The great integrity of Paul Gallen

By Tim Gore / Expert

“I’m me. I can’t put on airs. I’m not a phony. I know the way I am hurts me more times than it helps. But somehow it’s all tied up with my integrity, and my integrity is the last thing I’m going to let you take from me.” – Tony Dorsett, NFL Hall of Fame running back.

On August 14, Paul Gallen – the great warrior from the Shire and the oldest player in the NRL – will turn 37.

Since he debuted in Round 15, 2001 – 17 years ago – there have been few more divisive players in the game.

Sharks supporters adore him, as do many NSW Blues fans. However, Gallen is despised by far more.

Depending on who you ask, he is seen as anything from a thug, a bully, a cheat, and – of course – completely uncultured.

But, say what you will about Gallen, he is a man of great integrity.

When you look at his record of crimes and misdemeanours it isn’t hard to see why lots of people aren’t fond of him.

In 2003, he was sent off for a head-high tackle on Newcastle’s Sean Rudder. The following year he was suspended for two weeks after the judiciary found him guilty of instigating a fight with Wests Tigers’ John Skandalis.

In Game 3 of the 2007 State of Origin series, he hit Tonie Carroll high in a tackle and then proceeded to start a brawl, commenting afterwards that the fight was “good for the game”.

That same season he head-butted Roosters player Shane Shackleton, was reported for a head high tackle on Ben Creagh, and he got into a fight with his teammate Reece Williams.

[latest_videos_strip category=”rugby-league” name=”League”]

The following season, Gallen really stepped it up a notch. He was suspended for trying to rip the stitches out of Anthony Laffranchi’s head wound, was accused of grabbing Gold Coast player Josh Graham’s testicles, and he slapped the head of Josh Cordoba while the Eels prop was lying unconscious on the ground.

In 2009, he racially abused Mickey Paea and was also issued a with a criminal infringement notice for urinating in public, near the head of a drunken friend.

In 2013, he was vilified for his thumping of Nate Myles in Origin 1, an action that led to punching being banned in the NRL.

And, of course, in 2014 the Peptides scandal engulfed and nearly destroyed his beloved club.

So why on Earth, I hear you ask, do I think he has any integrity, and why do I want to celebrate it?

Firstly, Gallen is honest about who he is and what he thinks, and he has strong principles.

The problem for most people is that they don’t share his principles – or he doesn’t share theirs – and, as a result, they are indignant about him being honest and up front about what he stands for.

There are loads of examples that demonstrate his integrity.

In Game 1 of Origin 2013, you could see that Myles was playing the role of mongrel. He took smashed every New South Welshman he could and roughed them up constantly. A lot of it was sneaky stuff too, like facials and leg twists.

After one tackle, Gallen told referee Shayne Hayne that Myles was deliberately twisting his knee, trying to reinjure it. Hayne seemed to show little regard for the report.

So, at their next meeting, Gallen took matters into his own hands, clobbering Myles’ sizeable melon with three huge punches.

AAP Image/Action Photographics, Robb Cox

I’m still amazed that Myles stayed on his feet. What I wasn’t amazed about was that Myles’ enthusiasm for going hard at the Blues by any means necessary was distinctly curtailed after that point.

The subsequent hysteria saw Gallen’s actions soundly vilified and the beloved biff – an aspect still mythologised by the Channel Nine coverage – wiped out.

However, all Gallen had done was hold Myles to account for his actions, something the referees hadn’t bothered doing.

He backed up his words with action. That’s integrity in my book.

When the whole world was exploding about Todd Carney doing the ‘bubbler’ at Northies, there weren’t too many saying trying to defend him. In fact, most people were running the other way. However, Gallen came out and said we should leave Carney alone, because he wasn’t hurting anybody.

While Carney’s actions weren’t the best look for the NRL – and they certainly hurt the man himself – Gallen was right. Carney wasn’t drink driving, or assaulting anyone. He was just doing a party trick. It’s a safe bet that Gallen thought that the real crime was the taking and sharing of the photo.

You can be as disgusted as you want by Carney’s actions but that doesn’t mean Gal has to be. And he had the courage to stand up for his teammates no matter how unpopular it might be. That’s integrity.

