'Which is a sending off and which is sin bin?': Lawton learns fate for dangerous tackle after Hasler questions send-off

By Mike Meehall Wood / Editor

Karl Lawton will miss at least four weeks for his dangerous tackle on Rabbitoh Cameron Murray, in Manly’s 40-22 defeat in Gosford on Friday night.

Lawton was sent off in the eighth minute of the match for the tackle, forcing the Sea Eagles to play a man short for more than 70 minutes.

Despite suggestions from coach Des Hasler and former greats Brad Fittler and Cameron Smith that the sending off was harsh, the NRL judiciary have proceeded to throw the book at Lawton, hit with a grade three dangerous throw charge.

He will miss four matches with an early guilty plea, but risks increasing that to five should he choose to challenge.

Lawton was effecting a strong legs tackle on Souths captain Cameron Murray, and technically, it was a near-perfect tackle – but went far beyond the horizontal and resulted in Murray landing directly on his head.

It was a clearly dangerous tackle and nearly inevitably under the current iteration of the rules that Lawton would be sent from the field. He will now front the judiciary and likely find himself with a lengthy ban.

Des Hasler wondered aloud as to whether it might have been merely a binning rather than a dismissal.

“It’s not a good one,” he said. “He’s devastated, the poor kid, he’s such a hard worker. He plays the game at pace and he’s got such a nice temperament.

“There’s certainly no malice in the tackle but, at the same time, there’ll be some consequences to that tackle.

“Which is a sending off and which is sin bin? I thought maybe a decision could have been disputed there but either way, he wasn’t going to stay on the field and we’ll leave it to the judiciary to judge now.

“The way that they have been judging tackles, it was a one-on-one but there was certainly enough evidence that he was going to leave the field, either for sin bin or sending off. The referee chose to send him off so we have to wear that.”

GOSFORD, AUSTRALIA – APRIL 29: Karl Lawton of the Sea Eagles is sent off after a dangerous tackle during the round eight NRL match between the South Sydney Rabbitohs and the Manly Sea Eagles at Central Coast Stadium, on April 29, 2022, in Gosford, Australia. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Souths coach Jason Demetriou felt that it was not a malicious tackle, but was punished correctly.

“I don’t think it was deliberate,” he said. “It’s one of those things that happens, but it’s a really dangerous tackle. Cam’s lucky that he rolled, because otherwise he’d have been in a lot of trouble.

“If it was one of my players, I’d see it as fair probably.”

Media views were split. “No one is hurt, everyone is OK. Settle down. He doesn’t need a spell,” raged Phil Gould on the 9 commentary. “To be sent off for that, when there is no injury to the player, I find it extraordinary … if that’s your product, I give up.”

The polar opposite view was available on Fox League, with Greg Alexander telling the half time show:

“I thought it was a send-off offence. We have had players get players in positions and this is the tackle that we want to stamp out.

“Players that get a player up in an awkward position don’t go on with it like that, and Karl Lawton drove him into the ground head first.

“Cameron Murray twisted his head and landed on his shoulder, but it could have been a little different. I’ve got no argument with it being a send-off.”

Souths played fitfully, scoring points in bunches through tried defending, but were incapable of putting the Sea Eagles away.

When Souths got enough ball, they invariably found points through the weight of numbers and tiredness through the middle, but those moments were few and far between.

A blast at the end of the first half and again at the end of the second was enough to blow things out, but the story of the game was far closer than the score suggested.

Cody Walker, in his 150th NRL game, was a standout, as was Cameron Murray, who suffered the tackle from Lawton but got up to lead his team around the park.

“We started the season 1-3, and we won three of the next four and were beaten by a field goal in the last minute in the other game, so I’m proud of the month we’ve had,” said Demetriou. “We’ll freshen up and be ready to go again next week.

“I thought with the footy we always looked sharp and dangerous. Cody (Walker) is getting better every week. But defensively we invited them back into the game.”

Manly’s old firm halfback pairing of Daly Cherry-Evans and Kieran Foran were able to manoeuvre the Bunnies around, using smart kicking and game management to limit fatigue in their own ranks.

Josh Schuster, returning for his first game of 2022, was also excellent and Christian Tuipulotu on the left wing.

Less so was Jason Saab, who grabbed his first try of the year but was suspect defensively and managed just 40 running metres – over 100m fewer than Tuipulotu.

Hasler was impressed with how his team fought back after the early setback.

“We just talked about it there and we think there are plenty of good things that we can take away from this game,” he said.

“It was a very young side, so from an experience point of view, there’s plenty to get out of it.

“The harsher side of it is that there were times where we had the lead and lost it then got back in front within 40 minutes of football. There’s some improvement we can find there.

“Particularly against a side like Souths, that was the best forward pack that they could put on today so it’s not like they’re not an experienced side.

“They were calm about it, held their nerve and put on 40 points. We’ll walk away with some lessons learned and come back to Brookvale next week and back ourselves against a rejuvenated Tigers side.”

Hasler revealed that Brad Parker is in doubt for that Wests clash next week with a twisted knee, but floated potential returns for Haumole Olakau’atu – suspended tonight – and superstar fullback Tom Trbojevic.

Blake Taaffe kicked a goal from the penalty that resulted from the send off, but despite the man disadvantage, Manly scored the first try. After a smart ball strip from Dylan Walker, Kieran Foran looked like he had got the Sea Eagles on the board.

The try had been given on the ground, but after replays on the big screen, it looked a lot like Lachlan Ilias had got his hands under the ball. With the try given, it stood and 12-man Manly lead.

The Sea Eagles were suddenly rampant. Daly Cherry-Evans, for the first time in 2022, found Jason Saab with a weighted kick to the corner and the winger got another.

Souths didn’t panic. With an hour of footy left in them, they fought their way back up the field and, eventually, Keaon Koloamatangi got over the line.

Before Manly had touched the ball again, it would be more. Martin Taupau lay on too long and jumped the Bunnies up the park, before Alex Johnston made Jason Saab look very silly to cross in the corner.

The Sea Eagles wouldn’t go away. Cherry-Evans kicked a 40/20 before Josh Schuster reminded everyone of what they had been missing with a no-look, soft hands offload to Christian Tuipulotu.

Though only 60 seconds remained on the clock for the half, Souths would strike back again. Taupau coughed up possession and, on the last play, the Bunnies’ left edge had Manly shot for numbers and Isaiah Tass got over. Taaffe’s converted to put Souths ahead 18-16 at the break.

The tiredness started to kick in early in the second half. On the fourth tackle in the Manly end, Tom Burgess took a simple hit up but was able to shrug off Taupau and carry Lachlan Croker over the line with him.

Before Manly had touched the ball, Cody Walker was over in game 150, aided by a Tass offload.

Manly’s bodies might have been failing, but their spirit was not. Foran kicked for Cherry-Evans, but Damien Cook pulled him back before he could get there. It was as clear a penalty try as they come.

As had happened in the first half, the tiredness told for the Sea Eagles. Cam Murray strolled through fatigued tacklers to dive under the posts, and with seconds on the clock, Blake Taaffe completed the scoring.

40-22 wasn’t a fair reflection of proceedings, and things might have been very different with equal numbers, but Souths won’t care one jot.

The Crowd Says:

2022-05-19T22:55:40+00:00

Rugbytrylover

Roar Rookie


Gus... he’s an opinionated goose. Knows Rugby League like no other they say. Come on. It is a simple game.

2022-05-01T05:32:43+00:00

steveng

Roar Rookie


Hey "Panthers" stop giving us excuses of if this or that happened. As all that you are saying is nonsense... "Murray jumped immediately to his feet & wasn’t injured at all. No broken jaw. No broken cheek bone & eye socket. No injury whatsoever" as all that does NOT matter, the tackle was wrong and had a 98% potential of doing all that and a broken neck and a permanent injury, it was only PURE LUCK that it didn’t happen as Murray said in the post game interview that "he had no idea what happened as when he was mid air he blacked out and had no idea or comtrol of where he landed or where his body would land" it was just PURE LUCK that he didnt land head first or just slightly more right as his neck would have broken. This sort of a tackle is not on in the NRL as it's always penalised with any of tge slightest above horizontal tackling attempts but, this tackle was taken to a near and could have ended catastrophically with the same result as the 2014 Storm tackle on Knights McKinnon that has put a player in a wheelchair for the rest of his life. That is what the NRL and fans should never ever forget as there are no if or buts!

2022-05-01T02:26:45+00:00

matth

Roar Guru


There isn't really. Most fans accepted the send off, it's just a few outlying dinosaurs in the commentary box showing that they've maybe been dumped on their heads a few too many times.

2022-05-01T00:10:39+00:00

chris

Guest


I can assure you I'm not GB - or whoever else is in your head.

2022-04-30T23:32:48+00:00

Forty Twenty

Roar Rookie


If it makes you happy, I'll just blame it on some sort of mythical inner Gould.

2022-04-30T23:14:36+00:00

blahblah

Guest


I think it should be a send off. The potential exists for serious injury. Imagine losing Cam Murray to a serious spinal injury. That would suck.

2022-04-30T22:02:02+00:00

PeterCtheThird

Guest


For second read last.

2022-04-30T22:00:48+00:00

PeterCtheThird

Guest


What possible justification do you have for the last part of your second sentence, other than channeling your inner Gould?

2022-04-30T08:11:30+00:00

Big Daddy

Roar Rookie


Yeah it was 1986 Anzac Day . He lasted all of 16 seconds and I think Canterbury won with 12 men .

2022-04-30T07:26:42+00:00

SPM

Roar Rookie


But that keeps it simple and the tv executives and media don’t want it simple and clear cut they want the drama to sell papers and drive tv content for the sports shows

2022-04-30T07:24:48+00:00

Brookvale

Guest


It wasn’t just the one tackle from Mitchell last season. A deliberate elbow to the opposition players head. Two deliberate kicks to the opposition players heads. Deliberate shoulder charge to Manu’s head . Not a send off for any of them. There’s not only a danger of neck or head injuries, with a dumping style tackle. Wasn’t there a chance of Manu suffering brain damage from the shoulder charge . Or bone splinters going into his brain? Looking at his face after the fact , there certainly was. A suspension after the game , isn’t a send off. A ten minute sin bin , isn’t a send off.

2022-04-30T07:15:07+00:00

Justin

Guest


How does Wighton stay on the field today? He had his hand between the tackled players legs & it sure looked every bit the same tackle as Lawton on Murray. Except there was a second player in the tackle.

2022-04-30T07:07:45+00:00

Panthers

Guest


As if we’d believe you? Certainly not based on most of your comments. You’d be very happy to see that the Panthers came from 20-0 down against the Roosters , in SG Ball. To win the GF 22-20 . :thumbup:

2022-04-30T06:42:07+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


…and I’ll gladly admit when I’m wrong - I did it with this tackle, initially said I thought the send off was harsh, and then admitted I got it wrong - it’s just you haven’t said anything to make me think my interpretation of this is wrong…

2022-04-30T06:33:38+00:00

The Barry

Roar Guru


Enjoy your party mate… I’m off to one too, down in Wollongong…

2022-04-30T06:22:44+00:00

Forty Twenty

Roar Rookie


Who is condoning Lawtons tackle , not me? Cody Walker is the next one who needs to be dealt with. Grinding your elbow into a tackled player's head isn't very clever but it's o.k with you I guess?

2022-04-30T06:19:53+00:00

Forty Twenty

Roar Rookie


I've been watching the game long enough to know Mitchells action was a send-off and I'm not complaining about Lawton being sent off. If DCE is mauled by Mitchell and his season is gone I'll be demanding he is sent off, you can be sure of that. It's O.K to recklessly charge in like a lunatic and maul someone and because you close your eyes and don't care what happens next that makes it less of a crime? I've heard it all now. The judiciary got it right by ending Mitchels season which further proves that it was a send-off offence. It's not even debatable. I'm not a fan of any thugs and that includes Les Boyd and Hopoate. Mitchell's actions last season were as bad as it gets and not sent off, even once? They got it wrong, it's so simple.

2022-04-30T06:17:59+00:00

Gold Coast Bunny

Roar Rookie


And the next post you said “I think we’ve said all we can say on this” and yet you are still going on. The next post after agree to disagree was in response to that and assumptions you made to which I diasagreed and so deserved a response. However unlike you I certainly didn’t state that I have said all I can say (I would never presume to speak for you TB that’s why I said I instead of we). Furthermore I didn’t state 1.show me a tackle that uses the arms to drive and I will change my mind only to deny that tackle shows that stating he was slammed 2. Laugh at someone in a post (getting personal as you put it) and then become all indignant when they cop a little sledge back. TB if you think what has transpired is personal then perhaps your skin is not as thick as I perceived. 3. continue to refuse to answer the question I have asked on several occasions being can you push/drive someone with another part of the body other than the shoulder Now I understand the reason why you won’t answer a simple yes or no question in that if you answer truthfully yes you defeat your own argument and if you answer no well it’s plain to see you are just not willing to admit you are wr….. wr….. wr… not right. So yes you are deflecting. The 3 post happened cause I thought the you tube clip didn’t go through (2nd post) so I sent a third to explain. I was wrong about that. See it’s not hard to admit when you wrong TB you should try it. And I am chill TB. I love debating things and certainly enjoy the to and fros of challenging oneself against opposing ideas. But suggesting I am getting frustrated or upset couldn’t be further from the truth. That suggestion by you is a great tactic used to try and get an opponent to justify themselves as to why they are not getting frustrated to put them on the back foot so nice try on that one to- a bit more subtle that deflecting whilst refusing to answer the question about pushing with other than the shoulder. I know I am not going to change your mind on the tackle – but it has been fun, something to do on a Saturday while waiting to head out to a party. Its clear you and I have a different interpretation of the word driving, which I think can be achieved with either shoulder, arms, hand, you seem to think you can only drive with the shoulder. Best of luck TB I’m off to party.

2022-04-30T06:07:40+00:00

Forty Twenty

Roar Rookie


So when I make a 100% accurate statement that I'm not going to mention every incident every time I post, somehow I'm wrong. You are completely wrong, it's simple. You have a fascination with trying to educate me that everything that ever happens in the game is independent of any other incident. The fact is the one thing the coaches and fans as well as the players are all after is consistency, so it's you who is out of touch. How do you get consistency if you never reference prior incidents? I'll give you a tip , it's impossible. If a similar tackle to the Lawton one occurs next week and the player doesn't even get 10 in the bin , you will tell me I can't compare them? Yeah no worries.....

2022-04-30T06:01:06+00:00

Glory Bound

Roar Rookie


I don't have guestie accounts guestie. Never have. Never will.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar