The Wrap: Fast-finishing Wallabies earn respect but Bledisloe Cup remains elusive

By Geoff Parkes / Expert

Since their last win at Eden Park in 1986, the Wallabies have endured what is now 21 straight losses at New Zealand’s home of rugby, many by margins in excess of 20 and 30 points.

That’s why in the 64th minute of Saturday’s first Bledisloe Cup match, when Damian McKenzie planted the ball on the same patch of grass that David Havili had found six minutes before, with the score out to 33-8 and counting, it felt like familiar territory.

That the Wallabies finished off the match strongly – easily winning the battle of the benches, scoring three late tries and closing the score to 33-25 – tells us a few things about Dave Rennie’s side that sets it apart from recent iterations.

More on that in a moment. The reason things got to 33-8 in the first place tells us a few things about Rennie’s side that are common to recent versions.

Both sides were slow out of the blocks, seemingly confused by what was or wasn’t possible in the tricky, swirling conditions. The All Blacks’ passing game stuttered, while their defenders never settled on where the offside line lay.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

The Wallabies, meanwhile, fouled their first five lineouts, and with Tom Banks seemingly happy to chip off only 15 metres at a time, they failed to take full advantage of an early string of penalties.

Ironically, it was a lineout that delivered the Wallabies the opening try, Hunter Paisami spearing onto a long throw before sending a willing and capable Andrew Kellaway away for his debut Test score.

But in a familiar scenario, the Wallabies failed to exit effectively from the restart, captain Michael Hooper ruled to have chased forward ahead of the clearing kick.

The Wallabies will have known that it’s an area of the game New Zealand officials have been red hot on all season, making it all the more disappointing that they invited commentators to again remind everyone of the All Blacks’ propensity for scoring tries right on the break.

Captain Sam Whitelock duly turned down the almost certain three, pointed to the sideline, and Sevu Reece’s quarterback sneak was good enough for a 16-8 halftime lead.

Things hotted up on the return, Richie Mo’unga sparking the try of the season that wasn’t, before Paisami picked him out with a pass that didn’t need to be thrown. Up went the intensity from the home side, and – all too familiarly – the Wallabies failed to stay with them.

(Photo by Dave Rowland/Getty Images)

Both tries had a familiar ring, with strong, purposeful carrying taking the ball to the goal-line, before new centurion Aaron Smith recognised where the space was and found his wide men.

That’s where it ended for the All Blacks, the Wallabies drawing from same well that gave them their narrow series victory against France, albeit that there was a feeling they were benefitting from the inhibition that comes with knowing you can’t win.

The trick for the selectors will be to determine how much weighting to apply to performances in the final quarter against those from the first three. Was it the All Blacks who took their foot off the pedal and dropped their intensity, or was it the Wallabies who finally seized the initiative?

Marika Koroibete will come straight back in, Matt Philip is pressing for a start, and there will be more debate as to whether Taniela Tupou needs more game time. In the midfield, Matt To’omua looked sharper than he has all season, and while Paisami is a disruptor who has a knack of making things happen, not all those events benefit his own side.

The Wallabies will be frustrated, knowing that they are not miles off the pace, but also because they will know that the All Blacks were not at their best. In that sense, this was a missed opportunity.

As for the All Blacks, 18 penalties is a ridiculous number to concede, with the returning Brodie Retallick responsible for at least four on his own. An honest appraisal of their discipline alone will be enough to deliver improvement next week.

Of greater concern for the home side will be the lack of cohesion in their loose forwards. Ardie Savea, Dalton Papalii and Akira Ioane failed to convince as a unit, and don’t be surprised to see a return to a more traditionally balanced eight-seven-six combination.

(Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

There was an amusing moment in the lead-up to the match, with a Canberra journalist at Thursday’s press conference, in her desire to anoint Dan McKellar as the next Wallabies coach, inquiring of Dave Rennie whether or not he will be prepared to stand aside.

Rennie brushed it off with a smile, but even allowing for the parochial nature of the question, the nature of it reflects a modern trend to pass judgment on coaches indecently quickly, and move them along, no matter the underlying detail.

It’s a situation faced by New Zealand coach Ian Foster, who it seems, just three games into his second season, has already been found guilty of irredeemable crimes against New Zealand rugby, and so must be moved on, post-haste.

Foster’s greatest failing is that he wasn’t born Scott Robertson. There are question marks around his coaching and selection – as there should be of all coaches – but his day of reckoning must come after he has had the opportunity to develop his side through a second full season, not every single time a play doesn’t go to plan.

One interesting take from the match was that Aaron Smith’s first box kick came in the 60th minute. In the Cape Town series decider, Springbok halfback Cobus Reinach took only 25 seconds to launch his first kick skyward, followed just 55 seconds later by the Lions’ Ali Price.

No surprises there, given how the series played out, just as it was no surprise that the try that finally gave the Springboks their second-half lead came from a disputed box kick.

Unfortunately for the Lions, it was their familiar inability to grasp the loose ball that cost them – three players reaching in for the same pill – which left space for the Boks to finally free up Cheslin Kolbe to show his finishing skills.

(Photo By Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Arguments will rage back and forth about scrum shenanigans, but it was two individual errors in the first half that most cruelled the Lions’ chances. Inexplicably, Liam Williams forgot rugby’s most basic draw and pass skill, ignoring the free flying Josh Adams outside him, instead seemingly determined to stamp a metaphor for the series by crashing into contact.

It was a costly mistake, as was Tom Curry’s decision to shear off the front of a maul and illegally take Siya Kolisi with him, when a second try to hooker Ken Owens seemed imminent. With tries at such a premium throughout the series, the Lions could ill-afford to so wantonly waste their opportunities.

Clearly underdone heading into the series, South Africa backed their suffocating defensive screen to deliver them the result. The risk was that this increased the chances of a close, lottery-style outcome, but it is hard to recall a series where such unbending self-belief and rigid adherence to the game plan has been so rewarded.

As has been well documented, Rassie Erasmus got a lot wrong in this series, and he will face his day of judgment this week when World Rugby calls him to account for his calculated video attack on first-Test referee Nic Berry.

But what Erasmus got right was to recognise that in such a hot contest, the importance of goal-kicking was paramount, and how his sharpshooter Handre Pollard was a little bit out of sorts on the shifty Newlands turf.

Altering his bench to include 37-year-old Morne Steyn to reprise his 2009 heroics and calmly decide matters with two late penalty goals was a masterstroke.

Even if the series won’t be remembered for the quality of the rugby, both camps deserve full credit for making it happen in the first place.

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

And while a Lions tour without crowds reminds me of a wedding a few years ago where the caterer ran into such chronic and insurmountable problems with a kitchen failure that they resorted to ordering in buckets of KFC, the fact remains that everybody got fed.

The series was marred however by the incessant intrusion of coaches, water carriers and physios from both camps onto the field, blowing out game times and leaving viewers frustrated with the stop-start nature of the play.

Erasmus was captured among his pack, laying down the law, in the 42nd minute. What on earth was he telling his players that couldn’t have been said two minutes earlier at halftime? Why was he even allowed on the field at all?

Worse was the shameless intrusion of long-time physio Rene Naylor after the Lions turned down a kickable penalty in the 68th minute, electing instead to kick for the corner.

Throughout the next play, up until the point prop Mako Vunipola was held up over the try line, Naylor can be seen standing just behind the try line, barking orders at players, imploring them to hold fast, and directing them to fill gaps in the defensive line.

Even after the five-metre scrum was awarded, Naylor remained in the in-goal area, near the try line – well in the field of play – almost appearing to act as another player in the defensive line.

None of this carry-on is due to innocent exuberance or over-excitement. Nor does not change the record books. But such an extreme, calculated desire to win at all costs does, in the minds of many neutrals, chips away at the legacy of a side that frankly, as world champions, never needed to adopt such siege-like, underdog status in the first place.

World Rugby, when they are done with Erasmus, would do well to restate both the spirit and the letter of the law when it comes to on-field intrusions, and ensure that no future series is tarnished to the extent that this one was.

Nobody can argue that one style of rugby is more virtuous than any other. It is the beauty of the game that there are different pathways to victory, and it the choice of every side to adopt the one that best suits them.

But whichever route is chosen, let the players contest matters by themselves, without a cast of hangers-on infesting the pitch. Rugby is designed to be played 15 versus 15. Let’s keep it that way.

The Crowd Says:

2021-08-12T06:19:51+00:00

PeterK

Roar Guru


it was life and career saving , thats what it was

2021-08-12T06:18:56+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Oh please Pk that was not a mistake by Jonker... and I think we all know that

2021-08-12T06:15:40+00:00

Fox

Roar Guru


Hi Geoff… you probably know the AB’s for this week and the back row is the same meaning this is Foster 1st choice backrow IMO.. apart from Sam Cane… he siaid he thought Akira and Ardie were immense in the D last week in parts of the game and expects DP to play better at 7 this week as he was coming back from injury last week. But I just Lov……e the backline. Mounga… Havilli…Reiko 13… Reece …Jordon…DMac… Gees I ask you Geoff is there a quicker backline in the game from 10-15 than that? And including acceleration off the mark? My god if that backline gets any space or width the Wallabies could be in for very tough night IMO. I think the AB’s will be a VERY different beast this week. I agree with John Kirwan who made a very good point that if the Wallabies cannot beat the AB’s when they were so poor in first 20 minutes with so many errors and in the game an 18 to penalty count against them…then this week the AB’s will be much better in that area… as he said ” The Wallabies missed an opportunity last week” but he does not believe that they will get that this week. I think it might just be a thumping. Though Toomua will steady the backline… and Swinton provides them with Mongrel and MK on the wing has gas … but is it enough? I think deep deep down Rennie knows his task this week might be a bridge too far in game two at Eden Park but he is a smart tactician and he would never admit that either

2021-08-11T06:02:05+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


I have long loved those clowns from way back when I was too young to be one of them. Ah for the cranky truth…. :happy:

2021-08-11T05:37:03+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


Statler and Waldorf we may be! :shocked:

2021-08-11T05:14:09+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


That one is not a mystery Moa. Sadly. I see examples every day. Here, and in the mirror.

2021-08-11T04:59:21+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


Look up 'curmudgeon' while you are there. :thumbup:

2021-08-11T04:52:16+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


Bugger me Moa. Now off to the dictionary I go.

2021-08-11T04:35:14+00:00

moaman

Roar Guru


I definitely am a man of a more saturnine disposition-in my dotage-than I professed to be as a younger man. If I think the cap fits I may adopt it.

2021-08-11T02:01:22+00:00

Ken Catchpole's Other Leg

Roar Guru


“ I have been watching (and moaning about) this for years” A name change? Moanerman? Oh for a straight visible line whistled fine For these things I whine

AUTHOR

2021-08-11T01:48:39+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


Hi EFF, I agree that this was a good example of the process working as it should. The ref saw what he saw, and he used the video to make sure that there wasn't something obvious that he might have missed. The issue with this one is more around what constitutes a knock-on or not. We seem to have moved to a place where refs, commentators and fans all try to establish precisely what is forwards and back, (or in this case, straight upwards), whereas in the past, before there wasn't this whole business about forwards or backwards - if you spilled it, unless it was obviously backwards towards your own line, then it was a knock on. There's something to be said I think, for things being more simple like that.

AUTHOR

2021-08-10T10:33:31+00:00

Geoff Parkes

Expert


No worries RT, definitely better late than never! Just on Reece's no try, yes what a shame it was rubbed out (correctly). But the interesting thing for me was that it was similar in a lot of ways to the try France scored in the 3rd Test in Brisbane, BUT the difference was that the execution of the passing back infield by the French was precise and clinical, whereas the same pass thrown infield by Rieko Ioane (who otherwise had a good game) missed the target.

2021-08-10T10:09:13+00:00

Busted Fullback

Roar Rookie


:laughing:

2021-08-10T06:33:10+00:00

Philou

Roar Rookie


Piru, just one more point: Siya Kolisi is a devout Christian who is dedicating his life to what he believes is nation-building through the Boks' role in society. Does he make mistakes - sure. Did he get sucked into that narrative Rassie ran with about Lions intimidating the refs, quite possibly. But the very notion that he, of all people, would willingly play a race-card is as detestable as it is absurd. That's why I'm trying to get clarity from Geoff - if I misunderstood what he wrote and got it wrong, I'm sorry and I'll move along as he suggests. But that line from last week's 'wrap' seems damningly clear to me.

2021-08-10T06:04:54+00:00

Philou

Roar Rookie


I'm denouncing it now, or isn't that enough for you? There was more than enough inflammatory stuff and inaccurate reporting from both sides going around before the end of the series, thank you, including lots on this site. I'm very happy to rather let WR sort the whole mess out. E.g., let them determine whether they can prove that Rassie did in fact leak the video, what directors of rugby are or are not allowed to say, and whether any other members of the Boks or Lions management teams (or the captains) crossed any lines.

2021-08-10T05:06:24+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


The implication was pretty clear from where I was sitting, but I'm willing to concede that maybe it wasn't intended, at least on Kolisi's part - imo Rassie knew exactly where the line was and he stopped right on it. And, for the record: I hated what the Lions management team in their objections to Marius Jonker, and I equally hate what the South African team did to put pressure on the refs. B Then where were you when your mates were all gleefully jumping on the bandwagon with their pitchforks and 'Rassie or die' signs? I didn't see a single comment from any SAer denouncing it (apologies if I missed your comments)

2021-08-10T05:01:49+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


If we're just going to what about and then moan about arrogant commentators, it would seem you're not exactly on the moral high ground mate

2021-08-10T04:55:46+00:00

Suzy Poison

Guest


Here's a couple of first's for you. When the Boks won the Rugby Championship, all the Kiwis were quick to point out, no team that has won the Championships or Tri Nations has also ever won a World Cup. When the Boks lost in the pool games, there were also written off as no team, that had lost a pool game, has every won a World Cup. Go back and look at the arrogance of Kiwi commentators prior to the WC. The 10-14 guys had the Boks at 7th in the Power Rankings.

2021-08-10T04:41:39+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Don’t know about all three but I’ve said in the past that the Doctor, especially for HIA, should be a neutral. The doctor and at least waterboys - if nothing else it should be an opportunity for local juniors, in the same way the big tennis tournaments recruit ball boys Physios can stay on the sidelines, if players require treatment they can leave the field of play while play continues See how many need impromptu rubdowns and stretching then

2021-08-10T04:39:19+00:00

piru

Roar Rookie


Fair points, we'll at least know where we all stand after a few games.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar