What wicket suits a Rabada-less South Africa in Cape Town?

By Will Knight / Expert

Kagiso Rabada’s suspension not only means South Africa will change their line-up for the third Test, but they’re likely to also rethink their pitch preference in Cape Town.

You say that kind of intervention doesn’t happen. I say there’s been such variation in the scores at Newlands over recent years that it’s entirely possible.

And, of course, given the friction in the series so far, let’s just assume that dodgy deeds will continue.

We’ve got nine days between Tests, so there’s plenty of time for conspiracy theories and trash talk before the heavyweights go at it again.

Rabada is ferocious and skilful. He’s great to watch, and it’s rare to feel that when Australia’s batsmen are the ones hopping around. He’s quick and he knows it. He scares the crap out of even the best batsmen and he knows it. He gets a bit too feisty when he’s mowing down stumps. He probably knew that already, but he certainly knows that now.

So does Rabada’s omission – after brushing past Steve Smith in Port Elizabeth and copping a two-Test ban – mean Australia now hold a big advantage when the fast bowling stocks from the two sides are compared?

On the surface you’d say for sure. Mitch Starc, Josh Hazlewood and Pat Cummins have been effective without any rising to the level of a raging Rabada. The trio are all fit for a start and have been consistently threatening. It’s hardly time for panic. It’s still a formidable arsenal of strike bowlers.

AAP Image/Dave Hunt

The batting was what let the tourists down in the six-wicket loss in the second Test.

Lungi Ngidi hit the gloves hard for a 21-year-old in just his third Test. With Dale Steyn’s heel needing more time to heal, it looks likely that Morne Morkel will get the nod to return. But it’s Vernon Philander who looms as the trump card for the home side.

He’s looked a bit sluggish in the opening two Tests – Rabada can do that to his teammates – but his record at Newlands is top notch. It’s his home ground for one. He has taken 47 wickets in eight Tests at the venue, including a five-wicket haul on four occasions. His figures of 6-42 in the fourth innings of the most recent Test there – against India – are his career-best. He’s snared three or more wickets in 11 of the 16 innings he has bowled in.

He’s consistently outshone the best fast bowlers in the world at Cape Town.

So even though the wicket generally provides more bounce than either Durban or Port Elizabeth, it hasn’t meant that the speedsters have been the ones to shine. It seems more suited to those that nibble it around off the seam. Like Philander.

Newlands was also the scene for the horror show of 2011, when Australia were embarrassed in being dismissed for 47 – the nation’s lowest Test total since 1902. Nathan Lyon top-scored with 14 that day. Thankfully only one other player from the current team – Shaun Marsh – was part of that debacle.

The deck is also likely to be similar to Hobart, another seam-friendly wicket, in which Philander thrived in 2016 as Australia were rolled for 85.

Against India only two months ago, runs were hard to come by. It was fast and bouncy. India were set 208 to win but didn’t get close, dismissed for 135 to lose by 72 runs. Philander was rampant.

Vernon Philander (AP Photo/Matt Dunham)

A total of 18 wickets fell on the fourth day of that Test – the third-most wickets to fall on a single day’s play at Newlands. The most were 23 wickets between the hosts and Australia on the second day of the infamous 2011 Test.

But those two matches were a far cry from the 2016 Test when England, batting first, racked up 6 (dec)-629. Ben Stokes smoked 258 and Jonny Bairstow blasted 150 not out. It was the first-ever 600-plus first-innings total on South African soil. The home side countered with 7(dec)-627 – with Hashim Amla making 201 and Temba Bavuma an unbeaten 102.

And in between the two pace-dominated Tests, Pakistan off-spinner Saeed Ajmal took ten wickets but it wasn’t enough as South Africa chased down a victory target of 182 with four wickets to spare.

So it’s a wicket that seems a bit moody and changeable. Over the past few years, Test matches at Newlands have produced avalanches of wickets and also mountain of runs. But spinners have also got in on the act.

So if you were Faf du Plessis – and you could get in the curator’s ear and request a Test pitch to your side – what would you ask for?

Would a speedy wicket be too risky given Australia’s Starc-Hazlewood-Cummins pace attack and Rabada’s absence? Or would you still back Philander to thrive at his favourite ground?

