How the media got this Ashes series completely wrong

By Paul / Roar Guru

The media has got this series completely wrong.

There appears to have been an assumption made by the media some weeks ago, especially the English media, that this would be a competitive series.

I’m guessing this was based on a range of factors. The ICC rankings showed a split hair between England and Australia, England had been playing a gazillion Test matches in recent times and Australia had not, England had been in the middle of a very close series against India, and they had a squad led by the best Test batsman in world cricket, who’d spent the past three years developing a cunning plan to win the Ashes.

(Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

These are all valid points but fail to acknowledge a simple truth. The England squad, individually and collectively, was not and is not good enough to compete, on equal terms, with this Australian squad in Australian conditions.

Sure, they’ve had great moments and have won the odd session, but overall, Australia are a superior unit this summer.

All manner of reasons can be offered for this and I’m sure there are elements of truth in most of these, but the simple fact is the media expecting England to either draw or win this series got it wrong.

There was about as much chance of that happening as Carlton or the Wests Tigers winning the 2022 AFL or NRL premierships.

Pat Cummins is his own man. In his second Test as captain he won the toss and put the opposition into bat. My first thought was ‘what a brave call’.

Granted, the pitch had a nice, green tinge, as opposed to the straw colour we’re used to at the MCG, but it was still a drop-in pitch, which has been pretty good for batting.

(Photo by Darrian Traynor – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)

His call was made to look even braver, given the batting conditions the Australian openers faced in the last session on Day 1.

For most of the first 15 overs, the score was rattling along at better than four an over. Even Nathan Lyon seemed untroubled. The final result proved what a good call that was by Cummins.

I don’t get the no-balls. In the first innings, Ollie Robinson had already delivered more no-balls (two) in his first six overs than Australia bowled in both England innings.

It’s already cost England two wickets in this series and in the modern era, these simply shouldn’t happen, especially from guys bowling barely above medium pace.

What’s with the English media? I just don’t get how badly they pile onto their team, individually and collectively.

Case in point, the last hour of play on the second day. I don’t think there’s a batting side in the world that could have done much about that last hour of bowling.

(Photo by Daniel Pockett – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)

Every once in a while, Australian attacks get their tails up and carnage can result. Remember this from a few decades ago?

Zak Crawley and Haseeb Hameed did virtually nothing wrong defensively, yet got out to outstanding deliveries, while Dawid Malan was beaten by pace.

Jack Leach, a guy who’d probably bat 12 in the Aussie line-up, got out to one that seamed back and hit the outside of off stump. That’s seriously hard to play, just quietly.

The pile-on will no doubt become even more strident after the final day’s play but again, this was a case of two bowlers (and Cameron Green) using their skill sets to put the England batsmen under huge pressure.

Playing an accurate Mitchell Starc bowling at 90 miles per hour plus must be a nightmare and Scott Boland lived up to his pre-match billing.

While England’s batting was poor, Australia’s batting was not a lot better. Don’t forget, Australia were 8-219.

(Photo by Darrian Traynor – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)

David Warner made runs in the opening period when England, once again, bowled way too short. But as soon as the ball was pitched up, he was gone, a la the Ashes in 2019.

Marcus Harris looked sketchy, especially after lunch on Day 2 when he simply couldn’t rotate the strike. He should have been out stumped and could have been out way more cheaply with lots of plays and misses.

Marnus Labuschagne failed. He got a good one early on – it happens.

Steve Smith’s head is not in the game, at least with the bat. That was a really poor shot to get out, as was the one Travis Head played. The last time Head did that in a Test, it cost him his spot.

Green’s getting his technique worked over and right now, he is coming up short. He needs specialist coaching from Ricky Ponting.

Alex Carey looked composed then got out. He’ll be better over the coming matches.

His counterpart won’t be. Jos Buttler is not in a good place mentally. He can’t be.

(Photo by Mark Brake – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images)

That first innings ‘get out’ shot and the look of dejection as he trudged off reminded me a lot of Jonathan Trott from 2013, who then headed home.

Buttler is the victim of an English policy to pick batsman-keepers. That he missed that stumping off Harris was not the issue. That his foot work was so poor he could barely get glove on ball shows he’s simply a good Test backstop, not a good Test keeper.

It wasn’t wrong to bowl Jack Leach after lunch on Day 2 – what was wrong was to ask Leach to bowl on a middle- and leg-stump line against two set left-handers on a pitch offering plenty of turn.

England needed to take wickets, yet Leach’s bowling was purely defensive. Even still he should have had Harris stumped, or maybe run out, he was so far out of his ground.

Leach the batsman did himself no favours – in his retirement years, Leach will be able to dine out on the time he hit the GOAT for six on Boxing Day and the MCG.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

Presumably that ability so impressed his captain and coach, they decided he should be the nightwatchman after Dawid Malan was dismissed. Two balls later, he had another retirement anecdote – the time he shouldered arms to an absolute beauty from Scott Boland.

Where to for Australia for the rest of the series? I was going to do one for England as well, but they’re going to keep struggling with the touring party they have.

I’d have Ben Foakes in for Jos Buttler, Saqib Mahmood in to bowl fast, Matt Parkinson in for Leach and Josh Bohannon in for anyone in England’s middle order.

(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

As it is, none of these guys are likely to be available because only Mahmood’s in Australia, so England are stuck with what they’ve got.

For Australia, the batting is still a worry. Harris, Smith, Green and Carey all need to make runs because all have failed to fully deliver this series.

This is not about making so-called meaningless runs in dead rubbers, this about building confidence for some tough overseas tours ahead.

I’d also play Nathan Lyon at home in Sydney, then rest him for the Tassie Test. If the pitch in Hobart warrants, I’d play four quicks plus Green or give Mitch Swepson a chance to show what he can do.

The GOAT will have plenty of bowling to do in the coming months.

(Photo by Albert Perez – CA/Cricket Australia via Getty Images

Is this England’s nadir? Steve Harmison made the interesting comment that England’s Test team is in a worse place than their white-ball side was after their failure at the 2015 World Cup.

That failure prompted a complete review of both ODI and T20 cricket and the results have been obvious in recent years.

Moeen Ali felt there were a number of issues within the side had been papered over, which suggests a complete review is needed for England’s red-ball programme.

It was great to see Paul Reiffel umpiring a Test at the MCG. This has to be one of those occasions that will live with ‘Pistol’ for the rest of his life.

No doubt the same will apply when Rod Tucker steps onto Blundstone Arena for the fifth Test in a few weeks.

Finally, a damning statistic: a Fox Sports article had the following paragraph;

“Since January 2019 Starc averages 35.54 with the bat, which is higher than England’s entire top seven bar Root: Rory Burns (31.52), Ollie Pope (30.93), Jos Buttler (28.65), Zak Crawley (27.74), Jonny Bairstow (21.81) and Haseeb Hameed (19.80).”

That can’t be good for English Test cricket.

The Crowd Says:

2021-12-30T00:03:31+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


The truth is out there Scully and it’s a weird nebulous miasma.

AUTHOR

2021-12-29T22:13:06+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


Yet one bloke out of form made a 70 and Root easily made 50 while a heap of batsmen threw their innings away. I haven't heard any batsman commentator say the pitch was anything more than sporting and haven't hear either captain talk about how hard it was to bat either. It certainly wasn't an MCG road but it was far from impossible.

2021-12-29T18:54:41+00:00

Gee

Roar Rookie


“Well, everyone’s an expert with hindsight.” – Except for Shane Warne :silly:

2021-12-29T16:48:43+00:00

Just Nuisance

Roar Rookie


I certainly pre series didn’t predict the one sided results . Same time who could have foreseen Stokes so ineffective or England leaving out Anderson , Broad 1st Test .. nobody could have foreseen England spilling so many catches or bowling so many no balls ...or the opener Burns almost tripping over his own feet and gifting Aus a wicket 1st ball of the series ..I agree man for man Aus simply have more available talent but there are some basics England can immediately address to improve...Changes , big changes can be expected ..not this series though but It’s coming .

2021-12-29T13:55:41+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


Yes, it was. Anderson and Wood, the most incisive bowlers, should have started after lunch. Anything else was a bad decision and I would think that every time it happened without the need to look back

2021-12-29T08:20:04+00:00

Rowdy

Roar Rookie


The batsmen know how bad a pitch can be. Bowlers are oblivious when it comes to how hard a pitch can be to bat on. So they go for their shots freely.

2021-12-29T04:22:51+00:00

Redcap

Roar Guru


Good article, thanks Paul. That's an amazing stat about Starc and the English bats. England's problem with no balls and short pitched bowling has been going on for three tests now. Do they really think bowling short is, despite all the available evidence, suddenly going to start working? How have they not fixed the no balls? Head needs to take a leaf out of Sachin Tendulkar's book - eliminate the drives (or in Head's case the cross-bat slashes) and wait for straight ones. Not sure he has the patience for that.

AUTHOR

2021-12-29T01:30:53+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I think it's easy to second guess Root's thinking now, but it would be useful to know why he did what he did and what he expected to gain by handling his bowlers the way he did. As it stands, you've made comment on who should have bowled based on hindsight & conjecture. As you've pointed out, it wasn't just Leach who was brought on, it was also Robinson and neither had an immediate impact after lunch, yet it's only Leach that people have focused on, even though he should have had Harris stumped before Robinson got Head. Was it also a bad call on Robinson?

2021-12-29T01:08:35+00:00

Jeff

Roar Rookie


"I didn’t hear one commentator say, prior to Leach bowling a ball in that spell, this is a wrong call." Well, there wasn't much advance notice prior to bowling his first ball that he was going to do so. But FWIW, it most picked up and commented on immediately on the Roar blog once it became apparent he was going to open the bowling after lunch. Immediately prior to lunch, Wood was really testing the Australians, beating Harris twice in the final over. Yes Leach and Robinson were each given an over each before lunch as Root swapped ends for Wood and Anderson was spelled. Robinson went for 7 runs and Leach for 4 runs. Prior to Anderson being given a break 20 minutes prior to lunch Anderson's spell was 6-5-1-1 and Wood and Anderson's mini spell together was 4 overs, 3 maidens, 1 wicket (Smith). The two of them were really testing Australia. It was absolutely the wrong call to not open with Anderson immediately after lunch, and arguably the wrong call to not continue with Wood, rather than using Robinson. Root completely released the pressure on Australia when it was clear from the hour before lunch how well Anderson and Wood were bowling to Australia. Root didn't need to use Leach to tie up an end; his two best bowlers in the morning session had already shown they could do that. The fact that Leach's tactics and Root's field placements were poor, simply compounded the first error.

2021-12-29T00:47:31+00:00

KenW

Roar Rookie


In fact it was good enough to win the match They scored enough to win by an innings... sure, the bowlers were the stars but the Aussie batting scored more runs in 10 wickets than their opponents did in 20 wickets. The scores were not particularly impressive but match context is everything in cricket.

2021-12-28T22:34:09+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


And I’ve thought about this and I simply don’t agree there are no right or wrong decisions. Weigh up the options, one decision is more likely to deliver the preferred outcome. That is the right decision. The options with less chance to deliver your preferred outcome may get lucky but that wouldn’t change the fact it was the wrong decision. We really don’t agree. Thanks again for the insightful article though

2021-12-28T22:08:41+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


I thought it was wrong at the time

2021-12-28T22:08:12+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


We shall have to agree to disagree Paul. This was a bone-headed decision to take his foot off the throat. We’d never have done that in the same situation. Of the 30 wickets taken in the match, 4 were taken by spinners and 2 of those were junk wickets by Lyon late in England’s first innings. As the pitch sped up, the best wicket-taking option, by some distance, was with the seamers. Choosing a spinner who is a good way off test quality after a break when the quicks have all had a breather was a crap tactic.

2021-12-28T21:59:28+00:00

badmanners

Roar Rookie


Yep, despite England playing poorly the seam movement our bowlers got on the third morning to me indicated that this pitch was a bit too juicy. Anyone with access to the website with all the ball by ball stats may shoot me down yet! :thumbup:

AUTHOR

2021-12-28T21:59:01+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


I'm not at all convinced this was a tough pitch to bat on. If you run through the England first innings, Root made 50 off 82 deliveries and was killing it till he played a poor shot. Stokes was equally going well till he guided one to Lyon, ditto for Bairstow playing a "get out" shot and lets not forget how Buttler threw his innings away. In Australia's knock, Smith got himself out, as did Head as did Carey. The last 3 batsmen for Austral put on 48 runs, so I'm not sure the pitch was that bad.

AUTHOR

2021-12-28T21:51:45+00:00

Paul

Roar Guru


No it wasn't "completely and utterly wrong to bowl Leach after lunch on Day 2". There's no such thing as a right or wrong decision for start, only right or wrong execution of that decision and right or wrong consequences. I didn't hear one commentator say, prior to Leach bowling a ball in that spell, this is a wrong call. I only heard the experts questioning the tactic, once he'd bowled an over or two and it became clear what he was trying but failing to do. In this case, Root brought him on ostensibly to tie up one end by bowling negatively to a packed legside field. The decision to bring him on was not wrong, but he should have had Leach trying to take wickets by challenging off-stump because England needed to take wickets. As it was, he should have had Harris stumped but that didn't happen nor did Leach stop the flow of runs.

2021-12-28T21:33:32+00:00

Sgt Pepperoni

Roar Rookie


Hi Paul, everyone on here has been down on the Australian batting performance. Could it be that it was a very very hard pitch to bat on? Harris top scores for the match with 76 and never looked comfortable. The next highest score is Joe Root with 50. It seamed just enough to catch edges all game. Green actually did well to hang around against some good English bowling for a long time without attacking - he amassed the second highest number of balls faced in the Australian innings. Head also contributed a good partnership with Harris despite also only scoring 20 odd This was a bowler's pitch and our batting performance was not a cause for concern. In fact it was good enough to win the match

2021-12-28T20:40:37+00:00

Peter Viney

Guest


Well, everyone's an expert with hindsight.

2021-12-28T19:47:39+00:00

Derek Murray

Roar Rookie


Good read thanks Paul. I thought it would be closer too, more fool me. BTW, it was completely and utterly wrong to bowl Leach after lunch on Day 2

Read more at The Roar