Cricket and baseball: Compare and contrast, Part 4 – Money and audiences

By DaveJ / Roar Rookie

This article tries to size up cricket and baseball in terms of their revenues, salaries, spectators and viewing numbers.

I will leave to explore in a final piece how tradition itself is a selling point, especially in baseball, and how the two sports have changed with the times.

Links to earlier articles in the series can be found in the previous one here.

There’s a helluva lot of money in baseball
US Major League Baseball is the world’s second richest sports league in terms of revenue, after the NFL gridiron competition. It earned $US 10.7 billion in 2019. The New York Yankees ranked second on Forbes’ list of most valuable global sports franchises, worth $5.25 billion in value (similar in value to the entire IPL) behind only the Dallas Cowboys of the NFL ($5.5 billion).

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

However, only one other MLB team ranked in the top 20 on Forbes’ list – the Los Angeles Dodgers at 16th. All the top 50 places are taken by US gridiron, basketball and baseball franchises and European football clubs.

The Indian Premier League ranks about 12th in revenues among global sports leagues, earning $US 980 million in 2019. Adding the BCCI’s revenue outside its payments from IPL – just $190 million – gives a total of $1.17 billion for Indian cricket – just 11 per cent of MLB. Cricket Australia’s revenue was around one third of India’s in 2018/19 – $US 360 million – or a tad over three per cent of MLB’s earnings.

Pay packets
Around 160 MLB players earn salaries of $US 10 million or more. Some 250 are on salaries over $4 million – about the same as the biggest contract in the IPL, for Virat Kohli. Kohli, however, earns a lot more in endorsements than any MLB player, possibly as high as $25 million annually, on top of his BCCI central contract of $US 1 million.

(Photo by Michael Steele-ICC/ICC via Getty Images)

Steve Smith’s salaries with Australia and the Delhi Capitals probably won’t top $US 2 million this year – less than the contracts of 400 MLB players (not far short of the full complement of MLB players on the park on any one day).

Mike Trout, baseball’s highest paid player, signed a 12-year, $US 426 million deal with the Los Angeles Angels in 2019, with a guaranteed average annual salary of $35 million. The best (and only) Australian player in MLB, pitcher Liam Hendricks of the Chicago White Sox, will make $US 18 million annually over the next three years, i.e. three to six times Kohli’s and Smith’s salaries.

Bums on seats
The main reason the MLB, along with Japan’s Nippon Professional Baseball, earns so much is the sheer number of games played. Each MLB club plays 162 games over a six-month regular season, plus up to 20 extra playoff games if they make the World Series.

That means a maximum of 2477 total games (880 in the NPB), compared to 60 in an IPL season. The busiest cricketers like Virat Kohli average around 80 days’ cricket of all forms annually, half the total days of frontline MLB batters.

As a result, well over twice as many fans attend MLB baseball games in a season as any other sports league in the world – 68.5 million in 2019, an average of 28,000 per game. In fact, Japan’s NPB was in clear second place on 25 million, averaging about 30,000 per game, well ahead of US gridiron, basketball and ice hockey and English Premier League football.

Pulling together official stats and estimates, the total attendance at all international and provincial level cricket (first class, 50-over and T20) in all nine major cricket playing countries is no more than 15 million across nearly 2400 matches (and this estimate could be generous).

IPL attendance peaked at 2.1 million in 2016, averaging 35,000 per game, which fell to 28,000 in 2019, due partly to extreme heat, similar to the MLB average per game (but over 40 times fewer games).

(Photo by Rod Mar/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

Japan’s NPB saw revenue $1.2 billion in 2019, ahead of the IPL and BCCI combined and more than our AFL, for example.

Attendance in Korean baseball also outstrips the AFL, and attracts more than double the annual crowds (if not attendance per game) of NRL rugby league and English and French rugby union.

Further underlining baseball’s popularity is US minor league baseball, comprising 120 teams in the US and Canada, which draws about 40 million fans through the turnstiles – i.e. over 4000 (usually ticketed) spectators per game, to the equivalent of state second XI and first-grade cricket.

The US also has a huge college baseball system – nearly 1000 university teams, organised in three divisions, many well-funded and professionally organised. The best attended college, Louisiana State University, averaged more than 10,000 spectators per game.

The total annual attendance for all college baseball approaches my 15 million estimate for all top cricket in the top nine cricket nations. This gives an annual aggregate attendance around 125 million for US major and minor league and college baseball.

Eyeballs on sets
The big money in sport comes from TV rights deals and advertising rather than people through turnstiles – although ticket sales still form nearly one third of MLB’s revenue, with seats costing around $80 Australian on average, a lot when multiplied by 68 million spectators.

Worldwide TV rights to the IPL were sold for $US 2.55 billion for five years in 2017 and they reportedly hope to get $US 5 billion for the next five-year cycle starting in 2023. The Fox/Seven 2018 deal with Cricket Australia for all forms of cricket in Australia is worth $US 900 million over six years.

(Photo by Ryan Pierse/Getty Images)

Current TV deals with Fox, ESPN and local stations will earn MLB about $US 3 billion annually or $15 billion over the next five years.

Reliable figures on TV viewership are hard to find, but it seems that total US viewership for a full MLB season is around 1.5 billion, with World Series games averaging around 15 million in recent years (well down from a peak of 44 million in 1978).

Cricket audiences are potentially a lot bigger, thanks to the sub-continent. The ICC claimed that the 2019 men’s World Cup reached a “global cumulative average audience” of 1.6 billion viewers around the world, and a “706 million unique audience”, up 20-30 per cent on 2015.

The most watched game was India versus Pakistan with some 323 unique viewers tuning into TV or digital coverage. Peak viewing in the UK was eight million in the super overs in the World Cup final.

The IPL reached a record 405 million unique viewers in India in 2020, nearly half the total TV universe of 836 million viewers. For perspective, Roy Morgan Research reported in 2019 that 7.2 million Australians watched some form of cricket.

Final thoughts
While US (and Japanese) baseball’s revenues and match attendances currently dwarf those of cricket, cricket definitely has the advantage when it comes to global TV and online viewing.

The advantage in viewers represents a lot of upside growth for cricket, as living standards and the purchasing power of viewers continue to rise in India and South Asia, along with player numbers and success on the field.

While revenues are at an all-time high, MLB is experiencing some anxiety and self-doubt over declining attendances and viewership, fewer little league players and ageing TV audiences (now 57 compared to 45 in 1995).

While cricket has adapted to economic pressures in recent decades with innovations, gimmicks and faster paced forms of the game, baseball has remained fairly conservative in form. And it has also paradoxically become slower paced, despite – or in fact partly because of – a greater accent on power in batting and pitching. This is dictated by success on the field rather than trying to attract more spectators.

I will explore these changes in relation to the role of tradition in the two sports next time. By then time we will know the result of this year’s World Series, currently under way between the Houston Astros and the Atlanta Braves (tied at 1-1 at time of writing). I can’t get too excited about who wins, given both teams are from the old southern Confederate states, but I predict that Houston will prevail.

The Astros are in fact a good example of the international flavour of today’s MLB, with lots of Hispanic and Caribbean players and only a handful of southern good old boys. Fully 13 of their roster of 26 players come from the Dominican Republic, Cuba, Venezuela, Puerto Rico and Mexico.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2021-11-01T05:21:45+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


It would have been a miracle starting rookie pitchers with zero experience in 2 games out of 5 and winning a WS. Houston probably favourites again.

2021-11-01T04:17:17+00:00

Adam

Roar Guru


Yep, thought an early grand-slam would normally be a pretty big blow to a team. But the Astros have a lot of bats in their line up!

AUTHOR

2021-11-01T04:02:56+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Thanks Adam. The first couple got a pretty decent response. The problem this week it was given low priority at the bottom of the page. This one’s a bit drier with all the facts and figures I suppose. Looks like the World Series goes back to Houston. 7 game series a big chance.

2021-11-01T01:23:54+00:00

Adam

Roar Guru


I've missed your last two articles so there is definitely something to be said about articles getting buried as I'm pretty keen on baseball and actually went specifically looking for anything that might be around on the roar at the moment considering the world series is getting to an interesting point in time (Astros just tied it up at 4-4 in the top of the 3rd). Keep writing them mate, I've only bothered to write the one baseball articles years and years ago but it was completely baseball related so got barely a click. Combining and contrasting with cricket was a master stroke. Maybe time it the next couple during the ashes and you might get a few more sneaky clicks (something along the lines of the rivalries ala ashes against Yankees v Red Socks or Dodgers vs Giants)

2021-10-30T21:56:36+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


I read The Australian so that when l put down Murdochism and Trumpistan, in argument, I'm at least informed as to what is said in Skeleton Castle

2021-10-30T21:18:15+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


Not in the Pale context!

AUTHOR

2021-10-30T14:04:47+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Thanks Sheek. Left field is good too, especially in the baseball context!

AUTHOR

2021-10-30T14:04:02+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


That last sentence should end “..200 mill from WCs plus 200 from India.”

2021-10-30T11:05:06+00:00

sheek

Roar Guru


DaveJ, Great stuff. This article reminds me of the glory days of The Roar when ordinary sports fans shared their unique & varied knowledge. And even back in the glory days were those with weird ideas out of left field (a reference to a current capping colleague of ours).

AUTHOR

2021-10-30T08:32:05+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Good questions. International cricket is worth more than the IPL. : Sure but it is a marker. And I used it to give a total figure for Indian cricket, comparing by far the biggest baseball league with by far the biggest cricket league. England and Australia together fall well short of India. And Japanese baseball is bigger than all of them. Happy to add ICC revenue into the mix. I question the figure of US980 million that you have for revenue when the broadcast deal is just over US400 million. : Too big or too small? It’s hard to get clear and concise figures and to compare. $980m is latest available. A breakdown for 2018 gave as follows: Figures in USD per year, $510M from Broadcasting rights, $100M from League Sponsorships, $48M from Team Sponsorships, $20M from Ticket Sales; For Gross Total of $678M, $84.75M per team. Didn’t quite follow the points about ICC earnings from World Cup and India etc. ICC revenue was 200 mill in 2018, 600+ in 2019 thanks to WC, down to 45 mill in 2020. So they don’t seem to be getting 300 mill a year from WCs plus 200 from WCs.

AUTHOR

2021-10-30T07:17:46+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Hi JGK. Yes definitely gotta back the Braves on that score. They’re ahead now, so fingers crossed.

2021-10-30T06:19:57+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Great research Dave. As for the current WS - I couldn’t stomach Houston winning with the sign stealing still so fresh. Hi

2021-10-30T06:17:58+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


If you get Apple News you can get The Australian content.

2021-10-30T03:35:46+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


Baseball the advantage it has over cricket is you can be very close to the action in the good seats, whereas in cricket they are the center of the ground so attending games is very desirable for baseball. Also because baseball is very light impact per game they can play a huge number of games. The reason the number of viewers isnt going to peak is that big baseball is very much a home team sport across a lot of games, people would rather go to minor leagues than watch MLB and international baseball isnt a thing. USA vs Japan that would have a huge number of viewers if it was a thing. Viewership of the MLB isnt a big thing worldwide, people would rather go to their local game and the MLB isnt big on trying to promote itself overseas. International cricket is worth more than the IPL and I question the figure of US980 million that you have for revenue when the broadcast deal is just over US400 million . Of course next TV deal the IPL could be worth more than the rest of cricker. The ICC revenue which is from just world cups is worth 300 million a year. I wouldn't trust those figures on their earnings from the Indian national team, I know 60% of ICC earnings is from India so how is it possible the ICC gets about 200 million a year from Indian TV and others get a lot of money for a one in four years Indian tour and yet BCCI claims it gets only 200 million a year . Doesn't add up the BCCI has been investigated over their finances.

AUTHOR

2021-10-30T03:34:04+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Matth, not sure why we wouldn’t contribute a cent of coin, especially compared to some of the people who are billed as “experts”. If your article gets 50 or more people commenting on it, and ends up listed as having 150 comments a) that suggests quite a few people on top of that reading it, probably more than many videos or AAP articles and b) articles with higher numbers of comments listed add to the legitimacy and look of the site - the overall value of the “product”. So we are providing a service for free. Which is fine. But if I am wrong and we are supposed to regard it as a privilege, it would be better if we were told upfront.

2021-10-30T02:31:47+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


I get around that by never opening any video based articles on the site

2021-10-30T02:30:07+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


Agreed and I don't have an issue with the revenue side of it. Though I'd rather they not waste my time sometimes by click-baiting me into watching videos that are really not as interesting or relevant as the headline makes out.

AUTHOR

2021-10-30T02:27:12+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


PS it was a painful decision to admit that I had access to the Oz. I use it to make sure my blood pressure doesn’t stay too low.

AUTHOR

2021-10-30T02:25:32+00:00

DaveJ

Roar Rookie


Hmm I’d be happy to leave you a copy at our usual drop site in the Botanic Gardens - under the rock beneath the palm tree thirty metres north west of the bench next to the pond. Alternatively I could send you a PDF copy to a preferred email address, though that could risk having your computer hijacked by unsavoury elements on the dark web..

2021-10-30T02:22:42+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


And it’s a fact of life that all us non-experts don’t contribute a cent of coin to the site and they still let us post our efforts. If some compromise on advertising keeps the site alive I’ll accept it.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar