Mary's Wonder Women: Free Katie Brennan

By Mary Konstantopoulos / Expert

This weekend the second season of the AFLW will come to an end when the Western Bulldogs play the Brisbane Lions in the grand final on Saturday afternoon.

For the Western Bulldogs, with their win over the Melbourne Demons at the Whitten Oval last weekend they secured the minor premiership and a spot in their first ever AFLW grand final. It is also the first time a Victorian team has featured and is quite the turnaround from last year, where the Dogs finished with only two wins out of their seven matches.

They have been a pleasure to watch throughout the season – largely because they are fighters. They have been without their captain Katie Brennan for three games due to an ankle injury and will be without her for the grand final after today’s unsuccessful appeal.

Daria Bannister and Isabel Huntington were another two players sidelined due to injury during the season. But this did not stop the force that has been the Bulldogs with my favourite performance of theirs being their 73-point thrashing over the Blues in round 4.

Their opponents this weekend will be the Brisbane Lions, who are playing in their second consecutive AFLW grand final.

Heading into the final round of the season, the Lions were sitting fifth on the ladder and very few people were tipping them to beat the GWS Giants, who had not been beaten since Round 2.

Then the Lions did just that. Comprehensively. And in the process posted their highest ever AFLW score (64) with four goals for Sabrina Frederick-Traub.

Once the Western Bulldogs and Collingwood Magpies won, the Lions place in the grand final was confirmed.

There’s only one question remaining – can the Lions can go one win further this year and cinch their AFLW team’s first grand final win?

(Photo by Jono Searle/Getty Images)

Once the trophy has been raised into the air, the players have left the field and the celebrations by the winning club are complete there will be quiet. But only for a short time before planning for AFLW season three begins. I have high hopes.

We already know that the competition will expand next year to include an additional two teams (the Geelong Cats and the North Melbourne Kangaroos) taking the total number of teams to 10.

But I want more.

I want the AFLW to be celebrated and respected for the product it is and I want the AFL to demonstrate its faith in the competition being able to stand on its own two feet.

I found it exceptionally disappointing that only in the second year of a new competition, the AFL decided that rather than spending more money to promote the AFLW, they launched a product which competed directly with it, namely AFLX. And not just any product – a product with a launch including acrobats and parachuters and flashing goal posts which cost thousands of dollars to ship around the country.

There was plenty of discussion about marketing of the AFLW competition this year and whether the AFL had reduced its spend. The AFL conceded that there had not been a reduction in spend but instead a redirection of funds from marketing (because there was thinking that there would be greater awareness about the competition in its second year) towards player payments, with the players being paid an extra $477,000.

What would allow AFLW to promote and pay the players would be an injection of additional funding.

Additionally, I would like to see changes made to the match review panel so we never, ever have another situation that plays out like that involving Katie Brennan this week.

Katie Brennan will not have the opportunity to captain the Dogs in this weekend’s grand final because of an inequitable match review system.

(AAP Image/Tracey Nearmy)

Initially, Katie was offered a one-match ban for her tackle on Harriet Cordner which was determined to be ‘unreasonable’ in the circumstances by the Match Review Panel. This decision was upheld by the tribunal on Tuesday night (and the ban was upped to two games) and was then upheld on appeal yesterday.

What was also taken into account was that Katie had also been reprimanded for her conduct on two other occasions this season.

What’s fascinating here though is that in the AFLM, a rough conduct charge results in a fine of $2,000 if it is the first offence and $3,000 if it the second offence. Women competing in the AFLW do not have the option of paying a fine and instead are reprimanded by missing time on the footy field.

The AFL is correct that in the context of a competition where women are paid significantly less than their male counterparts, that a fine the same amount as the men is unreasonable.

But instead of introducing a system which reflects the system used in the men’s and pro-rataing the fine, the AFL decided that for AFLW, only a reprimand system is available.

This means that Katie, a pioneer in the women’s game, has been denied the opportunity to play in one of the most significant matches of her career. This is an exceptionally disappointing outcome and should never ever be able to happen again.

Truth be told, part of me is also exceptionally disappointed in the Dogs, who used compelling arguments in their case on Thursday which should have been used in the initial challenge on Tuesday. They dropped the ball.

I would like to see this process reviewed and changed ahead of the next season. Unfortunately, Katie Brennan has found herself on the wrong side of history.

Some very careful thought will also need to be given to the expanded competition next year, particularly when it comes to finals.

With ten teams in the competition next year, surely the case for a finals series becomes more compelling and a finals series which is not competing with the AFLM season for venues, eyeballs and support.

(Photo by Michael Dodge/Getty Images)

This weekend’s grand final will be played at Ikon Park which has a capacity of about 25,000. This is the same venue that had a lock out imposed for the first game of the competition. I am confident that the venue will sell out and am hopeful that it does not end up in a lock-out, particularly if this impacts any fans travelling from Queensland to support their team.

For next season, I encourage the AFL to dream big for its AFLW product and work towards filling up one of the larger venues like Etihad Stadium or the MCG. If this is to happen, then the AFLM season will need to be reconsidered. Should the game be a double-header or a stand-alone match? Should the AFLW season conclude before the men’s season begins?

It is interesting that the AFL decided that the AFLW should start after the Australian Open to give it space to ‘breathe’ but then interestingly decided to dump another whole competition right in the middle (AFLX).

My preference would be for a stand-alone match before the AFLM season begins. This would give the AFLW the opportunity to end with a bang and be the perfect introduction to the AFLM season which would begin the week after.

But before we think about AFLW Season 3, I have one more game to watch. Good luck to both teams competing – I’m tipping the Lions for the upset.

To those players and clubs which are not competing this weekend – thank you for another wonderful season of women’s footy. I can’t wait to see what you can all do again next year.

The Crowd Says:

2018-03-24T03:28:47+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Guest


Cheers Col. I started a new job 4 months ago requiring a lot more effort than my previous one and won't be able to comment as much this year.

2018-03-24T03:13:44+00:00

Aligee

Guest


I have seen Katie Brennan play and i reckon she verges on dangerous or reckless play quite a bit, she needs much better self control, both for her own safety and others.

2018-03-24T01:33:39+00:00

handles

Guest


There is the point exactly. Different comps have different rules and punishments, not based on some evil patriarchal plan to demean or discriminate, but based on the reasoned judgement of those running the competition about what is required to adequately and appropriately deter dangerous play. Using sexual discrimination as a "one-size-fits-all" argument against anything that appears to disadvantage a particular woman is totally ridiculous, and damages the real cause of equality. Bah.

2018-03-24T01:30:05+00:00

handles

Guest


Mary, if you pro-rate the fine, you are being sexist. Why is it only worth $250 to put a woman player at risk of injury when it is worth $5000 to do it to a man? Are you saying the wellbeing of female players is somehow less valuable than the wellbeing of male players? We don't pro-rate fines for rough play between the first year low draft pick players earning $140,000 and the $1,000,000 players. Why should it make sense to pro-rate between men and women?

2018-03-23T23:30:34+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


But you don’t have an issue with the lack of fines for Brennan’s two previous warnings? Male players would have lost money both times. Can’t have your cake and eat it too.

2018-03-23T23:03:33+00:00

me too

Guest


under which men's system - the vfl, wafl, sanfl, cafa, warnambool and districts, riverina schoolboys? etc etc? different comps have different rules and different penalties. both were in place before the incident occurred. it makes no sense to argue against it on the basis of another competition - you argue it on the whether or not the penalty is fair given the crime and the history of the offender and the realities of the competition and the impact upon the lives of its players. Those people arguing for a pro rata fine system forget that these players have a second income, most afl players don't - so basing it only on football wages would see the fine reduced to such a small amount it wouldn't be a deterrent - certainly not in the event of a final. And there is no pro-rata in afl - buddy franklin is fined the same rate as a first year player on a tenth of his income.

2018-03-23T22:35:51+00:00

Pedro The Fisherman

Roar Rookie


­I'll let Jarrad Waite and Koby Stevens know that they should head to the HRC and appeal the suspensions they received last year for sling tackles.

2018-03-23T22:33:41+00:00

Dalgety Carrington

Roar Guru


“shoving it down people’s necks”? You poor delicate thing. It must be hard for you to be so stricken by your own bitter feelings you can’t help but cast yourself as the victim to justify it.

2018-03-23T15:27:35+00:00

Scuba

Guest


I would prefer that we didn't have AFLW on tv because it's an awful fourth rate product but that's not going to stop people from shoving it down people's necks.

2018-03-23T15:23:00+00:00

Scuba

Guest


Once an ambulance chasing bottom feeder, always an ambulance chasing bottom feeder.

2018-03-23T13:25:40+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Not sure taking on the AFL is really good for the AFLW. It needs all the support it can get and the AFL is pouring in a lot of money into it. The AFL could get cold feet very quickly if every minor drama ends up at the Human Rights Commission. I also suspect the case would be hard to argue given they are essentially different competitions with different rules in several areas.

2018-03-23T11:24:51+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Haha, I have no time for rabid idealists on either side of the spectrum Benny I'm all about the words written, not the person writing them. It's just that certain people tend to write the same stuff, over and over

2018-03-23T11:13:56+00:00

I ate pies

Guest


It wouldn’t be a workday if you and I weren’t hurling insults at each other Paul. It gets me through the week.

2018-03-23T10:30:38+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


And yet, the grading system for offences IS the same. The comparisons you're making all relate to gameplay adjustments to compensate for women's lower level of strength and power. None of that should matter when it comes to penalties. Look at women's tennis - they have less sets in majors but they are still subject to the same kinds of penalties for offences as the men are. I don't have an issue with the way Christian applied the system, he just followed the prescribed process. I have a problem with a system that delivers a harsher penalty for a woman than it does a man for the same offence.

2018-03-23T09:01:51+00:00

Sam

Guest


Well,Katie is not letting this one go easily. http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-23/katie-brennan-takes-afl-rules-to-human-rights-commission/9578830

2018-03-23T08:54:54+00:00

Col from Brissie

Roar Guru


Hi Dougie, good to see you are still around - I thought you had disappeared.

2018-03-23T08:02:33+00:00

Paul D

Roar Guru


Hard hitting stuff there pies. Bet you’ve been dying to cut/paste that for weeks

2018-03-23T06:35:25+00:00

Ben

Roar Guru


Well said mate. Why is it that it always seems to be the most entitled, privileged people that are the most ungrateful.

2018-03-23T06:20:29+00:00

Cat

Roar Guru


I disagree. The AFL wants sling tackles stopped.

2018-03-23T04:25:16+00:00

Ben

Roar Guru


Mary, you couldn't even answer Cat's question. Would you rather see the AFLW player payments go back down to what they were originally (which is still a gross overpayment for the spectacle they offer) so that they can put that money into marketing a competition that loses them money? Either way, it's actually the AFL and sponsors that lose, not the AFLW players.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar