Manly front-rower Addin Fonua-Blake has escaped any additional ban for breaching the NRL’s anti-vilification code and instead been fined $20,000.
Already suspended for two games for contrary conduct, NRL CEO Andrew Abdo said Fonua-Blake had shown genuine remorse for calling referee Grant Atkins a “f***ing retard.”
The Sea Eagles firebrand will also volunteer as a referee in wheelchair rugby league, with his fine to help buy new wheelchairs for the sport.
Related
“What happened on the field was divisive, and it’s not what we stand for as a game,” Abdo said.
“Addin’s words and his actions were contrary to the anti-vilification code which exists in the NRL’s rules for all players and registered officials.”
Fonua-Blake will also undergo further education and rehabilitation directed by the NRL.
The decision takes into account both Fonua-Blake’s comments on the field, and another spray in the dressing rooms which included the term “spastics.”
The call was made in conjunction with Manly after Abdo met with the 24-year-old on Thursday.
“I found Addin to be genuinely remorseful and found him to be quite engaged in the discussion,” Abdo said.
“I don’t speak on his behalf, but my interpretation of the discussion was sometimes players in the heat of the moment don’t understand the impact of what they are saying with how that will make someone feel.
“That’s not an excuse for the behaviour and I made that clear. Neither is ignorance around the language we use.
“But I don’t believe Addin meant to offend the group of people he did offend with this. I believe he has learned through this process.”
As part of changes stemming from the incident, Abdo will also recommend to the commission that any serious referee abuse or intimidation is referred straight to the judiciary.
ARL Commission chairman Peter V’landys has already stated he wants tougher punishments to ensure players do not disparage any person living with a disability.
Initially hit with a grade-three contrary conduct charge, Fonua-Blake took the early guilty plea and a two-match ban for the incident earlier this week.
But the NRL then stepped up their probe determining the Manly player had breached their anti-vilification code and launched an investigation.
Abdo on Friday defended the decision not to impose a further ban on Fonua-Blake for the breach.
“Our focus here was getting the balance right,” Abdo said.
“Our focus was around rehabilitation and education.
“Increasing the suspension is an easy decision but what is more important is driving change in attitudes.
“I don’t believe that increasing the match ban would have made the difference in order to take a positive out of this situation.
“But everyone is entitled to their views on that.
“Missing two matches, $20,000 and a significant set of responsibilities I believe was appropriate in this circumstance.”
Phil
Roar Rookie
Has AFB been dealt with lightly?? Earlier this year a couple of blokes from Canterbury broke a moral code of conduct and were deregistered. They didn't disparage anyone or any group by insult. They didn't break any law, but, they did do something that society deems wrong and I totally agree. Now we have a bloke from Manly who, not once, but twice uses derogatory terms towards match officials, breaking a moral code of conduct yet he must sit out a mere two games and serve up a minor percentage of his income. Food for thought.
Gray-Hand
Roar Rookie
Why is there this bizarre idea that $20k isn’t a serious deterrent for a rugby league player? That’s about a months take home pay for someone earning $400k per year. There is no way that doesn’t sting.
Big Daddy
Guest
Nat, he could probably learn a lot. Most of them are probably smarter than him.
Ralph Malph
Roar Rookie
I reckon a 50k fine and mo suspension would have been more appropriate.
TP.777
Roar Rookie
very very lucky 2 games only is ludicrous!!!
kk
Roar Pro
Well put, Nat.
kk
Roar Pro
He will not be allowed into Queensland for Round 3 against Cowboys because he refused to have a shot thereby extending his absence to three weeks.
Nat
Roar Rookie
It may be the first 2-match penalty hurts the club. The $20k hurts him. I do like that he has to go to the RL wheelchair comp. Actually getting to know a few of the collective he insulted should give him some perspective outside his comfy NRL world.
Paul
Roar Guru
I don't know that hitting AFB in the hip pocket will get the message through. Obviously time will tell, but I'd hoped at the least he'd get a suspended sentence, so if he screws up again, he'd sit out a few games. I'm also confused how one event that happened on the field merits a 2 game ban and another event that appears the same in terms of abuse, cops a 20k fine?