AAP Image/Dan Himbrechts

When covering the NRL you ask players and officials lots of questions to try and get a deeper insight into how they tick and their intentions. Mostly though, your questions get met with strings of media-safe clichés that have all the flavour of cardboard.

Not so with Gallen. He is a joy to interview, answering questions without fear. Why? Because he has the courage of his convictions. In other words, he has integrity.

I was extremely lucky to be doing the sideline for ABC Grandstand at Canberra Stadium on July 18, 2015. It was Gallen’s 250th game and it was a cracker, with the Sharks winning by one in golden point.

Following the match, Gallen did a lap of the ground, meeting every Sharks fan he could at the fence. While he was doing it, I interviewed him for a good five minutes.

It remains one of my favourite moments as a broadcaster: witnessing the genuine bond between the player and his adoring fans.

One of the questions I asked him was whether he’d ever thought of going to another club. I assumed, especially given the occasion, he’d say something like, “No, never! I love the Sharkies and I love the Sharkies fans!”

Instead, he said something along the lines of, “Absolutely I did. There were a few times I genuinely considered other offers. It just worked out that I’ve always ended up staying with the Sharks – and I’m glad I have.”

AAP Image/Action Photographics, Brett Crockford

And that’s where you find the greatest integrity in Paul Gallen. Lots of people are now gleefully willing the Sharks to get five more losses so that Gallen can hold the record for the most amount of losses by a player – 161. However, whether he takes that record or not, those losses speak of his greatest integrity.

He has stuck by his Sharks in the darkest of times, when he could easily have gone elsewhere. The only reason he has lost so many games (he still has almost a 50 per cent win rate overall) is because he didn’t jump ship to a stronger team when Cronulla were struggling. He could have got great money and possibly won premierships elsewhere. That’s integrity.

Paul Gallen has no subtext or subterfuge to him, and he certainly has little time for political correctness. He’ll never try to convince you that his shit doesn’t stink. If you don’t like it, well, he doesn’t care. What you see is what you get. And what you get are no apologies, no hypocrisy and a bloke with a whole heap of integrity.

Don’t you forget it.

The Crowd Says:

2022-05-13T03:06:36+00:00

Aidan Booker

Guest


The most ridiculous opinion I have ever seen. Here is the definition of integrity which you have missed: he quality of being honest and having strong moral principles. If I did one of the things you listed above, at my workplace I would be sacked and banned from the profession and possibly charged by the police. Every Qld watching that fight was loving it and the violent ones amongst them were wishing they were Tervieski.

2018-07-27T03:10:29+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


Imagine a football team coached by Cheika and captained by Gallen. Ugh.

2018-07-27T01:08:36+00:00

Renegade

Roar Guru


Great article Tim. Very polarizing topic but this is a really well written piece... sticking to your guns as well just like the person of interest within the content. Gallen's personality will lead to a decent post-football career I hope, one of the few that doesn't stick to the script.

2018-07-27T01:03:23+00:00

Renegade

Roar Guru


Well articulated Bunney and agree with the end of your summary, so true.

2018-07-27T01:03:22+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Probably good that I never did then hey? I merely pointed out that has a record of doing something wrong but never taking responsibility for his actions.

2018-07-26T23:33:25+00:00

WQ

Guest


Well said mushi

2018-07-26T22:55:45+00:00

Eden

Roar Rookie


Agree, I think we could do with a few more playing the heel. Bit more colour and drama

2018-07-26T21:34:29+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


I’m sure we both know that if a court or academic panel of some kind had to decide what definition of integrity Tim was applying in this article, they would go with the one from Wikipedia. The term ‘strong morals’ refers to the strength or intensity with which the morals are held and adhered to. It doesn’t refer to some sort of theoretical objective level of righteousness of one moral belief (say the inalienable the right to own property, which most would agree is pretty important) compared to another ‘lesser’ moral belief ( say, to not eat meat on Friday, which even the people who believe Int it would regard as relatively trivial by comparison ). That has to be the meaning, because if integrity only exists with reference to ‘strong morals’, then it would be impossible to act with integrity in relation to trivial matters. Gallen’s moral beliefs may be problematic, but he has been pretty consistent in adhering to them throughout his career. Gallen’s change of behaviour after getting chewed out (if the story is true) is actually a good demonstration of how a man of integrity would act. He came to realise that he had been acting like a tool, developed a new outlook, resolved to change his behaviour in accordance with that new outlook and has behaved consistently with that outlook ever since. Having integrity doesn’t mean that you can never change your views on things, that would prevent people from maturing and integrity is often a sign of maturity. It would be different if he had flip flopped on his behaviour since then.

2018-07-26T20:44:45+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


I think you meant: “Unsurprisingly, there ARE an awful amount of posts...” Integrity is about being consistent in applying standards of behaviour.

2018-07-26T20:23:17+00:00

Gray-Hand

Guest


Think you meant: “Unsurprisingly, there ARE an awful amount of posts...” Integrity is about being consistent in the standards that one applies.

2018-07-26T15:02:10+00:00

Adz Sportz

Roar Guru


I think it's more of a case of don't break the law, don't bring the game into disrepute and don't take peptides!

2018-07-26T14:50:35+00:00

The Duad

Guest


Moral integrity vs personal integrity. Consistency, like honesty and loyalty are only virtuous when they serve more encompassing principles or right and good (not mafia loyalty), and further truth where it is good. We seemingly always think the truth is good. I very much doubt it.

2018-07-26T12:56:39+00:00

CJ

Guest


We live in a very judgmental age as far as sportsmen are concerned. It is fashionable now to expect them to be paragons of virtue which seems quite perverse to me. He is his own person and let he/she who is without sin throw the first stone

2018-07-26T12:47:54+00:00

Bad Spelling and Punctuation

Guest


Unsurprisingly, there is an awful amount of posts that seem insistent on quoting multiple ‘sources’ for definitions. It however does seem hypocritical that the vast majority of these posts are littered with grammatical errors. How can one expect their opinion to be viewed with any level of credibility whilst simultaneously displaying the inability to type simple sentences correctly?

2018-07-26T11:03:11+00:00

nomoregal

Guest


Its Gal's moral code is wrong. He might have integrity (by your definition) in executing that code but that does not make it right. A certain second world war leader had exceptional integrity and belief in what he was doing but that doesn't prevent him from being considered the biggest despot in history.

2018-07-26T09:57:12+00:00

Kurt S

Roar Pro


I Agree with your points, Matt H. In his early to mid career he was less than a stellar example of what the governing body was looking for in a pin up style player. His work ethic and courage can't be called into question. But at 37 years of age and having had more chances than a cat with a rabbit's paw, you would hope he has finally learnt something.

2018-07-26T09:41:07+00:00

Molly’s Hatchet

Guest


No , not at all, Snowflake is still appropriate, hey Snowflake.

2018-07-26T09:20:07+00:00

Kurt S

Roar Pro


Tim, in regard to the Gallen - Myles incident it seems Gallen did not get the result he wanted from the ref, so decided to take the onus upon himself and dish out his own justice. That seems more like vigilantism than integrity. It borders on bringing the game into disrepute by actively discounting the ref's decision. To say that Carney only hurt himself is selfish and misinformed by Gallen. From memory, the Sharks at the time were without a major sponsor and not in the best financial health. Then their prized playmaker, who is paid, in part, to be an ambassador for the team. To be an ambassador to sell merchandise, get the turnstiles moving and convince corporate Australia to give the team money for good exposure. Well they got exposure alright. They got some clown who doesn't realise how lucky he is and what he is being paid for exposing himself like a schoolboy on the back page. And Gallen thinks no one else but Carney as affected. Wow! Do we even need to bother with the peptides? If Gallen honestly thinks he was right in his views on those three points and therefore followed through with integrity , he has had too many head clashes.

2018-07-26T07:20:40+00:00

oldtimer

Guest


It's easy to call Gallen a grub from the same place.

2018-07-26T07:11:52+00:00

Adz Sportz

Roar Guru


Gallen always plays his heart out... I'll give him that. But personally I wouldn't put the words "Gallen" and "Integrity" in the same sentence.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar