Football Australia’s blown budget could be the reason Matildas won't play in February

By Janakan Seemampillai / Roar Guru

Australia’s failure to win the Asian Cup, and the subsequent prize money of $1.4 million, may prove more costly than first thought.

Many have questioned why the Matildas are not playing in the Algarve Cup in Portugal, which is in the February international window (14-22 February), but there is a school of thought it is partly because FA have exceeded their budget. Or perhaps the appropriate phrase is, they have not reaped budgeted revenue as expected, such as the Asian Cup prize money.

Consequently, the money to fund the cost of sending a squad and support staff to Portugal may not be available.

While other reasons have been put forward including player recovery, not wanting to lose more games and dent confidence, the financial factor is a big problem for FA, who have not been in the best financial position in recent times. The breakaway from the now-independent A-Leagues hasn’t helped.

Sports opinion delivered daily 

   

This news is sure to raise alarm bells among the Australian footballing community if true. With the World Cup 18 months away, it is expected FA would do anything they can to give our footballers the best preparation possible. Even if these means tapping into their cash reserves.

According to the balance sheet in the 2021 FA financial report, there was $20.7 million in cash at bank available. According to the profit and loss Accounts for 2021, $3.2 million was spent on travel, down from $7.2 million in 2020. These figures include travel costs for all FA employees and footballers, including men’s, women’s and youth national teams.

2021 was heavily impacted by COVID, meaning there were a lower number of games.

FA lost $5.2 million in cash in 2021, despite reporting an accounting profit of $11.8 million.

A tournament against the five strong European nations that are appearing at the Algarve Cup would have been an ideal opportunity for Australia to recover from the disappointment of missing out in India. Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Italy and hosts Portugal would have been excellent opposition for the Matildas, especially the fringe players, in preparing them for the World Cup.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

It is understood players and staff fly first or business class, with business class a minimum requirement under FA’s current Collective Bargaining Agreement with Professional Footballers Australia, which was a four-year deal signed in 2019.

With several Matilda players based in Europe, this significantly increases the travel cost for players when they come home. Australia played friendlies in October and November at home last year, against Brazil and the USA respectively.

The travelling party to India for the Asian Cup included 23 players and several support staff.

The players and support staff also stay in minimum four-star hotels when they get together. With current COVID protocols and restrictions, there would be additional costs involved.

While no one can blame the players for getting what they are entitled to, one must question why FA didn’t factor this in when setting their budget.

At the very least, the budget should have been revised to factor in another international standard tournament to prepare the Matildas for a once in a lifetime event, even bearing in mind the chance they may not get all budgeted revenue.

It must be pointed out the Socceroos are also playing a number of matches that would have similar costs to the Matildas. The Socceroos are playing in World Cup qualifiers with a number of matches in Asia or neutral countries. The cost of this would be phenomenal.

While FA will likely not comment publicly – most financial questions are not answered due to commercial confidentiality – there will be several questions asked in the coming months about the planning for 2023.

Missing out on a rare international window, especially against top-class opposition, is a golden opportunity missed to prepare the team for a chance at World Cup glory.

The Crowd Says:

2022-02-05T23:09:16+00:00

Kewell

Roar Rookie


A time of reflection is needed before there next game. They need to review why they keep loosing crunch games, their game day match strategies and a new injection of talent. Some of their players are playing on past performances. We cannot go to next games with dame players, the same structure and expect a different result.

AUTHOR

2022-02-05T09:26:44+00:00

Janakan Seemampillai

Roar Guru


Yeah agree. But I think hosting a comp here would blow the budget too

2022-02-05T07:06:33+00:00

Lionheart

Roar Rookie


Normally there are alternate competitions to the Algarve Cup, run concurrently. Being so close to the WC, why isn't Australia hosting a competition here? There would be np shortage of willing starter nations, I'd think, and a great warm up for the public.

AUTHOR

2022-02-04T23:12:51+00:00

Janakan Seemampillai

Roar Guru


Not sure if you are being sarcastic. But playing Algarve Cup be perfect. The European players won’t have club football as it would be off during the window. Give them a Rest I say. Our A Leagues continue but we can still take the girls because it’s a sanctioned window. Great chance for fringe players

AUTHOR

2022-02-04T21:57:15+00:00

Janakan Seemampillai

Roar Guru


If true shows how much power they have

2022-02-04T21:38:09+00:00

Brainstrust

Roar Rookie


Playing in the Algarve cup would have been foolish. They have got to let the players play for their clubs and get rid of the coach instead. What were they thinking they play a whole Asia cup and then Algarve its foolish. I am suprised it was every scheduled or planned given the proximity.

2022-02-04T19:56:50+00:00

Hudddo

Roar Rookie


I have it on good authority the only reason the Matildas aren't playing in febuary is because the playing group didn't want to. That's it.

2022-02-04T19:32:20+00:00

Stevo

Roar Rookie


The WC starts in July 2023, 18 months from now. There will no doubt be opportunities between now and then to have friendlies. FA like many other organisations will have budget-stress as a result of the pandemic so I kind of get it. The even more important question for me is whether Tony should remain as coach. He talks a big game but results have not followed. This messy situation follows directly from the undermining of Stajcic. Skuldugerry has reaped a poor harvest.

Read more at The Roar