Ben Stokes: More than just a cricketing hero

By Ajay Venkitaraman / Roar Rookie

With this superhuman innings, Ben Stokes has ensured that his name will forever be etched into the memories of cricket fans and his legend will be passed on to the kids of the future generations with some figments of imagination.

“Oh yes, he really did hypnotise the bowlers into bowling in his arc, as he hoicked them repeatedly into the western terrace. He also controlled the trajectory of the ball after hitting it, which tantalised the fielders and just fell out of their reach.”

Ben Stokes’s innings has been dissected in every way possible and praise has been heaped on each aspect of his innings. And they will continue to sing paeans for a long time when they talk about this Test or even this Ashes series.

But when I was discussing this innings with my brother, he asked me a question that made me see this spectacle from a different aspect. He asked me what I had learnt from this innings for my life.

Frankly, I was surprised by his question, which has inspired this article. It is a very important question that anyone who takes this sport seriously would want to ask themselves.

When people make highlight reels of the innings, no one would add the most important part of the innings, which was the 50 balls he faced on Day 3, scoring only two runs.

The fact that this was coming from the batsman who hit the fastest 250 at Cape Town three years ago was no surprise, because there’s no batsman in the current age who rises to the occasion as well as Stokes does.

England had been skittled out for 67 in less than 30 overs in their first innings and Stokes was no exception to the recklessness shown by the batsmen in that dig. But he learnt from his mistake and understood that one misjudgement by him would have meant that England could kiss their hopes of regaining the Ashes goodbye.

Like the foundations of a skyscraper that lend strength to the building but remain hidden beneath the ground, Stokes scrapped his way to two off 50 balls, ensuring that England were left with a glimmer of hope when they came out to bat on Day 4.

When Root fell before the second new ball arrived, the burden of the run chase squarely fell on the broad shoulders of Stokes. The arrival of Bairstow stoked within him the fire he needed to later change his tempo.

Bairstow’s wicket after lunch on Day 4 caused a collapse where England lost five wickets for 41 runs and Stokes was left with the No.11 Jack Leach, with a seemingly insurmountable task of scoring 73 runs to win the match.

He switched gears, realising that it was now or never. After being on three off 73 balls, he scored 74 runs off 45 balls in that partnership of 76 with Leach, which was as much about boundary-hitting as it was about farming the strike.

(Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

The switch hit and the paddle scoop – both of which went for sixes – were shots he couldn’t have pulled off if he hadn’t backed himself to clear the fence. That confidence earned him a bit of luck as well, which manifested itself in the sixes that just cleared the fielders and the umpiring error off Lyon.

The self belief that he showed throughout that innings – where he battled cramps, great bowling, a hard new ball and wickets falling on the other end – is what I hope to emulate in every walk of life.

If we can put in that amount of enthusiasm in our lives at least once a week, it can really bring about a transformation. And it is easy to forget that this innings came after bowling close to 25 overs unchanged, the spell broken only by the end of play on Day 2 and a short toilet break on Day 3.

Don’t forget the three wickets he bagged in the process as well, bending his back when all the other bowlers had pretty much lost hope. Shane Warne said that he’s the guy that trains the hardest in the nets, and his effort in the sweltering heat on Sunday is one for the ages.

If I can have just one takeaway from this knock, it’s the old cliche: “It ain’t over until the fat lady sings”.

The innings itself almost completes his redemption after the forgettable brawl that led him to miss the 2017-18 Ashes where the Aussies dished out a 4-0 thrashing.

We have always had a soft spot for imperfect heroes who make mistakes, then redeem themselves successfully. There’s a reason people love Maverick more than Iceman in Top Gun. Ben Stokes is one such guy. He’s made terrible mistakes and paid the price. But the way he has transformed his life and his cricketing career after that is commendable.

Lesser men would have been shattered by that final in 2016. Great men might never have come back after a year-long ban while in their prime. Stokes, though, has always found a way.

He exhibits in his life the never-say-die attitude that he showcased on Sunday. Everyone faces tough times, and no one would have walked the face of this planet without feeling as if the world around them has come crashing down at least a few times.

What differentiates the great from their contemporaries is their ability to bounce back from it all and put their best foot forward in life. That probably is the most important lesson that people who have tracked Stokes’ career closely would have learnt.

Thirty-eight years ago, the last legendary English all-rounder Ian Botham took the Ashes by storm in another Leeds Test, as England squared the series after being 1-0 down and later went on to win the Ashes.

If this match in Leeds galvanizes the English team like it did then, and England regain the urn, the Stokes redemption will be complete. For that, he’ll have to play a hand similar to what Beefy did – he was man of the match in three of the six Tests in that series.

There’s a reason why people follow sports with all their heart. It’s not just an avenue for vicarious pleasure. It’s a way of life, as Ben Stokes showed on Sunday.

The Crowd Says:

2019-09-03T00:00:28+00:00

Spanner

Roar Rookie


Great point Maxy - the boy swung from his a... and had a truckload of luck - we did not bowl well to him but let's see how he goes for the rest of the series. I, for one, am pleased the poms are going for the "one dayer" approach to test cricket because our bowling is strong and accurate. "Bowlers win test matches - batsmen save them !" (3 - 1 final scoreline)

2019-09-01T22:44:44+00:00

Dutski

Roar Guru


Hey ACS Bring it on! I know there is some interest in cricket beyond Australian cricket. The thing is, if it is well written and an interesting topic you will find readers. I know there's an Indian contingent that follow the Roar, so there may be interest. Try it out! I've written stuff about watching my then 8 year old play cricket, so if people will read that, they'll read anything! Good luck and look forward to it. D

2019-09-01T11:21:17+00:00

Neil Back

Roar Rookie


You really are quite strange. It's only the feeblest minds that resort to simply making stuff up to support their unfathomable agendas. You might have a shot at the US presidency with this approach. Of course the truth of the matter has been verbalized and publicized widely and consistently by Archer for a long time. As you well know. As everybody well knows. Serious question. Why post this?

2019-08-31T13:43:59+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


One of the more selfish innings seen in recent times. If I were Leach, I'd be livid. He started the Test summer with a 92. Just needs to score eight more to bring up the 100 for the summer; yet he's being denied at every turn. Have to feel for him...

2019-08-31T13:34:31+00:00

Titch

Guest


Upon reflection it was a shamelessly selfish innings; denying Leach a Test 3.

2019-08-31T11:20:23+00:00

Brian George

Guest


So you also comment as Gone for 4 Carn't?

2019-08-31T06:08:29+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


I'd imagine there would be a decent sized diaspora of expats from cricket nations in the US, especially India. So no doubt there is some competitive cricket being played at local level. Depending on where you live I guess. The USA is an Associate Member (though half the nations on the planet seem to be Associate Members) though the US actually holds ODI status along with seven other Associate members until at least 2022, in addition to the twelve Full Members. They played in the 2004 Champions Trophy and I see that they they are starting a Tri-Nations ODI tournament commencing in two weeks in the US (don't know the venues). Get along! So seems like there must be a decent domestic structure underpinning their international team.

2019-08-31T05:53:31+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Yes I do of course. But at the same time I don't think an individual should be made to carry the solution for/the burden of, an organisation (WICB) that has failed to properly govern/administer/grow the game. Three years restraint on a player performing at the highest level is a sufficient imposition on individuals; after which they should be able to pursue their own career path. It's a professional sport and like in any profession, the organisation that offers the most attractive working conditions (experience, diversity, remuneration) is likely to attract the best individuals. I get that West Indies cricket is starting from a position of disadvantage, but again I don't think individual players should be penalised because of that. Now a solution may be a better financial sharing model among member nations so there is cash available to retain talent, but there's no guarantee that the previous/current maladministration by Boards of nations like West Indies and Sril Lanka would effectively use those funds appropriately anyway.

2019-08-31T05:28:10+00:00

KenoathCarnt

Roar Rookie


Im saying that WI are missing out on a talented player that kids look up to simply because they couldnt afford him. Don't you want to see WI back to a very competetive team?

2019-08-31T02:07:20+00:00

Gee

Roar Rookie


He is just a cricket hero, as a person (and on YouTube) he seems like a real piece of work.

AUTHOR

2019-08-31T01:53:42+00:00

Ajay Venkitaraman

Roar Rookie


You stumped me with that question. I have been here only for a short while and I don't know of any locals who are into cricket. I've tried to capture their attention towards the game though, with moderate success. It's a work in progress though.

2019-08-31T01:52:14+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


But what's the relevance? Who doesn't work for money?

2019-08-31T01:50:03+00:00

ChrisH

Roar Rookie


Exactly - esp if that person (Archer) is *already* a citizen of that country by parenthood.

2019-08-31T01:24:34+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


There's plenty of stats nerds here! How's the state of domestic cricket in the US?

2019-08-31T01:22:00+00:00

Chivas

Roar Rookie


Yeah look at Stokes

AUTHOR

2019-08-31T01:17:12+00:00

Ajay Venkitaraman

Roar Rookie


To be honest, I'm neither an Australian (nor an Brit) for that matter. I'm from India, currently in the US of A, and I'm passionate about world cricket in general. To the extent that I sometimes have constant headaches after messing my sleep schedule because of matches during odd hours. I was thinking of a shorter article and probably a statistical analysis which some may find boring anyway, and hence my reservations on publishing here.

2019-08-31T01:13:05+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Goodness, imagine the concept of allowing skilled persons born in other countries to come to Australia and become citizens in order for them to practice their craft/profession....

2019-08-31T01:05:56+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


What areas of cricket beyond an Australian-focus are of interest to you?

2019-08-31T01:01:16+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Not as sickening and hyperbolic as the first sentence of this comment. As for accuracy, opinions are just that, so accuracy is irrelevant, unless one believes that their opinion is the only one that matters. Trust you appreciate the irony of my response.

2019-08-31T00:55:25+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


More than half of Australia's first Test team was born in England, India and Ireland! Not sure the rest could be called Australian given the country didn't technically exist at the time?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar