When you take the wrong rugby road, turn back

By Banjo Kelly / Roar Rookie

The Wallabies have gone down the wrong track and do indeed need to turn back. Spring is for Spring cleaning!

Was Michael Cheika’s rant at half time responsible for the Wallabies miraculous, second half turn around? Did asking the reserve front row, plus Bernard Foley, Dane Haylet-Petty and captain Mie Hooper to stand up, like naughty schoolboys work a treat before storming out? Good theatre yes, but who had a quiet word before they ran back out?

Who pulled them in tight and simply said “Now listen up. We can do this. Sanchez is off. They are less fit than us and we are at altitude. We are going to plan B. Old school and tight. We need to make them tired and our line out is struggling, so ball in hand.”

“Inside balls, pick and drives, forward runners, staying square at 10 and 12 – earn the right to go wide. When they have the pill, we get off the line and back the guy either side of you to make his tackles. No penalties”.

The real story of interest is who did the talking?

Banjo’s favourite Rugby World Cup moment was the quarter final in 1991 when the Irish scored a converted try with four minutes to play to hit the lead. Running it from a scrum deep within their own half, with openside flanker Gordon Hamilton, chasing in support, like a man possessed, to score his first test try as Rob Egerton made a noteworthy cover tackle.

The Irish hit the lead by 18-15. With captain Nick Farr Jones off the field and four minutes on the clock, the inside word is that vice-captain Michael Lynagh spoke calmly to the huddle under the sticks.

No ranting no raving. A clear and simple message. Long kick off deep into the left corner, a good chase from Egerton, the right footed kicker would have little angle and they could get an attacking line out.

Phil Kearns to throw to John Eales at four, attack the mid field with a switch move to go-to attacker, David Campese etc.

A scrum feed followed the maul curtesy of Simon Poidevin. Play to Campese again on the right wing and Lynagh himself backed up like a mad man to score in the right corner and snatch victory from the jaws of defeat in the pivotal moment in a victorious World Cup campaign.

Rest assured, when the ranting was over at half time in Salta, someone took the lead.

Perhaps it was Cheika himself. Either way, after months of following the wrong road, the Wallabies turned back.

Some are calling it a turning point but that insinuates that the plan finally coming together. In this case, it was a 180-degree turn, back down the road.

Are the Wallabies soft, not having a go, not fit enough, lacking attitude or pride in the jersey? Of-course they aren’t. They are professional sportsmen, have trained hard and will be hurting.

There are difficult times for Wallabies coach Michael Cheika. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Do we have the right cattle? Perhaps the Wallabies don’t have the best cattle in the world right now but have used largely the best cattle they have. But a good team of players has always given the team of good players a good run for their money.

Add the likes of Dempsey, Jed Holloway, Isi Naisarani and Jake Gordon either Samu Kerevi or Kuidrani to the 23 over the coming year the Wallabies will indeed have their best cattle on the field.

This will be at the expense of hard triers that do their best in Ned Hanigan, Rob Simmons and Nick Phipps with the other spots up to form.

The lineout may need Simmons or Rory Arnold if it still isn’t working at the expense of Izack Rodda.

Too many positional changes, too many rookies.

Sekope Kepu, Lukhan Tui, Pocock, Simmons, Kurtley Beale, Reece Hodge, Israel Folau and Haylett-Petty have played in relatively new roles and/or positions.

Adding to that all of three young hookers as well as Tupou, Rodda, Hanigan and Marike Koribete are relatively new to Test rugby. It was always going to be a big call to compete with any of the top tier nations.

Do we have the right coaches? With the second half come back in Salta, we look set to find out.

The spring tour is another chance to make good while many of the punters will have left the band wagon temporarily to focus on just how bad our cricket team has become and how not even Mitchell Starc would make the great teams of the past.

Stephen Larkham will take a lot from the success of the old school approach of the second half in Salta, with inside balls, pick and drives and forward runners as well as the 1-3-3-1 or the All Blacks.

The play behind moves adopted from rugby league need to be played down as part of the arsenal, not the arsenal. Playing direct and waiting to late in the phases to go wide worked with success in Salta.

Defence will be helped with selections and anyhow, Cheika is loyal, almost to a fault and won’t throw the passionate, but under pressure, defence coach Nathan Grey under a bus.

Cheika’s fiery address after the Wallabies’ insipid first half

Banjo’s team for the RWC 2019 remains relatively unchanged and has a caveat that Beale needs time on the bench to revert to form and eventually at fullback.

It should be as follows: Scott Sio, Folou Fianga, Alan Ala’atoa, Luckan Tui, Adam Coleman, Jack Dempsey, Isi Naisarani, David Pocock (c), Will Genia, Bernard Foley, Thomas Banks, Matt Toomua, Samu Kerevi, Israel Folau, Kurtley Beale.
Bench: Sekope Kepu, Polota-Nau, Taniela Tupou, Jed Holloway, Michael Hooper, Jake Gordon, Reece Hodge, Dane Haylett Petty.

In fairness to the current players and coaching staff, if we allow for comparison between eras, with Bob Dwyer’s team of 1991, are short on experience and smarts, not talent.

The team that defeated England 12-6 in the 1991 World Cup final was Marty Roebuck, David Campese, Jason Little, Tim Horan, Rob Egerton, Michael Lynagh (vc), Nick Farr-Jones (c), Troy Coker, Simon Poidevin, Willie Ofahengaue, John Eales, Rod McCall, Ewen McKenzie, Phil Kearns, Tony Daly.

Of the current Wallabies, realistically would we pick Adam Coleman for McCall or perhaps put Willie O to No 8 and include David Pocock. It would be a big call to replace Roebuck or Edgerton even for Folau.

These two were not the biggest, fasted, or most skilful players. They rarely played a bad game and were certainly two great competitors and rugby brains. A good team of players is what the Wallabies of 2019 can become.

The Crowd Says:

2018-10-15T06:06:41+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


He is on the record haviing explicitly stated that during his half time spray: "There was no technical information". I have no reason to think he is lying and take his statement at face value. So we are down to either one of the assistants set the agenda or the players came up with the change themselves.

2018-10-15T05:30:41+00:00

Alister

Guest


It may be that, rather than a player revolt, that Cheika over-ruled his attack and defense coaches. The more direct style of the Wallabies was more like the style of the Waratahs in 2014. Cheika is unlikely to want to throw his assistants to the wolves publicly so that might be why he was guarded about what he said. I personally don't have an idea what he said but i think the "make it personal" thing was only a very small part of it and he did (or someone did) give some strategic changes.

2018-10-11T21:01:17+00:00

Falco

Guest


Yeh Lano! Well said. Sums it up beautifully.

2018-10-11T14:54:06+00:00

gatesy

Roar Guru


Yes, you are right. It just may be that the players said "stuff the game plan" let's go and play like we know we can. There was such a drastic turnaround that you might have thought that the fix was in, but certainly not from the Wallabies. I only turned it on at minute 61, because I had slept in - glad I did!

2018-10-11T06:12:00+00:00

ethan

Guest


Yes it was the straightest I'd seen our whole backline operate for a long time. NZ like the way we put it through the hands rather than all the floating passes. Encouraging to know we can actually play like that. Shall be interesting to see if it continues, or was just a one off.

2018-10-11T05:06:03+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Ethan, if you can get a look at a replay. Watch the 40th minute. Puma scrum where Genia forces a turnover just before the halftime break. Wallabies play left with players shifting towards the sideline and floating a long cut out to get to the edge. Then they come back to the right, every player runs towards the outside side line and it finishes with no space and Hooper shifting the ball into touch. (Note, Hooper should have angled back in field and taken the tackle - continuing to shift to touch was only every going to be a handover/end of the half) Then look at the lead up to the 47th minute try for Folau and 50th minute try for Haylett-Petty. Straight running with the ball through the hands. (exception is Beale on the 50th who is still facing across field but holds the ball for so little time it makes no difference) Is chalk and cheese in the running lines and the dedication to put the ball through the hands rather than throwing long floating passes that allow the defence to jockey for position and shut down easily. The highlights for the two tries are on the RA website - for the Hooper into touch at the 40th you need a replay (I use RugbyPass so not much good to you but hopefully something you can find if you search)

2018-10-11T04:25:17+00:00

ethan

Guest


A part of me would love to think it was a player revolt. Like, OK Michael we tried things your way in the first half and it sucked, so now we're going to go out there and play our way, and if it works, we've got to stick with it going forward. But perhaps my imagination is running too wild.

2018-10-11T04:19:57+00:00

ethan

Guest


I'd love to see the Bish or Connor or Tipsy or Scott Allen or any one of our resident strategy analysts highlight what changed from first half to second. It really did look like a simplification of tactics. Were the Pumas just letting us run through them to easily, or was all that space and momentum created by different tactics?

2018-10-11T03:54:58+00:00

Lano

Roar Guru


Banjo, from the practice of mindfulness....there are three stages... - unconsciousness unconsciousness = you don't know what you don't know - the mind is closed - conscious unconsciousness = you know what you don't know - the mind is alerted - unconsciousness consciousness = the mind is instinctive and consciousness is automatic - the state of mindfulness ...after Jung, Freud, Ekhart Tolle and Buddhism 101.

AUTHOR

2018-10-11T03:36:41+00:00

Banjo Kelly

Roar Rookie


This piece was written before K&C episode in which MC confirmed that there was "nothing technical" in his half time words. Oddly, he didn't even acknowledge there WAS a change of strategy. They just made it personal !? I'm not buying that. So it wasn't MC, so who?

2018-10-11T02:53:01+00:00

Billy Boy

Roar Rookie


None of them. The replacement front row prob said f.. it lets just take it up the middle and see what happens, suddenly Rodda and Coleman caught on and bingo the cloud lifted and everyone started running straight. Suddenly there were gaps created for izzy, fantastic

2018-10-11T02:18:56+00:00

Tooly

Roar Rookie


Pretty good Banjo. The difference these days is that defence is far better and the locks are just as big but more mobile.

AUTHOR

2018-10-11T01:51:22+00:00

Banjo Kelly

Roar Rookie


Change to the coaching ranks or change of strategy ? I assume MC has autonomy on who he can employ as his off-siders ?

AUTHOR

2018-10-11T01:48:00+00:00

Banjo Kelly

Roar Rookie


Davo, yes definitely a crisis of confidence. Surely simpler rugby done with confidence and precision is better than complex footy done without timing or execution. There is a term called "conscious competence" ie where you can do a task if you focus on it (say at training) and then there is "sub-conscious competence" where you can perform a task almost by reflex or instinctively as you suggest. I imagine at Test match level it has to happen instinctively as there is no time to think it through. I'm just trying to imagine playing under 4 or 5 coaches. Perhaps too many cooks ? On the tactics, if you watch the video above again, Chieka storms out for effect and Hooper walks off not sure really how to respond to the theatrics. So who ? Foley, Genia, Pocock...Larkham ?

2018-10-11T00:22:33+00:00

RahRah

Roar Rookie


Watching K&C last night I wouldn't be holding my breath for change anytime soon.

2018-10-10T22:41:06+00:00

Davo

Guest


I agree Banjo. 2nd half in Salta was a clear change in tactics. And it didn't happen by luck or "heart". There must have been an additional set of instructions issued to the players that wasn't captured on camera. By whom is an interesting question! My view is that the players have been struggling with too much complexity. When trying to remember and implement all the clever plans provided to them by Larkham and Grey, they lose instinctiveness and make mistakes under pressure. I think the best thing the Wallabies could do in the lead up to RWC is to simplify things and get back to basics. Like they did in the second half at Salta. From a coaching staff perspective this would be best achieved by letting go of Larkham and Grey. Those guys have contributed lots of great ideas and techniques. But now is the time to simplify and execute. The Wallabies support staff have all the Larkham/Grey intellectual property on file. They don't need the creators hanging round to further overengineer matters and distract and confuse the players. The Wallaby coaching team currently has 5 members. Surely 3 is enough on the home stretch to RWC when the aim is to simplify and execute.

Read more at The Roar