If you could get the curator to drop the blades on the mower a few notches and take the grass off the deck, would you take that option? Then it’d likely become more of a spin duel between Nathan Lyon and Keshav Maharaj.

One shoulder brush has caused a big shift in the mindsets of those cooking up the plans for South Africa to topple their fierce rivals. Or have they now got such swagger that Rabada’s pace partners can pick up the slack?

The Crowd Says:

2018-03-15T05:05:21+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


Absolutely, you go to SA you want to beat them on their pitches.

2018-03-15T05:02:57+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


And ABDV and Amla are probably better equipped to handle it than any of the Australians.

2018-03-15T00:40:09+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Really? So when India comes to Sydney and the pitch is green that's not doctoring then? Or when England comes and the pitches are runway grade and offer absolutely zero movement, that's not doctoring then? Every country does it. It's an annoying part of the game.

2018-03-14T19:32:33+00:00

Bazza

Guest


I think a ground should have character and play that way each yr with some variation I'm fine with that. Not change it depending on who they play.

2018-03-14T18:24:09+00:00

The Doc

Roar Guru


Everyone doctors pitches. And of course only the aussies are above that sort of action. And of course only reason certain aussies fans (and it's just a minority) want a neutral pitch is because that helps you the most because the batsmen (bar smith) have shown they struggle on spinning subcont pitches and swinging English decks. for mine it is the beauty of test cricket - the away conditions are an enormous test of technique and skill and only the best are performing. Don't blame the pitches blame your batsmen and perhaps the lack of preparation time they are afforded in between meaningless ODI and T20I fixtures

2018-03-14T06:09:22+00:00

Yawn

Guest


No they dont.

2018-03-14T04:42:45+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


You know Australians pitch doctor too yeah?

2018-03-14T04:42:08+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Thanks Mr Jones. When I last checked, I've not personally attacked your name, handle or profile, nor wonder why you chose to bring that up. It's scarcely relevant to this discussion. Be on the forum as much as you wish. I'm certainly not going to advocate a ridiculous gated stance like a Nemesis or other football zealots would, but it is a bit odd to make comments (although, admittedly, yours wasn't a comment per se) on something you've declared you have zero interest in.

2018-03-14T04:26:25+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


I'll take that as a comment, from the man who throws a wobbler when people call him spruce goose Just because I'm not watching the test series doesn't mean I have to boycott the forum, surely?

2018-03-14T03:51:52+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


I'm just surprised you'd even make a joke on this forum is all... You reading, and making jokes on such articles suggest you care a little more than you let on.

2018-03-14T02:36:11+00:00

DaveJ

Guest


Agree with those who say pitch doctoring is a blight on the game as bad as sledging. India and England have been the worst offenders in recent years but South Africa has seemingly joined the party. You have enough home advantage without ordering pitches. Perhaps an ICC panel or match referee needs to take over supervision of groundsmen. Or even pay their salaries with a bonus for a good job!

2018-03-14T01:27:59+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


Fair point. What is happening to warm up matches is pathetic. Let me adjust my position to 'Pitch doctoring is one of the reasons why there are so few series wins by away teams in the modern era'.

2018-03-14T01:26:58+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


You do realise I know they still have water in cape town right. It's a joke ya goose

2018-03-14T01:24:03+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Considering yesterday your apathy to this series, would the answer really make a difference?

2018-03-14T01:22:17+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Yup, which is why they need to 'back their batsman to handle a moving ball better than the Australians" Chris. Neither are good, but Australia have probably proven themselves to be worse.

2018-03-14T01:15:45+00:00

jameswm

Guest


If Mitch Marsh can't play, Handscomb will come in. No doubt.

2018-03-14T01:11:53+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


But they don't necessarily. In those sorts of conditions, the SA batting lineup tend to crumble just as much as the visiting lineups do.

2018-03-14T00:52:29+00:00

Pedro The Fisherman

Roar Rookie


It is only dodgy if the wicket is vastly different to what is normal (and there is no valid explanation for same).

2018-03-14T00:48:07+00:00

Tanmoy Kar

Guest


Without Rabada, it would be easier for the Australian to win the remaining Tests and the Series by 3-1.

2018-03-13T23:58:55+00:00

bigbaz

Roar Guru


Manchester 1956

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar