Get up quick and shut em down: The World Cup rush is on

By Will Knight / Expert

Rush defence is all the rage, and it seems it has the potential to turn the upcoming Rugby World Cup into a French Open-style slugfest.

The good news is that the Wallabies, if they employ the strategy effectively, are arguably a better chance of knocking over the teams that have beaten them consistently over the past four years. The All Blacks, for instance, look more beatable when sides – like the Springboks last weekend – shut down their attacking weapons with a rush defence. Get in the grind, keep them relatively quiet for an hour, they’re under the pump and you’re a big chance.

The bad news is the World Cup in Japan might not be the best spectacle.

The clay surface at Roland Garros blunts the pace and power of the top tennis players, forcing long baseline rallies. It can be dour. Some appreciate the subtleties; many just wait to hear that Rafael Nadal has won another title.

Rush defence can similarly play a major role in turning a rugby Test into a dull contest, one that leads to one-out ball-running, more kicking and a time-sapping fight for set-piece dominance.

Boks coach Rassie Erasmus reckons tries will be at a premium in Japan, at least in games between the top-tier nations, due to the tactic.

“I guess in the old days, the scores were 12-10, 15-12 and Test match rugby was like that… it was only one or two tries normally,” he said after South Africa’s 16-all draw with New Zealand in Wellington.

“I’m not sure it’s the way the game should go but it’s definitely the way the game is going when you’re under pressure.”

(AP Photo/John Cowpland)

The Springboks bolted up on the All Blacks, stifling the best attacking side in world rugby. They were happy to get into the arm-wrestle and with the Kiwis under pressure in the last quarter – a situation they’re not used to – Herschel Jantjes crossed in the final minute to snatch a draw.

The Wallabies couldn’t handle South Africa’s rushing defence the previous weekend in Johannesburg, and the Boks were quick to seize on the errors made as they back-pedalled under pressure.

Argentina have also been charging up in defence in their two Rugby Championship games so far. They went close to beating the All Blacks in Buenos Aires and were in the contest until the final whistle against the Wallabies.

A blitz defence aims to shut down time and space for the attacking line, and often forcing ball-runners back on the inside. It means teams can back themselves to defend in the midfield and are less likely to get burned on the outside.

It certainly has its risks. There tend to be a decent number of missed tackles as players get beaten on the inside shoulder, but if the defenders further infield are committed and moving up with speed, they can mop up these misses.

It also means that if you get a side on the back foot, the job of a ball pilferer like David Pocock becomes easier and the chance of turnovers through counter-rucking become more common.

All Blacks coach Steve Hansen is well aware that opposition sides will use a fast defensive line to shut down his classy backs. The tactic is arguably the common denominator in their rare losses over the past few years to Ireland, the British and Irish Lions and South Africa.

It’s the blueprint teams will attempt to replicate against the Kiwis in Japan, and hopefully the Wallabies will adopt it over the next two Bledisloe Cup matches in Perth and Auckland.

Bolt up on Beauden Barrett at no.10 to try to suffocate him and the rest of the backline. It’s likely that Hansen shifted Barrett to fullback last weekend and moved Richie Mo’unga to five-eighth to get his prized attacking gem away from rush hour.

It’s been noted that Barrett has struggled at Super Rugby level against the Crusaders in the past because of their line speed, while in this season’s semi-final in Christchurch, the Hurricanes showed one way to combat a rush defence.

With the Crusaders smothering the Canes, Barrett and halfback TJ Perenara had success in turning the home side around with some smart kicking in behind the rush.

It’s something Michael Cheika should be aware of against the All Blacks, and for Bernard Foley, Christian Lealiifano, Will Genia or Nic White to kick in behind an aggressive defensive line – with Samu Kerevi and Tevita Kuridrani steaming through – is a smart option.

It goes against Cheika’s ball-in-hand preference, but it can create chaos if used prudently.

(Photo by Michael Dodge/Getty Images)

The other point to make is the Wallabies shouldn’t use the out-the-back, second-man plays too often as, against a fast-approaching defence, running the ball with playmakers so far behind the advantage line is a dangerous ploy.

Against the top teams, it creates too much stress. Using that depth to kick for territory is wise, while the risk of a turnover when running, with so many players in front of the ball, is high-risk.

A blitz defence usually leads to more kicking that means a strong set-piece becomes even more important. With tries at a premium, accurate goal-kicking also often becomes crucial.

But with defences naturally tiring around the hour mark, there’s added demand on an effective bench to come on and add energy and aggression. It’s an issue for the Wallabies, who didn’t get much out of Rob Simmons, Luke Jones and Matt Toomua against the Pumas. James O’Connor didn’t get much of a chance, while James Slipper and Taniela Tupou were solid. Tolu Latu was the bench standout, adding plenty of pressure at the breakdown and sparking up the Wallabies forwards.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The other option is to get expansive when given a chance from a scrum, but moreso a lineout with a lot of space to move in. Go for broke with a slick backline move. It worked for the Wallabies, their only try from Reece Hodge coming from a nicely executed set-play from the top of a lineout.

Blast away when given the opening as over the next four months with rush defence all the rage, there might not be many opportunities to get some room and wind up.

The Crowd Says:

2019-08-05T03:32:55+00:00

Realist271

Guest


Inside ball to a hard running back on a good line usually dents the rush defense and add a good attacking kicking game with a chase

2019-08-05T02:29:08+00:00

numpty

Roar Rookie


Will, I agree WBs should not be playing out the back as they did against SA. However I think rather than the chip in behind, smart use of plays off the 9 around the ruck and down the blindside is how to best counter a rush defense. This is playing where the rush isn't so to speak and unsettles their defensive line. Once they are unorganized or back pedalling because you are in behind the advantage line, then you spin it to the open or kick. Going down the blind has the added benefit of putting wingers/full backs in two minds of whether to be out the back or in the line, which then creates space for the kick. My 2 cents anyway.

2019-08-03T23:55:31+00:00

Jacko

Guest


So I guess its dumb teams deciding to take the 3 points instead of going for 5 or 7? Every time there is a penalty their is also a choice....Most chose what suits them at the time.....

2019-08-03T23:47:05+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Nothing wrong with a good hangover Rahrah...Its kinda an egg/chicken thing I guess....They made the errors so the pressure increased so they mad more errors.....i didnt really think the errors were made because of pressure but certainly the pressure increases once a few errors were made....

2019-08-03T22:29:26+00:00

graymatter

Roar Rookie


Chucked - You make a good if a little exaggerated point. The fact is many of these rushed defenses are leaving the mark well before the ball is released from the maul or ruck. Refs need to police this better. That said I do think backlines need to have the skill to rush up and tackle the opposition. The tackle also needs to be dominant and drive the ball carrier to the ground. Too many tackles are to high with swinging arms that merely brush the opponents chest or back - the turnstile! I actually think that the statistics of players tackles often count these ineffective contacts too much. Back to the Off-side element I do have a solution that would go a long way to addressing the problem. A rule simply needs to be introduced that requires all players not effectively connected to the maul or ruck to be 5 meters, rather than the current behind the last feet. This would give an effective 10 meter separation between backlines and allow the Refs to better police the offside infringement.

2019-08-03T22:15:00+00:00

graymatter

Roar Rookie


I can answer that one for you Rob. he's a better 5/8 and unlike Foley he can read a play! Further if you are going to base a game around your set play like lineouts then maybe it makes sense to include a 5/8 from a side that has demonstrated the best execution of this of all the Australian sides in the just completed Super 15 comp.

2019-08-03T10:57:03+00:00

Bentnuc

Roar Pro


Interesting read Will. Each world cup has had higher scores than the last one. I wonder if this year will buck the trend? People would rather see close matches anyway I guess

2019-08-03T09:46:13+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


SA Kiwi I’m not sure why the rush defence is somehow becoming viewed as a Bok tactic. It’s not. All teams deploy it in one form or another. All teams test the offside line. All. Also I fully disagree that the final Bok try was a fluke. Great no look pass from Pollard to release Willie into space who again perfectly set Kolbe free. Kolbe subsequent chip kick was great and in all probability Pieter Steff was his intended target. Jantjies got a little lucky with the bounce off his face, but he still had to finish it. Try was many things a fluke it was not.

2019-08-03T09:22:10+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Unfortunately the new proposed rule changes by the IRB which are now going to be trialed brings Union closer and closer to league. I am not pleased.

2019-08-03T07:34:37+00:00

FatOldHalfback

Roar Rookie


Trouble that has, imho, destroyed league, attackers just charge up one out and get over the advantage line easily, in league this has led to the wrestle tackle as the only way to slow the game down and get the defense set. In rugby a similiar thing would happen, the attacking side would almost always try for a quick ruck play and one out runner to either get a metre over the advantage line or catch a back-pedeling defense and milk a penalty, the defense would only have one option and that would be to wrestle and the ref would either let this limited play go or blow the whistle - 30 penalties later the score would be 21 all

2019-08-03T04:44:07+00:00

Ryan

Roar Rookie


Referring to the piggies not backs.

2019-08-03T03:46:10+00:00

chucked

Guest


Finally..someone has called rush defence for what it is...OFFSIDE PLAY

2019-08-03T03:42:40+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Yep Pk they were indeed running forward and back :)

2019-08-03T02:03:32+00:00

RahRah

Roar Rookie


And very fast wingers

2019-08-03T01:27:33+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


is that for forwards only if not can you break it down to forwards and backs?

2019-08-03T01:15:31+00:00

RahRah

Roar Rookie


Jacko that is very true, but it’s my contention that the pressure applied by constantly being pinned back in their own 22 and the ensuing frustration was the cause of those errors. (Hope that made sense, I have a hideous hangover this morning)

2019-08-02T18:17:26+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


Yea Ulrich they got that right , but. In reality it was 80% of that strategy targeting SBW. It’s of course also not without risk. Must execute or leave yourself a tackler short. In the context of this discussion, it tells me just what a massive threat Boks think SBW is. As a Saffer, leave him out and I am gonna have a pint. Very good for us.

2019-08-02T18:11:44+00:00

SA Kiwi

Guest


So glad to see there are other people hating it. You are 100% correct.

2019-08-02T18:03:30+00:00

SA Kiwi

Guest


Rush defense is just another name for teams being mostly offside. If the officials don't do something about it, it's going to kill rugby as a spectacle. About SA being on top of the All Blacks during the final quarter, what test did you watch? That final try was a complete fluke.

2019-08-02T16:19:49+00:00

Ulrich

Roar Rookie


Indeed. The Boks consistently tackled low and high, not only on SBW, but on several players where necessary. If you go the around the 26th minute of this video they start talking about it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBDM4KxG0_w&t=903s

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar