How to fix the congestion that's ruining the AFL

By You'll Never Hawk Alone / Roar Pro

After years of attempting to deny the AFL has a spectacle problem, I have finally succumbed to the chorus, having watched it this weekend.

On Sunday night, after North Melbourne had kicked a quarter of an entire match’s goals in ten minutes of get-and-go footy, I had to wonder why we see so little of this footy.

After endless rule changes in an attempt to speed up an ever more congested game, the AFL seem to have lost sight of an extraordinarily obvious rule that would fix the game: holding the ball.

Now, this is not to say the rule no longer exists, although I might easily make that mistake watching endless rolling mauls over the weekend.

It’s just, they seem to have forgotten how to adjudicate the rule.

Once upon a time, if a player was trying to break a tackle and failed to properly dispose of the ball, it was paid as a free kick against.

(Photo by Darrian Traynor/Getty Images)

But how often does that actually happen now?

A particularly frustrating trend is players putting out their arm immediately after picking the ball up to block the force of the tackle.

Surely this counts as prior opportunity? If you put your arm out, you have enough time to use that arm to dispose of the ball.

The most frustrating aspect of this trend is that it fails to understand the flow-on effects. Everything AFL teams do to congest the play is done in the knowledge these situations will not cost them a free kick.

Quite simply, if trying to break tackles results in more free kicks against, they will actually set up to move the ball more quickly.

With every AFL team understanding and tightly adhering to modern defensive structures, incentive to move the ball quickly among all the congested chaos is extremely low. Each team enters the battles and seems happy to keep it that way until the game is falling out of reach.

Teams are so incredibly reluctant to move the ball aggressively.

If players rarely kick from the back flank to the middle of the ground when they actually have space to make a good decision, why would we expect them to attempt to move the ball quickly out of congestion, when the risk of turning the ball over is so high, and simply riding tackle after tackle will not result in holding the ball?

So, it’s quite simple: pay holding the ball the way it is meant to be paid, and the entire situation will change.

If this slight tweak is made, it will incentivise teams to actually move the ball more quickly and break the congestion that is beginning to actually ruin the game.

The Crowd Says:

2020-07-07T13:44:50+00:00

In brief

Guest


Can someone translate ‘do the math’. Is that Trump posting or what?? In Australia we say ‘maths’ which is short for mathematics ????

2020-07-01T09:50:57+00:00

Johnno

Roar Rookie


It’s an amazing discussion when Ross Lyon is nowhere to be seen. Last year he was heavily criticised for his defensive game. Now it is the rules not being interpreted properly. Oh & yes, last year the likes of WCE were praised for being attacking. Go figure. The only thing that has changed from last year is the Covid impact. So settle everyone, this is the season we should expect with such disruptions.

2020-07-01T09:50:35+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


“best way to win a game of football is to kick goals” … unfortunately some coaches reckon the best way to win a game is to kick more goals than the opposition, if that means 3 goals to 2, jobs done

2020-07-01T09:49:07+00:00

sven

Roar Rookie


think it was the great john kennedy that said way back in the 70's, "if we played 18 ruckrovers we would win every game, but no one would come to watch us" , or something to that effect

2020-07-01T09:40:09+00:00

Johnno

Roar Rookie


It probably will.....but it will change the game far too much. No big men, athletes will dominate, no Lachie Neale type, no Lynch from Tigers type, just 190cm running machines. Free flowing..... contact & pressure free. It will be a totally different game. Isn’t that AFLX?

2020-06-30T22:18:54+00:00

Maxy

Roar Rookie


ITS THE COACHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES.Yes i know its all about winning,so be it,you want to play that garbage style do it,thank god my team doesnt do it,best way to win a game of football is to kick goals

2020-06-30T12:40:27+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Takes allsorts

2020-06-30T12:18:54+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


I don't even watch the AFL except finals. Watch the GF from start to finish and that's it. Big difference from 20+ years ago!

2020-06-30T05:44:52+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


And a separate note to let you know your conflations are wrong.

2020-06-30T05:43:50+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Thanks for letting me know what I don't do.

2020-06-30T02:10:31+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Rowdy... That's rubbish. You clearly don't watch enough of the other codes if you think they don't have the same issues. The six again rule in rugby league was made precisely to clear the ruck. The short arm penalty in union was created to quicken the play. The AFL does not suffer from snowflake syndrome. Hopefully you don't either. This instance that AFL's problems are more unique and more special than anyone else's is similar to a parent of a newborn who insists their baby's colic is more unique and special than other babies so they need more urgent attention.

2020-06-30T02:03:53+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


Those sports dont have the same issues. Scleric refusal to look at making the sport cleaner for the players and better visually binds you to a moribund future. ----- Make no mistake RL is our competition. Let's be clear in where the sport is heading. Removal of the grey areas of game-governance and simplifying the playing dynamics will give us the advantage.

2020-06-29T22:54:58+00:00

Ball Burster

Roar Rookie


I agree completely. It's really about codifying the old principles: never get caught with the ball; given the choice between a long and a short option, take the long one; never kick backwards, etc. These things made the game what it was. So get rid of "prior opportunity" and penalise blokes that get caught with the pill. This will encourage blokes to knock it wider or deeper into space where there should be one of yours. Make the minimum distance for a mark 30 metres. This will cut down on fiddle farting. Make it mandatory to kick the ball forwards, except in your own attacking 50. This will cut down on defensive play.

2020-06-29T20:36:07+00:00

Peter the Scribe

Roar Guru


Then footy is doomed

2020-06-29T13:57:13+00:00

Don Freo

Roar Rookie


You've become a very nasty unit Spruce. You only have to look at the number of 'likes' on my posts to see your "no one agrees" stuff is an emotive scramble for an argument that you can't find.

2020-06-29T13:44:18+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


That's why you are nowhere near any level of administration or management of the game. Leave the running of the game to those with brains. Your role is to sit on the couch, drool and talk about how much a legend Joffa is, and how Eddie McGuire totally never says racist things, and he's just a wind up merchant.

2020-06-29T13:42:08+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Ok boomer. Check the timestamps. I asked the question first. But to answer yours - 16,14 or 8 still won't solve the problem. They'll still crowd the ball like school children. For someone claiming I don't get its heartbeat or the subtlety of the game, you coming in with a sledgehammer suggestion to change the absolute fundamental of the game cause you are having a sook about the scoring is truly ironic. I guess you are still stumped by the fact AFL mathematically is the least congested of all codes of football, it being played on the largest field with the fewest players per sqm. Ouch, Boomer. Ouch.

2020-06-29T12:03:23+00:00

Peter

Guest


Great to see that the footy world is zeroing in on the real cause of the modern congested mess that used to be a fantastic game. People are identifying that holding the ball isn’t being paid and this is leading to ball up after ball up which just creates more and more congestion. But the reason umpires aren’t paying holding the ball is because of the “ no prior opportunity rule” . Get rid of that rule and you will have a massive reduction in ball ups , less players hatching the ball , less time to flood and suddenly the game will flow again as the original creators of the game meant it to. They need to change the rule to The Choice Rule - if a player is deemed to have chosen to take possession, then he/ she must kick , handpass or they are penalised. it’s that simple yet the blind fat cats at the AFL are afraid to make the change because that would be an admission that the prior opportunity rule was always a very damaging change to the game . It didn’t exist prior to the mid nineties and the game was far superior then. Giving a player a chance to get rid of the ball is exactly what a footballer isn’t supposed to do. If you are caught with the ball, let’s bad play and you should be penalised. If you don’t understand that then you don’t understand the game.

2020-06-29T11:38:28+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


i would argue that defenders require a specific award, like the Golden Fist that got proposed after Danny Frawley died.

2020-06-29T11:33:13+00:00

Charlie Keegan

Roar Guru


Licorice. job done.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar