08-07T21:26:55+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


I guess we all see things differently but... Debating on the internet often forces people into extreme views. What starts of with a reasonable "Gallen's tackle was bad, he should have been cited and spent a week or two on the sidelines" turns into "Gallen's swinging arm was as bad as Soliola's" Demonstrably it was nowhere near as bad a tackle as Soliola's. Soliola's tackle was late and after Slater passed. Gallen's was not. Soliola came in with a massive swinging arm. Gallen did not. Soliola made contact with the head. Gallen did not. Slater was knocked out, missed the rest of the game and had to have a week off. Boyd was not. And yes, the outcome matters in determining the suspension. Gallen jumped into the tackle. His contact was high. He deserved a brief suspension. But objectively the tackle is not even in the same league as Soliola's. The comparison is redundant other than saying if Soliola got five Gallen should only get 1-2. It's funny, my first post here was how could the NRL get this wrong, and I do believe they did, but with some of the ridiculous overkill I feel like I'm now defending Gallen.

2017-08-07T17:02:47+00:00

JVGO

Guest


His arm didn't really swing, how could it? Gallen was stationary and jumped as if he wanted to bulldog him to the ground, he wasn't moving forward even and he caught him with his bicep above the elbow not his forearm which wrapped around behind Boyd's head. Hence he never really injured him or even hurt him. You are all just over the top hysterical Gallen haters about what was nothing more than a clumsy effort.The guy has made about 7 zillion tackles in a 17 year career and this is all you've got? Seriously? He cops worse than this every time he takes it up. Check out how many guys of the four who generally drag him down have an arm around his neck trying to screw his head off. This is completely ridiculous.

2017-08-07T13:03:29+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


I think the NRL are waiting until someone becomes a paraplegic before they act. That usually seems to be the way it works.

2017-08-07T11:41:32+00:00

Wild Eagle

Guest


Are the Raiders the biggest rugby league ever in the history of the game anywhere?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar