Why the focus on Latrell misses the real issue in a failing system

By Tim Gore / Expert

The 56th minute of the Roosters-Rabbitohs match saw Bunnies fullback Latrell Mitchell smash Roosters centre Joseph Manu in the face with his shoulder.

The impact smashed Manu’s face and has ended his season.

And, hasn’t the world exploded?

However, most people have missed the real issue.

The narrative has mostly been in regard to whether Mitchell intended to do what he did and whether the incident should just be accepted as part and parcel of the game, which is after all a sport that involves plentiful collisions.

Firstly, there is no way to prove intent and there is nothing to support Mitchell being an endemically dirty player. However, there is no question that his actions were reckless.

People engaging in talk that Mitchell is a thug and meant to injure Manu are as misguided as those arguing that the officials have a set against the Roosters.

And they are doing precisely what NRL HQ wants them to do: view each incident in isolation.

When you look at each incident in its own bubble you don’t focus on them being repeated incidents of incompetence and failure on the part of the administration.

You don’t look at the underlying problem. You spend your time looking at each tree as being a problem rather than the woods as a whole.

You miss the point.

One person who didn’t miss the point was Roosters coach Trent Robinson. His press conference was one of the highest rating things on social media last Friday night.

Not only did Trent not miss, he was spot on in his comments about the blatant ineptitude of the bunker.

“It was laughable. It was that bad it was laughable. They don’t know what they are doing.

If you can’t do it, get out of there. Or just get rid of it completely. Get rid of it completely,” said Robinson.

“If you cannot do the job get out of there. And its shown that the NRL Bunker cannot do their job this year. It’s been a farce. It’s been an absolute farce… It’s that bad its actually funny. Like what are they doing up there. I don’t know what they’re doing up there. I’ve got this thing about circus music going on in the background and streamers…”

But neither the failing bunker officials, nor their bosses, are going to get out of there.

And who exactly do we expect to push them out?

Make no mistake, the Sydney Roosters are no one’s second-favourite side. They are commonly viewed as Uncle Nick’s sombrero-wearing golden boys. People like seeing them lose.

So the fact that the overwhelming majority of supporters totally agreed with Robinson’s assessment is damning.

In my opinion, the NRL administration isn’t very good.

(Photo by Matt King/Getty Images)

They’ve got an Operations Manager who continues to allow trainers to run virtually unrestricted through every NRL game regardless of the known risks. They’ve got an officiating department that continually makes errors that, should we punters commit the equivalent of in our roles with the regularity we see with the NRL officials, would probably see us sacked.

From what I can tell, the NRL is effectively a closed shop and beholden to no authority but their own.

The way I see it, there are only two ways that that can change:

a) a leader somehow gets in there and changes that reality and gives the NSWRL, QRL, RLPA and the clubs actual power over the operations, or

b) the clubs revolt and form their own breakaway league.

Both of these options are incredibly unlikely.

That leaves NRL HQ in the position where I’d argue that genuine accountability for their performance doesn’t really exist – except when it comes to revenue.

The only real benchmark I’d really be concerned about if I were in their shoes would be ensuring that the organisation makes money for my lords and masters.

While it does – and the NRL most certainly does make money – I wouldn’t be too concerned about any flare ups caused by, say, the Operations Manager allowing trainers to go wherever they like and one inevitably altering the course of a game.

Hell, I probably wouldn’t even fine or suspend the trainer, let alone sack the guy who runs the ground managers.

I probably wouldn’t be too worried when a referee had an absolute howler that cost a side a game – like illegally changing a six again call in the biggest game of the year.

If I were in their shoes I’d just come out and have a go at those casting comment on the incompetence. I’d label those people ‘refs faulters.’

But I’d sure as hell care if a coach refused to attend the post match press conference.

While the rule stating that the coaches must front the cameras and speak is in the exact same operations guide that stipulates the ignored rule that trainers must be on the field only for the briefest periods, the press conference is something the broadcasters want.

So if you don’t show up to that you’ll get fined.

(Photo by Mark Nolan/Getty Images)

And if you arc up about incompetence and inconsistency you can bet your backside that they’ll fine you for that big time.

It doesn’t matter in the slightest that, like Trent Robinson, you are absolutely spot on in your assessment, you can not criticise the NRL.

It’s all very 1984..

That’s the way NRL HQ runs.

You must go to the press conference but don’t dare say what you think or you’ll get hammered with a big fine. Just like the $40,000 one that the Roosters just accepted.

And who can you appeal to? No one.

The ARLC?

I’d love to think that Kate Jones, Tony McGrath, Dr Gary Weiss, Megan Davis and Wayne Pearce might decide that enough was enough and demand that a broom was put through NRL HQ.

I’d love them to usher in an era where those in charge were chosen in processes that were transparent to the clubs and even us fans so that we could truly believe that they’d hired the best possible people for the jobs.

Just try to imagine a world where we didn’t watch Graham Annesley’s Monday briefing without having to weather regular involuntary blasts of disbelief and incredulity in regard to the content.

Well, it’s not going to happen.

At least not while the NRL is turning a profit.

And let’s face it: outrage is good for business. People tune in to radio and tv and read articles to hear others railing at the incompetence and the injustice. And then the news cycle moves on and we wait for the next big issue to rear its head and we go again.

Even when the issue is the same incompetence from the officials we screamed about last time.

We are screaming into the void.

(Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

Here is a reality lots of people aren’t talking about right now: Henry Perenara is a lovely man. I’ve had the pleasure of talking with him a few of times, once pre-game in the bowels of ANZ Stadium when I asked him about his refereeing career. I found him engaging, funny, respectful, polite and very handsome.

He knows rugby league. He played 72 first grade games in eight seasons, across five NRL clubs. He even played a Test match for New Zealand and a game for the Maoris.

In 2007 he played his last game and was at a loose end. He seized on the opportunity to move into refereeing as it had a steady pay cheque and the job came with a car. He knew the rules well and he was certainly fit enough.

However, as lovely a person as he is, that doesn’t mean that he should be officiating games anymore.

His first top grade appointment was in round 17, 2011, where he officiated the Roosters against the Raiders. He controlled 204 first grade games until his last appearance in Round three this season where he controlled the Raiders against the Warriors.

That game was clouded in controversy in that he – and his fellow officials – missed a forward pass that was so glaringly obvious that no one could quite understand how it was let go. It cost the Raiders the match.

Now it is very possible that his last bunker appointment will be surrounded in controversy with him inexplicably not sending Latrell Mitchell from the field.

When Josh Papalii got the Bulldogs’ Sione Katoa in the head with his shoulder he was sent off on video review.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

When Corey Harawira-Naera got the Storm’s Jarome Hughes in the head with his shoulder he was sent off on video review. And even when the Broncos Kobe Hetherington played the role of power pole that Harawira-Naera smashed into he got sent off on video review.

The precedent was blatantly, unmistakably clear.

That Perenara didn’t think it was makes it clear that he is just not the right person for the job. It is that simple. To get that wrong was unacceptable.

The NRL sees 16 clubs competing. They are all businesses that need to turn a profit, just like the NRL. Their salary caps each season are in excess of nine million dollars. That’s $144 million dollars a year. And that is just the players.

That level of investment demands a competent administration and competent officials.

Yes, everyone does make mistakes and I accept that. No system is infallible.

However, these types of inconsistencies and incompetence can not and must not be acceptable when there is this amount of investment involved.

Because if it is acceptable – if Henry does retain his position – then the NRL is nothing more than a circus with colourful streamers.

And we all just have to accept that.

The Crowd Says:

2021-09-06T02:49:19+00:00

Bernie Kerin

Guest


What is the job of the linesman / lineswomen, now? It was not long ago that some linesmen (before we had lineswomen) were never off the field. They had a few different rolls and one was to report a illegal incident on the field, in back play. If the play continued they would leave their flag where the incident happened and they would go back to do the line work until play stopped. The NRL got rid of these stoppages by using the bunker in the referee's ear. I ask who is refereeing the game? It seems the referee will not stop play unless the Bunker is in his/her ear. The six again seems to come from the Bunker! It is very noticeable that the top 5 or 6 teams don't get pinged as much as the lower sides in fact, some top of the table games have very few stoppages. The bottom six teams get the rule book thrown at them while the top sides seem to get far more lattitude. The hole roll of "who is responsible for control of the on field game?" We got ride of the extra referee and goal line touch judges should we get ride of the overuse of the bunker. If the bunker has to look at an incident 5, 6, 7 times well the referees decision should stand after 3 goes! If a referee can't decide if it is a try or not then and only then should he go upstairs like they used to. We assume the referee missed the Mitchell incident or he didn't think the incident was bad enough for a stoppage because Mitchell was travelling at high speed from a distance however; the referee should have consulted with his touch judge first before going upstairs. The big problem was the Bunker was trying to run the game and no one was looking at the back play! My other question is "when can a defensive player move when the ball is played?" Every ruck the marker and the second marker are off side and never seem to get pinged. There could be a penalty every-time the ball is played close to the line. So many things are let go and will while the referee is not able to do his job. I played under the unlimited tackle, 4 tackle and 6 tackle rules and in early days both sides had to retreat the required distance in the play the ball. How can a referee judge a forward pass when he is back 10 - 15 meters. So much more to sat however; i have had my say!

2021-09-05T22:11:37+00:00

GregM

Roar Rookie


as proof that with virtually every try, the refs all go to the video. None are prepared to make the call anymore. Can't blame them tho because the press & internet trolls will crucify them if they make a blue. Damned iif the make the call live as they see it, damned if they don't & go to the bunker

2021-09-05T12:07:18+00:00

zonecadet

Roar Rookie


I'm with you.

2021-09-05T12:04:44+00:00

zonecadet

Roar Rookie


Just like this season. Magic round will be remembered for making players disappear and then they stopped that because..... who knows. I too don't care if 40 infringements are whistled per game as long as the infractions are there,....eventually they'll stop doing it. I'd rather a game where all the shit stuff in the game is removed and we just see football no matter how many weeks it takes to weed it out.

2021-09-05T12:01:12+00:00

zonecadet

Roar Rookie


Yes, yes, yes! How on earth can one referee police and see everything in a game on a field this big with 26 players? The 10mtr rule suffers if the single ref focusses on the ruck and the ruck suffers if the referee is checking the 10mtrs. A ruck referee might also start to see some of the forward passes creeping into the game because the touchies don't.

2021-09-05T11:54:44+00:00

zonecadet

Roar Rookie


For comparison, do we want RL to be like soccer, left in the hands of an incompetent (if not corrupt) referee answerable to no-one?

2021-09-05T11:53:15+00:00

zonecadet

Roar Rookie


Surely Wests not making the finals is a them problem, not the League's? As for heartland, not sure where the actual RL heartland is in Sydney but Leichhardt ain't it.

2021-09-05T11:51:20+00:00

zonecadet

Roar Rookie


Agree with you there. No way do I want a professional league to go back to the days when refs missed things because of incompetence or just the difficulty in being everywhere and seeing everything clearly in real time. Can't be done. Bunker idea is right, perhaps the execution and scope needs work.

2021-09-04T07:48:13+00:00

Tim Buck 3

Roar Rookie


The two referees making conflicting calls was an example of the NRL's amateurish fiddling with the rules. One ref rules six again and signals six again. The other ref rules it's the sixth tackle but there is no signal to tell the first signal was wrong. They didn't put much thought into it.

2021-09-03T02:28:14+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


It might not be budgetary. These girls are only semi-professional, so they can;t really go into a 34 month bubble and still hold down a job. That might be part of it.

AUTHOR

2021-09-03T02:10:49+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


David... this is FAR from Henry's first almighty blunder. This was an abominable call. It was the stuff of park footy. Its a billion dollar industry. He's not the man for the job. And there are plenty of great people out there. Plenty.

AUTHOR

2021-09-03T02:07:29+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Very few do. Those struggling would very much like a level playing field. Maybe the NRL could put one in place? We now have a situation a situation where the Wests Tigers have not made the finals for ten years. That's pretty bad. Especially given the rugby league heartland they cover.

AUTHOR

2021-09-03T02:02:49+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


The Raiders have missed the eight because they've been rotten. Perenara's blunder just helped them realise their mediocrity.

AUTHOR

2021-09-03T02:01:50+00:00

Tim Gore

Expert


Wow David... This is a billion dollar sport and your response is a la Frank Grimes... "whaddaya have against Homer?" A top grade official who didn't immediately - given the clear and plentiful precedents this season - see that as a send off is ,not up for the job. Your ethos rightly applies to amateur sport in the park, not in professional sport. And yes David, there are multitudes of people better. If the NRL Closed shop would open a bit we might be able to have some of them come in. Presently the NRL is completely in charge of the selections and appointments. Not the various leagues, not the referees associations. Until this year when Bernie has gone off to work with the Melbourne storm and advise them, we had the situation where the three brothers from Coonabarabran were all in the top echelons of officiating. This is a big, dirty can of worms you are opening here. Do we really have the best officials? Is there really a merit based appointment system? Why hasn't Matt Cecchin done an Origin or Grand Final for years? What punishment did Ben Cummins get for his country park level error in the 2019 GF? Are there better people? I'm firmly guessing yes David. Whether or not they are in consideration is anyone's guess. One thing I'm certain of - beyond any doubt - is that if Perenara got that call wrong then he is not suitable for the job in what is a BIG money industry. And this is far from his first blunder.

2021-09-03T01:34:37+00:00

Rabbit lover

Roar Rookie


We’ve missed the point alright. It’s all the tampering with the rules that is ruining things…even the officials are uncertain. Is it contact with the head or attacking the head? Is he tackled…yet? Was the pass forward? “It was forward but went backwards out of his hands”. Give me a break. Now we have types of tackles like the “surrender “ tackle. Give me a break. He is tackled when forward progress( thanks Rex) is halted. Now we wrestle for every millimeter even after the ref calls held. The tackled player keeps fighting to get forward. There used to be a penalty for moving off the mark. Surprise surprise commentators hate penalties. That’s because they are ex players and ex coaches. To appease commentators the ref now coaches teams during the game: hold, hold. Release. Stay in the scrum. Smith you are offside. Coaches should stop moaning about being penalised and coach your team to obey the rules and officials should penalise those who break the rules. If you want to see how to tackle and play the ball do this: watch some old games from the sixties and seventies, and watch how the women play. If you want officials to do a good job leave the rules alone and apply the rules.

2021-09-03T00:21:08+00:00

Chris Parker

Guest


Sutton needs to be forced to retire also

2021-09-02T23:29:38+00:00

David Kerr

Guest


As long as humans are involved, there will be mistakes made and we have to accept it. If we are to sack Perenara for this is there a better person to take his place? Do we just sack these guys every time they make a mistake and where does the budget for this bottomless pool of officials come from? Will the players take a pay cut to afford this luxury? People make mistakes and we just need to learn from them and try and improve the process. Remember, Latrell made a reckless tackle and we want to burn Perenara at the stake? Is that fair? If there is someone better to replace him so be it but to lose his job?

2021-09-02T21:50:37+00:00

Forty Twenty

Roar Rookie


I was critical of Perenara a few years back when he crucified Manly in a game against the Pennies. He hammered Manly with penalties and couldn't find any fault with the Pennies but Tim claimed it was all Manly's fault back then. It was a terrible display of one-sided officiating and one of the few I haven't forgotten. Years later, the Raiders miss the 8 because Perrenara misses a blatant forward pass?

2021-09-02T21:47:10+00:00

bazza200

Guest


So do you think the Ref's can make all these close calls with trys in the corner ? Would you be massively pissed if you lost a game when it was clear a player was out and it wasn't called. If your ok with that. I'm not and most fans aren't.

2021-09-02T21:45:22+00:00

bazza200

Guest


Have see in a few games where it's really helped and got the right call. In all things there are ppl who game the system but it's good to see ppl not using it willy nilly and only using it in 2 cases where they really think something happened or at end of the game the bad part but the good part on balance is better.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar