According to the stats, this Melbourne Victory side are the worst in club history.
After 18 games of the regular season, no Melbourne Victory side has ever lost as many as nine games, or 50 per cent of their league fixtures. With four measly wins, it is the joint worst from this perspective.
All the numbers point to the worst team in their 15-year history, however if you look at the players individually, the list is not so bad. The problem was the personnel who departed last year and who they replaced them with.
It is not uncommon for A-League clubs to see a pre-season mass exodus, although it’s less common at Victory. But even compared to recent years at the Mariners or Wellington, last winter at the Victory was extreme.
Firstly, the head coach Kevin Muscat departed. He had been either captain, coach or manager of the Victory in every season since its inception, a man almost synonymous with the club.
Following him out the door was Carl Valeri, the lynchpin at the base of their midfield since 2014, spanning almost the entire time that Muscat was in charge.
(Photo by Robert Cianflone/Getty Images)
It’s not a coincidence that the one season where he missed half of the games through injury was Muscat’s poorest regular season (2015-16) such was his importance to both breaking up play and starting attacks.
Then the three players sitting in front of him throughout 2018-19 were Terry Antonis, James Troisi and Keisuke Honda. While Honda was a little more unique and quite difficult to find a direct replacement for as he didn’t always play in the centre, there was a lack of focus not replacing the former two.
Troisi as the main central play-maker and Antonis as the box-to-box drive in the middle of the park have been crucial to how they set up and their structure.
The initial three signings of unknowns Jakob Poulsen, Migjen Basha and Kristijan Dobras was hardly inspiring, and it is a real stretch to call any of them marquees, despite Poulsen’s Danish caps. All play central positions but none of them have set the world alight, so much so that Leigh Broxham has often revised his midfield role to provide more impetus in the centre.
But not one of these three men are in the same stratosphere as Valeri, Antonis, Troisi and Honda. Aside from Dobras’ goal against Western United, his main contribution were his hand movements to the pre-season GIFs. He has since left.
Poulsen has been very underwhelming. Basha has been the only player that has slotted in and offered some physicality, and while he is no Valeri, he is a less polished and more pitbull-like replacement are the base of the midfield.
The question, then, is why are there so many holes in the middle of the park?
The answer is because Victory’s pre-season and then mid-season strategy was to sign up wide attackers. They lost Kosta Barbarouses to Sydney, and replaced him with Robbie Kruse, Andrew Nabout and then Marco Rojas. Throw in Elvis Kamsoba’s emergence and the squad is extremely well-endowed in that position.
(Steve Christo/Corbis via Getty Images)
The problem is that none of these wide players can perform what Troisi did from the middle of the park with his vision, nor offer the industry of Antonis.
The Jets game was no exception with Marco Rojas asked to perform these duties, and this is not his strength. He is a player who should play to the left or to the right instead of Kamsoba or Andrew Nabbout, but this season has effectively been about trying to put square pegs in round holes.
People have blamed Marco Kurz and soon may blame their new coach Carlos Pérez Salvachúa, but fans need to look at the higher levels of the club to assign this accountability.
Victory have eight games to save their season and will need to win seven out of eight of them to stand a chance of finals.
Ultimately, while looking at this team on paper, this is not the worst squad in their history, however the stats do not lie and poor recruitment has led to this being the worst team after 18 games.
Their focus should be to secure an attacking central midfielder at the end of the season to use in their Asian Champions League Campaign because that is all they have left.
Waz
Roar Rookie
Traore sums it up though - he’s been very poor.
Bendtner52
Roar Pro
The defensive side is another dilemma. Traore is an interesting case, given he’s played against Arsenal in the Champions League for Basel. He should be a key outlet for Victory this year as an attacking left-back. Given Victory are so short of people in the middle who can play, putting him in the middle could be a solution. Although full backs generally can replace the defensive midfielders as opposed to the play-maker of which Victory are so lacking on.
Brainstrust
Roar Rookie
MV went from one extreme to another. Last season to cater for Troisi they kept two better players Honda and Antonis wide, and Troisi hardly performed for MV last season. The previous season they had Troisi and Valeri and were in a bad position till Antonis saved their season. Basha is sort of like Valeri with less work rate and without the defensive brain. As I pointed out he stuffed up twice for two goals and had no idea what he was doing. Poulsen has more of a clue defensively but is too old and slow. Dobras while he wasn;t that skillful he was hard working and ball winning but they got rid of him. Mv either need a ball player to put through balls for their fast attacking players, or they need a set piece specialist for good crosses for Toivonen. The other question is Adama Traore, from what I remember he was very well physically developed when he first started at the Gold Coast, if you look at the other Adama Traore born in Spain, he is more developed now than he was before 20. Of course you have also the case of Adu who was well developed at 13 and they thought was going to be a giant, but he stayed the same which leads one to draw a conclusion. I would say put Traore central.
AndyAdelaide
Roar Rookie
if victory sort out there midfield dilemma, they arent actually that far away from challenging. They will have a big say in who gets in the six this year, massively worried for this upcoming match with how poor were defending
Buddy
Roar Rookie
You have to consider the rest of the competition as well as MV when sitting in judgement. I’d say the overall standard has gone up a few notches but most teams cannot find any level of consistency, nor can they maintain a high level of intensity each week and so the results and performances are erratic. SFC have been an exception but everyone below just blows hot and cold. MC might be in the post Joyce Era but are nowhere near the level being touted at the start of the season. Adelaide seem to be on fire one week and the next they are like a very damp firework. The fuse burns in fits and starts and you don’t know quite what will become of them. Wellington are the big improvers but travel often works against them, and the list goes on. MV has enjoyed a playing roster that has kept them ahead of the chasing pack for most of the time but not this year. Is it down to individuals, the coach, the recruitment, the tactics? It seems to be a bit of everything but noticeably, the players don’t all tick at once and there has been some poor performances that leave you wondering at what the alternatives are? Perhaps the answer lies in the overall lack of depth and alternatives. There’s no doubting that when players believe they are automatically on the team sheet there is a tendency not to give it everything and that results in a slack performance and we have seen a fair few of those this season.
lesterlike
Roar Rookie
Possibly, the results have been trash and the squad itself is obviously very weak. But in terms of performance or general atmosphere of the club, nothing can match the Mehmet/Magilton season for pure chaos. That side was one of the most disjointed, ineffective and completely frustrating sides I have ever seen in a professional league, despite having a decent enough core group of players to work around.