Oh goodness, another weekend full of close games and results that could easily have been different to the way they finished.
And the upsets! Oh, those glorious, unpredictable, frustrating-as-bloody-hell upsets!
A close look at the Super Rugby conference tables after eight rounds show how tight a race we’re in for this season.
The South African conference is ridiculous, with everyone now having won either three or four games and what feels like a weekly change of the lead. The Sharks are clear with four wins backed up by the most bonus points in the competition.
Behind the Sharks the second-placed Bulls are just one win clear of the fifth-placed Stormers. The Lions were comfortable among the conference leaders last week and have a healthy for-and-against, but having been thumped at Ellis Park by the Sharks, they now sit in that large group of mid-table teams that go up and down every week, and with a very negative differential.
The Rebels are seven clear in the Australian conference and are playing great rugby. Behind them the Waratahs head the remaining teams separated by just six points. All four sides have very similar try-scoring records.
In New Zealand the Crusaders remain six points clear courtesy of their second-half demolition of the Brumbies in Christchurch and with the Hurricanes and Blues within a win of each other. The Highlanders might well be in this group too, but they have only played six games, with the Crusaders game cancelled at the time of the horrific shootings in Christchurch.
On the unofficial overall standings there are effectively three groupings.
You basically have the conference leaders and the Hurricanes as the leading group, and only the Sharks don’t have at least five wins. But again, by virtue of their five bonus points, the Sharks sit comfortably within this group. The conference leaders all have distinctly better for-and-against records than the Hurricanes too.
At the other end of the table the Sunwolves, Brumbies and Chiefs occupy the bottom three positions and all have the worst differential records. They’ve all conceded the most tries too.
In between you have eight teams separated by just five competition points, with the Blues in fifth on 19 points down to the Highlanders in 12th on 14. All bar the Highlanders have at least three wins, but the Highlanders have points from the aforementioned draw and four losing bonus points.
So when teams are this close, what’s going to set them apart and get them moving up the table?
This is where I suspect goal-kicking is going to play a major role in 2019.
In that middle group of teams there are a few examples to look at a little closer.
The Blues have won their last four straight to storm up the competition standings, creating all kinds of headlines and causing all kinds of trouble for my tipping at the very least. They rank among the bottom teams in the competition for tries scored but are among the best as far as tries conceded goes.
But their goal-kicking has been a bit all over the shop by virtue of a seemingly revolving door at flyhalf and with the kicking tee over the first few rounds. Otere Black is kicking at 80 per cent, though, and has landed 11 from 13 over the last three games, of which he’s started the last two at No. 10.
The Bulls and Stormers have scored the fewest tries in the competition after eight rounds, but there’s a big difference between the two sides and the Bulls still look more likely in 2019 than the Stormers.
Bulls flyhalf Handre Pollard is kicking at 89 per cent for the season so far but has slotted all 20 shots at penalty goal. SP Marais was well in the 80s by the end of Round 6 for the Stormers but hasn’t been the preferred kicker the past fortnight and has missed both shots at goal he’s had late in games. Jean-Luc du Plessis has kicked five out of six in that time, but the Stormers aren’t playing with that same keep-the-scoreboard-ticking mentality that the Bulls do.
Last season Bernard Foley kicked at 83 per cent in Super Rugby, including a string of 50 from 63 over his last ten games. But this form didn’t carry into the international season and he hasn’t rediscovered it this season either. He’s well down at 66 per cent in 2019 and, worryingly, has missed eight of 17 conversion attempts. The Waratahs have picked up a bonus point in all four losses to date.
The Highlanders also have losing bonus points from their four losses, and their record isn’t too bad compared to other teams in this mid-table group. But news that Marty Banks will miss the next six weeks is a worry because he’s kicked 13 goals from 13 this season and all ten shots since starting at flyhalf two games ago.
The Melbourne Rebels are playing wonderfully, as I mentioned up front, but a big point of difference in their 2019 start to the season is the reliable kicking of Quade Cooper. Cooper kicking at 77 per cent isn’t earth-shattering in itself, but 21 from 24 across the last four games is a huge uplift, and it’s all significantly better than the 67 per cent Reece Hodge kicked at in 2018 as well as the 60 per cent Jack Debreczeni managed until he fell from favour.
Of course there are exceptions.
The Crusaders are the runaway competition favourites already but as a side are kicking at only 62 per cent. Richie Mo’unga isn’t much better at 64 per cent himself, but his nine from ten in his last two games is a decent indication of what might follow.
And of course, after he kicked 48 from 50 last season, Haydn Parker’s incredible 29 from 30 this year – and he proved his infallibility in Melbourne on Saturday night – isn’t rocketing the Sunwolves up the charts either. But now that they’re playing in a manner that asks more questions of sides, Parker’s boot can absolutely make a difference for the Moondogs in 2019.
The competition is already running too close for kickers to have off nights or lose their range.
But how many teams have the ability or the personnel to make the goal-kicking improvements they might already need?
RobC
Roar Guru
Yes. My comment deserved to be torpedoed.
riddler
Roar Rookie
can't remember that. i could very well be wrong. though i do remember distinctly noddy kicking in saffa land in 95 wc
Gray-Hand
Roar Rookie
Roebuck took over the kicking duties from Lynagh in about 1992.
riddler
Roar Rookie
so 6 years with the wallaby ball and then 5 years with gilbert internationally. almost 50/50.. and his success rate was below 80% but when he retired he was the highest test point scorer.
Gray-Hand
Roar Rookie
I think 1991 is correct. But I think Roebuck did most of the place kicking from the early nineties onwards. Leather balls were prone to water logging which made them heavier and more slippery. The sweet spot is also, apparently,much larger in modern balls.
riddler
Roar Rookie
don't know about that. the gilbert started when? 1990? it was definitely there in 91 for the wc. lynagh was meticulous in his goal-kicking even right up until his sarries days. often going to the ground where he was playing away the day before to practise. alos his old man helped alot with shrink side of the kicking process. i think, as like most things these days, we expect more and more perfection, while we get fatter and lazier sitting in the armchair and on the keyboard!! ;)
elvis
Roar Rookie
I'd make it confusing, with a penalty from the quarter to the halfway worth only 1 point, but one from over halfway worth 4. Stops play stopping for minor infringements not near the tryline, but still allows for the majestic sight of a long range penalty.
Bobby
Roar Rookie
Perfect solution Gloria.
Rugbyrah
Roar Rookie
Interesting research on goal kicking includes: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1440244014000255
Russ
Guest
Harry Jones more yellow and reds card would stop the constant infringements though.They`d soon desist.
Brett McKay
Expert
In 2015...
Gray-Hand
Roar Rookie
Can’t compare a brown leather ball that Lynagh played with to the modern balls we play with these days.
Rugbyrah
Roar Rookie
An interesting article on the history of points can be found at http://www.greenandgoldrugby.com/should-we-change-rugbys-point-scoring-system
Rugbyrah
Roar Rookie
An interesting article shows top sides favour goals than tries. https://www.economist.com/game-theory/2015/10/16/why-rugby-teams-should-go-for-penalties-not-tries
Bluffboy
Roar Rookie
Yep, it sure is. Sarcasm might have been at play there...…..
Harry Jones
Expert
If you make a PG worth only 2 points, get ready for a LOT more infringements, because then you can give up 4 made penalties before it exceeds a converted try, or 5 equals two unconverted tries. Easy maths.
soapit
Roar Guru
t man if you dont kick the unimportant ones your going to need more important one
soapit
Roar Guru
generally yes unless teams have a specific strategy of going for touch more than the others say like the brumbies used to (reckon other teams have caught up now). hooper has also gone to touch more often than most captains in the past
Harry Jones
Expert
Thanks, Brett Laidlaw. A rock-solid goalkicker is such an asset in a close competition, because rugby will always be a game where you can FORCE kickable penalties with pressure. And the immense relative value of a conversion, even moved down from 50% of a try to 40%, means that teams with a spotty kicker are always playing uphill.
riddler
Roar Rookie
i would be very surprised if lynagh had a % of over 80%. i think of people like neil jenkins, diego dominguez etc who are kickers of 80%. for me over 80% is elite.