Australian Test bowlers show guts in Dubai

By Ronan O'Connell / Expert

Faced with a dead pitch, oppressive heat and skilful Pakistani batsmen, Australia’s bowling attack refused to wilt on Day 1 of the first Test in Dubai yesterday.

At 0-199 at tea, Pakistan’s stubborn openers looked to have broken the Australian bowlers, who had been neutered by an awfully flat deck and drained by 39-degree temperatures.

Veteran Mohammad Hafeez had lifted the pace, scoring 65 from 94 balls during the second session to head to the break unbeaten on 113.

His partner, 22-year-old newcomer Imam-ul-Haq, had been greatly impressive playing the anchor role with 75 from 181 deliveries.

As the final session started it was hard to see from where Australia could conjure a wicket.

Number one spinner Nathan Lyon had been tidy yet unthreatening. Pace spearhead Mitchell Starc had caused the most problems but was bereft of luck. Veteran seamer Peter Siddle had rarely induced a false stroke.

Any pressure built up by that trio had typically been released by inexperienced left-arm spinner Jon Holland, who struggled to find a consistent length in the first two sessions, giving up 60 runs from just 15 overs.

The Pakistani batsmen must have looked at that final session as if it were a bulging plate of Biryani just waiting to be devoured. So often in third sessions such as this, the graft of batsmen earlier on earns play time for them and their teammates as the ball weathers, the bowlers fade and boundaries flow.

This looked set to unfold as, first ball after tea, a wide Starc delivery was slashed past point by Hafeez.

(AAP Image/Dave Hunt)

The 37-year-old had looked skittish at times in the second session, lobbing several shots just wide of fieldsmen, and being offered a reprieve at long off by Mitch Marsh after he was beaten in the flight while charging Holland.

Imam-ul-Haq had been comparatively serene yet it was he who opened the gate for Australia in just the second over after tea.

The left-hander tried to cut a Lyon delivery which was too close to his body and edged through to wicketkeeper Tim Paine. Australia then set about trying to suffocate Hafeez and first drop Azhar Ali, a man who has dominated them in the past.

Lyon, in particular, was outstanding, giving up only two runs from his first four overs of the final session. The slowing of the run rate appeared to frustrate Hafeez, who likes to score swiftly.

He was almost LBW trying to flick Siddle across the line, and then nearly chopped on as he attempted to cut a delivery from the Victorian which was too straight to allow that stroke.

Two balls after that, Hafeez’s fortune ran dry and he was caught in front by Siddle.

Despite his selection being questioned by many people, including myself, the 33-year-old seamer was fantastic yesterday.

At one point during his spell after tea, Siddle sent down a remarkable 27 consecutive dot balls. Azhar was blanketed by the veteran and the Pakistani eventually became restless.

On 18 from 79 balls, he aimed a lofted drive at a well-flighted delivery from Holland. When the ball dipped on Azhar he was unable to change his stroke and succeeded only in chipping the ball to Starc at mid-off.

It was the epitome of a team wicket, one earned through collective effort rather than individual brilliance.

Siddle finished the day with figures of 1 for 23 from 15 overs on a pitch which was putrid for fast bowling, offering no pace, bounce or seam movement.

While Starc is not described as ‘big-hearted’ or ‘courageous’ as often as Siddle, he too showed admirable tenacity yesterday in spite of a surfeit of luck and awful conditions.

Even when he went down with a nasty cramp in the third-last over of the day he didn’t relent. Not only did he stay on the field but he delivered the final over of the day while clearly in discomfort.

His pace was frequently in the mid-140s over the first two sessions and remained lively even during the gruelling final session.

Starc easily could have ended with two or three wickets but it was not his day. Holland, meanwhile, was yet again underwhelming at Test level. The left-armer deserved to be picked based on his sterling efforts in first-class cricket, having taken 77 wickets at 21 over the past two years, including six wickets in Australia’s only warm-up match.

Yesterday, however, his jittery performance was reminiscent of his debut Test series two years ago in Sri Lanka, where he bled runs on pitches tailor-made for spinners.

This Dubai surface was not nearly as helpful for slow bowlers yet, even had it been, Holland still would have been unlikely to flourish given his inaccuracy. He did improve as the day went on due, in a large part, to finally mixing up his speeds and trajectories after being too slow and loopy earlier on.

Lyon had no such problems.

(Photo by Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images/Getty Images)

The veteran off-spinner kept the Pakistani batsmen guessing throughout the day by continually changing up his speed, flight and delivery points.

He bowled noticeably straighter than he does in Australia, targeting the stumps. The pitch, however, offered Lyon little encouragement and tested his mental strength.

Rather than trying too many things, and losing his rhythm, the 30-year-old stuck to his plans and played a crucial holding role, particularly in the first and third sessions.

In the final session, Lyon returned the incredible figures of 1 for 8 from 11 overs. That effort was indicative of the terrific resilience displayed by the Australian attack as the day dragged on.

Granted, at 3 for 255 Pakistan are in a commanding position and deserve to be thanks to their wonderful opening stand. But it could have been far worse for the Australians had they disintegrated under the blazing Dubai sun.

They will start day two with immediate access to a new ball and the outside chance of keeping Pakistan to a below-par total on what is a belter of a pitch.

The Crowd Says:

2018-10-08T13:35:31+00:00

Tanmoy Kar

Guest


Australian bowlers did well to bundled out Pakistan within 500 runs.

2018-10-08T06:20:12+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Paine could always bowl Marsh to give Starc and Siddle some support. Unless Mitch is injured, one over from him yesterday was a serious mistake on Paine's part. Go back 18 months and the pace bowling workload was the main justification for Mitch being picked. Now, we don't throw him the ball. I realise that Steve Waugh stopped bowling as much when he started specialising as a batsman but would suggest it was after more than one decent series with the bat. In fact, Waugh was regularly bowling several overs an innings in 1999, even though he had scored 20 tests tons and was averaging 48+ as a batsman. Hopefully, it was just a rookie error from Paine.

2018-10-08T06:02:26+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


CA seem to prefer test matches going five days to maximise attendance figures so modern pitches are generally lifeless. Not sure if its a preference of runs over a contest or recognition that modern batsmen are very poor in bowler friendly conditions. Either way it seems there is rarely a contest in modern test cricket. Easy fix for these "win the toss, bat and other team is out of the game" pitches. Remove the toss and give the away team the option to bat or bowl first.

2018-10-08T05:52:25+00:00

John Erichsen

Roar Guru


Surprised Paine undervalues Mitch Marsh's bowling. Prior to the score being 0/200 and the pitch offering nothing to anyone, he should have been tried.

2018-10-08T05:44:47+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


I'd go new ball as I think the ball had stopped moving a bit by the end of the day, well at least that is what the radio commentators where saying.

2018-10-08T05:42:52+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


That is why I think it is starting to dawn on cricket as a whole that the game is better when the conditions favour the bowlers at least slightly. CA of course will be the last to realise this or they just prefer runs over a contest between bat and ball. Variety is good so you don't want all pitched to be the same but on average give us bowler friendly decks.

2018-10-08T05:04:17+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


I'd go old ball, but yeah tough choice.

2018-10-08T04:22:32+00:00

Brian

Guest


That's pretty much how Adelaide Oval and the SCG were for years, win the toss and bat every time. Back when Mark Taylor was captain I'll be surprised if he ever elected to bowl.

2018-10-08T03:12:35+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


I'd prefer that too but Burgy is correct.

2018-10-08T03:03:13+00:00

Nudge

Roar Rookie


Got to have some type of hope James,so that’s what we need to do. Keep them under 400. Big decision to start the day for Paine. Does he take the new ball very first thing, or continue on with the old one which was reversing a considerable margin, and because of its softness very tough to score off. If they stick with the old ball for 4 or 5 overs and it doesn’t come off, in that temperature Siddle and Starc would only have a couple of overs left each with the new one. I reckon we take the new one straight away and see while the bowlers are fresh whether we can rip in early and take 3 in the first hour. There may be just a tiny bit of sideways movement now the pitch is a day old. Tough choice either way

2018-10-08T02:58:58+00:00

Pedro

Guest


While the pitch was very flat there was significant reverse swing for Siddle in the last session and Lyon was starting to get some turn. I think it was pretty tough batting in the final session and 400 in the first innings will be plenty.

2018-10-08T02:39:15+00:00

AREH

Roar Guru


Regardless, people felt he was entitled to selection before those two because he's taken more wickets than anybody else across the last three Shield seasons.

2018-10-08T02:22:19+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


Khawaja and Finch will open with Labuschagne at 6, like in the tour match

2018-10-08T02:20:17+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


In retrospect, not sure why everyone was so sceptical about Siddle. 33 isn’t that old for a seam bowler. And he bowls as quick as than Tremain, who many of us thought was entitled to selection ahead of Neser and Doggett. I watched a couple of overs of Tremain in the JLT Cup and he didn’t get one ball over 130.

2018-10-08T02:18:17+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


I'd rather have Khawaja opening. I'm assuming it'll be Labuschagne and Finch? I'd prefer Labuschagne and Khawaja, SMarsh 3, Head 4, Finch 5, MMarsh 6

2018-10-08T02:01:17+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


my concern is that there is only one side in the game from day one and that's based on luck. I take your point about being patient but this pitch at present reminds me a lot of that road that was served up in Melbourne last year, where one of the best attacks in world cricket could hardly take a wicket. There needs to the something in a pitch for a bowler. It doesn't have to be much but it has to be there, otherwise captains win the toss effectively win the game, assuming their blokes can bat a bit.

2018-10-08T00:42:50+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


I'll be excited if this happens. I would suspect it would be a very long time since two players scored centuries on debut. And even longer since it happened away from home. I think more realistically, we have to look to Khawaja and the Marshes for the platform and hope one of the three players on debut contributes.

2018-10-08T00:01:08+00:00

Tanmoy Kar

Guest


In a dead pitch like Dubai why Pakistan playing 6 regular batsmen one can not understand, to save the Test match instead of winning it?

2018-10-07T23:53:44+00:00

big joe bumble

Guest


I think we did ok i the field yesterday. Finch to go large on the flat deck. I think Head will tonne up on debut too.

2018-10-07T23:48:58+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


I'm trying not to think about our batting until after our bowling is done. A team with three on debut, no specialist openers, containing barely a first class career average over 40 in foreign conditions after two days in the field doesn't bear thinking about.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar