Overseas bowlers I could watch all day: Medium pacers

By Paul / Roar Guru

Last week, I wrote some thoughts on Australian bowlers I could spend hours watching bowl.

Part of the fun of putting together that piece was reliving through video clips some great moments of their playing careers.

This article comprises my thoughts on a number of quality bowlers who have played in Australia I’ve watched and enjoyed. Some of these guys are not there because they’re out-and-out champions, and I also need to apologise to any New Zealand Roar fans. If you read, on you’ll see why.

As with my last piece, I’m starting off with bowlers I class as medium pacers – that is, they bowled around the 130 to 135 kilometre per hour mark.

The first bowler played only 16 Tests for his country, took a total of 38 wickets at an average of 41.26 and a strike rate of 79.9, yet I remember him fondly. This is of course the great Asif Masood from Pakistan.

Masood played when I was still a little tacker, and like schoolboy cricketers everywhere, my mates and I wanted to imitate the ‘big boys’.

Masood had a totally unique run-up. Cricinfo describes it as “a bizarre start to his run-up in which he turned sideways to the wickets and leaned backwards before starting his approach.” John Arlott was a tad more poetic, likening it to “Groucho Marx chasing a pretty waitress”. We had a lovely summer in 1971-72 when Masood played for the Rest of the World, trying to get his run-up right. We dropped him, though, when Jeff Thomson came along.

I’ve included the next bowler as a medium pacer because that’s where he was at his devastating best. I refer of course to Sir Richard Hadlee.

I saw him bowl for the first time in the 1973-74 tour to Australia and honestly thought he wasn’t much chop. I even remember thinking his brother Dayle was a better bowler, and on that tour he probably was. At that time Hadlee was probably trying to bowl too fast, but when he dropped his pace in future seasons he was simply terrific.

His run-up and bowling action were classical, and he was one of the few bowlers who could really make the ball ‘talk’.

Where he really impressed me wasn’t on the field, though he was pretty good, but off it. The way he handled himself in public after copping serious abuse every time he appeared in the Aussie cricket summer of 1987-88 was amazing. He was a seriously good bowler and great to watch.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

My next favourite has to have the longest name in Test cricket history. Warnakulasuriya Patabendige Ushantha Joseph Chaminda Vaas was simply outstanding for Sri Lanka across the 111 Tests he played.

It’s hard to stress just how important Vaas was to Sri Lankan cricket. Every bowling side wants bowlers who can pick up at least one or two early wickets, and this is exactly what Vaas provided. I’d argue that much of Murali’s success stemmed from Vaas getting an early breakthrough, opening up the middle order to face spin.

Vaas could move the ball both ways, and replays show him consistently beating batsmen through the air. He’s another bowler with a balanced run-up and a great bowling action.

My next medium pacer bucks the trend of guys who run in smoothly and have a lovely rhythmic action. The first time I saw Sarfraz Nawaz, I thought he wouldn’t be out of place on an Aussie Rules ground. He had a really awkward-looking run-up and almost seemed to stop before he let go of the ball, but he was probably the first of the great line of fast bowlers Pakistan has produced over the past few decades.

He’d played a total of five Tests against Pakistan before their inaugural tour to Australia in 1972-73. All expected them to be well beaten, and so it proved, but Sarfraz had a pretty useful tour, picking up 12 wickets at 25.66.

It was in the 1978-79 tour that Sarfraz really made himself known to Aussies, once in a good way and the other way – well, let’s call it questionable.

His effort of 9-86 in Melbourne, including a spell of 9-1 off 33 balls, is simply outstanding. What is less outstanding was his involvement in what became known as the Hilditch incident.

What both of these show are the great skills Sarfraz possessed and the huge desire to win, which was an early taste of what was to come from the great Pakistan teams of the 1990s.

The toughest bowling task in world cricket is trying to bowl finger spin in Australia. The second hardest has to be trying to be a fast bowler in India.

Before Kapil Dev came along, India didn’t have any world-class quicks. Dev changed all that and in the process made fast bowling something more Indian players would want to take up. There’s little doubt his example has influenced the current crop of excellent pace bowlers in the Indian attack.

The first time I saw Dev bowl was in the 1980-81 series in Australia and he looked pretty good, taking 14 wickets at 23 and a bit. He then came back with the Indian team in 1985 and repeated the dose, taking another 12 wickets at 23. He didn’t exactly light up any ground with his batting, but his bowling was very good.

I then had the pleasure of going to Lord’s a year later when India were playing England. There were three memorable parts to the day. The first was the 11-degree temperature and Arctic wind. The second was a how long it took India to make its first innings score, 341 off 137 overs. The final session and best part was all down to Kapil Dev.

He came out to bat to huge applause from a massive Indian contingent and made a very average one run. He then came on to bowl in England’s second innings with only an hour or two left and proceeded to knock over Graham Gooch, Tim Robinson and David Gower for 35. England were five down overnight, all out for 180 the next day, which led to an easy Indian victory. His bowling in that session wasn’t quick, but it was absolutely world-class, moving the ball both in the air and off the pitch.

No doubt these selections won’t be everyone’s cup of tea, but each in their way was a great bowler. One helped inspire a young fella’s love for the game, while the others not only helped their respective teams but also did massive amounts to inspire future generations of cricketers in their countries.

The Crowd Says:

2020-04-11T13:45:13+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


Forgot about him. Cleaned up the Aussies at Hobart. Also bounced the bejeezus out of the West Indies in an ODI in Aus,

2020-04-11T13:36:35+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


Certainly not mine. Definitely had 7 fingers....then plus 1.

2020-04-11T03:04:25+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


Indeed Rowdy! :stoked: I'm not sure how we ended up with a tally of 7 fingers as well as he's only missing 2, maybe counting isn't Azeem's strong point! ( Understandably)

2020-04-11T01:45:06+00:00

Mr Right

Roar Rookie


A lot of the greatest champions get booed. I hold them in even higher respect when they can handle it without sinking into self pity or allow the crowd to put them off their game. Warney never let the English or Indian crowds intimidate him. In my teens I was at the MCG booing Richard Hadlee, but he had a clever way of keeping us in check. He kept taking wickets & finished up with 10 for the match. A great man both on & off the field.

2020-04-10T23:41:02+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


I always enjoyed watching Ramesh Ratnayake. It might have been the novelty of him being a Sri lankan pacer but I thought he had a lovely action. Very smooth run up and energy efficient delivery. More recently Malinga the slinga never fails to fascinate me. That action is pretty much unique.

2020-04-10T23:36:39+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


Years ago I saw a little doco on how they actually measured that pace shootout. It’s a little fuzzy now but as I recall it was essentially an average speed calculated with a (for the time) high speed camera. The camera was placed perpendicular to the pitch and since it had a known and consistent frame rate they just counted the number of frames the ball was in flight. From that you can calculate how long it took to cover the distance and from there you get the average speed. .. Interestingly, by overlaying a 20 metre grid they could also work out the speed at any given point in the balls trajectory. Simply count how many frames it took the travel each metre and hey presto, a metre by metre breakdown. Pretty slick for the time I reckon.

2020-04-10T23:29:58+00:00

dungerBob

Roar Rookie


That progressive speed reading is an interesting thing oj. I've never seen it but will make a couple of predictions as to things it might reveal. a] The new ball will have less drop off than the old ball. A shiny new cherry effectively has less surface area than an older scuffed up one and should be less affected by drag. b] There will be more drop off on heavy overcast days than sunny days due to the air being denser because of the water vapour. c] The higher the altitude, the less drop off. This would be due to air density again. As air pressure decreases so does drag. .. cheers.

2020-04-10T23:21:24+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


On one hand, having two less sounds terrible, but on the other hand, having seven would be a handful.

2020-04-10T20:43:47+00:00

Ian Knightly

Guest


As an aside, I was watching some old cricket footage on You Tube the other day (as you do when you are in lockdown) and was watching 'fiery' Fred Trueman. He looked to have a fairly smooth action but didn't appear to be express pace. An older generation friend of mine told me a few years ago he was considered fast and saw him in operation. Perhaps he was bowling within himself in these clips? As a general comment, I have always been intrigued at the 'pace' of bowlers up to and including the 1960s. For example, it appears Harold Larwood was quick, but many of that era looked like pie throwers in old clips.

2020-04-10T16:10:07+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


He bowled left arm. He was missing 2 fingers on his right hand due to a birth defect.

2020-04-10T12:54:47+00:00

Lara

Guest


Paddles was brilliant for a long time and carried NZ cricket to some of their greatest wins. He could swing the ball both ways, but it was the way he planned his attack that was pure genius. Oz use to give him heaps......because he was that good.

2020-04-10T12:09:50+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Australian bowler Nathan Bracken was potentially great but in the wrong era where dumb selectors believed you had to be around the 140 kmh mark. The world still has stupid selectors who carry in preconceived ideas about what is required, rather than picking the best players. Of course he is not an overseas bowler. The West Indian Ritchie Richardson said of Hadlee who he rated the best he faced, "I knew exactly how he was trying to get me out (caught in slips?), and it was a huge challenge trying to see him off". Late movement is the enemy of every batter. Currently the Pakistani Abbas until his shoulder reconstruction was outstanding on docile wickets. And there is no doubt you never saw Wasim Akram bowl. He was, and judging by recently still is the master of medium pace deception.

2020-04-10T10:32:23+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


He was prepared for the digital age.

2020-04-10T10:09:47+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


True story.

2020-04-10T09:49:10+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


"7 fingered"? :shocked: You serious?!

2020-04-10T09:29:46+00:00

deepoz

Roar Rookie


Nice article Paul. Sarfraz is rumoured to have developed the skill of reverse swing. I have seen a bit of him on TV in tests between India and Pakistan. He was very very good. Chaminda Vaas, another skilful bowler. Kapil to me is simply the best cricketer India has produced ever. He is a rare fast bowler who has never missed a test due to injury! And must have bowled the least number of no balls in test or odis amongst pace bowlers. He used to be conscious of that even in nets.

2020-04-10T04:29:32+00:00

Mark Scarfe

Roar Guru


I met Sir Richard Hadlee in Christchurch in 2003. Lovely and and and very generous with his time. I emailed him before the trip and we met at my hotel where he bought along a few things he had signed for me. The class of the man has always stayed with me.

2020-04-10T04:05:11+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Roar Rookie


Pakistan has some pretty handy seamers tour Australia in the 70s. Imran particularly. Safraz wrecked my summer more than the 5-1 loss to England. I admired the pluck of 7 fingered Azeem Hafeez in 83/84 too. Which leads me to another more controversial Asif. Mohammed Asif at sydney had the ball on a string. Such a shame he choose to chuck games with Amir. They should have won many.

2020-04-10T03:59:14+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Enjoyed reading that. I liked Richard Ellison a lot; again not a vey smooth run up to the wicket.

AUTHOR

2020-04-10T03:47:33+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Thanks for your comments ojp. I think many cricket fans get hung up on whether bowlers are fast, medium fast, fast medium, etc. As you've rightly pointed out, two of the best bowlers the game's seen, could hardly be classed as fast when they were at their peak, yet neither seemed to care and both got a lot of guys out.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar