Ben Stokes: The technical side of the perfect all-rounder

By Saran Thiraviam / Roar Rookie

Ben Stokes has made it a habit of making up headlines.

With his astonishing match-winning skill, his reputation is getting higher and higher. Furthermore, the mature cricketer is getting inflated with his exceptional ability to read match situations.

Right from his debut until shouldering the England cricket team now, it was a battle of strong character to prove himself.

“As far as I am concerned, Stokes is better than [Ian] Botham,” said Allan Lamb.

“As a batsman, on current form, Stokes is as good as [Virat] Kohli, Steve Smith and Kane Williamson. On the bowling front, Beefy was ahead, but Stokes has the ability to make something happen when the team needs the most.”

Yes, it’s his batting that pulled the limelight over him. His adventurous innings in the last English summer has made him a superhero among cricket fans. In another point of view, it is his batting heroics that gives us the curiosity to look over his bowling skills.

From a batsman’s point of view, England is the most robust place to bat on. You have to allow the ball inside to manage the English swinging conditions. You have to change your way of batting to play red-ball cricket in England.

But in the case of Ben Stokes, he is lucky to find England as his home. He would have got so much experience with the natural conditions of English soil. So playing in England is not rocket science for the Durham all-rounder.

For a player like Stokes, who loves to play fast bowling, the seam-favoured pitches of South Africa, Australia and New Zealand will be helping him more with the extra pace they produce. Therefore, the future tours to other English-speaking countries won’t be a bigger test for the groomed Stokes.

More the speed, more the boom from the sweet spot of his sword.

(Gareth Copley/Getty Images)

“What we witnessed on Sunday wasn’t a fluke,” Moeen Ali said about the historic knock of Ben Stokes against Australia in the Headingley Test of 2019.

“It was the result of the hard work I mentioned. Seriously, you will not find a cricketer more dedicated to self improvement. He trains at 100 miles per hour and is just unrelenting with it. And over time it has made him into the player you see today.”

This way of practising against fast bowling had made him more comfortable in the middle. Consequently, he can have a clear sight of the steaming fast deliveries that come towards him.

Most of the English batsmen are good at facing fast bowling. But Stokes stands alone with his brave bat swing. Even the bouncers are negotiated without any hesitation.

The trigger movement
One more factor that bolsters the stupendous batting of Stokes is his trigger movement, mainly his walk down the pitch while the bowler makes the jump.

This walk gives him chances to distract the rhythm of the bowler. And as a consequence, the trigger down the pitch forces the bowlers to change the length they used to bowl.

Another way of the shuffle is getting behind the crease that provides him enough room to chance his arm for his favourite pull or cut shots.

Fluency in the shot-making makes the leftie handle the shuffle with confidence successfully.

Against the spin
In the flat tracks of Asian countries, the fast bowlers will never bother the player who is so good against them. The only thing that is going to be challenging for Stokes in subcontinent conditions is the mysterious spin attack on the spin-friendly pitches.

(Photo by Alex Davidson/Getty Images)

Stokes comforts himself in sub-continent conditions with his sweep shots and advancing down the pitch. It can be his IPL experiences that could have helped the England batsman in crafting this art.

“The strides he’s made on the subcontinent playing spin have been top class,” said Trevor Bayliss.

“It wasn’t all that long ago we were wondering how he might go on spin-friendly wickets, but he’s a guy that works extremely hard in the nets.

“It’s his defence to spin that has improved out of sight. We know that if he gets a bad ball he can hit anything over the fence, but you’ve got to be there to get that loose ball. In the past he probably hasn’t had a lot of footwork, has played from the crease and backed his eye and his hands.”

With the ball
The scene of four sixes by Carlos Brathwaite off Ben Stokes in the last over of the 2016 T20 World Cup final is what flashes in our mind when we speak about Ben Stokes’ bowling.

Apart from that incident, Ben Stokes is a serious bowler who has got all the skill sets of a fast bowler, especially with the dark red Dukes ball.

He can bring in the swing of the ball through the mastered release, and at the same time, he can also extract seam movement with his perfect seam positioning. With his ability to generate a serious pace, he has become the go-to bowler who creates more wicket-taking options.

Moreover, he is a situational bowler. He has got all the major variations of a modern-day fast bowler (the jolting bouncers, the toe crushers, mix of pace and slower deliveries). But he prefers to bring them in only when those are required for that moment for his team.

(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Speaking of white-ball bowling, Stokes still needs to be used well by English management. Maybe it is because of the availability of many new rookie fast bowlers, who are getting converted into veterans in the English team, or perhaps it is the process of reducing the work pressure of Stokes.

Ben Stokes can be the better option to start with the new ball in shorter formats, thanks to his knack of the wrist being able to produce exceptional shaping with the shiny new ball.

However, Stokes’ exposure around the cricket world is paying off along with his solid character right now.

“I think everyone understands that we are watching a player at the peak of his powers, at the peak of world cricket, delivering time and time again,” said Joe Root.

Ben Stokes, the all-rounder from Durham, has many stories on his shoulders, especially many drawbacks in the international stage. But his innings in the World Cup final has lifted him.

Even though Ben Stokes has the techniques that could match the top of the business, it is his bravery that sets him apart.

Bravery won the World Cup for England for the first time in history.

Bravery made the impossible Test innings at Headingley.

Bravery is setting a separate kingdom for English cricket in the cricket world at present.

Of course, technique speaks louder in cricket, but the right mindset and approach are even more prominent to execute that technique.

And Benjamin Andrew Stokes is an excellent example of it.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2020-08-10T11:43:17+00:00

Saran Thiraviam

Roar Rookie


I reckon this is a perfect explanation for NZ's loss.

2020-08-10T10:10:43+00:00

TW

Guest


Stokes is certainly the best all-rounder to play for England that comes from NZ... :laughing: Jokes aside, he is a fantastic cricketer, I have never been able to warm to him though, so that places him in the perfect zone to captain England in the future. :stoked:

2020-08-10T04:30:19+00:00

tauranga boy

Guest


Kiwis didn't win the final cos they weren't hungry enough when it mattered. Firstly, Santner didn't bother trying to run a bye on the last ball of NZ's batting innings. I said at the time it was a bad move, and it proved to be. Secondly, Trent Boult put down a straightforward boundary relay catch off Stokes with 2 overs to go - he wasn't concentrating and stepped over the rope. Gawd!! (I see them practicing those catches all the time!!) If he'd caught that, they'd've cruised to victory! So frustrating!!!

2020-08-10T04:23:35+00:00

tauranga boy

Guest


NZ lost the World Cup final to England because they were not quite hungry enough. Two reasons. The first was the last ball of their batting innings when Santner didn't bother to try to run a bye. I said at the time "I hope it's not a close game ; every run may count." Secondly, Trent Boult dropped Stokes (I think it was) on the boundary with a couple of overs to go. It was a standard boundary rope catch - they practise them all the time - but somehow he stood too close to the rope and overbalanced before he could throw it to Marty Guptill. ... (We weren't disciplined and hungry enough to close the game out!)

2020-08-10T03:49:36+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Charlie … Not if it’s so obviously out or not out, sure, but how could the stokes one have not at least looked close? I wouldn’t hold it against an umpire that gave the batsman the benefit of the doubt without the benefit of DRS technology. Ever since they started using video replay for run outs and stumpings in 1993 umpires were directed by the authorities to always use the video referral even when they know the outcome.

2020-08-10T03:49:30+00:00

bowledover

Roar Rookie


many world teams would be chomping at the bit to get a player of Stokes' all round capability in their side... heck Australia has done silly things in such a pursuit.

2020-08-10T03:29:45+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Yep, our mum's should have closed their legs!

2020-08-10T03:20:20+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


We both might cop a serve similar to the team mate who miss fielded off his bowling ...

2020-08-10T03:15:15+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


And he's probably rolled in his grave again at my misspelling of his name!

2020-08-10T03:08:04+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


JGK Noted but I actually meant in Australia. Meant to edit it but it was too late as you only have about 45 minutes to do so on the roar. It’s not like YouTube or Facebook – the roar has much higher standards.

2020-08-10T02:34:55+00:00

AJ73

Roar Rookie


and lost the T20 World Cup with the WI scoring 19 runs off 4 balls with 4 sixes to Braithwaite.......

2020-08-10T02:14:16+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


I think Fred Truman just rolled in his grave.

2020-08-10T01:40:08+00:00

Charlie

Roar Rookie


I would really hope an umpire never thinks like that. You're saying an umpire should adjudicate differently based on the situation of the match. What would people then say about consistency and applying the rules? The umpire should judge the appeal on its merits, and then gives it out/not out based on those merits.

2020-08-09T23:02:09+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'm not blaming the batsman or the captain, I'm assigning blame for a very poor decision to the guy who made it, the umpire. Everything that happened after that is irrelevant. If the umpire got it right, Australia wins that Test and the series and the innings is regarded as a good rearguard effort,rather than being glorified as it has been.

2020-08-09T12:27:01+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


While I don't think the rule in place in 1999 was flawless, I do believe it is the best used to far. Seriously do not believe in superior run rates either. I guess it is similar to determining a winner in rain affected matches when either or both innings don't run their natural course i.e. while shite, DLS is considerably better than either of the two completely inept methods it replaced. That's how I would view the 1999 stipulation that saw Australia progress to the final. Obviously, the rule in 2019 is similar to the rule that saw South Africa lose to England in the semi of 1992.

2020-08-09T12:08:27+00:00

Gonzo99

Roar Rookie


Whatever the rule is, you can't really apply it retroactively to the match since it would have affected how each team played. Not sure about the surviving batsmen vs not used bowlers. You'll get a situation where you have the worst batsmen vs the worst bowlers on each team. I'd rather see the best of each go against each other in the super over(s). After that 1999 semi final draw between AUS and SA, where AUS went through based on the group match, the ICC changed their rule to this. This latest rule is, if anything, worse. Makes you wonder how they'll work it next time.

2020-08-09T12:05:53+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


To be fair the playing fields are largely reduced now, so the reliance on boundaries, rather than runs between the wickets, makes more sense I guess.

2020-08-09T11:51:00+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Gonzo99 Or even better, how about nobody can bat in a super over who was already dismissed in the actual team innings, nor can anybody bowl who bowled a full complement of overs? The innings simply resumes where it left off, and to the extent that if a slow scorer is on strike he may retire, but that is retired 'out' and may not resume his innings. England were bowled out in that final, New Zealand were not.

2020-08-09T11:48:34+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Micko the biggest stupidity of the boundary count back is that if the two teams scored the same amount of runs in their total and one scored more boundaries then the other almost certainly bowled more dot balls. And dots balls are what builds pressure in an innings, particularly the chasing team’s innings. While their totals were equal, England were bowled out, New Zealand were not. Bob Simpson, who was coach when Australia won 62 out of 80 one dayers between world cups 87 and 92 said that generally whoever bowls more dot balls wins the match. I can see this being true even in this contemporary era of higher scores through more fours and sixes and less reliance on flashy running between the wickets.

2020-08-09T10:03:21+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


No prob.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar