AFL NEWS: Debate rages as league consider 'last touch' rule, Hardwick slams cheeky Bolton taunt

By The Roar / Editor

The AFL is weighing up whether to implement another major rule change for the 2023 season, according to general manager of football Brad Scott.

Speaking to 7 News, Scott revealed a proposal to bring in a ‘last touch’ rule, in an attempt to further ease congestion and improve the flow of the game.

The rule has been trialled since 2016 in the SANFL and 2018 in the AFLW – though not inside the 50m arcs in the latter – and Scott said its success there has led to thoughts of expanding it further.

The current interpretation sees SANFL players penalised if a kick or handball goes over the boundary line without the ball being touched by another player.

“It seems fairly universal that it’s been a positive change. It’s fair to say the AFL are looking very closely at what the SANFL are doing with last disposal,” Scott said.

The merits of the proposal have swiftly been debated around the footy world, with former player turned AFLW coach Daniel Harford expressing his support.

“I think it’s a no brainer. Bring it in,” Harford, who coaches Carlton in the women’s competition, said on RSN 927.

“It takes away a lot of confusion and gets rid of all that animosity with insufficient intent decisions.

“I really like it, I’m a last touch man.”

Controversial commentator Kane Cornes is also a known backer of the rule, having suggested in May last year the rule’s success in the SANFL could see it arrive in the AFL as well.

“I was really against it when it first came into the SANFL, I thought it was a bit Mickey Mouse,” Cornes said at the time on SEN SA Breakfast.

“But the more I’ve seen it and the more ridiculous the interpretation at AFL level has become, the more I think it has to come in.

“The AFL has been watching it for a while, they’re clearly cracking down on deliberate. Just clear all confusion.

“I’m about making it easier for the umpires and we’ve made it more difficult. This just cuts out all of the confusion – last possession out of bounds.

“I think we’re heading that way.”

However, another former player in Adam Ramaunaskas isn’t so sure, citing the impact of the rule in reducing boundary throw-ins would lessen the need for ruckmen and elite clearance-winning midfielders in the modern game.

“It’s part of our game. Last night [Richmond vs Carlton], Dion Prestia had 13 clearances… it takes that element of skill away,” Ramanauskas said on RSN 927.

(Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

Hardwick, teammates unimpressed by Bolton’s cheeky taunt

Richmond coach Damien Hardwick says Shai Bolton’s taunt of Carlton’s Sam Docherty is ‘not what we’re about’, while the Tigers star’s teammates were also less than impressed.

Bolton mockingly held the ball out at Docherty while running into an open goal in the final term of Richmond’s Thursday night win, prompting boos from Carlton fans.

Addressing the media after the match, Hardwick was definitive in labelling the incident ‘not a great look’.

“He‘s made a mistake, it’s not us. It’s not what we’re about,” the coach said.

“He‘ll be regretful, no question – he’ll be accountable and responsible for it. It‘s certainly not part of who he is and what we are.

“So we’re disappointed but we’ll work our way through it and support him. He’ll learn from it.

“It’s not a great look. It‘s not what we stand for.”

Tigers wingman Kamdyn McIntosh and co-captain Toby Nankervis also gave their thoughts on Bolton’s act, with McIntosh particularly nervous given the star goalsneak had squandered a number of chances from similar positions against Port Adelaide the week prior.

“I was a little bit, like: he’s got to kick this and also we better win the f—ing game!” McIntosh told Fox Footy, while Nankervis suggested Bolton had ‘overstepped the mark’.

“He’s [Bolton] a great player, and he plays with a lot of flair, but I was a bit worried,” Nankervis told ABC Grandstand after the match.

“There was still 15 odd minutes to go, so I wouldn’t be doing that, and I don’t think Shai would have done that if he had his time again.

“We want to be a really humble football club that plays footy in the right way and I love the way Shai plays the game, and maybe that overstepped the mark a little bit.”

‘You’d hope it was definitive’: Voss unsure about crucial score review overrule

Carlton coach Michael Voss has diplomatically disputed a critical score review that overturned a Blues goal during the final quarter of their lost to Richmond, saying the goal ‘didn’t look’ touched.

Jack Newnes’ snap appeared to have reduced the margin to just three points, only for the ARC to determine that Tiger Nathan Broad had got a finger to the ball.

The decision was controversial enough that former great Jason Dunstall admitted to being ‘mystified’ by the call.

“I had difficulty working out how they came up with the decision they made,” Dunstall said on Fox Footy.

“Not saying it’s wrong, but if this is the shot they’re making it from – and we believe it is – I struggle to come to grips with how this is definitive evidence. Because all his fingers are wobbling, they’re wobbling before they go up!

“I don’t actually see the ball touch it or bend a finger, which I found quite extraordinary. And then they [Richmond] go straight down the other end and they kick a goal.”

Speaking after the match, Voss described it as a ‘really big moment’ in the match.

I think it’s got to be definitive, doesn’t it?” he said.

“If you’re gonna make decisions like that in games, you’d hope it’s definitive. I guess I’ve now got the luxury of sitting back and making my own judgement with it slowed down a little bit.

“Certainly we’d want to make sure we’re absolutely 100 per cent sure before overturning something like that. Clearly the call was made and we’ve got to end up living with the result.

“It didn’t look [touched] from where I was, but I don’t watch the different angles. I’ve got one and looked at it. If it was touched, then we move on.”

However, Broad remains adamant that he indeed touched the ball, with teammate Nick Vlastuin telling Fox Footy after the match just how confident the defender was.

“Broady ran out saying ‘I told you, I told you pricks’! He was definitely adamant,” Vlastuin laughed.

The Crowd Says:

2022-06-20T21:52:20+00:00

Seymorebutts

Guest


Thats right Scotty, keep messing with the rules, you havent lost all the fans just yet by changing the essential fabric of our game, but you are well on the way to making our great game unwatchable. Nobody pays holding the ball, ''in the back'' is ignored during marking contests, as is ''kicking in danger''... when was the last time that was ever paid? Players dive on the ball to get possession and are charged with ''taking out the legs'' pfft. Nominating for ruck contests.. why? WTF decided THAT was a good idea?? Remember ''tunneling''?? Whatever happened to that? Cant handball back over your own goal line.. well except for when you can. Nobody had a problem with ANY of the rules until some clown at the AFL HQ decided to get involved.. 'prior opportunity'' everybody used to know what that was, now nobody does. 15 metres instead of 10 metres for bouncing the ball.. how has that helped the game? Ditto 15 metre kicks...if sides manned up like under 12's are taught too this never would have become an issue. Our great game is becoming unrecognizable from the game we once played and loved.

2022-06-18T06:47:26+00:00

Pedro The Fisherman

Roar Rookie


Has worked really well for the past few years in the SANFL. Last touch doesn’t apply if the ball is in dispute! Has been remarkably uncontroversial as well!

2022-06-18T06:44:49+00:00

Pedro The Fisherman

Roar Rookie


Ball is thrown in under that circumstance!

2022-06-18T03:34:51+00:00

Timmuh

Roar Guru


I think I need to watch a few SANFL games to see it in action. If its "last clear possession" rather than "last touch", then maybe. But actual "last touch" could well see players not going for the ball, trying to tap it into an opponent near the line, teams going more central more often (which seems good at first glance, except it makes the ground easier to defend by making it effectively narrower). I've not been a fan of what's used in AFLW, particularly a different rule applying inside 50. I do like the harder interpretation of "insufficient intent" over "deliberate". I'm all for giving the benefit of the doubt to the playmaker, but once you start looking for the boundary you aren't making play but looking to kill it. That would probably need to be retained along with "last disposal". But before writing it off completely, some SANFL is in order to see how it operates in practice.

2022-06-17T21:18:28+00:00

G money

Roar Rookie


Same.. I love the rule.. keeps the ball in play for longer.. a good thing

2022-06-17T08:24:36+00:00

COB

Guest


I am a fan of the last touch rule. Easier for the umpires to adjudicate rather than trying to judge insufficient intent or deliberate out of bounds. I would be happy if it meant less boundary throw ins.

2022-06-17T07:44:36+00:00

Clear as mud

Guest


if they bring it in, allow it in the 50s, but indiret free kick i.e. no shot at goal allowed.

2022-06-17T05:52:34+00:00

pablocruz

Roar Rookie


You're right. Already happens in aflw.

2022-06-17T05:39:06+00:00

nics

Roar Rookie


If everyone's a midfielder, everyone can win a Brownlow

2022-06-17T04:00:25+00:00

Spanner

Roar Rookie


Another joke of a rule afl has lost the plot!!!!!

2022-06-17T03:51:41+00:00

Windrince

Roar Rookie


Last tough rule is ridiculous. Players from opposition will be deliberately leaving the ball to go over the line and blocking people from getting there...

2022-06-17T03:05:32+00:00

PeteB

Roar Rookie


Another rule change omfg. At least it would stop the umpires guessing around intent.

2022-06-17T02:48:52+00:00

RT

Roar Rookie


I agree with Ramanauskas. Why would we want to reduce the need for skills such as rucks. Do we just want 36 midfielders running around? And funny, the only arguments for a last touch rule are to take out confusion on umpiring decisions. Typical AFL. Introduce a rule. Change the interpretation. Bring in a new rule to counter it. How about reverting to the original interpretation, which was about players blatantly tapping the ball out? But with Brad Scott there you can bet this change will happen. Got to be seen to be doing something…

Read more at The Roar