The case for Marnus Labuschagne

By Bill Peters / Roar Guru

Of all the left field selections in recent times in the various Australian cricket teams, that of Marnus Labuschagne in the Test team in the recent Pakistan series is one of the most curious.

By leaving out Matt Renshaw again based on ‘lack of time in the middle’, the selectors chose a youngster who had a growing yet not outstanding reputation and record, seemingly purely for the fact that he was a good field and could bowl some handy leg spin.

The big question the selectors now face is what do they do with him now? Especially since he has shown signs that he could be a player Australia has been searching for if he is given the time and space to develop.

I don’t think I was alone in being nonplussed when Labuschagne was selected instead of Renshaw in that 1st Test, but he has slowly won me over. Good short legs are in short supply (no pun intended) and he even appears enthusiastic about the task.

He has already nabbed a couple of good catches there which is a helpful task. His leg spin, which looks to be a tad better than part-time but no more, has already snared seven Test wickets, and as a partnership breaker he could prove to be the perfect foil for Nathan Lyon.

And although he made a nervous start with the bat in his first Test, he appeared calm under pressure in both innings of the second Test and probably should have made more runs in both innings.

Number six should be able to alternate between solidity and someone who will look to take the game on when it needs to, and Labuschagne looks like that’s the way he likes to bat. He played Yasir Shah with confidence, which not many not many do.

It hasn’t all been roses for Marnus, and perhaps that is what makes him so appealing. The dropped catch off Fakhar Zaman in the first innings of the second Test, when he was only on 30 and went on to make made 96 not only went some way towards costing Australia the game, but it killed off any confidence Jon Holland may have had and it did appear to hamper him from that point on.

Also, his run out in bizarre circumstances in the first innings was supremely disappointing after he had made such a solid start to his innings and was only saved by a more idiotic run out by Pakistan in the following innings from being a more major talking point after the game.

There have been flaws, but he hasn’t let it affect him after the event which is a good sign, and at just 24 years old, he has got a foot in the door and doesn’t appear overawed at what he is facing.

(AAP Image/Glenn Hunt)

Labuschagne is probably fighting for one place in the team with current vice-captain Mitch Marsh. There is no reason why Marsh should have the inside lane to the number six spot in the order simply because he bowls seam up.

The Test team only needs someone who can provide a few overs to give the four specialists a rest on tough days. That bowler certainly doesn’t have to be a medium pacer. Surely someone with a bit of variety would be more than handy than just another right arm seamer coming on that the batsmen have already seen.

A wrist spinner provides so much more and is a perfect complement to a left arm speed bowler, two right arm pace bowlers and a right arm off spinner.

More than anything else, Labuschagne has to make runs. Australia has spent too long picking a player in our top six who has averaged less than 30 with the bat, only because they can bowl some overs when needed.

First it was Shane Watson, who for the second half of his career was persisted with despite averaging only 30.50 in his last 33 Tests between 2011 and 2015, and now it is Mitch Marsh who has received that benefit on potential, who currently has a Test batting average of just 26.08 after 30 Test matches.

That’s over 60 Tests where the “all-rounder” averaged a touch under 27 with the bat. You can’t win Test matches with stats like that.
If Labuschagne is to demand selection and hold his place in the team, he needs to average 40 in Tests as a minimum.

If he can do this, then his other assets will prove to be extremely useful for the Australian cricket team. But without that kind of output with the bat his other assets cannot – or at least should not – sustain his place in the team.

In today’s Sheffield Shield match against South Australia, he was dismissed for just 3 batting at first drop for Queensland. Not an ideal score in which to push his cause. But he has several matches ahead of him to do so, and he will know just how important it is for him to make good runs and at least one big score to try and shore up his place in the Test team for the upcoming series against India.

I, for one, hope he succeeds.

The Crowd Says:

2018-10-26T22:10:50+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


All the Chappell brothers were good part timers, plus Walters and Ian Chappell was a great believer in variety to break partnerships. The reverse end of the spectrum was Kim Hughes, he didn;t need a fifth because he never bowled them even when he had some great options. Taylor picked Bevan against teams who were weak against wrist spin even though he was performing badly against their quicks.

2018-10-26T02:10:18+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Spot on Spanner. We have 4 world class bowlers, especially if they're playing in Australia, so taking 10 wickets should be a given. Making enough runs to support the bowlers is the issue and we need the best 6 batsmen, plus Paine

2018-10-25T23:46:06+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


Maxwell bowls little now days, and it is nothing to write home about when he does.

2018-10-25T23:44:47+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


It worked for a long time (6 bats, 4 bowlers) and then after Australia got smashed by Flintoff in the Ashes, the all-rounder obsession has not stopped.

2018-10-25T23:43:30+00:00

Harvey Wilson

Roar Rookie


Marnus over MItchell simply because he is a wrist spinner. Mitchell's tame seam bowling is very non-threatening and when Australia's best quicks are available, he is surplus. He is being barely bowled by the captain anyway. Marnus provides a difference.

2018-10-25T23:34:06+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


I got sick of the endless debates on this site about the "all-rounder" need in the team. Personally I think the performances of the team have shown you need to pick the best 6 batsmen we have and rely on our supposed strength which is our bowling attack. If Starc, Hazelwood, Cummins and Lyon can't get you 20 wickets I don't know how adding someone like Agar or M.Marsh or Stoinis is going to suddenly add that lethal mix. The real problem is that the fast bowlers are not fit enough or durable enough to play Test cricket.

2018-10-25T23:32:18+00:00

Matt H

Roar Guru


Well he scored 3 from 9 balls yesterday for QLD, so I think we need to hold off on anointing him just yet.

2018-10-25T23:25:46+00:00

JamesH

Roar Guru


The obsession with having a genuine fifth bowling option is killing our batting. We have Maxwell, Ferguson, Burns, Patterson, Renshaw and Head who could all bat 6 based on their last few seasons of Shield cricket, all of whom should be ahead of Marnus and Mitch. If we really need a part-timer as an option to break partnerships then just utilise Maxwell, Head, Finch or (on his return) Smith. If you're picking a number 6 to bowl sustained spells then you're doing it wrong. Marnus shows promise but he needs to be given time to develop his batting. Take some pressure off him and let him flourish.

2018-10-25T22:30:58+00:00

Spanner

Roar Rookie


I think we are all being hoodwinked by the selection panel's obsession with playing someone at 6 who can offer a few overs of rubbish to give our quicks a spell ! I believe Ian Chappell's basic test team selection philosophy still applies to the modern game - ie : pick the best 6 batsmen in the country, the best 4 bowlers (logically, at least one spinner), the best wicketkeeper and make one of them captain - end of story ! If the quicks need a spell then rotate selection, keeping in mind that test cricket is the pinnacle ! With this thinking - is Labuschagne in the top 6 batters in the country ? As a footnote, I'm sure Roarers would agree we are paying the price for disrespecting shield cricket and this will haunt us for a time to come !

2018-10-25T11:15:03+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


If Australia had two really good spinners and lesser quickies so the spinners got selection on all types of wickets then you could justify a Mitch Marsh otherwise he should not be in the team. Maxwell is the same as Lyon so unless they have another type of spinner or 4 quicks he should not be picked. A leg spinner is the ideal option but the question is at the moment is should he have been picked as the second spinner. If someone takes 7 wickets at 22 however they should be an automatic selection till they fail. Pakistan do have a history of unlikely bowlers getting hauls against them and then doing nothing against others.

Read more at The Roar