Win the toss, think hard and bat first

By Arvind / Roar Rookie

As a silver coin spun in the early September London air, Tim Paine correctly guessed the side on which it would land.

Then, when he decided to field first, he got it all wrong – if history prior to The Oval Test is any guide. Data for The Oval Cricket Ground only confirms the age old adage, ‘think hard and bat first.’

There’s close to nine per cent excess wins for the team batting first, which is why, of the 102 Tests played at The Oval, only 14 times have toss-winning captains opted to field. Fielding first has not had any advantage.

Well, perhaps these are all just characteristics of small samples and there’s no larger pattern at play. Or is there?

What if one were to look at all matches played in England. Well, of the 516 Test matches played in England, captains chose nearly 80 per cent per cent of the time to bat first and enjoyed an excess 11 per cent wins compared to the team that batted second – or 47 additional Test wins in aggregate.

The remaining 109 Tests, where captains opted to field, they won an excess of three Tests compared to the team that batted first. That’s slightly less than three per cent.

What if we look at Australian grounds? Does it say anything different? Well, every ground in Australia (with a minimum of ten matches) shows greater chances of winning for batting first.

And, no surprise, the aggregate picture across all Australian grounds reflects this advantage. There’s a 17 per cent excess winrate for captains winning the toss and batting first compared to 23 per cent excess losses when fielding first. This is over all Tests played in Australia – about 318, with captains choosing 227 times to bat first and 91 times, including as Nasser Hussain most famously did, to bat second.

To illustrate the consistency, across time, of the advantages that have historically accrued to the team that chose to bat first, we can look at the cumulative wins less the losses from the decision to bat first. Of the approximately 1150 Test matches where the toss winner chose to bat and with a result (no draws), there was an additional 108 wins, about 9.2 per cent to the team that chose to bat. The chart seems to suggest a steady advantage that accumulates and with one noticeable period of decline.

To compare, we can examine a similar chart for the nearly 440 instances where there was a result after the toss winning captain chose to field. There’s an additional 15 wins, or 3.4 per cent, to the toss-winning captain that fielded first and this chart does not show as steadily accruing advantages as the previous one did.

So why is this relevant?

In an earlier post, I proposed an alternative scheme for the toss. Here, we examine the systematic bias in the outcome of Test matches and show that there’s a relatively consistent advantage of 9 per cent that captains have enjoyed when they decided to bat first.

With less consistency, they derived a benefit from fielding first.

In forthcoming articles, I hope to show how the historical data referred to above may guide how to bid for runs for the right to bat or field first.

The Crowd Says:

2019-10-22T22:24:01+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


Good grief!

2019-10-22T22:23:36+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


If you think bowlers are not rested after a 3 day break, I'd assume you have never played the game. Rest had nothing to do with that.

AUTHOR

2019-10-22T20:12:54+00:00

Arvind

Roar Rookie


Apologies. Meant to say “thanks Don”.

AUTHOR

2019-10-22T13:17:23+00:00

Arvind

Roar Rookie


Thanks dan. I tried looking for data sources with historical weather to check if the conditions at the time of toss were favorable for bowling or not. I couldn’t find any way to get historical weather beyond the last few years. That would have allowed me to further fine tune the analysis along the dimension you allude to. Unfortunately I couldn’t make progress.

2019-10-21T09:35:20+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


WA showed this game against the Vics, the benefit of batting second. It's the better tactic when conditions are tougher for bowlers than for batsmen.

AUTHOR

2019-10-19T05:10:17+00:00

Arvind

Roar Rookie


Jeff, your read is right. Theres matter of skill that can still influence a decision despite starting off with a disadvantage from batting second after losing a toss. The bat first advantage for toss winning captains has accrued steadily as seen in the charts but only accounts for 10 pct (loosely speaking) for wins.

AUTHOR

2019-10-19T00:56:02+00:00

Arvind

Roar Rookie


Paul, you are right to an extent. Theres more to come on this analyses, but this merely shows that the field first decision has had a far weaker advantages - its a trickier decision because you have to weigh the short term advantage of some condition with the longer term diadvantage of having to bat fourth. I hope to share some of that analysis soon.

2019-10-19T00:05:35+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


exactly right Jero.

2019-10-18T23:54:22+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


I agree. The stat in the article has 1150 result Tests, with batting first toss-winners winning 108 more games. So if I read that right it's 629 Tests v 521 Tests? Seems like a lot of Tests then where fielding first worked out ok. If it's clearly a benefit to bowl first - pitch or weather - do it. If there's no clear advantage, then err on the side of caution and bat.

2019-10-18T23:50:50+00:00

Jero

Roar Rookie


I guess if it's a skill you lack, best stick with Plan A.

2019-10-18T23:38:46+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Arvind, the point you're making is, winning the toss and batting first will probably give you a better chance of winning and that's fair enough, but it doesn't mean winning the toss and batting second is wrong completely, as some would like to make out. I agree, especially in this day and age where pitches are at their best on the first couple of days, batting first makes sense most of the time, but there are occasions where that tactic badly misfires as well. The last Test in the Ashes in '74/5 saw Chappelli win the toss and bat first on a pitch that was damp at one end. Result - Australia was fired out for 152, England piled on 529 when the pitch dried out and Australia lost by an innings. There is a skill in deciding what to do at the toss and simply batting first all the time will cause sides to come unstuck. Not often for sure, but it only has to happen once and that might be enough to gift a series to the opposition.

2019-10-18T22:51:19+00:00

Pierro

Roar Rookie


The army of Paine supporters will support his decision not to bat first at the oval , after his bowlers came off a 3 day break virtually bowling 200 overs . Played another key part in Australias loss at the oval , the last afternoon saw Butler pile on some runs day 1 as the seamers looked tired with the old ball. .Great analysis Arvind , overall most know its wise to bat first 90 percent of the time. Headingly is one of the grounds where its an advantage to chase runs electing to bowl first supported by a lot of run chase downs but I cant think of too many . Hope TP has learnt his lesson

2019-10-18T22:12:25+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


Looking at you Tim.

2019-10-18T22:06:14+00:00

Jero

Roar Rookie


Thanks Arvind, this is excellent. May all captains read and understand this, if they didn't already get it. Particularly all current and future Australian Test captains!

Read more at The Roar