The Wrap: Suncorp buzzes as Super Rugby final delivers three winners

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

Even for home viewers, there was a palpable sense of Brisbane’s Suncorp Stadium bristling with excitement right throughout Saturday’s Super Rugby final, before things reached a crescendo when James O’Connor sealed a thrilling, 85th minute, 19-16 title win to the Reds.

It’s one of the oldest cliches in the book, but rugby – more specifically Australian rugby – was the winner.

With the final shown on Nine’s main free-to-air channel – albeit squeezed in-between a hefty advertising schedule – and almost 42,000 animated fans in the house, only the most uncharitable could insist that Australian rugby is not in the midst of turning away from recent lows.

Some of that is down to luck, with the pandemic forcing a domestic Super Rugby solution that guarantees a local winner, and which this season, has provided a string of highly competitive matches.

Some is also down to good management. With the relationship with long-time broadcast partner Fox Sports having run its course, new partner Nine/Stan has brought increased enthusiasm for the game and greater reach. If viewers never actually got to see the final ball released to O’Connor and see him straighten and dive for glory, that’s only a minor blip to what has been a hugely successful season, so far.

There is a sense in the rugby community that the focus is back on the game itself, and that while the challenges facing administrators remain formidable – a $27m loss for the 2020 financial year and more to come in the current year – that these can be overcome with a more united, disciplined approach, within a more settled environment.

Long-awaited constitutional and structural change is imminent, which is anticipated will create distinct functional committees to run Super Rugby and the community game which aren’t dependent upon or subject to, state-based voting blocs.

Expect to hear more on this in coming weeks, as negotiations continue with prospective Private Equity partners, who naturally, seek the certainty that Rugby Australia has its own house in order, and the surety that their investment cannot be held hostage to the whims of a few grumpy ex-captains.

The second, and obvious big winner, was the Reds. Under head coach Brad Thorn, Reds fans endured 2018 and 2019 finishing bottom of the four Australian franchises.

Reds coach Brad Thorn (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

While results were slow to come, and criticisms were often pointed and vocal, there were two constants throughout this period – not unrelated.

Thorn insisted that it was his way or the highway. It is rare that any single coach is the complete package, and in Thorn’s case, even after this win, nobody will be acclaiming him as a tactical or technical genius.

But Thorn’s strengths in identifying the type of character he wanted his team to exhibit, and the individual qualities required in his players to suit that, and to stubbornly reject criticisms about the manner in which some players were shunned, have held him in good stead.

Whether it was demanded by the board or not, by accepting the respected Jim McKay into the seat alongside him, Thorn understood how the two men’s strengths complimented each other, for the betterment of the franchise.

The other characteristic of his tenure is that even on some of the low days, his teams were very rarely beaten up. There was something in his developing side that consistently saw them fight back after poor starts, or put in long stretches of committed defence, despite being outmanned.

The results weren’t there, but that character became increasingly more evident last year; notably in a Round 7 match against the Rebels, where the side visibly grew taller as a result of a superb defensive effort.

Do not discount how much what on the surface, might look like a scratchy or lucky win, feeds into a huge dividend a year later, in a final.

That is exactly the reason why the Reds, who on Saturday were never in command of their own game, let alone in command of the Brumbies, were able to hang tough, fight through their own deficiencies, and ultimately snatch victory.

Two previous matches this season against the Brumbies had been claimed at the death, because of the Reds’ scrum dominance. Again this time, their scrum delivered a string of penalties that ensured field position, particularly during a tense second half.

But this time around, the scrum barely papered over major issues with their lineout – half a dozen throws lost – the collective failure of backs and forwards to punch through the gain line, and a confused, largely ineffective kicking game.

A perfect example of this was provided in the 66th minute, after the Reds had clawed the score back to 12-13, when O’Connor, who had lacked distance off his left foot all night, swung awkwardly onto his right, and inexplicably put up a high, cross-field kick that barely cleared the 22.

It was poor exit strategy and execution, which was deservedly punished by the Brumbies, who quickly restored the lead back to four points.

It meant that in the final stanza, the Reds needed to score a try to win; something that despite coming close through a ‘timed out’ Feao Fotuaika, and a lunging Jordan Petaia, they hadn’t managed to do all game.

In the end, the Brumbies, in panic mode, twice had their wings clipped by referee Nic Berry, and while the Reds could never be accused of finishing matters off clinically or with composure, they simply had too much momentum to be denied.

Which brings us to the third winner. Despite the loss, and despite his side’s ill-discipline under pressure at the end, Brumbies’ coach Dan McKellar emerged from this final with his reputation well and truly intact.

From the first whistle, the Brumbies – far from full strength – showed impressive clarity in their game plan and execution. It was the intent and speed of their recycle that troubled the Reds, and opened up the hole that allowed Noah Lolesio to put Tom Banks in for a great opening try.

Defensively too, they were very well organised, ready and waiting for the Reds’ switch plays that have served them well this year.

Finals are often messy, emotional affairs, where much of what has been ingrained into sides over seasons and in the lead-up, flies out the window under the pressure and heat of a finals cauldron.

(Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

But for almost 80 minutes, the Brumbies managed to retain their shape and their identity, and that is clearly the sign of a coach who not only has firm control over his playing group, but has players willing to die for the cause.

Yes, they lost, and McKellar will be hurting, but he and his coaching team and senior players, can be satisfied that they did all within their power to win the title.

Over in Christchurch, the impressive Crusaders took their record of success in home finals to a neat 24 from 24, including six grand finals.

As in Australia there was no shortage of intensity, although fans saw more of the pace and expressive ball movement that everyone has come to expect from New Zealand franchises.

In the end, the difference was familiarity; with the big occasion and big moments, and the Crusaders’ ability to change gears midway through the second half, when the game demanded it.

Chiefs assistant coach David Hill was interviewed just after the home side were reduced to 13 men, where Hill spoke about how his boys would “have a lick” to take full advantage of their numerical superiority.

Unfortunately for Hill, on-field actions didn’t match his words. The first thing they did with a two-man advantage was kick at goal from an attacking penalty, then from the kick-off receipt, Anton Leinert-Brown, who had the option to spark something, cleared for touch.

Soon after, Damian McKenzie kicked more ball away, before Richie Mo’unga brilliantly burned them on the counter, before finishing off the move with his first ever drop-goal in Super Rugby.

These things not only provided the Crusaders an opportunity to run down the clock, it shifted the Chiefs out of the mindset that they needed to be bold and keep taking the game to the opposition. Even with two men extra, nobody should go to Christchurch and expect matters to take care of themselves.

Richie Mo’unga. (Photo by Kai Schwoerer/Getty Images)

Like the Highlanders did this year and the Hurricanes last year, to beat the Crusaders at home you have to play with unbridled self-belief for 80 minutes, and actually win the match, as opposed to expecting the Crusaders to lose it.

The Chiefs shouldn’t feel too down on themselves, however. They were everyone’s popular pick for last at the beginning of the season, and a wee bit of stage fright at a vital and unfamiliar time is excusable.

Despite a dusty day off the tee, Damian McKenzie has been wonderful all year, Tupou Vai’i has validated his All Blacks’ selection, and when a player like Alex Nankerville demonstrates the presence of mind and skill to set up McKenzie like he did for his first half try, it’s easy to believe there is more improvement coming.

The Crusaders meanwhile, keep replacing quality with quality; prop George Bower the latest to fill big shoes with ease. The addition of Pablo Matera for next season almost feels like a joke.

Meanwhile, last week saw the Waratahs launch the dreaded ‘worldwide search’ for a new coach, with CEO Paul Doorn’s press release outlining how; “The coach of the NSW Waratahs is one of the highest profile roles in Australian rugby and, as you would expect, we have had a great deal of interest in the role already.”

“We are open about whether the coach is from NSW, Australia or from overseas, but what the successful candidate must do, is understand and embrace what the NSWRU is looking to achieve.”

“The Head Coach must be aligned with our strategic priorities and share a clear vision of what success looks like in the years ahead,” said Doorn.

Seriously. Perhaps the successful candidate, once appointed, and once they understand and embrace what it is the NSWRU is looking to achieve, might be kind enough to let the board know?

Aside from cash, one of the attractions of private equity into rugby is to add expertise in areas of the business of professional rugby that traditional rugby administrators aren’t sufficiently qualified or connected.

This is one area however, where old-fashioned rugby values don’t need to be set aside.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Instead of paying a global head-hunting firm to manage a short-list of candidates through a convoluted process of corporate doublespeak, why wouldn’t the Waratah’s chairman and CEO be confident in their own diligence, and spend a few hours over coffee and a beer, getting to know what makes their prospective coaches tick?

One can only imagine how early Brad Thorn would have been deleted from contention by a global head-hunter. Now, he’s a Super Rugby championship winning coach.

If there’s a market drawn up on which comes earlier – the standing aside of chairman Roger Davis or the appointment of the new Waratahs’ head coach, the smart money, right now, would have to be on Davis.

The Crowd Says:

2021-05-13T10:51:29+00:00

Muglair

Roar Rookie


"Grumpy Captains"? A throwaway line Geoff, or is this issue still being kept alive around the traps? On another note the NSW board situation underlines just how dysfunctional the 19th century structures are. A bunch of representatives from subsidiary unions taking turns to run professional rugby. On the other hand the only constitutional changes mentioned to date are diluting NSW and Qld further and the "need" for a commission. Who would have thought you could make the RA Board even less accountable?

2021-05-12T02:13:45+00:00


he went great...Often does at SR level...Pity he cant take it higher.

2021-05-12T02:09:03+00:00


Adam if you remember that at the 2015 WC it was Carter who was NZs no 1 10. BB came on in the end for a cameo and scored that famous try. BB tool over as 10 in 16 to 18 then BB was shoved to FB and RM bought in post Dmacs injury. RM came in as a sub 10 from 2018 onwards....BBhas never been dropped or been out of form...Just moved at the whims of some coaches...Time he was given a run at 10 again as 2016 - 2018 were very successful years for the ABs

2021-05-12T01:52:20+00:00

adam smith

Guest


I never said they didn’t get the opportunity at 1st five, only that I recalled BB playing FB in some of his early tests. Seems I was wrong about the opportunities being different as both had 4 games at FB out of their first 14 matches. I agree that the two playmaker experiment failed, as did Shag’s sudden urge to play players out of position, fail. I stand by my point that BB was given far more to time to grow (6 seasons) before the WC as No1 FH, to Richie’s 2 seasons.

2021-05-11T22:57:10+00:00

Danny McGowan

Roar Rookie


I understand your reasoning, but you are assuming a couple of things, a; that Fiji actually want to join Aus comp and b; that when the time comes to change they will have another comp to join. Personally I am quite happy with Aus playing in an Aus comp, and if the 2 PI teams who seem to be setting up with NZ bases if needed, playing in NZ, one more team in NZ (Tasman?) and we can have 2 seperate comps altogether. A 8 team comp in NZ will do me, couple of rounds with finals would just about be a good size comp. All the games at bang on time, no midnight games from Perth (you know how Aus hated them from SA :silly: ) which we got this week. Don't worry it won't happen, just throwing it out there if we all going to give alternatives.

2021-05-11T22:45:48+00:00

Muzzo

Roar Rookie


Haha Geoff. I also see that the NZRFU, will have a new ' top dog' at the end of May. A favourite for the position, that comes in with high credentials is a 42 year old Maori, whose held in very high regard. Great stuff.

2021-05-11T15:10:39+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Yes Laumape is arguably the form 12 of the comp – best season yet – wonder how the AB’s are feeling. Even before he got injured Goodhue got found out a bit this season – that is – he is a very well rounded 12 with great defence but Laumape and ALB have more attacking flair. The race for starting AB 6 and 8 is heating up in NZ – 6 for is a choice between Robinson for Auckland or Frizel IMO. I am a big fan of Ioane as he brings some skills and x-factor neither of those two have in attack but he needs more opportunity – that being said – he is a hell of sub. I think he should be moulded into a lock ( he has played there before) who can play 8 and 6 – his brute strength there and speed would make him a rare find at 5 or 6 and he jumps in the lineout already. No 8 is interesting, but gee Sototu has a serious skillset for a 8 doesn’t he? Is there nothing he cannot do – even kicking – long cut out passes – gas – physical and the list goes on. He should already be the AB starting 8 but that is another story – bad choice of coach and he must not get another two years IMO. But I was also very impressed with Luke Jacobson in the weekend after a time away. But the fact there are so many positions in the AB’s right now that are not settled in the starting line-up or even the bench that is a serious issue. Who are the AB’s starting props, wingers, 12,13,15,6 or 8 and Cane’s days are numbered at 7 – he has too many injuries now. Where is ALB’s fixed position? 12 for me and Ioane at 13 – I think Ioane will give the Aussie franchises nightmares there for the Blues if only they stop using him as the stand-off halfback if the 9 ends up in the ruck…what a waste of player and they have done it all year – dumb coaching IMO.

2021-05-11T12:51:32+00:00

Mungbean74

Roar Rookie


Yep, that was the last dregs of the Bad boy James coming out before he lifted the cup to complete his reformation.

AUTHOR

2021-05-11T11:21:22+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Laumape is a big loss for NZ rugby Fox, and a reminder, as if we needed one, of the commercial realities we face in this part of the world. Such a shame because he's been excellent this season and has really become a well rounded player. It's hard to argue with your assessment of NZ v Aus franchises, other than to say, things have a way of levelling themselves out in a game situation, and one 'faster' style of play doesn't always automatically win over a more grafting style - the AB's v Argentina last year as good an example of that as you'll get. But on balance yes, it's going to be a real test for the Aus franchises.

2021-05-11T10:47:40+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Hi Geoff nice article and two great finals but some of your analysis struck a chord with me and that is the attacking flair of the kiwi sides just looked sharper. I just read Bretts article also very good but am not so certain i agree with his belief the that the gap between the kiwi and Aussie sides will not show nor that the Blues – their own worst enemy at times – won’t beat teams like the Brumbies or Reds. “That is exactly the reason why the Reds, who on Saturday were never in command of their own game, let alone in command of the Brumbies, were able to hang tough, fight through their own deficiencies, and ultimately snatch victory.” Agreed but will never being in command cut it against the Kiwi sides? And Brumbies lacked some nous in attack at times also a worry. We should remember that the few wins the Aussie teams have had against kiwi sides in recent years have come at the early rounds – though not all of course -this time they face well drilled and match fit kiwi sides so they will face in form sides. The same argument can be reversed of course but….I look forward to the games and for the sake of new found buzz on Rugby in Australia I hope they stack up well…but i am not so certain as I just did not see the same attacking nous in the Australian franchises overall. The kiwi franchises have more x-factor players IMO even in the Highlanders and Hurricanes and that may be the difference. The Reds I think will perform well as they have very good pack – and the best 10 in Australia – but I am not certain about the rest. Also key All Black players are returning from Japan. Laumape is a big loss to Europe – for 1 million+ a season! – but he knows ALB has 12 locked up with Goodhue out

2021-05-11T06:22:33+00:00

jameswm

Roar Guru


Yep agreed with all that. It's tough to cross check them! One video against the other.

2021-05-11T05:45:25+00:00

ScottD

Roar Guru


Yes, ok. Maybe we were looking at the same thing. I think you are right

2021-05-11T05:08:01+00:00

Mungbean74

Roar Rookie


Yep, I was watching from here in Japan on Stan and that camera work was a bit of a shocker. At least we had the replays of the different angles straight after. I was surprised the commentators didn’t make more of the referee asking James O’Connor to wait before he could kick because he wanted to clear it with the TMO. You could see O’Connor and the players officially celebrate when he got the nod of approval to kick.

2021-05-11T00:12:22+00:00

Chully Bun

Guest


Thorn ? Lol The bloke who mumbles .Send him packing back to un zud immediatley.

2021-05-11T00:06:44+00:00

Bourkos

Roar Rookie


I hate mate too in a journalism context. I'm happy for whoever they bring on board as long as they add something. Tuirinui is a massive plus just like Cheika this season

AUTHOR

2021-05-10T23:54:55+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Cheers KP.

AUTHOR

2021-05-10T23:54:26+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


I see Brett is writing about that today, Scott. I'm sure both administrations will have a strong sense of what is working well and, how important that domestic piece is.

AUTHOR

2021-05-10T23:52:34+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Hi Scott I was watching on Stan, but assume we had the same pictures. When Tupou drove for the line they switched from the wide shot to a medium-close shot at ground level, which showed the pile of bodies on the ground and the rest of the Reds players jumping up and down to celebrate what they thought was the winning try. Then you got a sense of the ball flying out of the ruck to the right of screen and play continuing, but you couldn't see who to, or what the situation was. Next thing, O'Connor zooms into the close-up frame in the process of scoring. It wasn't until they showed some replays you could tell how the play had unfolded. In retrospect, they should have held the wide shot and we would have seen everything. But to be fair, when a player scores, the practice is to zoom in closer so we can see the ball of the player's reactions, and they wouldn't have been expecting play to keep rolling on.

2021-05-10T23:31:15+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


Agree totally. I am basing it solely when the review was happening and it got to the grounding Berry stated that by then he had blown the whistle. When the whistle was blown live all you could see was a huddle, on slo mo review they don’t have the sound. So I am accepting Berry knew when he had blown the whistle compared to what he was seeing and how much time had passed. If the whistle was in fact after the grounding I think it was a try, there is a little doubt though whether it was Whites hand at the end that grounded it, but on balance it would have been a try.

2021-05-10T23:28:39+00:00


Yeah I do see that actually. "Empirical truth".....I like it...Accurate...

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar