How will the AFL rule-changes impact the flow of play?

By Cameron Rose / Expert

Another year, and another footy season almost upon us. It’s hard to avoid a tingle in the nether regions.

The more things change (the rules), the more they stay the same (the AFL changing them). A new set of on-field laws greets us and, after one set of practice matches, it appears we will see a different brand of footy as a result.

The stand rule has created the most angst and conversation, and there should be some obvious flow-on effects.

We will see far less of the handball to a man running past from behind after a mark or free kick, which was often used to try and break a line. It won’t be as necessary, with the field more open for short kicks. In fact, it will be a waste of valuable seconds.

If players are middle wing to half-back and decide to go boundary-side with their possessions they are essentially wasting them, because that’s a kick the man on the mark would often be happy to allow anyway. Most kickers will elect to go in-board, as they should, but coaches around the league will be ardently trying to defend this option with team defence.

While the AFL brought in 6-6-6 in part to make it harder for teams to defend a small lead late in games by flooding back pre-bounce, the new stand rule will certainly make it easier to defend a winning position by chipping the ball around late in quarters. The man on the mark could often make himself quite a nuisance in these circumstances, but is no longer a hurdle to overcome.

What we should see in response to the above may well be more man-on-man defence around the ground, which will please those craving more contests between individuals. But we could also see more times where 18 defenders are crammed back inside defensive 50 or 60, as Sydney did at stages last season. That way, the man on the mark becomes redundant, because the players will be free to kick the ball around the middle and half-forward all they like for no forward momentum.

(Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

Other advantages will be seen inside 50, with a mark taken on or near the boundary line. Far easier now for the player with the ball to play on and score. And if marking the ball at the range of your distance, 50m out, easier now to play on and gain that extra metre or two that’s required to make the distance, so we should see more shots from long range, which is a good thing.

The extra distance a player is allowed to run from kick-ins will also make the ground harder to defend, as opposition teams will have to set their zone defence deeper than previous.

Melbourne have often used going long to Max Gawn as their set play from kick outs, but it was even more evident in the pre-season, planting him in the centre circle or on the wing, where he would try to punch the ball forward as much as mark it. If it comes off, it can mean full back to inside 50 with one possession.

All teams will have some sort of long-bomb planning, and the further back a defensive zone is pushed, the easier it will be to pierce through with a short kick, followed by a long one over the top. Either way, the ground will be lengthened, which is no bad thing.

The players will be running alright, covering more territory than ever before if the coaches still want to clog up around the ball and force stoppages. And they’ll be asked to do so with less rotations.

If fatigue does become a factor, coaches will naturally fold back defences and slow the game down with ball control.

The tactical battles will be fascinating as they always are.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Now, for the obligatory pre-season ladder.

1. Geelong – will be home and away strong again, but can they avoid the Tigers in the finals?
2. Western Bulldogs – their midfield will run rings around most, they just need to connect inside 50.
3. Brisbane – a solid top-four team now, but there is a hint that injuries are due to strike.
4. Richmond – hard to see them not playing a significant role again, they can be slow starters though.
5. St Kilda – love everything they are doing, would have had them higher if not for key players being struck down late in pre-season.
6. West Coast – perennial top-six team, but have been too compromising over the last two seasons.
7. Port Adelaide – they had a sense of destiny about them last year, but it went unfulfilled. Are they on an emotional rollercoaster?
8. Carlton – a popular pick to rise, and they could finish higher than this. A solid 25-30 players to pick from now.
9. Melbourne – always a hard team to assess, but easy to plonk them in the middle of the ladder.
10. Fremantle – some people’s pick for finals, but they’ll need a lot to go right. Not convinced yet.
11. Collingwood – the obvious slider, but will still be hard to score against. Depth all of a sudden an issue.
12. Gold Coast – still a year away from making a bigger leap. Big fan of Stuart Dew as a coach.
13. GWS – there’s a stench about them still and not exactly sure where they go from here. Big detractor of Leon Cameron as a coach.
14. Sydney – unlikely to take a big leap forward with John Longmire as coach. Will cause some upsets though.
15. Hawthorn – coached by anyone other than Alastair Clarkson and they’d almost be last.
16. Essendon – will cop some terrible hidings this year, with the occasional win in-between.
17. Adelaide – more pain cometh.
18. North Melbourne – it’s midnight for the Kangaroos.

The Crowd Says:

2021-03-18T09:01:52+00:00

Kevo

Roar Rookie


Not sure of you're point. Richmond kicked Geelong's bhind in the second half when the ball, ground, conditions were close to ideal for footy. And some Cats players were a yard off the pace. They would have been even more exposed on a hot sunny Saturday at the G than in the supposedly greasy conditions at the Gabba.

2021-03-18T01:27:15+00:00

Slane

Guest


As opposed to Dr Never Wrong saying so? Somebody who was actually playing versus somebody who wasn't even in the same state.

AUTHOR

2021-03-17T23:47:00+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


:laughing:

AUTHOR

2021-03-17T23:46:43+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


My fear is that the combination of this and fatigue will lead to a lot of slow boring play late in quarters. Ultimately though, the changes only really effect the peripheral things.

AUTHOR

2021-03-17T23:43:36+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


Yes, I will definitely get so much wrong, but just so hard to tell what at this stage.

AUTHOR

2021-03-17T23:43:15+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


Solid commentary here, and excellent point about uncontested marks.

AUTHOR

2021-03-17T23:42:02+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


Reasonable point. But far easier now to find an option before needing to use the man running past.

AUTHOR

2021-03-17T23:41:24+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


I think they can still jump at least.

AUTHOR

2021-03-17T23:40:34+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


Richmond is a good wet weather team, but in the first half v Port prelim and v Geel GF it was the Power and Cats ball handling that was surer in the conditions. Tigers tidied up much better after HT, which gave them more time with the ball and hence were cleaner.

AUTHOR

2021-03-17T23:38:35+00:00

Cameron Rose

Expert


I'll be happy to say nice things about Carlton tomorrow, after we get the W...

2021-03-17T22:57:53+00:00

Doc Disnick

Roar Guru


Well that’s it then. Jack said so...

2021-03-17T21:26:06+00:00

Jakarta Fan

Roar Rookie


The new man on the mark rule eliminates two blights on the game. 1. The man on the mark over the years has increasingly moved 10 meters infield, instead of staying on the mark. It was used to cut down angles, prevent infield passing etc and conflicts with the original intention to be where the offence or mark took place. I'm glad that has been restored, although I think the player, so long as not moving sideways, or forward or back, should be allowed to jump vertically. 2. The 2nd blight has been the increasing harassment of the man on the mark as another player comes in to block said player or to provide a shepherd so that the kicker can get past him. It always has had a terrible look and I'm glad it's gone. All tis will add up to better ball movement and a more attractive brand of footy.

2021-03-17T20:33:35+00:00

Brendon the 1st

Roar Rookie


Yeah, you're right, easy kick to kick, Joe the gooses are the worst goals to watch. Hopefully though it creates more one on ones in the F50

2021-03-17T20:30:46+00:00

Brendon the 1st

Roar Rookie


That's an interesting one, I assume that's a free kick against you because you've moved off the mark.

2021-03-17T19:42:34+00:00

Slane

Guest


You should check out 'One night in Brisbane' if you can stomach watching your team lose again. Jack Riewoldt mentions the weather conditions. He says that Geelong were handling the early greasy conditions better and Richmond only started to get ascendancy when they switched to playing dry weather footy. 2019 Richmond only beat Geelong because Hawkins wasn't playing. 2020 Richmond only beat Geelong because it had rained 2 hours before the match. I wonder what the excuse will be this year?

2021-03-17T11:46:41+00:00

Doc Disnick

Roar Guru


The ground was greasy as #$%@ from the torrential downpour prior to the match. Leppitsch was licking his chops in the pre-game presser. Go watch it. Perhaps it made no difference. Perhaps Geelong would have been up by more at halftime. We’ll never know. What I do know is: statistically, a wet prelim, backed by greasy wet conditions in the GF is unlikely to happen again for Richmond. Had both games been dry, perhaps Richmond wins one but not both.

2021-03-17T11:20:17+00:00

Kevo

Roar Rookie


Taylor and Henderson both looked a costly yard off pace at the big dance last year, and as far I recall weather was not a factor. Richmond have the players, game plan and long term synergy and consistency to adapt to any conditions. There's probably the usual 5 or 6 in genuine contention for the flag, including the 2 just mentioned. Lions are young but, barring injuries, they could be hard to beat around the centre and their big key forwards with Daniher are going to create a lot of score board pressure. Best game plan for defeating Richmond. Hard to see Port not at least going one step further.

2021-03-17T10:54:34+00:00

Kick to kick

Guest


Agreed. Pundits almost always overestimate the solidity of the previous season’s 8. I suspect that in fact the very significant changes this year - longer quarters again, fewer rotations, new marking rules - will mean less continuity this year than usual. Expect to see above average changes to the 8. The problem is predicting the victims and beneficiaries of change. That’s why forecasters underestimate the shifts.It’s easy to look like a dope by predicting the wrong ladder movements. My other concern is that the new rules may open up space at the expense of interesting contests. Repeated uncontested marks are the most boring aspect of Australian Rule Football. The rule makers don’t seem to understand that it’s good defensive pressure and attacking brilliance in defeating it that increases crowd tension and the excitement value of a goal. Anyone who honestly watches replays from the 80s and early 90s is dumbfounded by the defensive laxness and the consequent mediocrity of attacking play and ease of scoring. The game is too professional to return to that, but let’s hope that rules hindering defence don’t bring a loss of intensity to the sport.

2021-03-17T10:40:19+00:00

Yattuzzi

Roar Rookie


Can’t agree with Carlton and Fremantle. Perennial non performers. Hope you got the the premiers and runners up in reverse order.

2021-03-17T09:40:56+00:00

2dogz

Roar Rookie


Realistic comment bro

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar