Would the British loan system work in the NRL?

By Steve Mascord / Expert

Like most Australians, Michael Maguire thought the loan system at play in British sport was a bit weird.

Sport is tribal, after all, and which tribes loaned their best fighters to other tribes?

It’s like selling players off mid-season to pay bills – the Brits take their sport so seriously but they do things at the same time that seem to fly in the face of what we see as loyalty.

Then Maguire joined Wigan in 2010 and loaned a youngster called Josh Charnley out to Hull KR, all the while dubious about the idea.

Charnley scored five tries in five games for Rovers, returned to Wigan when they had an injury and went on to become a superstar of the British game.

In Monday’s edition of the English paper League Weekly, Maguire suggested that NRL clubs loan players to Super League teams mid-season.

Not only that, “you’d probably be able to do that every now and then with NRL teams.”

That’s right, a loan system within the NRL.

So a let’s say Robbie Farah is stuck behind Damien Cook at Souths – he could be send on loan to Wests Tigers for a month, with the proviso that he does not play against the Rabbitohs.

(AAP Image/Dan Peled)

Would the system work in Australia?

Firstly, the permutations and complications regarding the salary cap would be considerable. Look at the number of teams who’ve won Super League (four) and compare it to the uncertainty in the NRL and you could be led to believe NRL teams have a lot more parity.

That parity might be a fragile thing. Could a player be loaned out maliciously, to ensure he plays against a team that his primary club wants to lose a vital game?

Certain we would need a salary cap that was live in a way we’ve not seen before – almost like a ticker over every club in the NRL showing what their cap is today, yesterday and tomorrow at 3pm – if players are going to be moving around for month-long stints.

Maguire’s idea regarding loaning players to Super League teams seems more plausible – but only if the UK Home Office can be talked around.

Don’t forget, Darcy Lussick was denied entry when he returned from a weekend off earlier this year. Players who have not played at NRL level cannot get UK work visas as a rule so sending young players to England is not practical.

Sending experienced first graders – who’ve played more than half their total matches the previous year at the top level – could conceivably work if the RFL and Super League agreed to it.

Certainly the old days of Andrew Johns and Adrian Morley popping up for a handful of games could return, although the transfer cut-offs have been tightened up a little since those days.

In both scenarios (domestic and international loans), administrative red tape looms large.

But what about in the other direction? Imagine Jackson Hastings being loaned mid-season to an NRL team that’s lost a halfback to two.

It would certainly add another dimension to what is increasingly the oxygen of the game’s social media life – transfer speculation.

The Crowd Says:

2019-12-11T06:37:23+00:00

Dogs Of War

Roar Guru


It would work. Just make sure it's a system where a player has a min of 4 games on loan up to 8 max. The team loaning the player would pay the wages so the salary cap wouldn't be affected. Both clubs win because club A gets a player some games time, while club B gets to bolster there squad for a period. I could see clubs use it a lot especially regarding a try before you buy type situation to see if a player would make a difference to your team.

2019-12-11T01:17:12+00:00

Paulie

Guest


Instead of Loaning players to other clubs why not rent them, that would be a win win for both clubs.

2019-12-10T08:11:58+00:00

Sam

Guest


The NRL simply doesn't need it, NSW and QLD cups are still a good standard for players not in first grade.

2019-12-10T05:08:18+00:00

Train Without A Station

Roar Guru


Wouldn't it work just like moving on under contract players? X player is on $500k a year. Club A doesn't want him and agrees to pay $200k a year of his salary to offload him elsewhere. Club A has $200k under their cap, club B has $300k. So if a player is on $500k, and you agree to loan him out at $20k a game, for 5 games, then Club A has $400k under the cap, and club B has $100k. To me the only issues are: * Club's having space during the season; * Club's being motivated to save cap space that they won't use anyway.

2019-12-10T03:22:06+00:00

Jimmy

Guest


Gee...if only there was a way to solve for that! Maybe....loaned player needs to be on the bottom half of salaries at the parent club... or loaned player needs to have not started in any of the last 5 games at parent club. Just thought of two in the 10 seconds thought I gave to this!

2019-12-10T03:16:32+00:00

elvis

Roar Rookie


Whenever Easts play the Titans, Warriors and St George, they could rent out Latrell and Teddy to whoever is playing the Storm that weekend.

2019-12-10T02:45:04+00:00

mushi

Roar Guru


Conceptually it's fine my only thought would be the cap makes it difficult as teams would need to carry dead cap space to make it work. The other way to ESL makes sense depending on the economics

2019-12-10T01:54:58+00:00

yippityio

Roar Rookie


Here's a wacky idea, you could loan players to rugby. If they're tempted to make the switch it might be just the taste they need to stay in the NRL... or to go.

2019-12-09T23:58:44+00:00

Dwanye

Roar Rookie


Yeah, nice idea Paul. ‘Try’ something NRL, but then if it poor, don’t be worried about changing it back.

2019-12-09T23:34:37+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I wonder if this loan idea could work with disgruntled NRL players? Latrell Mitchell springs to mind. By all accounts, Easts don't want him in the first grade side and the story is they'll make him play reserve grade in 2020. Why not loan him out to the Tigers, for example, rather than waste that talent and make an unhappy player even more resentful?

Read more at The Roar