The Wrap: Are the Wallabies cursed? Too right they are

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

Losing 35-17 to the Springboks in Johannesburg, the Wallabies kicked off their 2019 Test season by extending a 56-year Ellis Park losing streak.

Predictably, yesterday’s headlines suggested that the Wallabies are cursed. And it’s true, they are.

But it’s got nothing to do with Ellis Park.

Try instead their inability to remain composed and clinical to finish off clear-cut scoring opportunities. Or captain Michael Hooper failing to demonstrate Test-match awareness, neglecting easy points when they were offered to him.

Or the Wallabies’ ball-runners consistently entering contact too upright, against an enveloping, fast-advancing defensive line known for favouring upright choke tackles.

Or the inability of Samu Kerevi and Dane Haylett-Petty to treasure possession in the third quarter, so as to help stem the Springbok tide and provide a platform to re-establish field position.

Ditto Taniela Tupou, whose biggest crime was not to fly into a prone Springbok to clean him off the ball, but his lack of situational awareness, failing to grasp that his side had already won the scrum and there was nothing further to be gained from once again drawing the attention of the match officials to his shoulder.

And what about Wallabies coach Michael Cheika reverting to type after the match, bemoaning Tupou’s yellow card, as if another disappointing loss – their tenth from their last 14 matches – was somehow down to referee Paul Williams.

Failing to look inwards and acknowledge one’s own deficiencies. Now that’s a heck of a curse.

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Make no mistake, there were some good signs shown by the Wallabies. There is also the promise of emerging players below, while Scott Johnson and his man Dave Rennie wait their turn to chart a new course from 2020.

But for now, the die is cast. Quibble all you like about player selections here and there, but the Wallabies essentially contain all of Australia’s best players. And for as long as they stay in the World Cup, for the rest of this year they will continue to live or die by Cheika’s sword.

But too many of the usual hallmarks were there. After adjusting to the initial jolt of the Springboks’ rushing defence, the Wallabies twice failed to commit enough numbers to their attacking breakdown, the second one freeing up S’busiso Nkosi on the right edge, who calmly put debutant halfback Herschel Jantjies across for the opening score.

The reply should have come at 18 minutes, but Samu Kerevi inexplicably failed a basic draw-and-pass test, which would have seen Lukhan Salakaia-Loto stroll in under the posts instead of being the recipient of an obvious forward pass, which was easy pickings for TMO Rowan Kitt.

It was another trademark lack of urgency on the part of the Wallabies pack that led to the Springboks’ second try – too slow to form a defensive line after an attacking scrum broke up, allowing Pieter-Steph du Toit and Jantjies to split them open and Lood de Jager to burrow over.

The Wallabies finally struck back when Kerevi stayed strong in contact and a quick transfer enabled Haylett-Petty to scramble over on the corner. But Haylett-Petty turned villain five minutes later, fumbling a pick up and score with no opposition player in sight, after he and Bernard Foley had done well to work their way around the umbrella defence.

If there was cause for optimism at half-time – the Wallabies were only down 14-10 and had left 17 clear points on the park – it dissipated in the third quarter, with the Springboks dominating field position and territory, and the Wallabies were unable to impose any further imprint on the match until it was all but over.

To be sure, Tupou’s card didn’t help – the Springboks working the numerical advantage to put Nkosi over. But Jantjies’ second try was again an illustration of the Wallabies’ poor situational awareness, first Haylett-Petty and then Matt Toomua leaving the side door ajar.

Regaining his feet, Toomua only turned away for a split second, but this is Test match rugby, the margins are fine and good players exploit even the slightest weakness.

Jantjies certainly looked like a good player, enjoying a dream debut behind his monster pack, and coach Rassie Erasmus will be delighted that the confidence he extended to his squad players was rewarded with a strong win.

For the Wallabies, it tells a tale that their best – Nic White – still came second to his opposite on the night. Debutant Isi Naisarani fought hard to get some go-forward in the first half, and ring-in prop Harry Johnson-Holmes acquitted himself well on limited preparation.

Both Kurtley Beale and Will Genia added spark and class from the bench, but the game was already lost by the time they were introduced.

Beale poses an interesting selection poser for Cheika. A mercurial player, it was his opening-minute shocker that set the Wallabies on a downwards spiral in the equivalent fixture last year. Yet at his best, he can unlock any defence.

(Photo: Rugby AU Media/Stuart Walmsley)

For now, Cheika seems comfortable using him as a finisher (is there a sillier term in the game?). But as the inquiry into the sinking of the Titanic in 1912 discovered, while it is true that the ship was grossly under-fitted with lifeboats, the best way to have avoided a disaster was to not hit an iceberg in the first place.

No doubt that question and others will be addressed when Cheika sits down to study his opponent for next weekend. Oh, hang on a minute.

Assuming that Cheika’s claim (boast?) to eschew video analysis of opponents is actually true, whoever fills him in on the Pumas’ 20-16 loss to the All Blacks will tell him to prepare for a side that continues to grow in cohesion, has a world-class line-out, offers high intensity in defence, and – just like South Africa – has the strike power and speed to punish even the smallest lapses of concentration.

Over their short 34-year, 27-match history, Argentina has often been highly competitive against the All Blacks, only to fail to last the distance as the class and fitness differential kicked in late in the game.

Here, despite the All Blacks trying to crank up the pace of the game at every opportunity, the Pumas not only stuck to them but clearly had the better of the second half, despite coming up short on the scoreboard.

At their heart was the wonderful Pablo Matera, continuing his great Super Rugby form, and the always inventive Tomas Cubelli, in command of all the halfback skills and varying his game wonderfully.

In such a hard-fought and even match, it seemed incongruous that the difference was ultimately a soft try just before half-time, presented on a platter to Brodie Retallick by Nicolas Sanchez.

Earlier, Ngani Laumape had burrowed over after some impressive lead-up work by his pack and Aaron Smith, and going into half-time at 20-9 ahead, there was every reason for All Blacks fans to believe that opening match rust was – like players having a proper off-season to revitalise body and mind – a thing of the past.

But via a combination of their own impatience, ill-discipline and some wonderful Pumas defence, New Zealand never seriously threatened the try line again. In retrospect, if Sanchez probably kicked too much ball away in the first half, the All Blacks didn’t kick enough in the second, in the process losing the field position battle.

(Photo by Gabriel Rossi/Getty Images)

Nevertheless a win is a win, with a number of new players successfully introduced to Test rugby, including Sevu Reece, who hinted at exciting times ahead against any defence that allows him even the slightest latitude.

If there are concerns, they will be around lack of ball control at vital times and how Patrick Tuipulotu and Vaea Fifita failed to impose themselves on the match, although to be fair, Fifita’s line-out contribution was an important one.

There was also a curious tactical decision in the 77th minute when, after previously absorbing a lot of pressure on defence, the All Blacks elected to play wide into the collision zone from a scrum on halfway, when a more certain ball retention option may have been the safer route to take so close to full-time.

Almost inevitably a turnover and penalty resulted, offering the Pumas two final chances to win the match from a line-out maul. On the second they threw long but failed to get their blocks set tight, the maul falling in a heap, along with their chances of a first historic win against the All Blacks.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

It was enough, however, to suggest that a win next weekend in Brisbane is not only possible but likely – particularly against a Wallabies side seemingly so cursed as this one is.

Time this week to finish with a competition, where readers are invited to submit their version of what they believe Beauden Barrett had scrawled on his wrist during the Buenos Aires Test.

Leading off, here are some possible contenders…

Keen rugby fans everywhere will know that only two of those things are true.

The Crowd Says:

2019-07-27T04:06:44+00:00

ThugbyFan

Roar Guru


Good comment Nuisance. Thanks for that as I was never too sure of how long does altitude training take to be effective. The WB match tactics also were pretty naive and all things said a SB victory was on the cards, their forwards were magnificent. However the WB players looked like they had 5kg lead shoes on after about 35 minutes. That 1st half was played at blistering pace.

2019-07-25T04:41:46+00:00

Ryan

Roar Rookie


..or over-feeling things?

2019-07-24T16:41:28+00:00

LifestyleSpecialist

Roar Rookie


Bok's first try was a forward pass to the 9 Jantjes. No on ground replays to alert the ref! Classic. I can't believe they let the big screen replays be decided by a local without any purview from the match officials. We see it again and again across all countries. The big screen is now the 17th man after the crowd! Still, Wobs not good enough to win so won't blame our loss on this.

2019-07-24T12:29:34+00:00

charly777

Guest


The curse of the "intelligent" is to know the small things that happen at the power level and not be able to remedy them! The ignorant have a limited view of the world ... and why is he happier?

2019-07-24T06:29:47+00:00

freddieeffer

Roar Rookie


Yep, there's a cast of thousands in there (uni) mate..... I can personally vouch for that!

2019-07-24T05:10:31+00:00

Over here

Roar Rookie


I was watching Shane Lowry trying to hang on to win the Open and a mate sent me a message about the wallabies game being on tv. A couple of years ago, I would have channel surfed between TV ads. This year, I stayed watching the golf. When the clown leaves, I will come back.

2019-07-24T04:28:34+00:00

Over here

Roar Rookie


the old saying "its better to keep your mouth shut and have people think you are dumb than to open your mouth and prove it". oh look, its a talking clown!!!!!

2019-07-24T04:23:49+00:00

Over here

Roar Rookie


Very true. for example, I was sitting next to an oldish long haired hippy type on a flight from singapore to sydney. we get talking and he tells me that he was a retired university professor ( i gave him a good googling when i got home and he was telling the truth). he told me how he led the world (true again) in xxxxx research in his prime but now he was living the hippy life. great!!!! he then tells me how he was just coming back from some hippy festival and recommended to me that if i wanted get a great buzz, I should try injecting pure heroin, not the dangerous commercial stuff on the streets. great!!!!! thanks for sharing. i'll just stick to beer. just because you've got a uni degree doesn't mean you are smart (true again)

2019-07-24T00:35:39+00:00

buk

Guest


The usual great wrap/read Geoff. But I was a bit lost on the exact direction of your analogy ' ... the best way to have avoided a disaster was to not hit an iceberg in the first place. ... ' So to avoid disasters, do the Wallabies stop playing test rugby? I must admit, has a certain amount of appeal as would ensure they go through unbeaten from here on in :)

2019-07-24T00:22:59+00:00

charly_777

Guest


If you want your players to swell their lungs, create a soccer team and play against a Bolivian team at 4500 meters high! The Johannesburg 1700 m is nothing!

2019-07-23T14:35:45+00:00

Carlos the Argie

Roar Guru


Austria, Switzerland and Germany. I meant German speaking.

2019-07-23T11:44:18+00:00

Wally James

Roar Guru


Your memory is good Geoff. Our thoughts seem well aligned. I was at Twickenham in 2015 to watch the 13 man Wallabies defend against Wales. That self-belief came from honesty, truth and hard work. Let’s get back to that. Give the weather, ground size, refs and miscellaneous irrelevancies a miss. Have the courage to change the things we can (not throwing forward passes to get a bloke over the goal line), serenity to accept the things we can’t change (ref’s decisions for instance) and the wisdom to know the difference. Cheers Wal

2019-07-23T11:03:53+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


TF, I live in Johannesburg. It’s not the nicest place in the world. Nobody comes here for a vacation. To subject the players to this environment for 2 weeks was mindless. Better off preparing at home. 2 weeks anyway not sufficient to fully acclimatize to the altitude. Takes at least a month. The only reason I can think of and it fits with your post is that altitude training is highly beneficial. Many top names in World athletics including Usain Bolt came here regularly for that reason. Good facilities and altitude. But as an athletics coach myself for the training to be beneficial it has to be tough so it cannot be done in tapering for an event or match. Could it be possible that Cheika only has the World Cup in mind and that this was the best opportunity to improve base conditioning and fitness levels. In fact Bok coach Erasmus did exactly the same by selecting a B team. He knew it was risky but is only concerned with building depth for The World Cup. Just thinking out loud.

2019-07-23T10:53:43+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Give Jake White a call. Say you are sorry for what happened at the Brumbies and that all was just a misunderstanding. He won't say no. He won't let Australia down. He knows how to produce winning teams.

2019-07-23T10:43:37+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Wallabies were ahead on every important count at halftime except the most important one... The scoreboard. But I would not be too critical. Ellis Park is a huge factor. There is a reason no Wallaby team has won in Johannesburg for 63 years. The thin highveld air is The Boks 16th man. Better Aussie teams than this one... In fact great Aussie teams have not conquered in Joburg. The yellow card was a killer blow. Players lungs feel like they are on fire and fatigue takes over. With Having to play in the 2nd half for 10 minutes a man down was asking too much of bodies already under the cosh. That was the turning point.

2019-07-23T10:10:39+00:00

somer

Guest


Spot on. I've said it before, Australian rugby is obsessed with high impact ball runners. The fact that Cheika built his Super title win on big dynamic ball runners didn't help the situation further. As you say, everything occurring without the ball is given short shift - defense, work rate, breakdown technique, positional play, field kicking, etc. etc. There's the odd glimmer of multi-dimensional enterprise - the Brumbies and mauling, but in the context of the Brumbies gameplan, this deviation became a tad one-dimensional in itself. Even passing is an afterthought, Folau, Kerevi, TK, Koroibete, all struggle with a simple draw and pass. Before them, AAC and Digby, were ball-hoggers extraordinaire.

2019-07-23T09:38:49+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


The "German countries" Carlos? Do tell?

2019-07-23T09:34:03+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


Check mate.

2019-07-23T09:31:19+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


I hope you are right,Funbus ;-)

2019-07-23T09:13:07+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


Double Agent: Great point going almost unnoticed. Personally i think any (ruck )hit a decent interval after the whistle is cowardly and should receive an automatic card.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar