Picking the Ashes squad is more straightforward than you think

By Michael Keeffe / Roar Guru

There is currently a lot conjecture about the choices that await the Australian selectors for the upcoming Ashes series.

There are a thousand opinions about who should play floating around. I think when looked at, picking the squad is a little more straightforward than everyone is making out.

There should really only be a couple of spots in doubt for the squad overall.

Batsmen
In Australia’s last Test our top six was Joe Burns, Marcus Harris, Usman Khawaja, Marnus Labuschagne, Travis Head and Kurtis Patterson.

Four of these six should be lining up with Dave Warner and Steve Smith for the first Test at Edgbaston in early August.

Warner will open with one of Burns or Harris. It should be Burns.

Harris has no doubt made a mountain of first class runs and should be our first backup opener if anything should happen to Warner or Burns. But he hasn’t taken his opportunities at Test level averaging 32 over the Aussie summer with no centuries from 11 innings.

Burns has. He has four Test centuries from 16 Tests at an average of 40 including a century in his last Test innings. Test runs trump first class run every day of the week.

If fit, Khawaja will bat 3. He wasn’t amazing over the summer but he is our best bat after Smith and Warner. Lock him in.

Smith will bat 4. He’s our best, no discussion needed.

Steve Smith (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Then you have Labuschagne, Head and Patterson. As much as Labuschagne is in good form in county cricket (albeit div 2) he’s the odd man out here. He hasn’t succeeded at Test level at all and doesn’t have the most amazing first class record.

Also his bowling isn’t enough to get him in the side. He’s a great fielder and from all reports a great team man. I want him to succeed, he just hasn’t done enough yet to get in the team.

Head is our vice captain, has made a century in his last Test and has averaged 50 over his short career.

Has been our best bat while Warner and Smith were out. He bats at 5.

Patterson is two matches into his Test career, scored 100 in his last test, and deserves his opportunity. He bats at 6.

Our top six for the first Test should be Warner, Burns, Khawaja, Smith, Head, Patterson. I don’t know if it will be, but it should be.

We need two backup batsmen. Our options: Harris, Matt Wade, Pete Handscomb, Will Pucovski, Labuschagne, Mitch Marsh and Cameron Bancroft.

One should be a top order spot which really comes down to Harris or Bancroft. Harris is the incumbent has been making a heap of runs in first class cricket. He’s the choice. Bancroft will need to wait and earn his way back with weight of runs.

The second spot should be for a middle order bat. M Marsh and Handscomb can’t seriously be considered. They have no current first class form and have both failed in their most recent Test opportunities.

That leaves Pucovski, Labuschagne and Wade. Pucovski is a fine young player. The only circumstances in which he’ll play a Test in this series is if Australia is struggling and needs to drop someone.

I don’t think the pressure of a struggling Australian team in an Ashes series in England is the place to debut this kid. He is 21, leave him at home. He has time on his side and if he keeps performing in Shield cricket his time will come.

I think it needs to be Wade over Labuschagne. His form with the bat can’t be ignored. Labuschagne’s bowling is overstated at times. He would be more a throw the ball to Mike Hussey/Michael Clarke to try and jag a wicket type bowler.

Keepers
Straightforward conversation. Tim Paine is our captain, has done a fine job and those arguing he shouldn’t play have lost their head.

He is our best keeper and has a Test batting averaging of 35. He’ll play until his form falls off a cliff or he wants to retire.

Tim Paine of Australia (Photo by Quinn Rooney/Getty Images)

Alex Carey is the backup keeper who’ll one day likely take the gloves from Paine. Let’s not confuse his recent ODI form with red ball form.

He averages 29 in first class cricket. Not terrible for a keeper but not amazing either. His time will come, it’s not now.

Spin bowlers
Nathan Lyon = GOAT. Enough said.

Jon Holland is the next best option who’ll carry the drinks for the tour unless in the unlikely event of a Lyon injury he’s needed to play.

Quick bowlers
Mitchell Starc, Pat Cummins, Josh Hazelwood, James Pattinson all pick themselves. Assuming Jhye Richardson isn’t fit that leaves Pete Siddle, Chris Tremain, Jack Bird and Michael Neser.

Tremain has been the best of them over the past few years, it’s whether he suits English conditions as much.

Siddle is a great option for the right pitch, Neser is a swing expert who has had a lot of success with the Duke ball and Bird is similar to Siddle. They are less likely to get a lot of game time behind the other four bowlers but lets say Siddle and Tremain.

Siddle has the experience and very good record in county cricket and will suit English pitches. Tremain has been the standout of the four at first class level over the past few season.

That leaves us with a squad of: Warner, Burns, Harris, Khawaja, Smith, Head, Patterson, Wade, Paine, Carey, Lyon, Holland, Starc, Cummins, Hazlewood, Pattinson, Siddle, Tremain

Of course we may not take a squad of 18. If it’s a squad of 16 or 17 the most in danger is the eighth batsmen, second keeper, second spinner or sixth quick bowler.

The upcoming Aust v Aust A game should only carry weight for the fringe positions. E.g. If Wade get’s a pair and Labuschange scores a century. Or Siddle goes wicketless and Neser takes 5 for. Or it may help decide who from the squad plays the first Test.

If Pattinson took 5 for and Hazlewood went wicketless he might play the first Test or if Harris scored 100 and Burns scratched around for a 20 ball duck he might get the nod.

Short of that the first Test team should be Warner, Burns, Khawaja, Smith, Head, Patterson, Paine, Cummins, Starc, Pattinson/Hazlewood, Lyon (Can’t decide between Pattinson and Hazlewood for fourth bowling spot).

The Crowd Says:

2019-07-19T12:56:57+00:00

Spinosum

Roar Rookie


I'd play Burns & Khawaja as openers, Smith at 3, Harris 4, Head 5, Warner 6 . . . Paine 7, Cummins 8. J. Richardson/Siddle 9, Starc 10, Lyon 11. Twelfth person Labuschagne. My problem is fitness issues with Khawaja and Jhye so my ideal first Test might not get off the ground.

2019-07-19T09:15:52+00:00

Jules

Roar Rookie


I agree that Burns should be in the team, even if they want to open with Harris. He seems better than most against the moving ball, is coming off consistently big runs (including in Tests) and is a right-hander in a lefty-heavy top six with Warner, Khawaja and Head basically certainties. For mine, either Burns opens and the batsman who's looking in the best form against the moving ball bats six (Patterson, Pucovksi, Labuschagne, Wade etc) or Harris opens and Burns bats 6. It would be risky to leave Burns out and have 5 lefties in the top six, there's enough pressure on Smith's batting already.

2019-07-19T03:25:38+00:00

Brett

Guest


So a single century against Sri Lanka with the Kookaburra ball at home carries more weight than a 1,100 run season averaging at 66 against the Dukes ball in County Cricket? Patterson averaged 32 against the Dukes in the Shield rounds and has had a poor Aus A tour so far. Labuschagne over Patterson at 6. For that matter, Labuschagne over Khawaja at 3 if he isn't fit.

2019-07-18T04:05:43+00:00

Chris Kettlewell

Roar Guru


The suggestion from Hohns is a squad of 16. I have a feeling that Wade gets in there as a combined backup middle order batsman and backup keeper. And only 5 fast bowlers. So it's either Siddle or Tremain, not both. I'm not sold on Harris or Burns to open with Warner. Harris seems to be coming in with much better current form while Burns would again be hard done by to miss out, getting picked for just a couple of tests, doing well in them, then being dropped again the next time tests roll around. He's been in that position before, would be unlucky to be again. Getting Wade into the starting lineup is a bit tough too. The only real batsmen he could push out would be Head or Patterson. And both of those two have only just started their test careers and have both done pretty well in the limited opportunities they've had. So while Wade has been in great first class form, it would be pretty rough to drop either of those two, with Head averaging 51 after 8 tests and Patterson averaging 114 from his limited test opportunities so far. Khawaja's injury may open up more options there though. If he is out, then either Patterson or Labushagne bat at 3. If it's Patterson then Wade or Labushagne slide in at #6. Or Smith moves up to 3, everyone just slides up, and then Wade or Labushagne have a chance to play at 6.

2019-07-18T03:21:04+00:00

Jero

Roar Rookie


I know we're all itching for 1 August, but maybe we should all hold our breath, calm down, and see what happens in the Australia v Australia A game. Because the key decisions, like who opens with Warner, who bats at 6, and who the the third seamer is, are such margin calls that it will come down to what happens in this game, to close the deal for the lucky ones picked. Everyone, whether in the last Test, in the Shield or on tour as we speak, has some recent(ish) form to put them squarely in the mix. And if the World Cup Final is anything to go by, Harris, Burns, Bancroft, Wade, Labuschagne and Patterson will all get scores of 50 in the first innings, 25 in the second, and Josh, Sid and Pattinson all end up with the same bowling figures too. Just to make things even harder. Maybe the boundary count will be re-employed to sort things out, once and for all. I'm taking a Bex, lying down and thinking of England until 26 July.

2019-07-18T01:50:46+00:00

Chris

Guest


Perfect.

2019-07-18T01:01:41+00:00

13th Man

Roar Rookie


My only real complaint is that Wade isn't in the XI itself. Form dictates that he has to be.

Read more at The Roar