My Australian ODI team of the 21st century

By Arnab Bhattacharya / Roar Guru

In this multi-part series, I’ll be picking my 21st century ODI XI for many countries alongside an associates XI of the 21st century. First up, Australia.

Having won five ICC 50-over tournaments this century, Australia are without question the best 50-over team of this century with relative ease. Having produced some of the best one-day cricketers of the world, here’s my Australian ODI team of the 21st century.

Opening the batting, I’ve gone ahead with David Warner and Adam Gilchrist. One of the finest white-ball openers, Warner has this knack of going after bowlers, especially with the field restrictions in play. Gilchrist is a similar player to Warner, preferring to take the aerial route against bowlers. A quality keeper as well, there was no second thought when giving Gilchrist the gloves in this XI.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

At first drop comes Ricky Ponting. With the most ODI runs by an Australian, it’s practically impossible not to have Punter. An excellent student of the game with vast cricketing knowledge, Ponting was an outstanding skipper for Australia, winning four ICC 50-over trophies as captain. He stood up on the big stage including a blistering 140 in the 2003 ICC Cricket World Cup final against India.

To stabilise the innings alongside Ponting will be Michael Hussey. He was a freak of a player and could find gaps all over the field effortlessly. The most significant trait of Michael Hussey was his ability to score runs regardless of the situation and his batting position. Naturally, he is a number five, but I still believe he’s good enough to bat in the top four.

(Photo by Hamish Blair/Getty Images)

At number five is the one and only Michael Bevan. Any team would be blessed with a player like Bevan. His ability to revive early collapses and pull off intricate chases is second to none. To date, no Aussie has got anywhere near Michael Bevan’s ODI career average of 53.58.

My two finishers are Andrew Symonds and Shane Watson. Both batsmen are destructive with the bat down the order. Symonds is arguably the world’s best fielder after Jonty Rhodes with a rocket of an arm and having had one of the safest pairs of hands in world cricket. Watson is Australia’s best white-ball all-rounder of all time, and after his retirement, Australia struggled to replace him adequately. Both Symonds and Watson would share the fifth bowling quota and are both capable of bowling ten overs if required.

My number eight is the one and only Mitchell Starc. The left-armer has been one of the finest ODI bowlers. With an unplayable yorker, late in-swinger, a fiery bouncer and many more successful bowling traits, Starc has shown his worth in ODIs – especially in World Cups.

With the lone spinner, Brad Hogg beats out Shane Warne based on the fact that Hogg played more ODIs in this century compared to Warne. Being a vital cog in Australia’s 2003 and 2007 World Cup defence also helped Hogg’s selection in this XI. Perfecting left-arm wrist spin is a tough task to craft, but Hogg was in a league of his own. He had everything required for a left-arm wrist spinner to succeed in ODI cricket and was rewarded with 156 ODI scalps. Not bad for someone who was in Shane Warne’s shadow for the majority of his career.

To round out my bowling attack, I chose two seamers from New South Wales, who are only the joint leading Aussie ODI wicket-takers. It was an absolute no-brainer choosing Brett Lee and Glenn McGrath. Both are fantastic bowlers in their own right and made world-class batsmen look like club cricketers on their day.

This is how the XI rounds up in the end.

1. David Warner
2. Adam Gilchrist (wicketkeeper)
3. Ricky Ponting (captain)
4. Michael Hussey
5. Michael Bevan
6. Andrew Symonds
7. Shane Watson
8. Mitch Starc
9. Brad Hogg
10. Brett Lee
11. Glenn McGrath

The Crowd Says:

2020-07-30T05:24:30+00:00

Peter85

Roar Rookie


This is a very hard team to pick. That said, I only have one real change that on the face of it not many would agree with. Bevan out, Maxwell in. Running my eyes over the 2000’s stats (60 games minimum), there is such a wealth of talent, with 12 players averaging over 40 with the bat and 5 more notable all-rounders in the 30’s. For my batsman I would go with (average/strike-rate): Warner (46/96) Gilchrist (37/100) Ponting (42/84) – most runs Watson (41/90) Hussey (48/87) – leading average Symonds (40/93) Maxwell (32/123) – leading strike rate The biggest takeaways that I had were the increase in strike rates as you get to the newer batsmen, from around 80 to 90 for a good strike rate. Hayden/Warner have the same average but Warner strikes at 95 compared to Hayden’s 86. Maxwell is probably the most contentious pick, but no-one comes close to his striking ability. For the bowlers there are a few more standouts, with not so many players having big long careers, so I am going with (average/RPO). McGrath (20/3.77) – leading average and RPO Starc (22/5.10) – leading strike rate Lee (23/4.76) – leading wicket taker Hogg (26/4.52) – better average than Warne (30/4.39) and comparable RPO given playing a longer career The all-rounders that bowl the last ten overs are: Watson (32/4.95) Symonds (37/4.99) Clarke (38/4.99) Maxwell (51/5.61)

2020-07-20T08:42:16+00:00

Nick

Roar Guru


Watson!? Over Hayden, Waugh and Warner! WATSON!?

2020-07-20T08:27:29+00:00

Ace

Roar Rookie


It's a great side. Watson was included in a Wisden all time team but he loved no 3 or 4 spot so I'm not sure how his temperament would handle being at 7. Plus I think Warne's fear factor would stand him in good stead over Hogg. But there is always team B

2020-07-18T06:16:34+00:00

Targa

Roar Rookie


Imo Gilchrist (wk) Watson Ponting (c) Clarke Symonds Bevan Hussey Hogg Starc Bracken McGrath

2020-07-18T02:26:02+00:00

Brian

Guest


Hayden over Warner and i would take Clarke or Smith over Hussey. From memory Clarke stood up more then Hussey in 2007 and 2015

2020-07-18T00:20:22+00:00

Rellum

Roar Guru


Haydos over Warner any day. It is not even a choice.

2020-07-18T00:12:39+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


The Warne fear factor is something that transcends the number of games people play and when they play them Matt. There's no way Hogg would have the same impact on a game as Warne, Just watching Warne getting warmed up at slip would have put the frightners up more than few guys, eg Cullinan. I like your call about dropping Hussey & Bevan down a spot or two. Hayden was certainly intimidating though I'd stick with Junior. Great ODI bat.

2020-07-18T00:01:58+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


Warne missed the 2003 World Cup due to suspension and was retired before 2007. Mark Waugh was also predominantly in the 1990’s. I’d take Hayden over Warner, his performances in the Caribbean World Cup were great. Or Watson up the order. He is not a finisher so should go up the order in place of Warner. Then you could bring in another middle order player and shift Bevan and Hussey down a spot. Martyn? Clarke?

2020-07-17T22:38:41+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I get why you'd pick Dave Warner, but I'm a big Mark Waugh fan at the top of the order. It's tough to line up these two guys given the changes to ODI cricket across recent times, but I think their batting is about on par, while Waugh was a better fieldsman and could bowl some overs when needed. I'm also not sure what difference it makes, how many ODIs a guy played in this century when deciding between Warne and Hogg. For mine, Warne's as automatic a selection as Gilchrist, but it's your article and your parameters.

Read more at The Roar