The great Windies batsman you've probably never heard of

By Tigerbill44 / Roar Guru

The list of West Indies batsmen with a 50-plus batting averages in Tests looks like this: George Headley, Everton Weekes, Gary Sobers, Clyde Walcott, Charlie Davis, Brian Lara, Shiv Chanderpaul and Viv Richards. 

Here I have only considered batsmen who have played 20 or more Test innings, otherwise Andy Ganteaume and Vic Stollmeyer would top the list.

Anyone with minimum knowledge of West Indies cricket history would easily pick the odd man in the list: Charlie Davis from Trinidad.

In 15 Tests between 1968 and 1973, the right hander scored 1301 runs at an average of 54.20. Now, we all know over a short period a batsman’s average can be inflated by different factors. Before analysing Davis’ Test stats more critically, I would first like to look back at his career.

Although his first class debut was in 1960-61, he made his Test debut in the Boxing Day Test at the MCG in 1968. Windies cricket was starting a transition period at the time, and Davis was picked as a useful all-rounder in the team. He was also a right-arm medium pacer.

In his debut Test, he batted at number eight, scoring 18 and ten as the Windies suffered an innings defeat. In the only Aussie innings, he bowled 24 overs, taking 1-94. He dismissed Bill Lawry but not before the Australian captain had scored a double ton.

In England, during the northern summer of 1969, Davis was given the proper job of a top-order bat and he didn’t disappoint. At Lord’s, in only his third Test, he scored his maiden Test ton and hence got his name in the Lord’s honour board. Perhaps he got a bit too excited, because in the second innings he got his only duck in Test cricket.

(Steven Paston – EMPICS/Getty Images)

In early 1971, Davis had a memorable series against the touring Indians, scoring 529 runs in four Tests with an average of 132.25. Unfortunately, his efforts were overshadowed by those of a young Sunil Gavaskar.

Davis scored hundreds in the third and fifth Test of the series, but his best effort came in front of his home fans at Port-of-Spain in the second Test for a losing cause. He scored 71* and 74* in the match, showing excellent technique against the Indian spinners, but couldn’t stop a historic seven-wicket win for the Indians.

In the first innings he came to the wicket at 3-62, and it immediately became 4-62 as Clive Lloyd was bowled by Abid Ali. Skipper Sobers contributed 29, but after his departure India was right on top. There was some help from the tail-enders for Davis, and the Windies ended with 214. India replied with 352.

WI needed a change of batting line-up in their second innings. With opener Steve Camacho injured, Rohan Kanhai opened the innings, while Davis came at number three. The change certainly worked. The West Indies finished the third day at 1-150 and was right back in the match.

But things started to go wrong for the home side even before a ball was bowled on the fourth morning. At the nets, Davis was hit over the eye and went to the hospital for stitches. When he returned to the crease, the West Indies had slumped from 1-150 to 5-169.

Roy Fredericks was run out without adding to his overnight score of 80, and Sobers was out for a duck. Davis did his best, taking his score from 33 to 74, but the Indian spinners were on top and there was no support for him. Later in the day, India completed a memorable victory.

The next season, he enjoyed another successful home series, this time against NZ. He amassed 466 runs in five Tests, and at Bridgetown he produced his Test best score of 183. He looked set for a double ton but was run out after batting for ten hours.

Surprisingly, Davis only featured in the last two Tests of the 1973 home series against Australia. He failed in both and was permanently dumped. He wasn’t even 30 at the time.

As a critical analysis, most critics consider averages over a short Test career with a bit of skepticism. One factor can heavily inflate the stats: in the case of Adam Voges, it is his extra-ordinary record against the Windies. In the case of Vinod Kambli it is the two double hundreds early in his Test career.

Davis’ average certainly got boosted by his five not-out innings out of 29. In the list of top averages, Voges (seven in 31) and Eddie Paynter (five from 31) has similar not out rate. Marnus Labuschagne in fact has none in 31 innings. Brian Lara only had only six in 232.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Still, while his average is a bit inflated, there is no doubt that he performed admirably given his limited opportunities. His record while batting in the top order (third, fourth or fifth position) is especially impressive. In 23 innings, his average is 63.74.

In terms of the selectors’ whims, after a disappointing end to the 1960s, there were signs that West Indies cricket was gradually coming back on the right track. There were fine emerging talents in the batting department like Lawrence Rowe, Alvin Kallicharan, Viv Richards and Gordon Greenidge. Roy Fredericks and Lloyd were already regular members of the side. In this scenario, Davis became the victim.

The selectors’ plan was to build for the future. And eventually, this certainly brought excellent rewards. Still, Davis was hard done by, especially given his excellent Test records.

In conclusion, Charles Allan Davis is an easy name to remember, and a nice one for the commentators. As a writer you don’t have to check the spelling three times before submission. But he never seemed to the selectors’ favourite.

Maybe they considered him unlucky. The West Indies didn’t win a single Test with him playing. They lost five and drew ten of the 15 Tests that he played.

He did the best of the limited opportunity that he got. He got his chance when the team was on a transition period. As so often happens with such teams, the players’ role often change rapidly. Davis batted in six different positions in his short Test career.

There is an aura of un-fulfilment about his career. He played Tests under Sobers and Kanhai. It would have been nice if he had played under Lloyd as well as the West Indies started a new era in their cricket history.

Interestingly, even his Wikipedia page seems to be an incomplete one. That, for me, pretty much sums up the story of Charlie Davis.

The Crowd Says:

2021-05-28T09:00:56+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Among Australian batsmen between WSC and his dumping in late 1992, Dean Jones easily holds the record for playing the most number of tests against the West Indies without ever reaching 50 in a non-dead rubber.

2021-05-28T08:54:26+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Oh goodness, give me strength ... I have debunked the Dean Jones lost cause myth on here so many times it's just not funny. His record against the West Indies was dismal with a capital D, and please don't use the desperate dud argument "Well not too many others did any better" (because it's simply not true). (Throws hands in the air in despair)

2021-05-28T03:08:10+00:00

Gee

Roar Rookie


Nice piece. The poor guy sound like a Victorian, Dean Jones & Brad Hodge couldn't get a game despite having better averages than their replacements.

2021-05-27T02:20:23+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


That is a dud argument. Most aussie batsmen post wsc had some days of success against them in non dead rubbers. Jones never did. So he was indeed mostly alone in that regard.

2021-05-27T02:14:10+00:00

The Sports Lover

Roar Rookie


That Windies side from 1984 to 1994 wrecked quite a few Australian batting careers. Jones was certainly not alone.

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T07:10:11+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Jack Ryder had 5 Not outs in 32, avg 51. 62.

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T06:10:02+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


sorry, I think slightly misunderstood your comment.

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T06:06:20+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Thanks for the link. Very helpful. But I think the order is done on most balls faced between dismissals. His SR about 38-39 doesn't seem that bad, lots of famous names in the 30s.

2021-05-26T05:59:31+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


The other Charles Davis (cricket statistician extraordinaire) has a list of the most tenacious batsmen (balls per dismissal). Charlie Davis features very high on that list: http://www.sportstats.com.au/hotscore.html#_The_Most_Tenacious

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T05:54:18+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


I have just checked his stats. BF data is not always available, looking at mins column, I wont say he was a painfully slow scorer, certainly not in those days standards. But, yes, I don't think he had the array of strokes of Rowe or Viv.

2021-05-26T05:38:30+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


From what I've read, Davis was a painfully slow scorer (maybe not surprising given he played in non-winning sides). I wonder if that counted against him in the Lloyd era which had Fredericks, Greenidge and Viv.

2021-05-26T05:09:36+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


thanks very much for this link Tiger. I can completely understand why Davis gave it away now. As you say, he's also done it tough on the health front.

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T04:30:10+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Davis was a useful medium pacer in FC level. But his test record with the ball shows 2 wickets at 165 each. Lawry and Basil Olivera were his victims in tests.

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T04:07:32+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Yes. I always enjoy reading about the players who had their moments at the top but not considered among the greats. Larry Gomes, Asif Iqbal, Rodney Hoggy, Vinod Kambli just to name a few. Also, its pretty easy to write about them. its tough to write on Trumper or Sobers because so much has been written already. For the part 2 of my article on Asian cricketers I have to write 8/10 lines on Shakib. what will I write? I am constantly asking myself.

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T04:03:15+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


http://www.cricketweb.net/charlie-davis-trinidad-and-west-indies/

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T04:02:38+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


http://www.cricketweb.net/charlie-davis-trinidad-and-west-indies/ I think you will find more detailed information here. It seems that like many cricketers at the time he wasn't sure whether to concentrate on cricket or on other profession. Playing for WI wasn't very rewarding (money wise) at the time, I am not sure it still is. I think his dilemma made it easy for the selectors to drop him. still to drop him prior to the Aus series when his average was 60+ is strange. I think he pretty much quit int cricket after learning that he is not going to Eng in 1973.

2021-05-26T03:54:24+00:00

Once Upon a Time on the Roar

Roar Guru


Waugh’s rise to greatness began in 1993. Jones may well have succeeded against the pop gun attack in England in 1993, but based on history he would most likely not have succeeded against South Africa and Pakistan in 1994. Both Waughs succeeded against both and Michael Bevan succeeded in Pakistan late 1994 also. Greg Blewitt succeeded against England in 1994-95 and 97 and against Saffies in 97. He also played a key innings in the deciding test in the Caribbean in 95, an innings Jones would never have played. Boon was in decline from late 1994 and when he retired in early 96, a 35 year old Dean Jones would not have been the answer, especially as the following series was against the West Indies. Ricky Ponting and Justin Langer took a few years to fully mature as test batsmen but that was okay because this was during the Waughs’ great years.

2021-05-26T03:24:04+00:00

Insult_2_Injury

Roar Rookie


Great read, TigerBill! Player's stories like Davis' fascinate me. Many players have a short but eventful career and Davis is no exception, but it would be fascinating to know what the selectors were actually looking for! Apparently he wasn't in their future plans, regardless of coming back in after being hit in the face in the nets, steadying after a collapse and eventually making 70 in a losing cause. You'd normally expect the selectors to pencil a guy like that in first, add an average over 50, willingness to bat anywhere in the order and all that in losing sides. He would have to feel stiffed! As TB says, we know what the Windies top order developed into thru the '70's, but why was a well performed under 30 on the scrap heap? Do Sobers or Lloyd know?

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T02:20:34+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


He only scored 70 runs from 4 innings, had his problems against Max Walker. Without that series, his test average is 61.50. This makes the selectors decision to ignore him initially, very strange.

AUTHOR

2021-05-26T02:18:32+00:00

Tigerbill44

Roar Guru


Charlie's brother, Bryan , an opening bat also played 4 tests for WI.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar