Why picking the best players does not always make the best team

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

It should all be so straightforward, shouldn’t it? As a coach, you pick the best player available in every position, and then you name them all in your team. They go out on the field and play superbly, each to his or her full potential.

In reality, it never works out that way. The best players do not always work as the best combinations in the sub-units of the team. The front row, the back row, the midfield, the back three.

The missing element is synergy. An invisible binding force which persuades one player to perform better in the company of a second individual, sometimes to the exclusion of all others.

Synergy – you cannot see it, but you can feel it.

Mark Twain referred to it as “the bonus that is achieved when things work together harmoniously”. The author of the worldwide bestseller The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People, Stephen Covey, said, “synergy is the highest activity of life. It creates new, untapped alternatives. It values and exploits the mental, emotional and psychological differences between people.”

It is the same with rugby teams. At the beginning of 2012, Stuart Lancaster’s England were searching for a midfield. There was a good young prospect at No.10 in Owen Farrell and Manu Tuilagi was already established at outside centre.

The missing link was at number 12, and this spot was filled by ex-Sharks inside centre Brad Barritt. Barritt’s kicking was not a strength and he was only an adequate passer of the ball, so he did not fit the profile of an all-singing, all-dancing ‘triple threat’ from that position.

But his abilities and character dovetailed nicely with young Faz and big Manu. His temperament was tough, even and dependable where theirs could be volatile. He was strong on the run. He was a natural communicator who led the defence and excelled at all the bits and pieces in contact and collision, which are so much a part of the 12’s job nowadays.

The synergy worked, and it carried England to a famous victory over the All Blacks on a cold day at Twickenham at the beginning of that December. The trio were instrumental in the side’s three tries, and they gave the team a working platform for further development.

The situation in the Queensland midfield is even more fascinating than it was with England of yore. The Reds have three incumbent Wallabies from 2020 in the shape of James O’Connor at ten, and Hunter Paisami and Jordan Petaia in the centres.

Wallabies attack coach Scott Wisemantel has spoken publicly about Paisami developing into that type of a triple threat.

“Certain players get pigeon-holed at certain times in their lives,” Wisematel said last November.

“Hunter is aggressive and we know he can hit in defence and we know that he can run hard, so people see that – and then he gets pigeon-holed as a hard-running hitter.

“He’s actually got a lot of subtlety to his game – he can kick off both feet and has got a nice passing game, good tempo – so really we want to evolve him into a triple threat where he can run, pass, kick. That’s where we see Hunter’s future.”

Hunter Paisami. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

He also saw Paisami and Petaia as a combo, adding that, “It’s about competition… and we will pick whoever is in form, but they’re going really well as a centre pairing at the moment.”

The problem for Wisemantel and the Wallabies is the Reds’ synergy in midfield looks better when Hamish Stewart is playing at number 12, with Hunter Paisami pushed sideways to 13 and Jordan Petaia left out in the cold on the right wing.

This is especially true on the defensive side of the ball, where the Reds average just over 15 points conceded per game with Stewart/Paisami in combination in 2021, against 24 with Paisami/Petaia in harness.

Hamish Stewart’s was not one of the 40 names announced in Dave Rennie’s first Wallabies squad of 2021 – and that makes the Reds’ choice at the sharp end of Super Rugby AU, in which they will inevitably participate as the unbeaten leaders of the competition, all the more intriguing.

It certainly appears Queensland attack coach Jim McKay has the confidence to uncork his best offensive moves when Stewart is around. Remember this from the game against the Waratahs in the very first round of the competition?

Now take a look at this reprise from the first quarter of the weekend game against the Rebels at AAMI Park:

McKay has noticed in his preparatory work for the game that the Rebels tend to overwrap their forwards at the first ruck from lineout in midfield:

Four Melbourne forwards have run around the back of the ruck to the openside, and that is one too many.

The same themes announced in the move against the Waratahs are all repeated: Harry Wilson is the first-phase ball-carrier, aiming to set the ruck at a spot no further than ten metres from the near 15-metre line; there is a pod of forward runners faking same-way movement on second phase, with Tate McDermott taking an initial step in that direction in both instances before switching the ball across his body; and O’Connor and one other back button-hook to the short-side on second phase – Petaia in the first example, Paisami in the second.

The common denominator is Stewart, clearing out at the tackle zone over Wilson. He is doing the unsung Brad Barritt job and allowing the strike runners to do theirs. That is synergy.

There is also a big difference in the types of kicking game available to the Reds when Paisami or Stewart are playing at number 12. Paisami’s tends to be confined to attacking chips in the last third:

Stewart’s kicking game operates more strategically, from distances much further downfield:

That kick set up the position for the Reds’ first try of the match.

But it is on defence where the value of Hamish Stewart’s presence in midfield really comes into focus. The task of a defensive leader is to recognise issues before they arise on the field:

After a long kick downfield, Matt To’omua receives the ball, and he has two other Rebels outside backs, centre Stacey Ili and wing Frank Lomani, back-tracking to join up with him on the counter:

It is a potentially dangerous scenario with all three Queensland front-rowers defending on the same side of the field. Stewart defuses it by swinging outside Brandon Paenga-Amosa and ensuring he is able to cover the attacking options from the optimal spot – in this case, the kick in behind by To’omua.

One of the other primary responsibilities of the defensive leader in the backs is to play as the furthest man forward in the line, ready to make a ‘spot tackle’ when the situation allows. This is the role Wales’ Jonathan Davies, South Africa’s Jean de Villiers and the All Blacks’ Conrad Smith played with such distinction for so many years for their teams:

Stewart spots Marika Koroibete shifting out to the right of the Melbourne attack, and shoots out of the line to shut him down before he can build up a head of steam.

Stewart also created a try out of defence by recognising that Matt To’omua’s passing targets were limited:

The Rebels have a four-to-two advantage, but unfortunately for To’omua, the two closest to him are both tight forwards.

It’s a great spot by Stewart. He can afford to come up and square in on To’omua, and dare him to lob the pass over the top, confident in the knowledge that the fastest man in the space behind him is wearing a maroon jersey.

When Jock Campbell is finally hauled down only a few metres from the Rebels goal-line, who is there to protect the tackle ball? That’s right, it’s Hamish Stewart – still glueing the pieces of the counter together.

At the end of the game, Paisami was not quite as effective defending in a similar scenario:

At present, it appears the Reds coaches are coming around to the idea that Hamish Stewart is the glue player they cannot do without:

Here Stewart knocks down Koroibete, gets up and gives Lukhan Salakaia-Loto a helpful nudge, then makes a dominant turnover hit on Reece Hodge with Jordan Petaia’s assistance. All in the space of ten seconds.

Hamish Stewart. (Photo by Asanka Ratnayake/Getty Images)

Summary
Hunter Paisami and Jordan Petaia both have more explosive points of difference, and more glamorous skill-sets than Hamish Stewart. Both will enjoy longer international careers, and Paisami may well one day emerge from his cocoon into the multi-coloured, triple threat butterfly that Scott Wisemantel foresees.

But for now, the wheels of the Reds midfield run better with the oil that Hamish Stewart supplies. He is the best defensive leader at the club in the backs, he adds more to the kicking game, and a better balance between game-breakers and expertise at the contact points comes with him quite naturally. The synergy is there.

There is a downside, of course. Jordan Petaia cut an increasingly forlorn figure on the right wing, and looked thoroughly out of sorts by the end of the game. Stewart’s selection does nothing to advance the development of the Paisami-Petaia combination for the Wallabies.

Picking the best players is never enough in selection. You need the bonus that comes from good synergy, and the Queensland Reds have it when Hamish Stewart wears the number 12 jersey. The intangibles really do matter.

The Crowd Says:

2021-04-09T22:03:34+00:00

Kent Dorfman

Roar Rookie


why did Horan & Little work out as such a great combo? Cuz they grey up together, played state together, it's about fraction of a second timing. No point having the 2 best centers in the world together if one is always a yard off the page - them pop asses wont work then

2021-04-09T06:14:47+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


I think this is true of many team sports Nick except I would always pick the best players in a cricket side - for the conditions of course - but still only a fool would not pick the best players in cricket IMO. And the team many football analysts regard as probably the greatest in the games club history - Barcelona between 2009 - 2014 - Pep used to say he would almost always pick the best available players in that side. I mean man, what a ridiculous midfield, let alone Messi - The greatest compliment ever was Sir Alex Fergusson after the best team in the UK lost at Wembley 3-1 ( could have been more) in a game where Man U hardly got their feet on the ball. He said " You know I've been managing this team a long time and sure we've been beaten before but we've never been beaten like that". Barcelona - if your saw the game - made Man U look like a team that was near the bottom of the table in the EPL. Easily the best football side I have seen and no coincidence Spain won the WC in 2010 either with most of the side being from Barcelona especially that seriously gifted midfield's control and supply line. That isn't to say a great team cannot defeat a team of great players ( though the great team also usually has its share of very good to great players lets be honest) but that Barcelona side under Pep was freakish and now look at how Man City are doing since he took over - so perhaps we should add phenomenal manager into the mix. Pep is IMO the best football coach in the game right now and has been for awhile. Barcelona have never been able to replace him and god knows they have tried. Not sure players who are not your best are the right choice without the right coaching staff either just quietly. the other side of the equation IMO.

2021-04-08T23:32:20+00:00

Tony H

Roar Pro


Agreed Nick. NT is a loss for The Roar given his now infrequent attendance.

2021-04-08T22:32:59+00:00


I think thats why I want to see him at 10...They moved the worlds best 10 to accommodate a particular thought bubble all around a perception...

2021-04-08T13:48:42+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


Agree. He’s about 100 times better than Elton.

AUTHOR

2021-04-08T11:41:32+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


What do you make of the recent move to start Hegarty at 15? He’s been coming off the bench for a season and a half and all of a sudden the seemingly first choice fullback in Campbell has been shifted to the wing while a wallaby in Dungunu has been benched? Are you any relation to the Chookster? :stoked: The move with Hegarty might have been because they felt they wanted an extra kicker at the back versus the Rebels?

AUTHOR

2021-04-08T11:37:51+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think SA rugby would have had better results with him if they had persisted with him at 10, like NZ did with Dan Carter Harry. Failure of nerve on their part.

2021-04-08T11:28:58+00:00

mudchooks

Roar Rookie


Another good deep dive Nic. To start the season I was keen to see the Hunter 12 Jordan 13 centre combo but must admit the Reds have looked more composed on both sides of the ball with Hamish at 12. What do you make of the recent move to start Hegarty at 15? He’s been coming off the bench for a season and a half and all of a sudden the seemingly first choice fullback in Campbell has been shifted to the wing while a wallaby in Dungunu has been benched? As a side note, not sure how much you know your league, but picking the best players rather than the best team makes me think of the NSW state of origin team. They’ve always had the much bigger talent pool and top class players yet have been beaten countless times but Queensland teams full of unfashionable players.

2021-04-08T10:12:21+00:00

Harry Jones

Expert


He was the most talented 10. Perfect example of your point

2021-04-08T09:55:35+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


I don’t think BB did anything wrong, the (meta)game style just moved away from what suited his style. Having him at 15 gives him that space back.

2021-04-08T09:52:19+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


I can appreciate where you’re coming from, and understand the principles about leaving RM out all together if it was the BB/DMac nexus they wanted. I’ve said as much in the past about if RM isn’t starting he takes up too valuable a bench spot. We both know where we stand on this one, we’ve done this dance a few times. We just see it differently.

2021-04-08T09:37:14+00:00


yeah pretty harsh on BB to change everything due to a Lions series played under some of the strangest reffing we have seen....The simple question to me is what did BB do that was wrong and the simple answer is nothing.....Coaches had a great couple of guys in BB and Dmac and became desperate to replicate it...And RM/BB has proved to be a failed replication of BB/Dmac I think Dmac is definately around the ABs 23 just perhaps not in the 15 barring injury.

2021-04-08T09:24:10+00:00


Paulo personally I dont believe RM is the longterm answer at 10..BB didnt get dropped due to form or lack of ability...Infact he has never been dropped. the coaches decided that they loved what Dmac and BB were doing so when Dmac got injured they tried to replicate it with a RM/BB combo and to me RM has never made the position his own and the RM/BB combo has never been as successful as a BB/Dmac was. I wonder what BB could have achieved at 10 over the past 2 plus years and feel its time he was allowed to play in the position that he made is name and won many awards at....RM is a fantastic 10 but he is a bit in the Carlos Spencer/Quade Cooper mould where is good is genius but his average is very average and his bad just coincides with being under some pressure from opposition sides..... BB did nothing wrong but was moved due to a coaching theory...Just let him have a season back at 10 and we will see what we have been missing for 2 plus years now.... I wouldnt even have Mounga in the test team...Not because he isnt ( IMO ) the 2nd best 10 in NZ but because his speciality isnt needed....10, 15, 23 would be BB 10...JB 15 & Dmac 23... 10, 11, 14,&15 are covered by BB and Dmac with Dmac also capable of playing HB if needed plus with guys like ALB, Goodhue, Jordan, Bridge, Ioane, the versatility in that lot is amazing and has every possibility covered....( 9 would be the only backs specialist needed on the bench ) Not that I expect to see this from Foster but I do think Foster has concidered bringing BB back to 10 and I think BB will play 10 at the Blues next year as they are desperate for a good 10...

2021-04-08T09:03:09+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


I think Numpty illustrates an issue when trying to compare BB and RM. I know the winning percentages favour BB, but the team he played 10 in and the teams he played are different to the teams RM has played in and the teams he has played. It’s just hard to compare. In the period of BBs dominance I think he was brilliant. His speed and acceleration was/is phenomenal. The defensive patterns we started to see changed though. The Aus, Arg and SA kept the same defensive pattern we were use to. But the Lions came down with a NH style and it strangled us. The teams that then emulated it, like England and Ireland and Wales did really well, and gave us a lot of trouble. Hence the change in tactics was required. BB operates extremely well in space, and turn over ball, and he got that space and turn over ball from SH teams, but had none when faced with NH rush defence and ball retention. This was the issue, and still is the issue. The 2 playmaker system was developed to combat that, originally as you know it was BB/DMac. But then DMac got hurt, so the next option was RM/BB, they pivoted to RM/BB and have stuck to it. The litmus test will be now that DMac is apparently back in form - not that Chief results show it - will the ABs go back to BB/DMac? I personally don’t think so. But if they do, I will be the first to admit I was wrong.

2021-04-08T07:55:02+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Isn’t pretty! Happily haven’t seen anyone fall for it twice.

2021-04-08T07:53:55+00:00

Paulo

Roar Rookie


I don’t think many are saying BB shouldn’t be able to back up RM at 10 mate, he just isn’t the first choice. The other teams have caught up, this was happening prior to BB being moved from 10. Ireland got their first win, then they beat us in Ireland. England almost got a win hit we squeaked home on that one, and that was all on BBS watch - but it was the alarm bell that we needed to change. The performances of those northern sides got better, England went on a huge winning streak. Wales took world #1 briefly. Ireland got choked teams out (including the ABs) - those aren’t linked to ABs decline - it’s extremely narcissistic to think it was just the ABs getting bad. The game has moved on from when BB dominated. It’s just the way the game changes.

AUTHOR

2021-04-08T07:17:48+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Greg might have learned that trick in Europe, where it's quite common - Rabah Slimani started it and we used to call it 'the jack-knife'!

2021-04-08T06:59:50+00:00

jeznez

Roar Guru


Sio's been using three options to bail on contests and collapse. 1. The hinge, straight from the hips 2. Elbow pulling straight down 3. Rolling his outside shoulder in and under. The only one I haven't noticed is the over-extension Haven't watched enough of Medrano but not too surprised to hear that, the Force appear the other scrum quite happy to bring things to deck. Holmes has been running a crazy one, have seen him against three different opponents induce the LH to slide under his chest and into the tunnel. Has looked incredibly dangerous with the LH basically winding up on the ground under his own hooker.

AUTHOR

2021-04-08T06:48:54+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


The return of Philip and Rodda kind of makes the talk about Neville redundant doesn't it? You have those two plus LSL (maybe on the bench) and Hosea as the best young second row. Not much need to look beyond that group.

AUTHOR

2021-04-08T06:44:44+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Okay thanks, I didn't know there were two of em!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar