The Sharks must consider relocation

By Adz Sportz / Roar Guru

One of the most polarizing subjects in rugby league in recent times has been expansion and the need to relocate Sydney clubs.

Everyone has an opinion, but they’re usually subjective and without consideration of proper analysis.

The ARL Commission has tasked NRL CEO Todd Greenberg and his team to assess viable expansion and relocation options over the next 12 months, so it’s expected to raise many talking points throughout 2019.

Greenberg recently dismissed the notion of relocating Sydney teams, preferring to ensure all current 16 clubs are sustainable and with the possible addition of new teams across the competition.

However, one club who may not be sustainable for much longer is the Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks.

The past decade has been particularly difficult for the Sutherland Shire based club, despite experiencing on-field success.

In 2009, the NRL refused a proposal from Cronulla to move five of their home games over five seasons to the Central Coast as they were haemorrhaging money on games at Shark Park due to poor crowds. At the time, the NRL offered $8 million for a Sydney club to fully relocate to the Central Coast, however, the Sharks rejected the move.

The disaster that was the 2013-14 season again left Cronulla on the brink of collapse, with the club fined $150k for salary cap breaches as well as $1 million ($400K suspended) for the infamous “doping scandal” which also resulted in coach Shane Flanagan suspended for 12 months.

It was estimated the 17-month ASADA investigation cost Cronulla upwards of $4 million from fines, legal costs and other lost revenue.

Just two years after their maiden premiership, Cronulla are again experiencing financial hardship, with an estimated $6 million loss over the last two seasons despite property development deals and grants from the NRL.

To make matters worse, major jersey sponsor Opal Solar along with two other jersey sponsors decided to part ways with the club by not taking up an option for 2019, so Cronulla are now currently without major sponsors and without a front-of-jersey sponsor, merchandise sales are also affected.

(Photo by Mark Evans/Getty Images)

The club has been forced to make changes to their business structure which included laying off ten staff members and making further cost cuts to save money. But with an impending salary cap investigation hanging over the club, which they self-reported to the NRL regarding anomalies from the 2015 season and earlier, they may get hit with another fine should the NRL prove the Sharks breached the salary cap.

Unfortunately for Cronulla, the salary cap investigation allegedly uncovered evidence that coach Shane Flanagan defied an edict not to contact players or club officials during his 12-month suspension following the doping scandal in 2014.

If evidence suggests Flanagan broke the terms of his suspension, he will likely be slapped with another ban and the $400,000 suspended from their $1 million fine from 2014, may be triggered which would be yet another financial blow for the club.

To add to Cronulla’s decade of woes, controversy has continuously followed the club in regards to off-field indiscretions from high profile players, including the abuse of a junior referee, unpleasant photos of a player leaked online, recreational drug use and expletive-laden rants on a podcast, leading to players being sacked or punished.

The Cronulla-Sutherland Sharks brand has taken so many hits over the past decade, and there has never been a better time for the club and its supporters to consider a fresh start and a new image.

Relocation has always been talked about as an option for Cronulla each time they’ve come close to financial ruin, but this time they really need to consider the option to secure the club’s long-term future.

The logical option for Cronulla is to relocate to Perth. They would become a stand-alone club based in a capital city with a population of 2.2 million compared to Sutherland Shire of 218,000.

According to Roy Morgan research, the Sharks have the third-least amount of supporters (224,000)and the second-least amount of members this past season (15,800) of all the Sydney based clubs.

They’d have the potential of gaining hundreds of thousands of new supporters, thousands of additional memberships, endless corporate sponsorship opportunities and the advantage of the ARU’s decision to scrap the Western Force. Everything a congested Sydney market is unable to offer.

They would likely play at the 20,500 capacity NIB Stadium, which is close to the CBD.

The time difference between the west and east coast would mean home games would predominately be played during family-friendly timeslots on Saturday and Sunday afternoons-early evenings, which would be televised during primetime on the east coast.

Many are of the belief that Perth deserves their own team and their own identity rather than a relocated Sydney club, which fans out west may not buy into or are of the belief that a relocated Sydney club wouldn’t be successful for various reasons.

However, West Coast Pirates bid team and NRLWA CEO John Sackson has previously stated that he’d be open to a relocated Sydney team as fans on the west coast have been crying out for rugby league for over 20 years since the Western Reds fell victim to the super league establishment war.

It would also potentially save the bid team at least two years to assemble a playing squad and having to market a new brand.

For relocation to work, Cronulla need not look any further than the success of the Sydney Swans AFL side. Relocated from South Melbourne, they have become the most supported AFL club with 1.2 million fans, according to Roy Morgan research.

The Swans membership numbers finished with around 60,000 this past season, with more than 12,000 of those from Melbourne, so you’d believe Sharks supporters from the Shire will remain loyal to their club should they relocate.

The success of the Melbourne Storm (1.05 million fans, 25,000 members) also proves that rugby league can make inroads in AFL territory.

Perth is obviously not as big as Sydney or Melbourne, but the blueprints of the Swans and Storm have clearly worked extremely well.

Although Todd Greenberg has been emphatic in his refusal to bail out struggling clubs, he should consider offering Cronulla a financial incentive to help with the costs of relocating the club and it’s players to Perth because relocation would also be beneficial to the NRL.

Expanding and growing the game on the west coast will move the ‘National’ Rugby League away from being east coast centric and enter new markets.

Not only does the “West Coast Sharks” have a nice ring to it, there are plenty of great white sharks off the coast of west coast, so it would be a perfect fit.

The Crowd Says:

2018-12-28T05:24:34+00:00

William W

Roar Rookie


Adam Hayward, you are a dead set fool if you believe anything written in that "Lurkers" Sporting News. Their success rate is at about 5% as they get their stories/Rumours straight from Social Media Forums. They do recycle news reports/stories off other News Media outlets!

2018-12-24T13:20:13+00:00

William W

Roar Rookie


Red Barron... You say that the Sharks, have the Second largest junior league in the Nation? WHAT RUBBISH! In the NRL, Brisbane, Penrith, Parramatta, Newcastle, St George Illawarra, North Queensland, Canberra and Souths all do have way more Juniors than the Sharks. In Mens/Boys tackle competitions U6s to A Grade. Roosters, Sea Eagles, Bulldogs are extremely low. Even the Bears have more junior participation than the 3 listed above but not much quality as their better player's do sign with NRL Clubs Who can blame them! Red Barron... You are obviously counting touch football figures which have ZERO to do with Rugby League. Touch footy players play for recreation and never ever play tackle footy so therefore do not contribute to possible future NRL selection. The NRL use touch football registrations as a political tool to inflate overall figures. Even Women/Girls playing figures are used in overall figures! As the AFL also do with their OZ Kick programs. The Sharks do have one of the biggest touch footy competitions in Sydney. In my day only the soft kids play touch. The tough kids always played tackle!

2018-12-24T00:32:34+00:00

William W

Roar Rookie


No Sydney club should ever be forced to relocate to Brisbane. Queenslanders will never ever accept it. Any 2nd or 3rd club in Brisbane should be 100% local. Relocation is extremely difficult on the whole as Regions will always prefer their own identity. The Cronulla Sharks, what should we do about them? If we look back in History way back to 1967 they were always short of cash. In 1991 they were technically insolvent. From 1995 to 1997 during the War, they were gone but aligning themselves with Murdock kept them alive. Their fans should be so thankful that the Dragons rejected Murdock otherwise the Cronulla Sutherland Sharks would be in the same boat as the North Sydney Bears... Extinct!

2018-12-23T02:51:26+00:00

STEPHEN Mills

Guest


John Sackson works for the NRL and would have to quit his position to run an NRL club also the pirates are an NRL WA run team for promoting our juniors

2018-12-23T02:37:04+00:00

Beergardener

Roar Pro


That's just patently untrue Battler. The furthest Sydney club is Penrith at about 70km from Sydney CBD. Compare Robina to Brisbane CBD which is over 80km. Many parts of the GC are over 100km from Brisbane. I'm so sick of Southeners pretending we're one and the same. Queensland deserves another team farm more than NSW deserves its 10! And I'm a Broncos fan who would welcome another team - another rivalry, another strong crowd for the Broncos, more Queenslanders getting to stay/develop at home, good for the local economy, fun night out for Broncos fans if there is no Broncos game that weekend etc. Lots of benefits

2018-12-22T03:58:18+00:00

Admiral Ackbar

Guest


Adam can you tell me exactly how the Sharks would stay afloat (excuse the pun) if they moved to Perth? Over here we have very restrictive poker machine laws (the only place they are allowed is the casino), and therefore Leagues Clubs are out of the question. At least if you had Brisbane Sharks or Sunshine Coast Sea Eagles the club would have that source of revenue.

AUTHOR

2018-12-20T09:31:50+00:00

Adz Sportz

Roar Guru


Hi AllyOZ, I think because the Sharks are cash strapped they'd need to be moved to a big market so they can grab those big corporate sponsorship dollars available. Their only real options are Perth, Adelaide or give Brisbane the Sharks. If areas like the central coast get a relocated team, they'd be better off taking a stable club like the Roosters

AUTHOR

2018-12-20T09:28:46+00:00

Adz Sportz

Roar Guru


NRL will consider relocating Sharks to Perth if they go broke https://www.sportingnews.com/au/league/news/nrl-2019-cronulla-sharks-relocation-fines-broke-fine-shane-flanagan/13l68928t50fp19rbm7vv6lwjw

AUTHOR

2018-12-20T09:28:15+00:00

Adz Sportz

Roar Guru


NRL will consider relocating Sharks to Perth if they go broke https://www.sportingnews.com/au/league/news/nrl-2019-cronulla-sharks-relocation-fines-broke-fine-shane-flanagan/13l68928t50fp19rbm7vv6lwjw

AUTHOR

2018-12-20T09:26:56+00:00

Adz Sportz

Roar Guru


NRL will consider Perth if Sharks go broke https://www.sportingnews.com/au/league/news/nrl-2019-cronulla-sharks-relocation-fines-broke-fine-shane-flanagan/13l68928t50fp19rbm7vv6lwjw

2018-12-20T02:59:29+00:00

AllyOz

Roar Rookie


There are a lot of Brothers players and ex-players from Brisbane to Cairns as you say. Not sure how they would get the rights to the blue and white butchers stripe off the Bulldogs though.

2018-12-20T02:46:24+00:00

AllyOz

Roar Rookie


I am not sure if those associated with tourism in WA would want to highlight "sharks" as part of the team name. I would say bring Wests back as the magpies and sell off the Tigers brand to Perth. The Sharks can go to Gosford as the Central Coast Sharks or to Central Queensland. I would like to see an additional team in SE Queensland but set in Ipswich, not in Brisbane. Ipswich and the western corridor has its own identity and there would be a real rivalry grow between Brisbane and Ipswich (there is already something there to build on).

2018-12-19T23:01:02+00:00

Jordan Klingsporn

Roar Guru


I hate South Sydney, i'd only support these relocated teams Canterbery Bulldogs Cronulla Sharks Manly Sea Eagles (My team) North Sydney Bears Wests Tigers But if Souths relocated they might just be the super-team of the competition.

2018-12-19T22:08:00+00:00

Zavjalova

Roar Rookie


Exactly. They havent even been fined to the cap breach yet. The sharkies are doomed. Relocate or die. They need a bigger market.

2018-12-19T04:08:09+00:00

Brisguy51

Roar Rookie


In regards to having a 2nd Brisbane NRL team i remembered a article about having a stadium at Springfield.I looked it up and it seems the Brisbane Lions are relocating to Springfield to be their new elite administration and training base.It would be interesting to see how many juniors they can come up with when the area is fully developed.

2018-12-19T03:18:24+00:00

clipper

Roar Rookie


I used the example of Cronulla as that's the team the article is about. I could've easily used the example of Canterbury - when they last won, there were streamers in just about every business, banners everywhere, cars overloaded with paraphernalia - when easts won there was just about nothing - apart from a few tradie cars and surprised visitors wondering why the fans weren't out.

AUTHOR

2018-12-19T03:13:51+00:00

Adz Sportz

Roar Guru


Well after the events of today, it will be even harder to at least obtain jersey sponsors in the market they're currently in. The fact Greenberg had to reiterate his "preference" to keep the Sharks in the Shire suggests that there will be even more talking points in regards to relocating.

2018-12-19T03:03:24+00:00

Battler

Roar Rookie


NRL fans also won't accept a new club getting a leg up like new AFL clubs in terms of extra cap space etc.

2018-12-19T02:49:43+00:00

Battler

Roar Rookie


Non-Broncos fans only want a second Brisbane team because they think it will weaken the Broncos. It’s a dream that will never come true even if you add three Brisbane sides. The GC are basically a second Brisbane team (the GC is closer to the Brisbane CBD than a lot of Sydney teams are to the Sydney CBD), and it’s already a failure that subsists off Broncos rejects and juniors that they pay big dollars for. Adding more plastic clubs to SEQ in the hope that they will eventually dilute the Broncos isn’t going to work and isn’t healthy for the game when the Broncos are pretty much the sole reason the game is afloat with the ratings, support, and professionalism as a business that they bring to the table. EDIT: Which Broncos supporter is going to drop a side they’ve supported for years in favour of a relocated Sharks or some made up club like the Bombers? It’s not going to happen. Although it would never happen in the NFL, it would be like shoving another team into Denver or Dallas.

2018-12-19T00:24:05+00:00

Randy

Roar Rookie


I think the Dolphins would be the perfect club for the NRL to have up their sleeves if another club suddenly folds, like the bears. They have a decent stadium which could be upgraded to 20k if needed.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar