It's too soon for an 18th team... but the NRL should still expand

By Hairy / Roar Rookie

With the addition of the ‘Insert name here’ Dolphins to the NRL in 2023, talk has already turned to when and where an 18th team will be introduced.

This seems quite premature, given the Dolphins have barely finalised their name and are yet to so much as assemble a playing roster, but we are all a creative lot and are all CEOs at heart. So, I figured I may as well give it a go too.

The obvious benefits of an additional team are the extra game each week, which increases revenue from broadcasters, removes the weekly bye and provides exposure to new audiences. The obvious detractions are that there isn’t enough first grade-standard playing talent as it stands to fill two new teams.

The NRL’s goal is to secure its financial future, made even more important due to the bottom-line impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. No expansion is low-risk right now, but failing to act could see rival sporting codes extend their reach and revenue into traditional rugby league heartlands.

Increased pathways in other sports could reduce the talent coming to the NRL, and increased revenue from rivals could result in luring the best talent away from the game.

Given that, the NRL needs a greater presence in the Australasian region to secure its financial future, but expansion of the NRL to 18 teams – or more – may not be the only way to provide sustainable growth.

>> READ: Matty Johns’ pick for 18th NRL team

My solution is to create a second-tier rugby league competition. It would be geographically distinct from the NRL, Australasian-wide and responsible for generating its own broadcast revenue. This would allow the NRL to expand into multiple new areas at once at a lower cost, without adding additional teams to the NRL.

It will also provide a natural stepping stone for prospective NRL teams in the future, and give new franchises the chance to build their supporter bases, pathways and football departments.

This would be a bold change and would require some upfront investment from the NRL, but it’s a move I believe would reap huge benefits moving forward. Let’s see how this could work.

Competition Structure

So, which clubs and regions could be considered?

The first step is to promote existing clubs from the NSW and QLD Cups. There is still scope for expansion in Brisbane in the future, despite the existence of a second NRL team alongside the Broncos now; so the two unsuccessful expansion bidders, the Jets and Firehawks, could form their own new rivalry in this competition.

The Central Queensland Capras and the Mackay Cutters could merge and represent both central and northern Queensland. The Sunshine Coast Falcons could also generate some support.

NSW is well represented in the NRL and there is no need for expansion there, but the state still needs representation in my proposed new league. The Central Coast Bears could fit in nicely, by representing that region and reviving some of the lingering North Sydney Bears sentiment.

Joseph Suaalii of the Bears celebrates a try during the NSW Cup Trial Match between the North Sydney Bears and the Canberra Raiders at Seiffert Oval on February 27, 2021 in Queanbeyan, Australia. (Photo by Mark Evans/Getty Images)

The Newtown Jets’ popularity makes them an obvious candidate; if the Tigers are unwilling to bite the bullet, Wests Magpies could be resurrected to specifically represent south-west Sydney.

Western Sydney could then be represented by the Blacktown Workers, with the team centred around the new airport – a pity the Jets name is already taken. The NRL is focused on improving country rugby league, so a NSW Country team which represents and travels betwen regional towns could also be a great idea.

Perth is the obvious expansion team from outside rugby league heartland, to give the NRL a more complete national footprint. Another Victorian team is an option alongside the Melbourne Storm, as is rebirthing a team in Adelaide (though perhaps not quite yet).

Jamal Fogarty of the Bears in action during the Intrust Super Cup Grand Final match between the Wynnum Manly Seagulls and the Burleigh Bears at Dolphin Stadium on September 29, 2019 in Brisbane, Australia. (Photo by Bradley Kanaris/Getty Images)

Internationally, a second New Zealand team on the South Island is a no-brainer; perhaps even a 3rd team is an option to create a local rivalry there. The Papua New Guinea Hunters should be included as they have already made into the QLD Cup, and have pointed to further facilities back home. Another Pacific Islands team would be great for the game; either as a standalone Fijian side or a combined team from the region. In future, it may even be plausible to add Japanese or American teams, but let’s not look that far beyond our borders just yet.

I really like the idea of adding an Indigenous Australian representative team into the mix. They could be quite a drawcard for Indigenous talent to come and play rugby league over other codes like the AFL. I won’t attempt to name this team, but I can imagine some awesome jersey designs, and it’s easy to get excited about some of the footy a team like this could play. If the NRL are so inclined, the new team could be a perfect starting point for the league to assist in awareness and funding with Indigenous programs across the country.

Possible Competition Structure
1. Brisbane Firehawks
2. Ipswich/Western Corridor Jets
3. Central Queensland Cutters (merger of Central Qld Capras and Mackay Cutters)
4. Newtown Jets
5. Wests Magpies
6. Blacktown Workers (potential name change)
7. Central Coast and Hunter Bears
8. NSW Country
9. Australian Indigenous
10. Perth
11. Melbourne
12. New Zealand (South Island)
13. Papua New Guinea
14. Pacific Islands/Fiji

Playing Talent and Quality

You might be wondering if the playing quality would be any different to the current NSW and QLD Cup competitions. It is a fair point, but my answer is that this competition would concentrate that playing talent more effectively than the current system, as well as help to retain some of the talent that might normally go overseas or retire altogether.

The NSW and QLD Cups combined had 25 teams run around in total in 2021. A competition of around 14 teams would almost halve this, ensuring the best talent from those competitions would be playing.

With investment from the NRL and broadcasters, player payments can increase, which will encourage fringe NRL players to stay in Australia rather than heading overseas.

Perhaps the likes of Jackson Hastings could have rediscovered himself playing for Perth instead? Imagine if you could still go and watch Benji Marshall run around for another few years? James Maloney is another one who could be playing in Australia rather than the second-tier in France. Sam Burgess wanted to come back, as did Greg Inglis. Add in the likes of young guns Joseph Suaalii, Sam Walker, Jayden Sullivan, Tyrell Sloan, Jayden Campbell, Blake Taafe, Piakura and the next batch of superstars, with a dedicated competition for them to strut their stuff in rather than having to bide their time before cracking their first-grade sides.

This competition would be really entertaining.

Revenue

The biggest question over my plan is, of course, how it will be funded.

The first step will be to ensure as many clubs as possible can be financially self-sufficient. The two unsuccessful bids for the 17th NRL team were strong, and meet that requirement comfortably. The Perth and Central Coast bids were also relatively strong; scale these back a little and they could still be self-sufficient. The opportunity for future promotion is sure to encourage some private funding.

In terms of broadcasting appetite, the new geographical areas and local buy-in to those areas should ensure there is an audience for viewing these games on TV as well as attending them. This should attract some new viewers and engage some existing viewers to watch additional games, and so would not cannibalize the existing NRL viewership.

The playing standard should ensure a decent level of interest as well, particularly when some of the game’s gun teenagers are running around alongside some older superstars like Marshall or Maloney. Fox League chose to televise a North Sydney Bears trial game earlier this year due to the hype around Joseph Suaalii and Sam Walker, so there is certainly interest in certain players competing at this level.

Joseph Suaalii of the Roosters looks dejected after the Roosters were defeated by the Pamthers during the round 15 NRL match between the Penrith Panthers and the Sydney Roosters at Panthers Stadium, on June 18, 2021, in Penrith, Australia. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Channel 7 have made enquiries into the next NRL broadcast deal, so perhaps this competition could be a good investment for them to showcase the quality of their coverage to the NRL ahead of a prospective first-grade challenge of Channel Nine. Fox League could potentially play the game of the round as well, if interested. There are a couple of additional timeslots over the weekend and on Monday that can be used to have most games in separate timeslots to the NRL.

Add to that naming rights of the competition, and that the additional visibility will give clubs better access to sponsorship as well, and with the right investment, the new competition could prove a money-spinner.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Expenditure

The expenditure of starting a new competition from scratch is obviously high. Then there is the additional club funding, increased player payments, venue hire, event costs, travel, advertisement, regulatory services, insurance, and general management to consider. However, much of this can consolidated with the current expenditure for the NRL.

Promoting existing clubs means they should have a lot of the systems, infrastructure, and day-to-day operations already in place. The are plenty of opportunities for double-headers with NRL matches to reduce venue hire, event costs, advertisement, and travel.

Much of the players’ salaries will already be paid for by an NRL club, so total roster payments may not be as high as expected. It may also be an opportunity for NRL clubs to offload some underperforming players and get some financial relief.

At least initially, the expenditure may well exceed the revenue, but this is an investment in the NRL’s future which is sure to reap rewards down the track.

The Clubs

The other part to this is the agreement of the NRL clubs and there are both positives and negatives.

If the numbers stack up, the clubs would surely be keen to encourage improving the financial sustainability of the game, and ensuring as high a standard of competition as possible for their fringe and emerging players.

What they won’t like is losing what form of control they have on how their fringe and young players are played. It would also be likely that some NRL clubs could have closer proximity to these teams and get benefits from that. Both are undoubtedly issues, but in my view the benefits outweigh the downsides.

Overall, I think this idea could take rugby league and the NRL to the next level. The time to do it is now.

The Crowd Says:

2021-10-22T06:50:51+00:00

bjt


I've always thought why not Tasmania? I can promise you now, that if Melbourne didn't get in from the Super League war, people would be saying the same thing about a adding a team there now. The Storm have been a success and a greater success for rugby league in general. We shouldn't be scared about a lack of grass roots, and be brave and build. I don't think people realize how powerful a sport could be if it reached every corner of Australia.

2021-10-20T18:16:41+00:00

Micko

Roar Rookie


South Australia & Tasmania aren't really viable. Tasmania STILL doesn't even have an AFL franchise, so I'd doubt there'd ever be an NRL one there! Perth is the only realistic option with the large kiwi/PI & east coast states migrant population base.

2021-10-20T01:44:46+00:00

fiwiboy7042

Roar Rookie


Here's the thing ... NRL stands for National Rugby League. It's focus should be just that. It's not the NRL's job to develop the game in other countries (even New Zealand). Everything you say about domestic games sounds good, Hairy, but you are falling off the giant elephant on the even bigger turtle's back (Terry Pratchett book reference there) in regards to the other countries. Some points: 1. these countries don't have league clubs so there is no retail commercial base for such a club(s). I live in Redcliffe; the Dolphins stadium is part of a leagues club there and they have a shopping mall as well. Big commercial base there; 2. lower cost of living. $20 at the gate to watch a game in Fiji, Samoa or Tonga is an absolute fortune. $10 is maybe pushing it which means you need stadium capacity to allow more people in and only Fiji MAY have that capacity (and only around 25,000) in Suva and then there is stadium infrastructure (including lighting and TV broadcast facilities); 3. fielding a merged Islander team will pose its own cultural problems which is why PNG needs to be considered separately from the other Island unions. PNG needs to go it alone, in any case; 4. the days of TV broadcasters paying top dollar for rights is disappearing. The broadcast landscape is changing. I stopped TV years ago; everything is streaming now on my laptop. Can't remember the last time I watched FTA; 5. the IRL is there to develop the game internationally. The NRL should be helping the IRL (if they can sort out their bad blood); 6. I think Tony Kemp in NZ made the suggestion that a second NZ NRL team should be affiliated with the champion Crusaders Super Rugby side. There is merit in that suggestion; whether its feasible is another matter. (Actually, NZ RL should be taken under the umbrella of NZ Rugby, the way things are going over there); 7. NRL sponsorship deals have already fallen foul of NZ anti-gambling laws. This is another challenge to be considered; 8. NRL needs to look domestically (Perth, South Australia and Tasmania) for future expansion. Queensland is slowly being expanded to death

AUTHOR

2021-10-18T00:39:11+00:00

Hairy

Roar Rookie


I guess what I am struggling to get across is that players can be signed to both an NRL club and a tier 2 club at the same time, they are not exclusive. So the fringe players not in the NRL playing squad every week that would normally play in the QLD cup or NSW cup would play in this tier 2 comp instead. Their salaries are already paid by one of the 17 NRL clubs and so the tier 2 clubs would essentially get them for free. These players would fill about half of the comp and so the only new salaries will be for the remaining players, around the additional 200-250 rather than the full 420. Regardless, your point is correct that the funding is obviously a big hurdle and is contingent on a broadcaster having the appetite for this.

2021-10-18T00:27:48+00:00

no one in particular

Roar Guru


broadcasters are also charities, they willingly give money to leagues that get minimal viewers.

2021-10-18T00:07:13+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I reckon your maths is a bit rubbery Hairy. All up, the NRL would need to have 930 contracted players to fill 31 squads of 30 players. Sure some would come from existing Clubs, but all up, the NRL would have to sign on another 420 guys Of these, 510 would be a part of the tier 1 salary cap which currently stands at $158 million. Unless the players agreed to a substantial paycut, there's no way the NRL will be able to help fund another 420 players on even a minumum wage, let alone a decent package to reduce the difference from tier 1 to tier 2. You're also making a huge assumption broadcasters are going to stump up $60 million for 2 games per week of tier 2 football. Unless the product is as good or close to the same standard as tier 1, they might not be interested at all, or would only broadcast if they had to pay may a million or two a year.

AUTHOR

2021-10-17T23:50:31+00:00

Hairy

Roar Rookie


The Sydney teams are not intended for future expansion but are included for balance, otherwise you would have a comp without it's biggest city/state represented.

AUTHOR

2021-10-17T23:47:31+00:00

Hairy

Roar Rookie


That is a long list.

AUTHOR

2021-10-17T23:44:24+00:00

Hairy

Roar Rookie


What I mean is around half of those 420 players will already have contracts with existing NRL clubs as part of their 30-man roster or development squads. This will leave 200-250 'new' players. These players aren't going to be on larger contracts either and an upgrade to somewhere near the minimum NRL contract on average would be big for them. You want a few players $200-300k per club as effectively marquee players and might throw in a few bonuses for some of the better players, but the best players would already be covered by their NRL club contracts. For the same reason, a lot of the NRL's current expenditure would already cover around half of these players to some degree so total additional expenditure to run this competition would be significantly less the NRL is currently paying. The broadcast deal would effectively need to be valued at around the value of an additional 1.5-2 games per week of the current deal to cover these costs which is a modest deal of around $60m (around 15-20% of current deal) . Of course, this is very rough and I have no idea whether the broadcasters have the appetite for this at the moment, but I don't think the costs would be as high suggested above.

2021-10-17T23:06:05+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


"Keep in mind, most of the players are already on NRL contracts". I'm not real sure what you mean by this. There are presently 510 guys on contract, including those who will be signed by the Dolphins. Agreed some will come from other Clubs, but ultimately there will be 30 new contracts across the NRL. Every player in the NRL has to have a contract that is ratified by the peak body, but the terms of the contract, including the salary, are negotiated by the Club, who then has to pay the player. My issue is where that money s going to come from when the number of players on contract increases by around 420.

2021-10-17T09:22:33+00:00

Mick Holland

Roar Rookie


The simple answer to who funds it is easy, The NRL can add to it as well as pay tv Fox/Kayo & FTA tv, Clubs could also lease their players to NRL teams until the NRL clubs sign them full time so country clubs can get a return on developing their players. Then there is sponsors & some teams who might get some healthy crowds. Being a development & stepping stone for NRL players NSWRL North Coast Dolphins – (Coffs Harbor) New England Razorbacks – (Tamworth) Newcastle Knights (2) – ALT – Hunter Miners Central Coast Centurions Manly Sea Eagles North Sydney Bears South Sydney (2) – ALT – Glebe Dirty Reds Newtown Jets Balmain Tigers Western Suburbs Magpies Parramatta Eels (2) – ALT – Wentworthville Currawongs Canterbury Bulldogs (2) – ALT – Mt Pritchard Mounties Penrith Panthers (2) – ALT – St Mary’s Saints St George Dragons Illawarra Steelers Western Rams – (Bathurst) Canberra Raiders (2) – ALT – ACT Colts Riverina Bulls – (Wagga Wagga) Victoria Thunder Tasmania QLDRL PNG Hunters Darwin Destroyers Cairns Pride Townsville Blackhawks Mackay Cutters Central Queensland Capra’s Sunshine Coast Falcons Redcliffe Dolphins Norths Devils Fortitude Valley Diehards Western Suburbs Panthers Eastern Suburbs Tigers Wynnum – Manly Sea Eagles Souths – Logan Magpies Ipswich Jets Toowoomba Mustang Burleigh Bears Tweed Heads Seagulls Adelaide Rams West Coast Pirates NZRL Hawaii Kaiviti Silktails Pacifique Treize Nuku’alofa Apia Akarana Falcons Counties – Manukau Stingrays Waikato Stallions Bay of Plenty Lakers Wellington Orcas Canterbury Bulls Otago Whalers

2021-10-17T09:00:31+00:00

Big Daddy

Roar Rookie


Hairy, I commend you for putting a lot of thought into this . I’m all for a second tier national competition but I feel it may be a little political as in QRL v NSWRL . I’m a member of a club that was competing in NSW cup . They turnover about $50 million plus per annum and normally generate a $2 million plus profit every year. They put in about $1 million into their local team . They were a feeder club to an NRL side wanting them to change their colours to the NRL club and also wanted to take over their club group . It never eventuated and they parted ways. Some of these larger clubs are a little bit greedy in wanting to control things . To me it would be very difficult in get some of these clubs to agree on anything as self interest is their prime focus . My feeling is any 2 nd tier national competition cannot be aligned to NRL clubs and that’s where the problems may lay .

AUTHOR

2021-10-17T08:32:22+00:00

Hairy

Roar Rookie


Keep in mind, most of the players are already on NRL contracts and most of the remainder are on game payments so wouldn't be looking at that size salary cap. Would be much more modest spending in my opinion. I provided more detail in another comment below if you're interested.

AUTHOR

2021-10-17T08:26:50+00:00

Hairy

Roar Rookie


The intent would be that is a professional league with salaries to match. Don't think I agree with your reservations on the Indigenous side. I view it as more of an expansion on Indigenous round and All-Star game which seem positive. But hey, just and idea and I'm not indigenous so cannot really comment any further. As for Cousin Itt, I couldn't rule it out entirely.

AUTHOR

2021-10-17T08:20:29+00:00

Hairy

Roar Rookie


In response to a few comments about how this would be feasible financially, I have done some rough numbers below. The basic premise is using much of the NRLs existing systems and infrastructure to deliver the games at a lower cost and generating enough interest to effectively add another 2 or 3 games in broadcast revenue each week without detracting from the current NRL spectacle. The NRL spent $129m in 2019 putting 8 games on a round. Significantly less cost will go into putting this competition’s games on with reduction in venue hire, double headers with NRL clubs, synergy with existing supply chains and just generally less fanfare. Of course, the NRL would have to cover transport and few other things, so 75% of this value once scaled for only 7 games seems about fair. This is about $85m per year. Administration, integrity, player welfare and insurances are already partially covered. Expanding the existing systems could cost half as much as the NRL is spending currently. This is another $30m (NRL Spent about $67m). So $115m total to run the game. Player payments will be another large expense, but with each of the 17 NRL teams able to provide at least 10 players per week from their 30-man squad, development squad and U20s who aren’t playing or injured then only 250 players remain to fill 14 full 30-man squads. These players currently receive match payments of around $500 I believe which is about $10k per year. If their annual salary average was raised to around $85k it would require a total of $18.75m. Add in some $10k bonuses for players playing in expansion sides of Perth, Melbourne and perhaps 3 no. marquee players per club who might earn up to $250k each result in a total of about $26m in additional player payments and total expenditure of $141m. Now, historically, NRL games generate non-broadcast revenue of about double the costs of putting on the games. This number will be lower than that given this won’t be as popular as the NRL. However, with the geographical focus and buy in of the local communities, there can still be some decent turnouts at these games and support for these clubs. The Newtown Jets are a pretty good example as they are able to generate a decent crowd even with their current standing. So a profit of about 25% can be achievable. This will result in revenue of about $100m. The broadcast revenue is obviously the most difficult to predict, but NRL received around $330m from broadcast revenue which averages out to about $41.25m annually for each game per round that is broadcast (currently 8 games per round). There could be 2 additional timeslots (Sunday and Monday nights) that 2 of the games could be aired which could effectively increase the broadcast to 10 games per round. Assuming these games would be about 50% as popular as your average NRL game (could well be more popular than this), this could be worth an additional $41.25m to Fox. Channel 7 might be willing to pay about 5% of that value for the other 6 games which would total $12-15m. The broadcast revenue could then around $55m. Obviously, this is super rough and there are a lot of ‘ifs’, but this could see a profit of $10-15m per year which could be used to fund the clubs that need the help and payback the obviously high startup costs. Perhaps not as farfetched as first thought?

2021-10-17T04:03:13+00:00

Big Daddy

Roar Rookie


Good post GB. When you look at the amount of money that Redcliffe had to front up it’s so so hard for any club to break into the main NRL competition or even a lower tier . You look at the wealthy clubs in NSW cup like North’s , Mounties and Blacktown the rest are feeder clubs to the richer NRL clubs and are only there to supply players . Outside Metro area there is only a handful of rugby league clubs that have their own licensed clubs and are reasonably self sufficient . Not sure outside Redcliffe in Qld what clubs have money . If you look at EPL most clubs are self sufficient or are owned by wealthy foreigners . We just don’t have the money to run a 2 tier style competition that can support itself and secondly we just don’t have the crowds . No broadcaster is going to fork out another $100 million plus for second tier which not many people will watch .

2021-10-17T03:09:35+00:00

Glory Bound

Roar Rookie


Hairy, are you sure you aren't Cousin Itt from The Addams Family? That idea is something that Uncle Fester would have come up with when he had one of his light bulb moments. That's what you get when you stick your fingers in an electrical outlet. The idea of running a second-tier (i.e. semi-professional) Trans-Tasman Trans-Pacific rugby league competition has as much chance as getting off the ground as a hippopotamus with butterfly wings! As for adding Japanese or American teams... that idea is right up there with playing the GF at the North Pole. Then perhaps Santa can referee the game and best decide which team is naughty or nice? Franchises playing in a semi-professional second-tier competition could ill afford the expense of interstate, much less international travel. The cost of transportation, accommodation, training, equipment, uniform and staff costs would be exponentially prohibitive. You couldn't cover those costs in a chook raffle or a community fete fundraiser. Where do you think this money is going to come from to fund poorer Pacific nations? Does the NRL have to foot the bill? As for the idea of creating a club along racial lines, i.e. Australian Indigenous, I think that is fraught with danger and open to racial bigotry in both directions. Does that mean non-indigenous players will not be allowed to play for this side? I played for the Redfern All Blacks for 2 years and right up until first-grade they had a non-indigenous (Anglo-Australian) HB. The players, coach and supporters loved him as he had played through the lower grades for the club but by the time he was due to progress to first-grade they tapped him on the shoulder and advised him to move on. That only indigenous players would be picked for first-grade. Not a good look I can tell you. To discriminate on the grounds of race for any reason is not something the game should endorse or tolerate. Indigenous kids get plenty of opportunities as it is and there is already a thriving indigenous state and interstate competition. Why undermine that? As for heritage clubs like the Newtown Jets and the North Sydney Bears, those days are gone. There isn't a sufficient junior base to support teams in this area. What little there is go to the Rabbitohs, the Roosters or start to spill into the territory for the Tigers and the Bulldogs. Sydney inner-city cannot support any more teams! As for NSW Country, where are the boundaries? Where do they train? Where will they play? How do semi-professional players support themselves and yet manage to travel inordinate distance to train and play? Like the majority of teams on your list mate it may be a good idea in principle but in practice it has as much chance of getting of the ground as that Hippo I mentioned.

2021-10-17T00:27:37+00:00

Onya.

Guest


If it’s about expansion? How is any suggestion about another team in the Sydney region a good one? That makes zero sense.

2021-10-17T00:15:42+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I enjoy reading pieces about the future of the NRL because those taking the time to write, have the games best interest at heart. The problems with all of these pieces happen when it comes to talking about revenue and this article is no exception, There's no numbers mentioned, which is fair enough, but there's also no mention of where money will come from to pay players and what financial test will be applied to each Club to assess viability in the short and long term. The NRL salary cap this year was $9.9 million per team or $158.4 million for all 16 teams. In order to make the second tier competitive, their salary cap has to be close to the first tier in order to build a competitive roster. There's no point them only have a million bucks to spend per year, then expecting them to step up when they get promoted, buy another 8.9 million dollars worth of players and hope they can be competitive. Let's assume the second tier teams all have salary caps which are 67% of the top tier. In other words, they will each get $6.33 million dollars. If there are 14 teams in this second tier comp, that equates to another $92.86 million the NRL has to find each year. I can't see any way the NRL can generate enough interest in the sport that sponsors or broadcasters are willing to come up with a quarter of a billion dollars every year unless the product is absolutely red hot and right now, the top tier of the game is anything but that. I think, for the next few decades, the NRL needs to limit itself to modest expansion, perhaps to 20 teams, reduce the number of matches and manage it's budgets well so only quality footballers make the grade and they are paid appropriately.

2021-10-16T23:17:14+00:00

Nick Symonds

Guest


Go to 32 teams like the NFL.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar