Back to back row: When the going gets tough, the tough get going

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

The 1985 Billy Ocean hit When the going gets tough (the tough get going) was one of the biggest pop songs of its time.

It was the theme tune for one of the Hollywood blockbuster movies back in the day, The Jewel of the Nile featuring Michael Douglas, Kathleen Turner and Danny de Vito, who provided background support in white suits for the video. It was so good, it even returned to number one in the charts for a second time in 1999, when the track was re-recorded for Comic Relief by Boyzone.

If the song was infectious, its banner headline was even more so. What do the tough do when confronted by a new challenge? The Kathleen Turner character in the movie was not too sure.

“When the going gets tough, the tough, well… I don’t know what the tough do.”

Despite the lopsided nature of the scorelines, Wallabies head coach Dave Rennie will have a far better idea of what the tough do after Super Rugby Trans-Tasman. The higher level of competition will have been a great help in sorting out the wheat from the chaff in the jostle for Test places in July.

If he didn’t know it already, it will also have reaffirmed what works and what doesn’t against teams from New Zealand. The Force, even with such limited scoring power, can stay in games with their Kiwi opponents because they know how to keep the ball and limit the number of tackles they have to make.

The Westerners have made the lowest number of tackles per game at the highest completion rate (85%) while conceding the fewest points (117). Teams that are far more dangerous on attack but not so good at maintaining possession (like the Reds) have had to make 20 more tackles per game at a very modest 77 per cent success rate while conceding 51 more points than their brethren in the west.

The Reds scrum, which looked world-beating during Super Rugby AU, has not enjoyed the same impact against Kiwi opponents, and some of its front-rowers have been exposed by the higher tempo of play in defence. These are all new lessons that were previously masked by the lower standard of play.

Within the success or failure of a team, there are always individuals who rise to the new challenge. They are resilient and have the mental toughness to confront adversity head-on.

From this perspective, events in the back row have made for compulsory watching, and especially so in the problem positions of numbers six and number eight. These have proved to be a conundrum for Wallaby selectors over the past few seasons.

At the end of Super Rugby AU, the key Australian options at these spots had posted the following stats:

Mins total Mins between carries Gain-line dominance + or – Decisive outcomes Mins between tackles Tackle success T/O
Harry Wilson 556 7.1 +3 +0 7.2 88% -3
Rob Valetini 790 10.3 +11 +4 7.8 92% -3
Lachie Swinton 351 8.6 +5 +0 4.9 88% -8
Tim Anstee 377 8.2 +2 +5 6.3 89% -3

Harry Wilson and Lachie Swinton were work-rate headliners, but in domestic competition Wilson was struggling to make an impact (especially as a ball-carrier) while Swinton still had discipline issues to resolve (in the “T/O” column). Rob Valetini was the toughest on the gain line in both attack and defence, and Tim Anstee had flashed some promise as a game-breaker for the Force.

Let’s move the focus onto Super Rugby Trans-Tasman:

Mins total Mins between carries Gain-line dominance + or – Decisive outcomes Mins between tackles Tackle success T/O
Harry Wilson 230 5.5 +3 +13 5.7 83% -1
Rob Valetini 320 8 +16 +1 8 80% -5
Lachie Swinton 309 7.2 +8 +3 5.4 88% -2
Tim Anstee 239 14.0 -1 +1 10.9 88% -3

With limited experience in the 15-man game, Tim Anstee has obviously struggled to get himself involved at the higher level of competition. Wilson and Swinton post even greater workrate on both sides of the ball, with the latter showing definite improvement in the discipline department.

Perhaps the most interesting stat is the change in Harry Wilson, whose decisive outcomes (breaks, assists etc) have exploded while his gain-line dominance remains unchanged. Rob Valetini is still the most powerful inside ball-carrier in the Australian game.

There were some hints of a different, and more creative, usage of Harry Wilson by the Reds towards the end of their game against the Crusaders:

In the first example, Wilson is the man on the edge in attack, in the second he is defending wide in defence. In both cases, there is evident comfort playing in space, with the Reds number eight delivering a crowd-fooling dummy for the first try, and delivering an over-the-shoulder offload of which David Campese would have been proud of for the second five-pointer.

The following week versus the Chiefs, there were signs of a growing recognition of what kind of ball-carrier Wilson really is:

In American football, a clear distinction is made between the type of running back who is a hole-runner, and a power back who wins collisions. The hole-runner is an expert at identifying and penetrating the gap quickly, while the second is happy to accept contact and win his metres after it has occurred.

It is becoming evident that Wilson belongs squarely to the first group. In the instance against the Chiefs, he steps off his right foot and angles his run in between two forward defenders to make the break.

The weekend match against the Blues added further fuel to the fire. If you run the Reds man straight at people, there is much less probability of a positive outcome:

Wilson runs straight into Akira Ioane without any attempt at deception, and the result is predictable: no gain, but quite a lot of pain.

Compare that with this creative set-up with Hunter Paisami in the middle of a pod and Wilson running the hole outside him:

Wilson sees the hole and the angle he must take to penetrate it from way, way back. As a consequence, Akira’s compadre at the salon, Patrick Tuipolutu, is left flat-footed and gets nowhere near making a stop.

Having Harry Wilson run late into a hole beside the ruck off Tate McDermott is an excellent masked use of both his running ability and work rate:

Wilson starts the play next to the breakdown, then runs across the width of the field to make the extra man in attack.

The game against the Blues also furnished further evidence that Harry Wilson is well able to handle the demands of the wide channel on offence:

Okay, maybe keep the ball in hand next time, Harry.

Summary
Super Rugby Trans-Tasman has proved a rough ride for the Australian teams. But slowly, the cream is rising to the top, and the tough guys are getting going – even if they did not know quite what to do at the start of the tournament.

Dave Rennie will already have a much better idea of who is a genuine Wallaby contender with four rounds of the competition gone. He will also have an even clearer understanding of what works and what doesn’t against opponents from the shaky isles.

In the back row, Michael Hooper will be an automatic choice as captain-designate, what with Fraser McReight falling so sharply out of favour in Queensland. But who will join him in the cursed spots at blindside and number eight?

Harry Wilson. (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

A strong case is building for Rob Valetini to start at number eight for Australia, if he can handle the chores at the back of the scrum. He is by far the best first-wave ball-runner in the country, if Isi Naisarani remains out of the selectorial equation.

At blindside flanker, Lachie Swinton looks to be responding well to the demand for more discipline to add to his physicality and strong work ethic, but he may find himself under unexpected challenge for the spot from the Reds’ Harry Wilson.

Wilson is really a hole-runner and a second wave ball-carrier, not a straight-ahead power merchant. So why not let Valetini handle the load on first phase, and then find an angle for Wilson thereafter? Why not play Rob inside during phases, and let Harry roam on the flank?

It will take time to play the All Blacks on an even field, but maybe not as much as expected at the beginning of Super Rugby Trans-Tasman. As the Kathleen Turner character says in the movie:

“In my last novel, Angelina and the Savage Secret, Angelina used a nail file to chip away at the bars of her cell to remove them and escape to freedom.”

“How long did this take?”

“About two pages.”

The Crowd Says:

2021-06-24T07:33:34+00:00

twodogs

Roar Rookie


:boxing: Challenge accepted good sir! Although I think my argument about him being the smallest has a bit of proof behind it. My argument about physicality is completely observational so you are right to call me out.

AUTHOR

2021-06-17T05:43:26+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Sounds like you have an article brewing - good luck with that. I have lost count of the number of Hooper knockers over the years who have gestured towards proof, then backed off when challenged to produce it. :stoked:

2021-06-17T03:53:31+00:00

twodogs

Roar Rookie


I'm not sure if it is too strong a word. 10 CMS taller or 10 kg heavier is "significant" in my book. One only has to look at boxing weight divisions to understand the impact a few kilograms can have on overall power and strength. Have to agree to disagree there. Otherwise you raise a good point, it's hard to gauge a lack of physicality other than anecdotally or through observation. The stat which refutes my point is his ability to make an incredible amount of tackles. I would be confident in saying that if we sat down and watched the last 5 tests he played that the majority of those tackles are passive, combined with his very low turnover stats as of late leads me to believe he is being out muscled. Going to look into the stats to buttress my argument even further. Also interesting to note the three 7's you listed for Wales all have at least 5cm and 5kg on Hooper as well. Is he the smallest 7 on the international stage ?

AUTHOR

2021-06-12T05:58:06+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


'Significant' is too strong a word. Yes they might be a little heavier or taller, but it does not really matter TW. England coped in a WC knockout with only two lineout jumpers for example. Wales have played three 7's together - Tipuric, Navidi and Wainwright, without a top ball-carrier among them. Where do you get your idea that Hooper is not winning any physical contests? Examples?

2021-06-12T04:40:33+00:00

TJ-Go Force!

Roar Rookie


I’ve played first grade with Pete in Melbourne. Never met a hardworking and more humble bloke. The whole thing is weird..

2021-06-11T22:34:32+00:00

Unders

Roar Pro


Samu had a good defensive shift in Wellington. Then all of a sudden dropped. DR defo doesn't rate him which is a shame

2021-06-10T21:38:01+00:00

Nick Maguire

Roar Rookie


NB, well, a winger of course!

2021-06-10T14:29:59+00:00

Francisco Roldan

Roar Rookie


Exactly Nick ...! Argentina in particular has been developing in academies financed by the UAR (Argentine Rugby Union) the entire physical preparation and skills program for each player. We privilege the physical type and we develop it in relation to its genetics and the position in which we want to place it. We have had good performances in the RWC U20 with this player training policy. Also, I am one of those who believe that a simple change in the laws of the game can put a successful player format out of combat.

2021-06-10T14:25:35+00:00

twodogs

Roar Rookie


Kremer absolutely manhandled Hooper during the Argentina tour! He was also very agile for his height + weight. It definitely left an impression on me Francisco.

2021-06-10T14:13:01+00:00

twodogs

Roar Rookie


Thanks for the articles Nicholas. Curry and Underhill both have 5cm and at least 5kg on Hooper. (Curry has 10kg on him). Sam and Ardie both have 10cm on Hooper and are slightly heavier. Ardie in particular is known for breaking the first tackle (at least) and winning the physical contest, which is not something Hooper has been known to do as of late. To me, in aggregate, this makes Hooper the smallest player of all of them. McReight has 4cm on Hooper so can definitely put on 5kg and then at least he could size up Underhill. The players you mentioned might not be Kremer huge, but all have a significant height or weight advantage over both Hooper and McReight.

AUTHOR

2021-06-10T13:32:42+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


It also depends on national characteristics too Francisco. South Africa and Argentina are prob better adapted to the idea of an extra second row 'tweener' like PSDT or Kremer than say, Wales or Scotland would be.

2021-06-10T13:29:49+00:00

Francisco Roldan

Roar Rookie


Twodogz ...! Your mention of Argentina's use of a 4 or 5 instead of a 6 or 7 is trending in rugby today. Currently they are comparable positions if they are versatile players with good ball handling in hand, so that they can perform as dueling and evasion players as well as impact. It is an excellent strategy and highly valued when organizing a roster of players for championships or world championships. As a counterpart to the analysis about Hooper, we see in Pablo Matera, for example, he is a super specialized player for his position, even very skilled with the use of the foot. We are going to see him play in the 2022 season for Crusaders.

AUTHOR

2021-06-10T13:27:18+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


No worries.

2021-06-10T12:16:32+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


The specialised jackling 7 was demonstrated to be an evolutionary dead end in the 2015 World Cup final, when David Pocock was comprehensively played out of the game. A strategy relying so much on a jackling 7, ultimately fails by offering a smart opponent the initiative and a single point of failure to counter. Unfortunately Australian rugby has taken a while to work that out, I think the Brumbies "get it" and the Reds seem to be gets there with Wright they just need McReight across the line too. It is really the position that forwards from a variety of body types can make their own nowdays, with what is between the ears being the most important attribute.

2021-06-10T12:00:02+00:00

Olly

Roar Rookie


Since when have teams been restricted to only having one good runner in the backrow? It is more about what other skills they have. lineout, on the ball, physicality etc etc

2021-06-10T11:56:03+00:00

MaxP

Roar Rookie


Of course. And a sincere apology from me for being a bit of a sensitive petal :stoked:

2021-06-10T11:49:41+00:00

Olly

Roar Rookie


I hope you are right. It could be a very good backrow for the Wallabies.

2021-06-10T11:35:45+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


Yes, all of the 6/8 options have competed hard this year and the depth is far better than I expected it to be, for positions where the inter code competing for body type is so fierce. It is a good problem for Aussie rugby to have.

2021-06-10T11:27:09+00:00

Busted Fullback

Roar Rookie


Thanks again RB. The good big man versus the good little man scenario at play. This also indicates to me the development of depth within Aus Rugby, even though there is some suggestion, from off-shore(?), that we have too many teams. Appreciate your thoughts as always.

2021-06-10T11:21:28+00:00

Rhys Bosley

Roar Pro


Wilson can jump, he is just used as an attacking option off lineouts quite a bit this season, so other jumpers have been used.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar