Springboks out-Eddie England to claim 2019 Rugby World Cup

By Brett McKay / Expert

Incredible.

It was the word I started uttering to myself soon after Makazole Mapimpi’s try blew open what was already an incredible Rugby World Cup final, and it just remained the best word to describe South Africa’s 32-12 win over England, even well after Siya Kolisi lifted the William Webb Ellis trophy in Yokohama.

First and foremost, it’s been an incredible tournament from the outset. Japan emerged as the perfect hosts from the opening ceremony back on September 20 in Tokyo, and that carried right through to the conclusion last night. As much as I’d love to have been over there myself, the dozens of people I know in Japan have had an incredible time.

And it’s just been a joy to watch on TV, too.

Last weekend’s semi-finals were incredible for the contrasting ways they were played; England at their clinical best, putting the world on notice that they remain the ever-present force in the international game. And South Africa beating Wales in the calculated, attritional way that didn’t win them too many new fans, but was necessary to get them through to the Final.

South Africa then went beyond incredible, turning out a performance for the ages to beat England in a way that draws so many parallels to the way England ended New Zealand’s tournament last weekend.

Rassie Erasmus has done an incredible job, formulating the game plan and overseeing the perfect preparation that has seen South Africa claim their third Rugby World Cup 12 years after they won their second in 2007, which in turn was 12 years after winning their maiden championship in such uniting circumstances at home in 1995.

The 2007 captain John Smit said during the week that a Springboks win would be even more important and more uniting for their country than in 1995, and that came through in Kolisi’s immediate reaction after fulltime.

“I was just grateful. Grateful for everything the team has been through. We’ve faced a lot of challenges, but the people of South Africa have got in behind us, and we’re so grateful to the people of South Africa,” he said.

“We have so many problems in our country, but to have a team like this…we come from different backgrounds, different races, and we came together with one goal, and we wanted to achieve it.”

“I really hope we’ve done that for South Africa, to show that we can pull together if we want to achieve something.”

As far as on-field answers to the first post-match question posed in an interview go, it might be without peer the world over.

It was a truly incredible response.

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

And it spoke for the incredible way this South African squad has come together over the last year and a bit.

It’s little over 12 months ago since the ‘Boks lost to all three opponents in the Rugby Championship, and the way Erasmus has managed to bring every member of the squad together since he took on the head coach role in addition to his overseeing Director of Rugby.

Yet in that time, he’s created a total squad mentality, with every member aware of their role within the squad and for the squad.

Kolisi spoke of the need for them to play the six-two forwards-backs spilt on the bench throughout the tournament and especially through the knockout stage, with the job of the finishing forwards just as important as the starters.

The performance of those finishers was indeed incredible. Superb even.

The ability to replace a world-class tight five with another equally world-class tight five is a luxury no other coach has had in this tournament, yet Erasmus had them singing, completely overpowering England upfront, and transferring that dominance into opportunities out wide.

Not many opportunities out wide, mind you, but such was the incredible performance of the Boks in this match, Mapimpi and Cheslin Kolbe had the confidence from within the team and the drive to perform for the team to turn those limited opportunities into a couple of the great moments of the tournament.

(Photo By Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Last week, I wrote these two paragraphs of England’s outstanding semi-final win:

“The truth of the performance is double-edged; the All Blacks played about as well as England allowed them to. They had moments, only small moments, but just couldn’t ever covert these small moments into genuine opportunities.”

“And then to top that off, England just kept applying the scoreboard pressure that always seemed to increase as New Zealand thought they might have been edging closer.”

Substitute South Africa for England, and then England in for New Zealand, and this 64-word summary perfectly represents how the Boks did exactly the same thing to England this weekend that England did to the All Blacks last weekend.

If last weekend was Eddie Jones’ finest coaching performance, then Erasmus has not just kept up with the Jones; he has absolutely out-Eddie’d Eddie.

England knew they had to start well last week, and that was clearly the perfectly executed approach of the Springboks this week. And like England last week, South Africa never lifted the foot from the throat this week.

An incredible Rugby World Cup has had its deserved conclusion, with a final that certainly didn’t go the way so many predicted, but capped off the tournament so well because it was one last twist.

The Crowd Says:

2019-11-07T18:37:25+00:00

Greg

Guest


As a South African, I'm still in shock at how emphatic this win was. I think this was more a case of South Africa doing what they do well, only for some inexplicable reason been given more space and time to do it, and England, perhaps trying to be clever, changing their game plan and shifting from their strengths and their tried and tested recipe. As an example. Why did Farrell, after winning the toss, choose to receive the kick? Immediately gifting SA territorial advantage? England then thought they could run from deep, but a rush defence, monster tackles and accurate SA kicking kept them pinned down. Pressure and more pressure was the result, leading to unforced errors aplenty. SA on the other hand hardly looked under pressure and the few times England had the advantage of front foot ball or tactical space, poor discipline or a lack of execution let them down. Playing straight back into the SA strengths of set piece and restarts. Defence, relentless pressure and physical dominance all came to the fore, with SA definitely saving their best for last.

2019-11-06T04:28:52+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Apology accepted :thumbup:

2019-11-06T04:20:00+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


It is a bit sad to see All Black supporters so desperate for relevance, The All Blacks are pretty relevant when it comes to rugby, in fairness

2019-11-06T02:57:10+00:00

ClarkeG

Roar Guru


Yes our friend Rhys is the typical generaliser. If it's one it has to be all. He himself may be "desperate for relevance". Bet you he loved all the haka.

2019-11-05T09:10:43+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


The Perfect Storm? :stoked:

2019-11-04T19:09:26+00:00

Tirateg

Roar Rookie


What does that say about you?......not much!

2019-11-04T11:35:58+00:00

Graeme

Roar Rookie


Sour grapes ....

2019-11-04T11:27:51+00:00

In brief

Guest


Not sure who was to blame but it was a depressing match which was incredibly dull, negative, full of injuries, stoppages and errors.

2019-11-04T08:43:07+00:00

Bill Shut

Roar Rookie


Which shows what a joke the ranking system is.

2019-11-04T08:40:06+00:00

Bill Shut

Roar Rookie


I was a neutral and enjoyed the final. It was a real contest. The first quarter was not a great advertisement regarding player safety with three players off with serious injuries. And maybe people who are not fully "into" rugby might criticise that there was not enough attacking. But I enjoyed seeing how the Boks spun wide on penalty advantages (very good strategy) and had no risks. They took advantage of their tight five dominance. Not sure why the Japan result affected the English outlook. They were expecting NZ to top their pool, which they did. As an analogy, you could criticise tennis for the fact it is dominated by boring baseline players all playing low risk tennis opposed to serve and volley etc. Great game and the result was just reward and lacked any real controversy.

2019-11-04T01:07:43+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


No, I don’t like any penalty goal kicks for infringements outside the 22 (as this is the only feasible “red zone” as the game stands. Most of the English penalty kicks were just as bad. I’d just like to see them have to kick for touch or even have a scrum or tap kick 20-25 metres downfield. Make people play rugby and earn the points as much as possible- even if it’s a drop goal. Save the penalty kicks at goal for when teams are really in a threatening position.

2019-11-04T00:43:41+00:00

Boomeranga

Roar Rookie


How often has the Lions tour ended up being vs he reigning WC? 2001, 2009, 2017, and now 2021. Not quite a pattern / omen (wont put money on Wobs for 2023 just yet) but pretty consistent.

2019-11-04T00:39:05+00:00

ShaghaiDoc

Roar Rookie


Who cares. They won!

2019-11-04T00:38:23+00:00

ShaghaiDoc

Roar Rookie


Well Done Bokke. The SH, (Superior Hemisphere), rules. You have reiterated that 2003 was a statistical error caused by the gifting of the Lottery by The Mouth and that other traitor; Mad Mitch. They both sold IPR to the highest bidder. Any relation to Moscow Mitch?

2019-11-04T00:06:05+00:00

1eye

Roar Rookie


Hansen touched on that lack of familiarity too, having a dig at the 6 nations and rugby management in general on its reluctance to open up the six nations for the Southern hemisphere saying something like......... you cant have a rivalry when you don't play them enough ! And maybe there is something in that when we see the Irish and English teams ambushing southern hemisphere teams in one offs... nb Irish in Chicago to be outplayed in the following game i wonder how the Abs would approach the English should they play them again food for thought.

2019-11-04T00:00:06+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Thanks BeeMc Nicely put! Rassie, especially his teams scrum. Put the Poms to the sword

2019-11-03T22:09:15+00:00

zhenry

Guest


We all have to be careful when we name-call. I am not impressed with a site who's editors condone name calling and commenters ganging up on other commenters. And don't tell me to f..o somewhere else; I've visited this site for a long time and overall appreciate the standard of discussion. I am not taking away from the many things the Boks did to win the game, but the detail that BIB mentions are valid points for discussion and the editors should distinguish disagreement of detail with generalised hot air name-calling. If there is name calling we know who is going to cop it the most.

2019-11-03T17:54:48+00:00


Quite happy with a win every 12 years, will take that.

2019-11-03T17:05:22+00:00

kgbagent

Roar Rookie


Have another drink – 4 more years Errrr – sorry – 12 more years is your average success rate yes?

2019-11-03T16:48:47+00:00


Yeah , nah, good luck with your disillusions mate.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar